Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old September 19th, 2017 #561
Brooklyn Rick
Senior Member
 
Brooklyn Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northwest Montana
Posts: 687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironguard1940 View Post
Apparently he has been back in the fight for several weeks. He had a moment and his Twitter account was down briefly after UtR. It is back up now. I honestly admit that I had some doubts about him, but he seems very solidly in our corner.
I still have doubts about that guy. A staunch obama supporter and key player in the occupy movement does not change their ideology so quickly or so radically.. What's in it for him?
__________________
Sine Timore
 
Old September 19th, 2017 #562
Emily Henderson
Intellijintly Dezined
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
Default Info. that makes their methods more clear-two obscure streches of the law=death penalty

A fellow VNNer sent me the VA statute for capital murder, and in VA, lying in wait is not enough for the death penalty.

However, that got me looking up a few things and it makes very clear why they are approaching the case in the manner they are, and how they can put the death penalty on the table. It's not in the way I previously thought. In some States lying in wait is enough, but not VA.

Another way to do it under the VA statute is 'multiple murders', which is automatically a Capital offense-they had to wait and see if more people died. Had more than one died, they could’ve used the ‘multiple murders’ part of the VA statute to make it a Capital offense. But they didn’t.

So even raising the charge to 1st degree murder with lying in wait would not be a Capital offense, it would give 20 years to life, as the fellow VNNer pointed out.

But they are still IMO seeking death, and I did a little research and saw how, which I'll lay out here.

So how do we get him death? Read on, you'll see why they are looking to mix pre-meditated 'terrorism' with his 'hate' beliefs being allowed in, it all adds up to Captial offense-otherwise, there is no law re domestic terrorism in VA to charge him with.

But using 'domestic terror' as an excuse to investigate both James and the group(s) and people he was involved with, they can say it was a violation of the Civil Rights Act.

Odd, but true. Explanation:

Firstly, there is no statute for domestic terrorism to charge James with anything in VA which fits this situation.

So why are they interested, then, in talking about 'domestic terrorism' if they can't charge him with it?

Because it can bring about an 'investigation' via 'The Patriot Act' that would be needed to charge him via violation of the Civil Right Act.

“..The Patriot Act does define domestic terrorism, and under this designation, the Justice Department has broad powers to investigate, said Neal Katyal, a Georgetown University law professor who served as former President Barack Obama's acting solicitor general and as the national security adviser to the Justice Department.
He said the government has three basic ways to approach the Charlottesville case.
"No. 1, this is a hate crime, under the hate crime statutes," he said. "The second is that this is a conspiracy to deprive individuals of civil rights."
"And the third is, this is an act of domestic terror, which isn't itself a crime," he noted. In short, the government can't file a criminal charge of domestic terrorism, but so defining the incident does allow it to investigate not only an individual suspect, but also any group the suspect may be affiliated with.


From: http://www.npr.org/2017/08/14/543462...harlottesville

So they will have an excuse to conduct (and pay for) a fed investigation of people and groups associated with James.

How the Capital charges could be brought ties into the second scenario in the above link, the 'conspiracy to deprive individuals of their civil rights'.

That's why they need the investigation-even if James willy nilly committed an act of violence, and only one died, it does not fit anything but second degree.

Using the Civil Rights Act and making it a 'conspiracy' means he can be killed, though. That's why they need it to be based on race AND a conspiracy with others.

Without the 'others'=no case save 2nd degree or lower.

"..Tracing to a law enacted in 1871, the so-called Ku Klux Klan Act criminalizes certain types of politically motivated violence that today would be called terrorism. Some of its provisions require evidence of conspiracy, so they would apply only if investigators turn up evidence that the attacker plotted with others, rather than spontaneously decided to commit violence. One notable provision, however, can cover a defendant who acted alone.

