|
September 17th, 2021 | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,645
|
The alternative to peer-review is what exactly? Everyone is equally an expert?
How to separate the wheat from the chaff? Actually, don't know why I'm asking this crowd of cultists about STEM matters. Enjoy your fucking cult.
__________________
Blood & Soul Aryan |
September 17th, 2021 | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,433
|
Quote:
Don't let the door knob fit into your ass on the way out, kikenshitdickvermin |
|
September 17th, 2021 | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,645
|
It's an Aryan pejorative against WN cultists.
__________________
Blood & Soul Aryan |
September 17th, 2021 | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,433
|
|
September 17th, 2021 | #25 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 4,250
|
Quote:
Last edited by U. Dunrouse; September 17th, 2021 at 08:12 PM. |
||
September 17th, 2021 | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 4,250
|
If they had planned to demolish WTC7 through a controlled demolition, wouldn't they have crashed a third plane into it for deception purposes (pyrotechnical show for gullible goyim)???
|
September 17th, 2021 | #27 |
RaHoWarrior-SKINHEAD
|
Obviously that was not necessary. In fact they probably could have claimed that simple office fires brought down all three buildings and many would have swallowed it. But it is easy to underestimate the gullibility of the public at large.
__________________
卐 White ⊕ Power 卐
|
September 17th, 2021 | #28 | |
RaHoWarrior-SKINHEAD
|
Quote:
Don't misunderstand. I don't ask you to believe anything, I am merely pointing out evidence. Evidence is not the reason you believe what you do and it is not likely to change those beliefs. Belief is irrelevant to fact. Nor have I ever suggested that a single ethnic group alone was involved. I do not personally find such a notion plausible. Nevertheless, the owner of the building was a jew and, as I pointed out earlier, he himself claims to have given the order to bring down the building. The audio evidence of him doing so is what compelled him to explain it. The few who base their beliefs on evidence must do something with that.
__________________
卐 White ⊕ Power 卐
Last edited by joeylowsac; September 17th, 2021 at 06:17 PM. Reason: spelling |
|
September 17th, 2021 | #29 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,645
|
Quote:
You say the NIST report is garbage, that means nothing to me. You also believe we never landed on the moon. You're one step above a flat-earther who says we're all gullible round-earthers. A very small percentage of the very broad science and engineering community says the report is garbage. OK, it means I have somewhat of an open mind on the subject, but it still isn't compelling. Again, I come back to Occam's Razor. You say the fires didn't bring down WTC 7, they were merely there to make it look like they caused the collapse, when in actuality "they" rigged the building with explosives that went off in the late afternoon of Sept 11 I assume. But the NIST report critically depends on the locations and durations of those fires so as to heat certain long span beams by 100-200° Celsius. How did "they" know with certainty that fires of such intensity and duration would occur on multiple floors of WTC 7? If they got it wrong, and the requisite fires hadn't materialized, it would have opened up a Pandora's Box. There would be no end for calls to investigate who had rigged WTC 7 with explosives, I mean, it would have been a much bigger deal than hijacking 4 airplanes and crashing them. It also would've clued everyone in to the fact that the twin towers were in all likelihood also brought down by controlled demolition. And why? If you already know with certainty that fires will effectively gut large portions of multiple floors of the building, warping long span beams that cause the building to be structurally compromised, why go to the bother of rigging it with explosives? The building is already pretty much a zero, what are you gaining by demoing it? Compared to the twin towers, or the Pentagon, WTC 7 is nothing. So I don't understand the logic. When I read the above comment by Juden Raus I lol'd at the thought of going to all the trouble of crashing a commercial airliner (Boeling 747/757) into WTC 7, just so it can be a ruse for the real deal of controlled demolition. Occam's Razor is our friend. You want to assert WTC 7 was brought down by controlled demo, you got a lot of explaining to do.
__________________
Blood & Soul Aryan |
|
September 17th, 2021 | #30 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
|
Quote:
Quote:
Also, video of controlled demolitions with explosives: There wasn't this loud, earth shattering "boom" for every one of them. Quote:
They partnered with a university on this. This seems like getting "peers" involved to help review it to me. Although that's different from the kosher "peer reviewed" you're referring to, Gigi. The scientific community has proven to be untrustworthy on controversial topics like WTCs, global warming, vaccinations, holohoax, etc. They're largely going to follow the agenda of whoever is paying them, and honesty is in short supply.
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER Last edited by Crowe; September 17th, 2021 at 10:49 PM. |
|||
September 18th, 2021 | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
|
I've been looking for other examples of full, and complete collapses of other steel high rise buildings caused only by fire, and I've came up with a big, fat, nothing burger.
There are some examples of partial collapses, but nothing like WTC 7 for example, and we've been building steel buildings for 100+ years. So, maybe someone can find me one other example of a steel high rise building fully collapsing due to fire like WTC 7 was alleged to have?
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER Last edited by Crowe; September 18th, 2021 at 12:58 AM. |
September 18th, 2021 | #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
|
World Trade Center 7 building did not collapse due to fire: Report
Quote:
Nobody can honestly dismiss this as crackpot CT.
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER |
|
September 18th, 2021 | #33 |
Formerly Cowboy Zeke
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,788
|
This is why George ‘The Jew Faggot’ Wiztgallstein is not wanted here. Always casting seeds of doubt and running interference for Jews, and they are definitely Jews, not “Jews”.
Simply put, no steel building in the history of the world ever collapsed like that from fire before burning down to the frame. On that day 3 fucking reality breaking miracles at the least are supposed to have occurred, while a bunch of Israeli heebs danced for joy as they ‘documented’ an event which if unplanned would be a one in a billion chance also. Also Israel just by sheer chance said go to a perfect location to watch a terror attack on a specific target that day, if one were just to magically happen at that time and date and location. Then dance for joy. A one in a trillion chance to be there with film equipment at the exact moment for it to happen that way by chance. So yeah it was Jews. They must have been dancing for joy that their kinsmen insured a derelict building for billions months before the unexpected event. GTFO Witzjew.
__________________
Channon and Chris; gone but not forgotten. Fuck you hippie, you are the system. Jews are not just a race or just a religion; they are a race who worship themselves religiously. Last edited by Frank Toliver; September 18th, 2021 at 11:26 AM. |
September 18th, 2021 | #34 | |
RaHoWarrior-SKINHEAD
|
Quote:
All three occurred on the same day.
__________________
卐 White ⊕ Power 卐
|
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|