Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old March 15th, 2014 #1061
Solskeniskyn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,424
Default

Quote:
The Scott Horton Show - 03/13/14 Scott McConnell

Scott McConnell, a founding editor of The American Conservative, discusses the polls showing Americans oppose intervention in Ukraine; Russia’s reaction to State Department neoconservatives engineering regime change in Kiev; and why the US national interest is best served by non-hostile relations with nuclear-armed Russia.
MP3 DOWNLOAD
 
Old March 15th, 2014 #1062
Solskeniskyn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,424
Default

Quote:
The Scott Horton Show - 03/14/14 Sheldon Richman

Sheldon Richman, vice president of The Future of Freedom Foundation, discusses how Americans can help Ukrainians; the ratio of crazy/stupidity in neoconservatives picking a fight with Russia; and the imperialist core of American exceptionalism, dating to the country’s earliest days.
MP3 DOWNLOAD
 
Old March 15th, 2014 #1063
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,679
Default

Quote:
and why the US national interest is best served by non-hostile relations with nuclear-armed Russia.
And Russia's national interest is best served by non-hostile relations with the US, but unfortunately as long as we have globalist jews running the US there will be problems.

Thanks for the link Solskeniskyn.
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race


''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers
 
Old March 15th, 2014 #1064
Solskeniskyn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,424
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Serbian View Post
And Russia's national interest is best served by non-hostile relations with the US, but unfortunately as long as we have globalist jews running the US there will be problems.

Thanks for the link Solskeniskyn.
True.

Havn't listened to them yet though, just thought them worthy of posting and collecting here as food for thought... and I add this seemingly unnecessary disclaimer as I'm just now only a minute into the Richman interview, where he has started off saying that the best way the US can help in regards to the Crimean issue is to... open the U.S borders and let any Ukrainian who wants to move in (!?!?), and since he could very likely be a jew with that name, and hence dead serious with the suggestion, I want to note that I take my vouching hands off him as I resume my listening.

Last edited by Solskeniskyn; March 15th, 2014 at 11:44 PM.
 
Old March 15th, 2014 #1065
313Chris
Senior Member
 
313Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,139
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Serbian View Post
Of course not to be outdone their kwan counterparts will travel across the globe constantly in search of new Hitlers to destroy.
As hard to believe as it seems, it's becoming clear that those days are ending. I honestly feel ashamed for this, as America is my only homeland, but the fact is the US has been irretrievably drunk on power since at least 1991, and is fast headed for a humbling geopolitical, if not outright military, defeat. And this prospective Eurasian alliance of Russia, China, and Iran is looking exactly like the contender that's going to do the honors.
 
Old March 15th, 2014 #1066
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,679
Default

John McCain: U.S. Should Provide Long-Term Military Assistance to Help Ukraine Resist Russia

Mar. 15, 2014 11:26pm

(TheBlaze/AP) — Sen. John McCain called Saturday for the United States to provide long-term military assistance to Ukraine in the face of Russian hostilities, noting that such action is “the right and decent thing to do,” CNN reported.


U.S. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., speaks during a news conference in Kiev, Ukraine, Saturday, March 15, 2014. (Image source: AP/David Azia)


McCain was among a bipartisan delegation of U.S. senators who traveled to Kiev ahead of Sunday’s secession referendum in Crimea — which the White House and U.S. allies in Europe have denounced as unconstitutional and illegal given that Russian troops are occupying the southern Ukraine peninsula and threatening annexation, CNN added.

“Ukraine is going to need a long-term military assistance program from the United States — equipment both lethal and nonlethal,” said McCain. “They ask for some modest means that can help them resist. I believe we should provide it.”

