Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old July 7th, 2017 #81
Emily Henderson
Intellijintly Dezined
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marin View Post
Your government has troops on the Middle East to help with Greater Israel, not oil.

Hugo could have easily sabotage the war effort in Irak, it was one of the largest exporters in 2003, putting the Oil reserves of the US at risk, but he didn't do it, commies need shekels too. the coup of 2002 was a set-up, Lucas Rincon was one of the generals who supposedly asked Chavez to quit the presidency, he showed up on TV telling the Venezuelan people that Chavez had quit his term, after two days he was reinstalled on office... the timing was perfect to pacify the people and make it look like the "coup" was successful, what do you think happened to Lucas Rincon?, fired, stripped of his charge? no, he was rewarded with an Embassy in Portugal by Chavez himself. If the coup had been legit he would have never been placed back on office, chavez would've been living in exile or killed.
IMO he was killed-he's quite dead.

You cite no sources. That's not how you present a case.

There are plenty of anti-Chavez sources to discuss Rincon. I specifically used an Anti-Chavez news outlet--Fox News were Bush lovers and Chavez haters for that entire administration, and yet that's the story re the Coup. Precisely why I didn't use 'Mother Jones' or something of the 'left'. Fox is a bs rag, too, but was a pro-Bush one.

BTW: Big oil IS 'Greater Israel'. Here is some evidence:
https://islammyreligion.wordpress.co...feller-family/

(((Conoco, Standard Oil, ExxonMobil, BP)))) all owned by the 'chosen ones', while Whites get blamed for their wars.

Once someone understands that the Religion, Corporatism, and Jewish power structure are a trinity, they've understood a lot.

Re Lucas Rincon Romero: he and Chavez both told media that they pretended Hugo 'resigned' and then went on with business as per usual-Chavez made Rincon Romero his Minister of Interior and Justice.:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucas_Rinc%C3%B3n_Romero

The crime in Venezuela was out of control BEFORE Chavez, and got worse DURING Chavez, and is even worse now.
But the Coup was for our interest in taking him out, and we used absolute scum like Negroponte to do it.
S'more on that:
http://www.peoplesworld.org/article/...nezuelan-coup/
And those tv stations that Chavez was trying to get control of were owned by none other than Gustavo Cisneros, a billionaire who helped with the coup, as cited in the above article.
He owned all the radio stations in Venezuela as well.
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier
 
Old July 7th, 2017 #82
Marin
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 131
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emily Henderson View Post
IMO he was killed-he's quite dead.

You cite no sources. That's not how you present a case.

There are plenty of anti-Chavez sources to discuss Rincon. I specifically used an Anti-Chavez news outlet--Fox News were Bush lovers and Chavez haters for that entire administration, and yet that's the story re the Coup. Precisely why I didn't use 'Mother Jones' or something of the 'left'. Fox is a bs rag, too, but was a pro-Bush one.

BTW: Big oil IS 'Greater Israel'. Here is some evidence:
https://islammyreligion.wordpress.co...feller-family/

(((Conoco, Standard Oil, ExxonMobil, BP)))) all owned by the 'chosen ones', while Whites get blamed for their wars.

Once someone understands that the Religion, Corporatism, and Jewish power structure are a trinity, they've understood a lot.

Re Lucas Rincon Romero: he and Chavez both told media that they pretended Hugo 'resigned' and then went on with business as per usual-Chavez made Rincon Romero his Minister of Interior and Justice.:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucas_Rinc%C3%B3n_Romero