A provision added as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, Section 245 of Title 18, makes it a federal crime to use force to willfully injure or intimidate any citizen because the victim was “participating lawfully in speech or peaceful assembly” opposing the denial of certain civil rights to other people, like a right to vote or receive service from a business that accommodates the public. If bodily injury results from the crime, each count can carry a 10-year prison sentence. If a victim is killed, prosecutors may seek life imprisonment or the death penalty.."


Federal prosecutors might try to use this law, but it is not clear whether it would apply to people protesting a white nationalist rally. Justin Levitt, a law professor at Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, who was a deputy in the Justice Department’s civil rights division during the Obama administration, said there was scant guiding precedent about whether the statute covered something like the attack in Charlottesville.."

From: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/13/u...t.html?mcubz=0

^^And that is why Heather has to be 'killed by James' also, you need a murder victim, and she's the only one who died. You also need a conspiracy of one or more people to create your Capital case, one guy won't do it.

There is a method to their madness, not always obvious on the surface.

IMO they want to start killing racialists. It was easier to do to Dylan Roof, but harder here. They want to make an example of whomever they can to intimidate activists, and any openly 'team White' people/orgs. Any chance they have, they'll go this route, even when ridiculous even on its face.
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier

Last edited by Emily Henderson; September 19th, 2017 at 02:59 PM.
 
Old September 19th, 2017 #563
Emily Henderson
Intellijintly Dezined
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
Default More re the above info.

Re the attempt to tie in the 'deprivation of civil rights'---that gets real interesting if you factor in that the assembly had been declared unlawful.

The 'right to assemble'--even if they manage to put together a convoluted case where there was a 'deprivation of others' civil rights'--there was no exercise of civil rights, such as the right to assemble, that was lawfully occurring at the time-the assembly had already been declared unlawful.

So they may go the route of using the 1871 'KKK Act', where they need a 'conspiracy' to commit 'politically motivated' violence.

They are trying to cover both at once, it seems, but there would be holes in either attempt---if his Atty wanted to find them, that is.
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier
 
Old September 19th, 2017 #564
Ironguard1940
Senior Member
 
Ironguard1940's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,613
Default What Fields is being charged with

I understand Fields is being charged with ten felonies:

Second-degree murder-5 to 40 years, fine not mentioned

Hit and run-Class 6 felony, 1 to 5 years, up to $2500 fine

3 counts of aggravated malicious wounding-Class 2 felonies, each 20 years to life and up to a $100,000 fine

5 counts of malicious wounding-Class 3 felonies, each 5 to 20 years and up to a $100,000 fine

So he is facing up to three life sentences plus 145 years years in prison and over $800,000 in fines for fleeing an angry mob that most certainly would have killed him had he just sat there and let them do their angry mob thing. I know of none of that mob that has been charged with anything as of this posting.
 
Old September 19th, 2017 #565
Fred
Commie Killer
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,615
Default

I don't think it matters what the facts are or what the truth is.

This kid is going to get railroaded.

Look at the Justice that Matt Hale got.
 
Old September 19th, 2017 #566
Emily Henderson
Intellijintly Dezined
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
Default The Complete Formal Charges will be at the Preliminary Hearing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironguard1940 View Post
I understand Fields is being charged with ten felonies:

Second-degree murder-5 to 40 years, fine not mentioned

Hit and run-Class 6 felony, 1 to 5 years, up to $2500 fine

3 counts of aggravated malicious wounding-Class 2 felonies, each 20 years to life and up to a $100,000 fine

5 counts of malicious wounding-Class 3 felonies, each 5 to 20 years and up to a $100,000 fine

So he is facing up to three life sentences plus 145 years years in prison and over $800,000 in fines for fleeing an angry mob that most certainly would have killed him had he just sat there and let them do their angry mob thing. I know of none of that mob that has been charged with anything as of this posting.
Right, but he hasn't been charged yet. These are the current charges, as they read them to James in his first hearing. The second hearing was to finalize his formal charges and lay out their case, and they pushed it to December. That's why they held off-and are investigating it as a 'domestic terror' event, so they can expand their investigation to include other people. Otherwise, the time between a first hearing and a Preliminary Hearing are far closer together-giving the State an additional four months is a huge wrong.