McCain and seven other senators — John Barasso (R-Wyo.), Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.), Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), John Hoeven (R-N.D.), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), Christopher Murphy (D-Conn.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) — said Congress stood with the people of Ukraine and called for strict sanctions against Russia, said CNN.


http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014...resist-russia/
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race


''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers
 
Old March 15th, 2014 #1067
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,679
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 313Chris View Post
As hard to believe as it seems, it's becoming clear that those days are ending. I honestly feel ashamed for this, as America is my only homeland, but the fact is the US has been irretrievably drunk on power since at least 1991, and is fast headed for a humbling geopolitical, if not outright military, defeat. And this prospective Eurasian alliance of Russia, China, and Iran is looking exactly like the contender that's going to do the honors.
The US dollar as the world's reserve curreny needs to be dropped.
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race


''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers
 
Old March 16th, 2014 #1068
M. Issig
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 459
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 313Chris View Post
As hard to believe as it seems, it's becoming clear that those days are ending. I honestly feel ashamed for this, as America is my only homeland, but the fact is the US has been irretrievably drunk on power since at least 1991, and is fast headed for a humbling geopolitical, if not outright military, defeat. And this prospective Eurasian alliance of Russia, China, and Iran is looking exactly like the contender that's going to do the honors.
And, therefore, abuse of said power; occasionally also known as nigger-with-a-badge syndrome.
 
Old March 16th, 2014 #1069
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Ukraine: The lessons of history and the balance of interests
Sunday, March 16, 2014 - 8:27



Britain in the late 19th century at the height of world power, a power that had no precedent in history. Since then and until now none of the known superpowers was able to overcome and to overcome the influence exerted internationally then this country. A glance at a map of that time shows that the fifth planet waving the British flag where the flag was waving resided the fourth of the world population.

Characteristics mention that the naval power of Great Britain included 21 battleships, 53 cruisers, 30 frigates and 24 torpedo boats. Britain could then intervene anywhere on the planet and to bring the power and influence of any State, or alliances rival states.

Cuba in the late 19th century had revolted against the Spanish rulers. The then U.S. President William McKinley wanted to intervene militarily on the island, which is only 150 miles from the American coast (um...try 90 miles), to restore order and evict the Spanish colonizers. Before we implement the plans requested the then superpower Great Britain. The response of the then British Prime Minister Lord Salisbury and through the American ambassador was the following: "We recognize the sad situation of Cuba. We hope that the Spanish Government will do all it can to restore order. The UK has no interest in this, beyond the economic and trade, and we had to consider favorably any effort that would lead to the restoration of peace and prosperity in Cuba. " In a briefing note from the U.S. ambassador reports to the Chairman of the following: "I have the impression that Britain would not intervene if the U.S. take action in Cuba."

It is very interesting to compare the response time of Britain to the U.S. government with current events in Ukraine. The U.S. in the late 19th century wanted to include Cuba in their sphere of influence. Ukraine of the 21st century belongs unequivocally to the Russian sphere of influence. The superpower of the 19th century Britain did not want to cause the U.S. and to challenge the sphere of influence, although it had all the power to overturn the U.S. plans for Cuba. For Great Britain the spheres of influence of the major powers were too great importance and it is certain that the British Prime Minister had in mind Machiavelli's theory of 'balance of interests' which teaches that the balance is much more important than any temporary advantages in foreign and economic policies of the great powers, but also of small L.

When Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev in 1962 tried to install missile bases in Cuba calculated completely misjudged the balance of interests or otherwise the U.S. determination to prevent a change in this balance within their sphere of influence. In similar manner the USA and the EU completely incorrectly calculated the power of Russia, when they tried to integrate Ukraine into the EU and to distract from the
Russian sphere of influence, thus altering the balance of interests.

In the example of Cuba geopolitical implemented by Great Britain in the 19th century was based on the following attributes or otherwise doctrines. Firstly the major powers should avoid conflicts and crises which do not affect their national strategic plans.
Arising from this principle is that you must avoid ethical implications and justifications in their policy, which underlie almost everything hypocrisy and arrogance. Secondly never have great powers to ignore Machiavelli's theory of 'balance of interests'.

When a world power bothers interests and tries to penetrate the realm of another world power, the result is always the deterioration of the ability of rival sides to deal effectively with a crisis talks and diplomatic manner and to increase the probability warfare. Which is exactly what happens in US-Russia crisis in Ukraine and perhaps even more important, something that most analysts ignore what is happening in Asia and the Pacific with the U.S. effort to implement the plan Amerikanosionistiko "Asian Core'.