The crime in Venezuela was out of control BEFORE Chavez, and got worse DURING Chavez, and is even worse now.
But the Coup was for our interest in taking him out, and we used absolute scum like Negroponte to do it.
S'more on that:
http://www.peoplesworld.org/article/...nezuelan-coup/
And those tv stations that Chavez was trying to get control of were owned by none other than Gustavo Cisneros, a billionaire who helped with the coup, as cited in the above article.
He owned all the radio stations in Venezuela as well.
El auto-golpe de Chávez
Quote:
El presidente Chávez, bajo la orientación de los servicios de inteligencia cubanos, fabricó un golpe para descubrir la conspiración que se viene desarrollando en el seno de las Fuerzas Armadas y simultáneamente poder destruir los resortes de la resistencia civil que seriamente amenazan la integridad del gobierno. De acuerdo con las informaciones que han circulado en Venezuela, son 58 los generales que participaron en el famoso golpe militar que culminó con el secuestro del presidente. Chávez utilizó un autosecuestro para mantenerse en el poder. Nadie ha podido entender cómo un movimiento militar de proporciones tan extensas pudo haber fracasado, cuando no hubo combate alguno para liberar al presidente.
THE REAL COUP OF HUGO CHAVEZ ON FEBRUARY 4, 1992
http://peoplesvoice.ca/2017/02/15/th...bruary-4-1992/

Chavez already had experience in destabilising governments and causing distress, the crime rate was bad yes but not like it is today, chavez made everything that was bad worse, before chavez there was a crime rate of 3000 people every year, now is more than 25.000 every year, Venezuela became a war-zone with him ruling. The Americans played no part during the coup, not even a statement was made during the brief rule of Carmona Estanga. what happened to Venezuela is a crime, and Chavez was directly responsible for Maduro, he encourage his followers to vote for him before he passed.
 
Old July 7th, 2017 #83
Marin
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 131
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emily Henderson View Post
IMO he was killed-he's quite dead.
You're Totally right about this. I think it was case of cuban doctors malpractice, if chavez had used venezuelan or american doctors he would probably be alive today.
 
Old July 7th, 2017 #84
Marin
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 131
Default

The Orthodox Nationalist: Stalin the Philo-Semitic Internationalist



Dr Matthew Raphael Johnson begins with a summary of current events concerning Donald Trump and Black violence in the USA, before getting to the bulk of the podcast which debunks two big myths about Joseph Stalin, that he was a Russian Nationalist and that he was an Anti-Semite. He was neither.

It is one thing to show Stalin was not a Nationalist and was Philo-Semitic but it is another to explain why these myths have been around for so long, as Stalin’s writings and policies were not secret and his works are available to all. The explanation is that the leftist mind eventually tired of the USSR and its misery and sought for ways that it could be denounced.

A search for legislation that assisted the cause of labor in the USSR will prove fruitless as it was never about the workers, but rather the enrichment of a small oligarchic elite that was overwhelmingly Jewish. The USSR could not be hated by leftists just on these grounds, so other foundations were needed. If he could be depicted as “another Hitler” then not only would it be OK to hate Stalinism, but it would also give the Left an excuse to say that “Leninism has never been tried.”

Almost without exception, American and western historians paint Stalin as both a “Russian Nationalist” and an “Anti-Semite.” The latter especially being believed without question. Stalin is presented this way because it allowed the western left to oppose the USSR in good conscience. Nationalism was universally hated by the ruling class from campus anarchists to corporate billionaires, hence, to recast Stalin as one is to make him non-socialist.

Communism as a vague ideology was never a problem in the minds of the US, the State Department or western corporate capital. Obviously, since corporate capital built the USSR, Socialism was a part of the profit structure of American capitalism. Only Nationalism was to be fought and therefore, allowing Stalin to be hated by the Left required him to be recast as a Nationalist and an Anti-Semite. As with all American academic dogma, this is false.

The myth has been deliberately created. Jewish writers need the gentiles to believe that Hitler and Stalin were the same, lest they be forced to admit that Jews in the USSR slaughtered Christians. By claiming that Stalin was anti-Jewish, they can blunt this claim and argue that the Jews were also targeted. The fact is that the USSR was largely Jewish, was based far more on Jewish ethnic identity than Marxism and certainly had nothing to do with labor. Stalin continued this trend and backed Jewish ethnic interests indirectly throughout his life.