The Preliminary Hearing is of uber importance in felony cases:
"..A criminal defendant's first appearance on the formal charges before a judge. The defendant is formally charged and enters a plea of guilty, not guilty, or no contest. This occurs at the initial appearance in misdemeanor cases and at some point following bind over at preliminary hearings in felony cases..."

http://www.everettshockley.com/procedures.html

The State didn't have what it needed to lay out a case for anything other than 2nd Degree in August.

Life in prison-even several times over-is therefore not what they want, or they'd have gone ahead and had the Prelim. in August as was planned.

After the Prelim. Hearing is over, they cannot tack on new charges, or up the charge, or anything else.

They had been hoping likely that there would be more than one death-if there had been, they'd have gone ahead and charged him with 1st Degree Captial murder in August.

They already publicly stated they are investigating it as a 'domestic terror' case in the links I added, and the reason for that is only one or two things-to give him Captial punishment by obscure means, and I think they also would like to set precedent here--because there really isn't a 'deprivation of civil rights' case like this one involving a rally.

The requirement for the KKK act is that you have co-conspirators, and that someone died from the attack. That can mean the death penalty.

And the 'deprivation of civil rights' being the 'motive' for violence can mean death penalty as well--That one would be harder, as you have to actively deprive someone of voting, assembling, or something tied into their 'civil rights' being exercised at the time of the attack. Assembly was unlawful, so no cigar me thinks on that one. They likely will go for the first.

The only reason for investigating the other two men is to do as I'm stating, make it eligible for being a Capital offense. Otherwise they'd not spend the time nor the money, it would serve no purpose.

What may happen if their bs doesn't work:
The fact that he was fleeing violence himself, and I don't believe it was a pre-meditated event involving any other people, should be enough to strike either attempt down.

But they will still do it if they can. Too big of an opportunity.

It is also a way to spread fear, and cause more than one person a problem, which is certainly something they would welcome.

If things go as they should, and if I'm correct on what actually happened, the worse he should get is 'involuntary manslaughter', because he did not intend or pre-plan killing anyone, but it might be argued he was 'reckless' in his attempt to flee.

I actually would disagree with even that conviction, but it would be the only one that makes sense. You would have multiple counts of that also, but of course the penalty would be far less than all the 'malicious wounding' felonies, and of course far less than a death penalty terrorism case based on law from the 1800s.

The tables could be turned, and Antifa could be considered depriving lawfully assembled Whites of their civil rights, if they ever kill anyone in their violent attacks--but this is a 'get Whitey' operation, just like the statue removal.

They'd like to use the case to build on it and intimidate Whites further, that's what they're trying to do. That's more important to them than the case against the one man.

Being held without bond when he has no serious adult criminal history, and extending the Prelim to Dec. is ridiculous.

His Atty fought them on neither. Oct.14th would've been two additional months for the State to make its formal case, and that would've been more than they deserved. IMO a decent Atty would've at least made that request, esp. if bond is denied (and there wasn't even a bond hearing).

Four months is ridiculous for a Prelim. Hearing to see what they're going to finally charge him with.
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier

Last edited by Emily Henderson; September 19th, 2017 at 07:02 PM.
 
Old September 19th, 2017 #567
Erik T. White
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: The Deep South of the USSA
Posts: 4,813
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emily Henderson View Post
Right, but he hasn't been charged yet. That's why they held off-and are investigating it as a 'domestic terror' event, so they can expand their investigation to include other people.

The requirement for the KKK act is that you have co-conspirators, and that someone died from the attack. That can mean death penalty.

And the 'deprivation of civil rights' being the 'motive' for violence can mean death penalty as well.--That one would be harder, as you have to actively deprive someone of voting, assembling, or something tied into their 'civil rights' being exercised at the time of the attack. Assembly was unlawful, so no cigar me thinks on that one. They likely will go for the first.