Thirdly never a great power should not forget that international stability is always from the balance of power, not the trend hegemonism. The stability is ensured through constructive diplomacy and dynamic military presence. The hegemony is highly unstable because infuriates small and large forces and poses always create opposing forces.

All the above-mentioned authorities have systematically violated and trampled by the U.S., acting on instructions of Amerikanosioniston, the crisis in Ukraine. The negative consequences for the U.S. and the EU will certainly be significant and substantial and will probably result, albeit temporary, setback U.S. from reaching implementation of projects of Amerikanosioniston in Eastern Europe, the Eastern Mediterranean and Asia.
Note: We had indicated in previous analyzes that Americans (at least the leadership) is ignorant of history, and proves to be uneducated.

GL

Διαβάστε περισσότερα: http://translate.googleusercontent.c...#ixzz2w8SMjHj1
 
Old March 16th, 2014 #1070
Johan
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 4,231
Default

An Obama Loss in Crimea is a Victory for Putin and America

March 15, 2014

Americans have the entirely wrong perspective on the Crimean crisis.

Russia is the perfect enemy that conjures up images of the USSR, gulags, stonewalls and scary Slavic people with big helmets waiting to paint America red. That being said, the dynamic that Americans are looking at this America-Russian conflict through, is a false one. Rather than looking at this conflict as an America-Russia clash, it should be more properly viewed as an Obama-Putin clash.

Russia could properly be described as generally unified around the vision, policies and administration of Vladimir Putin. He enjoys high popularity and is a unifying figure for a reviving Russian nationalism.

In contrast, the United States is being ruled by a socialist autocrat and ideological usurper. The Obama Administration is utterly divisive and hostile to the traditional American nation and consequently, there is no unity and no motivation on the part of traditional America to support anything Obama does. That being said, Obama may have struck the perfect cord with Middle America to actually rally Right-Wingers to his cause, without them knowing it.

When one listens to conservative commentators, it is nothing more than a criticism of the Obama Administration’s perceived inability to not be aggressive enough. They still support massive intervention, and some such as Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), are pushing for war with Russia. Nonetheless, both Conservative Inc and the Obama Administration agree on the desired outcome, which is the expansion of the EU and NATO and the further erosion of a traditionalist, anti-internationalist power structure.

The question that then presents itself is, where the heck are the libertarians? This is the perfect opportunity for a libertarian opportunist such as Paul or Cruz to be on the floor of the Senate demanding that the US not intervene into an area with no geostrategic interest and that is clearly in the sphere of the EU and Russia. A statement made by one of these Tea Party leader demanding neutrality by the United States and seeking peace in a war-weary nation would be the perfect chance at improving in the polls and redeeming themselves from the bad reputation they have received from supposedly shutting down the government.

Senator Paul, instead of promoting non-interventionism as his father is doing in regards to this issue, is now openly calling for the United States to point missiles at Russia in Poland. Even Forbes magazine is already calling Rand Paul a flip flopper for having argued a soft non-interventionist line, and is now a slightly softer version of John McCain.

Yet they are nowhere to be found or are actively clamoring for war now. The only conclusion then is we should not expect any type of classical Ron Paul rhetoric from these men, as they cannot violate the national imperative, that the American Empire expand at all costs. If one of these Tea Party leaders were to challenge the establishment now, they would be fighting a tide of establishment and populist fanaticism for a classical projection of American power against our longest standing enemy.

Interesting how nationalism still can serve its purpose when needed to con the patriots of the mid-West and south.

If Rand Paul and Ted Cruz, the leaders of American political libertarianism, are going to line up and promote an unjust and unconstitutional war against a nation who really has committed no crime that is comparable to what the US has done to Iraq, Libya, Serbia, Bosnia, Iran and Egypt, then who is there to trust in the American political establishment?