They are only investigating the other two to do as I'm stating, make it eligible for being a Capital offense.

Had more than one person died, they'd likely have gone ahead with the second (Preliminary) Hearing and charged him with 1st Degree, they'd have met the standard (multiple deaths).

I think they also would like to set precedent here--because there really isn't a 'deprivation of civil rights' case like this one.

The fact that he was fleeing violence himself, and I don't believe it was a per-meditated event involving any other people, should be enough to strike either attempt down.

But they will still do it if they can. Too big of an opportunity.

It is also a way to spread fear, and cause more than one person a problem, which is certainly something they would welcome.

If things go as they should, and if I'm correct on what actually happened, the worse he should get is 'involuntary manslaughter', because he did not intend or pre-plan killing anyone, but it might be argued he was 'reckless' in his attempt to flee.

I actually would disagree with even that conviction, but it would be the only one that makes sense. You would have multiple counts of that also, but of course the penalty would be far less than all the 'malicious wounding' felonies, and of course far less than a death penalty terrorism case based on law from the 1800s.

The tables could be turned, and Antifa could be considered depriving lawfully assembled Whites of their civil rights, if they ever kill anyone in their violent attacks--but this is a 'get Whitey' operation, just like the statue removal.

They'd like to use the case to build on it and intimidate Whites further, that's what they're trying to do. That's more important to them than the case against the one man.

Being held without bond when he has no serious adult criminal history, and extending the Prelim to Dec. is ridiculous.

His Atty fought them on neither. Oct.14th would've been two additional months for the State to make its formal case, and that would've been more than they deserved.

Four months is ridiculous for a Prelim. Hearing to see what they're going to finally charge him with.
Hi Emily! I've been following your posts in this matter and have agreed with your observations.

One thing that might...MIGHT...have been missed is that he was attacked from behind and there were antifa behind him. IF he had immediately backed up, the possibility of a premeditated murder charge COULD have been easier to prove legally, since a car is a "greater weapon" than a baseball bat or rocks. It is the legal system of (((the tribe))) which has put this into "law" beginning in the early 1960s. When I was a campus cop we went through "shoot/don't shoot" exercises. One involved a man holding a woman hostage, having a switchblade, and getting ready to throw it at the officer. In some states, a justifiable use of lethal force would have been firing to kill ONLY AS HIS ARM WAS COMING UP, AND SHOOTING AT THE APEX OF THE KNIFE THROW!!!!!!!!!!

Otherwise, if he missed the officer, he would be unarmed.

Edit: I incorrectly had the perp ready to "fire" at the officer. I have clarified that to "throw it" (the switchblade) at the officer. I am under some degree of duress since I just saw one model of hurricane Maria, a category 5 storm, with a possibility of impacting the east coast of Florida. I thank all in advance for excusing my error and editing since I just survived hurricane Irma.

Leave it to the joooz to come up with those (((laws)))!!!!!

14/88

Erik
__________________
Whites are afraid to speak out against their enemies, let alone act out. This must change ~ Alex Linder
Sweat saves blood, blood saves lives, but brains saves both. ~ Erwin Rommel

Last edited by Erik T. White; September 19th, 2017 at 07:28 PM. Reason: I am under distress being a hurricane Irma survivor
 
Old September 19th, 2017 #568
Emily Henderson
Intellijintly Dezined
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erik T. White View Post
"..One thing that might...MIGHT...have been missed is that he was attacked from behind and there were antifa behind him. IF he had immediately backed up, the possibility of a premeditated murder charge COULD have been easier to prove legally, since a car is a "greater weapon" than a baseball bat or rocks..."
Hi Eric-we were writing at same time, I added mo' stuff, lol.

That's a good observation--I think if anyone considers what they'd do if surrounded and attacked in that manner, 'flooring it' would be a natural fear response, and it's what made me take pause in deciding what I for sure thought when media stated it was 'deliberate' from the get go.

I knew it was odd that he hit two cars in front of him-this could've pinned him in and caused him to be further assaulted, so it looked like someone who panicked and gunned it-if he had wanted to deliberately attack people, he'd not have done it in that manner IMO.

And of course now we know he was attacked first, and he was further attacked before backing up to get out.

..this further illustrates why they need to find another avenue for their case than the traditional route, because even in the worst case scenario of 'one White guy gets mad and attacks random shitheads and one of them dies', it does not work to fit the terroristic act of 'conspiring' for political purposes, which is needed for Captial murder since we only have one death-(and btw, it's a stretch to claim he is the proximate cause even of the one death).

So they need to harangue the other two guys, otherwise they can't even get what they want in lying on the one guy (James).

'Deprivation of civil rights' would be odd if they follow that route, with the assembly being at that point unlawful, I think they will go the other route (KKK Act).

But we will know in December, a ridiculous long way away.
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier

Last edited by Emily Henderson; September 19th, 2017 at 07:26 PM.
 
Old September 19th, 2017 #569
Kevlar Vest
Junior Member
 
Kevlar Vest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Toonerville
Posts: 169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emily Henderson View Post
I'm not an Atty. but I'll do the research pro-bono.
Or Sonny Bono.
__________________
Thanks to those who give me a thumbs up rep.
 
Old September 19th, 2017 #570
Erik T. White
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: The Deep South of the USSA
Posts: 4,813
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emily Henderson View Post
Hi Eric-we were writing at same time, I added mo' stuff, lol.

That's a good observation--I think if anyone considers what they'd do if surrounded and attacked in that manner, 'flooring it' would be a natural fear response, and it's what made me take pause in deciding what I for sure thought when media stated it was 'deliberate' from the get go.

I knew it was odd that he hit two cars in front of him-this could've pinned him in and caused him to be further assaulted, so it looked like someone who panicked and gunned it-if he had wanted to deliberately attack people, he'd not have done it in that manner IMO.

And of course now we know he was attacked first, and he was further attacked before backing up to get out.

..this further illustrates why they need to find another avenue for their case than the traditional route, because even in the worst case scenario of 'one White guy gets mad and attacks random shitheads and one of them dies', it does not work to fit the terroristic act of 'conspiring' for political purposes, which is needed for Captial murder since we only have one death-(and btw, it's a stretch to claim he is the proximate cause even of the one death).

So they need to harangue the other two guys, otherwise they can't even get what they want in lying on the one guy (James).

'Deprivation of civil rights' would be odd if they follow that route, with the assembly being at that point unlawful, I think they will go the other route (KKK Act).

But we will know in December, a ridiculous long way away.
"Deprivation of civil rights" is a nice jooo law which could be a catch-all for just about any action which a White person takes against any of (((the tribe's))) pets. It was used in a major case, the killing of Lemuel Penn:

Quote:
Penn was shot to death on a Broad River bridge on the Georgia State Route 172 in Madison County, Georgia, near Colbert, twenty-two miles north of the city of Athens. Soon Lackey, also a Klansman, Myers and Sims were identified as the ones who chased the trio of Army reservists. Sims and Myers, both members of the Ku Klux Klan, were tried in state superior court but found not guilty by an all-white jury.[4]

Federal prosecutors eventually charged both for violating Penn's civil rights under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. On June 27, 1966, criminal proceedings began against Sims, Myers, and four other local Klansmen, Herbert Guest, James S. Lackey, Denver Phillips, and George Hampton Turner.[5] Two weeks later, Sims and Myers were found guilty of conspiracy charges by a federal district court jury;[5] their four co-defendants, however, were acquitted.[5] Sims and Myers were sentenced to ten years each[5] and served about six in federal prison. Howard Sims was killed with a shotgun in 1981 at age 58.[citation needed] James Lackey died at age 66 in 2002. Cecil Myers is still alive.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Lemuel_Penn