From time to time there comes along issues that honestly divide the politicians from the statesmen and the crooks from the businessmen. This issue is one of those moments, where the only just side to take is to not advocate for war. Many libertarians are furious at Russia because it is denying Ukraine access to a new “free market” that could benefit Ukraine’s economy.

Yet, since when did the EU help Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece, Spain or even the United Kingdom or Germany? Since when did Chevron getting new oil contracts as a result of NATO fomented coup d’état be called the work of the “invisible hand?” Is becoming locked in an archaic customs union, where almost all national decision-making is given over to Brussels contusive to freedom, liberty and prosperity? Libertarians at the height of power that Cruz and Paul are at know this, yet, they persist in pushing us to war with McCain, Graham, Limbaugh, Obama, Kerry and Clinton.

Therefore, if we are to be consistent patriots and nationalists, it is the imperative of every patriot of any right-wing persuasion to look at this situation in a completely different way.

We must convince our political kin, that firstly, modern Russia poses no geostrategic threat to the United States, which is true. Russia though looking impressively powerful, is still a relatively weak nation, with greater pressure coming from the Islamic and Chinese world, which would force it to divert necessary attention there.

Secondly, it must be clearly communicated to the American people, that Obama is an illegitimate occupier, leading us down the road to war and poverty and that any time Putin makes a fool out of Obama or thwarts the Obama agenda, that is a victory for us as conservatives, Republicans, nationalists, right-wingers etc.

A good example to cite is the crisis in Syria. Are we not happy that Putin outplayed Obama and therefore we are not at war in Syria? Are we really upset that Putin made Obama look more like a fool than he already is? And if one does meet that stubborn patriot who will go down with the Obama ship, despite never having voted for him, just remind them that Obama’s interests and objectives are all designed to destroy America, so how can it get any worse if Putin stops Obama?

We must begin to transcend our traditional national borders and identities. Traditional Americans have much more in common with Vladimir Putin than they do Barack Obama. It is on these issues that we must strike people and shatter their contemporary misunderstandings that we have to support our leaders in a time of crisis no matter what. We must present to the people a new mantra of saying that we the people have an international ally in the fight against Obama and his agenda. That leader is Vladimir Putin.

Regardless if Putin is a criminal, authoritarian or “bad guy” nonetheless Obama could the average American far more harm than Putin could ever do. Nationalists can use this crisis as an opportunity to further drive home the message that the system that runs the USA is the enemy of the traditional American nation and Putin is fundamentally nothing more than a victim in the march of this great cabal called “the system.”

It is not a hard sell to get American conservatives on board with at least not hating Vladimir Putin. After eight years of doofus Bill Clinton, followed by eight more years of the jackass George Bush and now this effeminate leftist community organizer, authentic, traditional Americans are craving a masculine like leader such as George Patton or Ronal Reagan. Putin can serve as an interim filler for Christians and nationalists to sit back and say, “hey, I like that guy. He represents more of my values that Obama does.”

Whereas Russia is united, America is divided and a house divided cannot stand. Therefore let us exploit this weakness inside the American system to redeem America and allow Russia to beat Obama again. Only by having Russia triumph over the expansion of the European Union and present an alternative global vision than what the New World Order offers us, can the true American nation be redeemed from the secularist occupation.

http://www.tradyouth.org/2014/03/an-...n-and-america/

Last edited by Johan; March 16th, 2014 at 09:49 AM.
 
Old March 16th, 2014 #1071
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

They opened the polls in Ukraine: What happens next?
Sunday, March 16, 2014 - 13:21



On the morning the polls opened in Ukraine in order to vote people and decide the fate of Crimea. The question raised by the referendum gives voters the choice between "reunification with Russia, as a member of the Russian Federation 'or' restoration of the Constitution of 1992 and the status of Crimea as a member of Ukraine."

First let us say a few words about the referendum itself, which has caused a stir worldwide, since Westerners characterize illegal and Russians accept. The truth is that by the time we started fighting in the Square of Kiev, which legitimacy is buried so quaint to talk about it. Obviously the government of Kiev is vicarious and illegal, while the Ukrainian constitution has ceased to exist from the time appointed government without elections. Therefore and a referendum in the Crimea can not be termed as illegal and unconstitutional, since the Constitution does not now is the presence of a government emergency.