I was an adjunct professor at the Georgia med school during the early 1980s and also lectured on occasion at the University of Georgia, Athens campus. I also picked up my Ph. D. in research design/medicinal chemistry. I was eating at a local barbecue restaurant one Sunday evening and began talking with a man. He and I had a nice conversation and I bought his dinner for him. He attended a Baptist church nearby, and I had just come from an Episcopal service. I saw a student at the Athens campus who said, "Dr. White, you bought dinner for a man Sunday night. He is my father." I had bought dinner for Howard Sims. I know how he died and must let that go unanswered for his family's sake: however, it was not an unusual death for the state of Georgia at the time and nignogs didn't kill him. Through the academic grapevine, I learned Mr. Sims daughter dropped out of her program at the Athens campus. It was right as I was cleaning out all my stuff at the Athens campus where I had an office that Mr. Sims' daughter saw me. I expressed delight that she was back in school. She said she had to take a year off, but was on track to graduate in the class of 1985. As far as I know she graduated. And, I was glad I bought dinner for a White stranger.

And, Emily, it seems like you and I have a "connection" and can show that an atheist and a Christian get along In Our White Race being the connector.

14/88

Erik
__________________
Whites are afraid to speak out against their enemies, let alone act out. This must change ~ Alex Linder
Sweat saves blood, blood saves lives, but brains saves both. ~ Erwin Rommel
 
Old September 19th, 2017 #571
Emily Henderson
Intellijintly Dezined
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erik T. White View Post
"Deprivation of civil rights" is a nice jooo law which could be a catch-all for just about any action which a White person takes against any of (((the tribe's))) pets. It was used in a major case, the killing of Lemuel Penn:



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Lemuel_Penn

I was an adjunct professor at the Georgia med school during the early 1980s and also lectured on occasion at the University of Georgia, Athens campus. I also picked up my Ph. D. in research design/medicinal chemistry. I was eating at a local barbecue restaurant one Sunday evening and began talking with a man. He and I had a nice conversation and I bought his dinner for him. He attended a Baptist church nearby, and I had just come from an Episcopal service. I saw a student at the Athens campus who said, "Dr. White, you bought dinner for a man Sunday night. He is my father." I had bought dinner for Howard Sims. I know how he died and must let that go unanswered for his family's sake: however, it was not an unusual death for the state of Georgia at the time and nignogs didn't kill him. Through the academic grapevine, I learned Mr. Sims daughter dropped out of her program at the Athens campus. It was right as I was cleaning out all my stuff at the Athens campus where I had an office that Mr. Sims' daughter saw me. I expressed delight that she was back in school. She said she had to take a year off, but was on track to graduate in the class of 1985. As far as I know she graduated. And, I was glad I bought dinner for a White stranger.

And, Emily, it seems like you and I have a "connection" and can show that an atheist and a Christian get along In Our White Race being the connector.

14/88

Erik
Not to be corny, but a few years back I had a Baptist neighbor who was miffed that I would not accept their invite to church. He and his wife were uber concerned 'bout my Sundays, lol.

Well, he had a stroke when he was away from home, and she got the call they'd taken him to the hospital--a far-ish one, and his wife didn't drive (disabled). Cabs take a while to get to the burbs and she didn't want to wait. I took her. She tried to pay me, I said no are u kidding?

When he came home there were less haughty invites to church, more genuine niceness based on something real.
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier
 
Old September 19th, 2017 #572
Emily Henderson
Intellijintly Dezined
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
Wink Lol, Pro Bono means 'for the public good' in Latin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevlar Vest View Post
Or Sonny Bono.
No comprendo-Sonny Bono hit a tree, he beez dead.

Rumor has it he was targeted and murdered, oddly enough, because he was about to expose a drug and weapons ring in 1998-I don't know about that.