The second thing you need is to comment on the accusations hurled each other for supposed 'fascism'. Whilst the Russians accuse Westerners that crowned as the Ukrainian government, a government 'fascist', respectively, while Westerners accuse Putin as a warmonger and compare him to Hitler. Both are two categories within the propaganda and no serious person can not take them into account. Regarding the "fascism" of the government of Kiev , have been reported extensively. Regarding the Russian aggression, we present a picture that is truly "worth a thousand words."



We will emphasize on our side once again the one and only truth on this issue. Ongoing struggle in Ukraine has not ideological sign. It is only a geopolitical tug of war with background pipelines, ports and passages. On the one hand we have the U.S. trying to encircle Russia and on the other we have Russia trying to break the cordon and find the exit to the warm seas. These few, in order not disoriented by the propaganda and see the events clearly. Not sure how you can say that's not ideological. It's clearly the jew-led NWO trying to strangle Russia. The stuff about gas pipes - we've posted an upthread in which a pro oil guy says that's not the case: very little of what Russia pipes to the west goes through Ukraine.



As for what lies ahead, it is unclear what will be the result of the referendum, as clear is the fact that Russia will not lose time in the annexation of Crimea. The western course will react, but it is unlikely to reach the ends. The Pentagon has already said "no" to military intervention, while the rest of NATO, anyway are conducted and carried by the decisions of the Pentagon.

At the time you finish the count, the Crimea will pass on Russian territory, despite the fact that no Western will recognize this annexation. Course, this is irrelevant for Russia and Putin, as important for them to be possession of the port of Crimea, and the control of Russian pipelines crossing the territory. Medium Putin will try to attach larger pieces of eastern Ukraine, "pushing" away the foundations of NATO will soon be erected in the area. The step of this will be judged on the basis of risk to be involved in this movement, given the military - political and geopolitical relationships of the moment.

Διαβάστε περισσότερα: http://translate.googleusercontent.c...#ixzz2w8TshtvC
 
Old March 16th, 2014 #1072
Dan Hadaway
.
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,923
Default

http://rt.com/news/yarosh-destroy-ru...mTlksI.twitter

Quote:
Yarosh said that Crimea was too small to satisfy the appetite of the “Russian Empire,” and that the Kremlin would seek to take over the whole of Ukraine.
When I read stuff like this, I really think the guy is stuck in some sort of time warp where Germany was still under the leadership of Hitler and that Russia is the Soviet Union and that the "West" is still pro-European. Somebody needs to sit him down and give him a history lesson of the past 70 years or so.
 
Old March 16th, 2014 #1073
RickHolland
Bread and Circuses
 
RickHolland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Jewed Faggot States of ApemuriKa
Posts: 6,666
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Serbian View Post
It always has to revolve around the Nazis and Hitler.

Should have a Star of David instead, but no the mental Soviets see Nazis everywhere.

Of course not to be outdone their kwan counterparts will travel across the globe constantly in search of new Hitlers to destroy.

I bet the great man is laughing at this comedy show, with himself always at center stage, from beyond the grave.
__________________
Only force rules. Force is the first law - Adolf H. http://erectuswalksamongst.us/ http://tinyurl.com/cglnpdj Man has become great through struggle - Adolf H. http://tinyurl.com/mo92r4z Strength lies not in defense but in attack - Adolf H.
 
Old March 16th, 2014 #1074
Johan
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 4,231
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Serbian View Post
It always has to revolve around the Nazis and Hitler.

Should have a Star of David instead, but no the mental Soviets see Nazis everywhere.

Of course not to be outdone their kwan counterparts will travel across the globe constantly in search of new Hitlers to destroy.

I bet the great man is laughing at this comedy show, with himself always at center stage, from beyond the grave.
 
Old March 16th, 2014 #1075
zoomcopter
Senior Member
 
zoomcopter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The goyim reservation
Posts: 5,944
Blog Entries: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Serbian View Post
John McCain: U.S. Should Provide Long-Term Military Assistance to Help Ukraine Resist Russia

Mar. 15, 2014 11:26pm
“Ukraine is going to need a long-term military assistance program from the United States — equipment both lethal and nonlethal,” said McCain. “They ask for some modest means that can help them resist. I believe we should provide it.”

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014...resist-russia/
Haven't we already provided 5 billion dollars and arranged for professional snipers to kill off both police and protesters?
__________________
Vladimir Putin's Russia is being attacked by the very same forces that attacked Hitler's Germany, namely the Jews. The fate of the world hangs on Putin defeating the Jews.
 
Old March 16th, 2014 #1076
M. Issig
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 459
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
Ukraine: The lessons of history and the balance of interests Sunday, March 16, 2014 - 8:27

Britain in the late 19th century at the height of world power, a power that had no precedent in history. [....]
One day, perhaps soon, authors may provide new histories in which the players roles are more fairly and truthfully represented. Although I appreciate them greatly, I hope for more than the comparatively few specialized, revisionist histories. I am not contemplating equal time, but a paradigm shift.

There were no more crucial players in post-Napoleonic Europe than the Russian Czars.
 
Old March 16th, 2014 #1077
M. Issig
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 459
Default

Crimea Today:



I love it!

Who is supposed to be spreading democracy, again?
 
Old March 16th, 2014 #1078
procopius
Senior Member
 
procopius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,611
Default About 93% of Crimeans in referendum voted to join Russia - exit poll

http://rt.com/news/crimea-vote-join-russia-210/

Quote:
About 93 percent of voters in the Crimean referendum have answered ‘yes’ to the autonomous republic joining the Russian federation and only 7 percent of the vote participants want the region to remain part of Ukraine, according to first exit polls.
 
Old March 16th, 2014 #1079
procopius
Senior Member
 
procopius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,611
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by M. Issig View Post
Crimea Today:



I love it!

Who is supposed to be spreading democracy, again?
ZOG press is claiming that they are being forced to vote yes by the Russian Military to join Russia. Eyerolls.
 
Old March 16th, 2014 #1080
Roy
Perception Manager
 
Roy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,794
Default

An entire book could be written about ZOG hypocrisy, from double standards involving the Zionist entity, to saying it loves democracy while supporting the theocracy of Saudi Arabia and now this.

Let's face it. ZOG wanted the entire Ukrainian pie for itself, and is angry that Putin is taking a slice for himself.


5 referendums that the West ZOG has not taken issue with

Quote:
The West has condemned the upcoming referendum in Crimea as “illegitimate” and is preparing sanctions against Russia. However, the West’s seemingly random policy on other referendums hints at a double standard in their governments’ rhetoric.


In the past the West has not batted an eyelid when countries sought to hold referendums and in some cases actively supported them.

Kosovo

Washington was quick off the mark with Kosovo, backing the region’s independence two years before the UN declared it was legal in 2008. NATO forces intervened 1999, carrying out a massive bomb campaign on targets in Serbia and in Kosovo. Human Rights Watch reported that over 500 civilians were killed in NATO’s incursion into the former Yugoslavia.


South Sudan

After a long and bloody conflict, South Sudan separated from the north in 2011 to become the world’s youngest nation state. Then-US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton hailed the move as a historic day and “a testament to the tireless efforts of the people of South Sudan in their search for peace.” Washington has since spent around $600 million in building the new nation, but has frozen payments because of an escalation of violence in the fledgling nation.


The Falklands


The UK government held a referendum in overseas territory the Falklands in 2013 to ascertain whether the islanders wished to remain a British colony. In spite of Argentinian protests, the West did not move to intervene and stop the vote. Argentina lays claim to the Islands, calling them the Malvinas. In the referendum an overwhelming 98.8 percent of the Falklands population voted to remain British.
http://rt.com/news/yarosh-destroy-ru...mTlksI.twitter
 
Reply

Tags
#1

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:21 PM.
Page generated in 1.32428 seconds.