Interestingly, Bono was one of the few in the House who cared about the dead children at Waco, he cried during the Hearings when Clive Doyle testified about recognizing the voices of the people screaming when he (Clive) jumped out of the flames.
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier
 
Old September 19th, 2017 #573
N.B. Forrest
Senior Member
 
N.B. Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, CSA
Posts: 11,145
Default

Quote:

They'd like to use the case to build on it and intimidate Whites further, that's what they're trying to do. That's more important to them than the case against the one man
Sure: they want him to get the Sleepy Juice just like Roof in order to intimidate other White men into keeping their mouths shut & allowing our race to be exterminated in an orderly, systematic fashion. Just like the jew Bolsheviks collared innocents & held show trials to spread terror throughout their victim population.

The young man is marked for death by the kikes & their whores. Still, I hope for a near-miracle. The facts are certainly on his side, above all that vital video of the commie cunt smashing the back of his car with the club right before he accelerated. The normies on the jury ought to be able see that clip - and that he was surrounded by scores of those armed, violent leftist scum who also attacked instantly after he tried to get to safety in a panic - and put the blame where it really belongs.
__________________
"First: Do No Good." - The Hymiecratic Oath

"The man who does not exercise the first law of nature—that of self preservation — is not worthy of living and breathing the breath of life." - John Wesley Hardin
 
Old September 20th, 2017 #574
Erik T. White
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: The Deep South of the USSA
Posts: 4,813
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironguard1940 View Post
You have a lot of insight on this subject. If I ever get into a jam I will definitely consider you for my lawyer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emily Henderson View Post
I'm not an Atty. but I'll do the research pro-bono.
I don't know about the laws of North Dakota, but in Georgia and Florida a paralegal is one profession which doesn't have to have a college degree to have the job. I worked a part of a summer as a "title runner" for an attorney along with his son, who was a pal of mine, later to become an attorney. In 1972 I had an offer of 100 dollars a week to do that for the entire summer: however, I needed to get ready for a move to Florida and had to turn it down. Getting into a legal firm, even as a "runner" like I was, is a first step to becoming a paralegal in either Georgia or Florida. And, let me be very frank. I had a case one time many years ago which was not criminal but civil. The "wonderful" attorney, member of the bar, with Esq. behind his name, etc., was telling me over the phone (I NEVER saw him) that the other party wanted to do a court battle which could be expensive. I went to the BIG law firm and the attorney, of course, was out. His paralegal, a very sharp White lady (he was also White but had a big caseload) took some information from me and I told her I had documented some things that could be of assistance. I had already told the attorney: however, when I told her she lit up like a Roman candle!!! She passed the documentation to the attorney. Two days later the other party caved and I won a settlement without ever going to court. Paralegals in Florida are often billed at 150 dollars per hour, billing time, which must be the time they are actually working on YOUR case. It sounds like a lot of money: however, both attorneys and paralegals often work 60 or more hours per week to achieve what constitutes "billable" hours.

A paralegal is a profession I highly respect and I don't care if the paralegal has a college degree or not. They are professionals in my eyes.

And Emily Henderson has the "eye" to be a great paralegal.

14/88

Erik
__________________
Whites are afraid to speak out against their enemies, let alone act out. This must change ~ Alex Linder
Sweat saves blood, blood saves lives, but brains saves both. ~ Erwin Rommel
 
Old September 20th, 2017 #575
Emily Henderson
Intellijintly Dezined
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erik T. White View Post
I don't know about the laws of North Dakota, but in Georgia and Florida a paralegal is one profession which doesn't have to have a college degree to have the job.
All States are the same with re to the profession.

There is a NALA certification offered that is governed the American Bar Association, you have to have a 2yr or 4yr degree, or a BA with a Cert. program from a University, and it has to be ABA approved-- or 7yrs experience working as a paralegal with a specific legal focus (criminal, civil, family, etc.) to take it. That is the same in all 50 States. There is no licensure based on degree for the profession, the NALA certification is what employers look at. That's what schools were preparing you for in TX-good programs cover all areas of law.

I worked as one from 2012-2016. What I do in ND I don't divulge online since openly pro-White.

Interestingly, Heather Heyer was given a job as a paralegal by a nigger friend. I could well imagine what kind of operation he was running, as she had no experience whatsoever.

Michael Morton was released from 25 years of wrongful imprisonment because a Paralegal took it upon herself to look into finding the real killer, which she did.
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier

Last edited by Emily Henderson; September 20th, 2017 at 01:51 AM.
 
Old September 20th, 2017 #576
Emily Henderson
Intellijintly Dezined
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
Default Nigger College Still Pushing the Heyer Lie

This is the typical anti White story, out of Temple University--- located in the city of Niggerly Murder...er, brotherly love---of how Whites are never called terrorists even when they are killing errbody (what?)

This story is from just a couple days ago. They are still way back on that page (Heyer hit by car) and are using the phrase 'domestic terrorism' very pointedly, albeit wrongly, as there is no such direct charge to bring in VA:

http://temple-news.com/opinion/call-acts-terror/
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier
 
Old September 20th, 2017 #577
Emily Henderson
Intellijintly Dezined
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
Thumbs up Teacher Arrested for Committing Assault in Charlottesville

http://www.newsleader.com/story/news...lly/664152001/

"..CHARLOTTESVILLE - Wilson Memorial High School French teacher Phoebe Stevens, known to students as Mademoiselle Lafroy, had her trial date set Tuesday for allegedly assaulting Charlottesville "Unite the Right" rally organizer Jason Kessler at his press conference the day after the August event.
Stevens, 35, was arrested and charged with class one misdemeanor assault by Charlottesville Police, turning herself in "without incident" Sept. 12, and receiving a summons to court. The maximum punishment allowed by Virginia law if she's convicted is*"confinement in jail for not more than 12 months and a fine of not more than $2,500, either or both."
At her hearing in Charlottesville General District Court Tuesday, Stevens's trial was set for 10:35*a.m. Nov. 17
, when she will be tried along with "a number" of other co-defendants in the case.."

Their trial will commence before James even gets his Preliminary Hearing.

Would be good to see them get a full year in jail, might think twice about randomly attacking people to stop them from existing.
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier

Last edited by Emily Henderson; September 20th, 2017 at 02:50 AM.
 
Old September 20th, 2017 #578
Ironguard1940
Senior Member
 
Ironguard1940's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,613
Default I had doubts too but they are gone

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brooklyn Rick View Post
I still have doubts about that guy. A staunch obama supporter and key player in the occupy movement does not change their ideology so quickly or so radically.. What's in it for him?
You will have to ask him. As I said, I had doubts about him but he has come out of his moment solidly pro-White. My friend that helped remove the tarps on Monday vouched for him and that is all I need to hear.
 
Old September 20th, 2017 #579
notmenomore
Senior Member
 
notmenomore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,632
Default Status of injunction?

Can someone PLEASE report back on the status of the court proceedings in the Charlottesville Circuit Court.

There is an injunction in place that is the ONLY thing that has prevented the "City" of C-ville from actually removing the statues.

Can someone please report here the status of the case at this time.

Who's the Lawyer?
When are hearings scheduled?
When does the injunction expire?
Do I really have to drive up there to the courthouse to get this info?
__________________
No way out but through the jews.
 
Old September 20th, 2017 #580
Ironguard1940
Senior Member
 
Ironguard1940's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,613
Default You know as much as we do

Quote:
Originally Posted by notmenomore View Post
Can someone PLEASE report back on the status of the court proceedings in the Charlottesville Circuit Court.

There is an injunction in place that is the ONLY thing that has prevented the "City" of C-ville from actually removing the statues.

Can someone please report here the status of the case at this time.

Who's the Lawyer?
When are hearings scheduled?
When does the injunction expire?
Do I really have to drive up there to the courthouse to get this info?
http://mynorthwest.com/737631/judge-...monument-case/
 
Reply

Tags
alt-right, charlottesville, christopher cantwell, richard spencer, white activism, white activists

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:15 AM.
Page generated in 0.28419 seconds.