[A paper soon to be published in the Barnes Review on this subject is called: Self-Indulgent Historical Mythology:The Fantasy of Stalin’s “Anti-Semitic Russian Nationalism”]
Presented by Matt Johnson

To hear the radio click here:
https://www.dailystormer.com/the-ort...ernationalist/
 
Old July 7th, 2017 #85
Emily Henderson
Intellijintly Dezined
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marin View Post
You're Totally right about this. I think it was case of cuban doctors malpractice, if chavez had used venezuelan or american doctors he would probably be alive today.
You're totally wrong about this. They (Cubans) discovered how yellow fever was transmitted via mosquitoes in the wayback (Carlos Finlay), and although they are the lowest paid motherf'ers in the world, they get 20,000 "health tourists" a year and get $40 million a year in revenue from it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_in_Cuba

You forget perhaps that Spaniards are White. They're not dumb. The American healthcare system kills as many as it saves--Cubans have had 20 years of foreigners going to Havana for treatment.

Cancer drug Cimavax, available in Cuba-Americans going there to get it:

\http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-39640165

From Wiki:
"..Cuba has been serving health tourists from around the world for more than 20 years. The country operates a special division of hospitals specifically for the treatment of foreigners and diplomats. Foreign patients travel to Cuba for a wide range of treatments including eye-surgery, neurological disorders such as multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's disease, cosmetic surgery, addictions treatment, retinitis pigmentosa and orthopaedics. Most patients are from Latin America, Europe and Canada, and a growing number of Americans also are coming. Cuba also successfully exports many medical products, such as vaccines.."

We have people practicing medicine in the USA from India and Pakistan who aren't fit to make a falafel.

Chavez went to one of the hospitals for diplomats--not very Socialist to get things the locals aren't getting, but he probably got better care than he would've in any American shithole hospital, since he was of the 'elite' class.

There is classism in everything, it's inescapable.

...But back to murder.
Bolivia's leader, Banzer, was 'getting cancer' at a very young age right when Hugo was. He was trying to kick certain (((people))) out of Bolivia.:
http://www.sfgate.com/politics/artic...nt-2895637.php

Banzer worked closely with former 'Nazi war criminal' Klaus Barbie. I like Banzer for the same reasons as Chavez.

He DESTROYED the Cocaine problem in Bolivia--something America had quite a hand in. Sniff sniff, Dubya.

But he and Hugo conveniently died.
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier

Last edited by Emily Henderson; July 7th, 2017 at 07:00 PM.
 
Old July 7th, 2017 #86
Emily Henderson
Intellijintly Dezined
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marin View Post
This is basically what you've been saying with no evidence other than the fact that Rincon and Chavez went back to work together once it was all over. My article cited the who's and the why's re the coup. The documents that can be obtained via FOIA re such include discussion of Cisneros and the Colombian murderer who helped with the efforts. That is 'evidence', more than an article but what's in the article.

Cisneros...why would he want to get rid of Chavez?:

"..One of South America's most prominent businessmen oversees a diversified empire with interests in Venezuelan television stations, telecom outfits, a regional brewery and a baseball team. Sold U.S. Spanish-language TV network Univision to a private equity consortium led by U.S. billionaire Haim Saban for $700 million in 2007. After locking horns with president Hugo Chavez, Venevision, his Venezuela TV company, is avoiding politics these days, preferring to concentrate on entertainment content, including hugely popular Latin American soap operas. Cisneros and his wife are familiar figures in high society, hobnobbing with former presidents, designers and fellow billionaires; George H.W. Bush is his fishing buddy.."


I also cited the names of the US backed groups who funded the Coup. This is all documented.

Here's that evidence again, which proves you totally wrong on US 'not involved in the coup.' No matter what you think of Chavez, we for fuck sure know who did the Coup, exactly who--(you would have to cite a source with documented evidence to compare, not an 'opinion piece'):

"..The union federation has been a consistent and key opponent of Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez. In the year 2001, two years after his first election to President, Chávez's government ordered the union federation to undertake its first-ever direct leadership elections. Although the Supreme Court refused to certify the results, the winner Carlos Ortega assumed the presidency. The International Labour Organization (ILO) and International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU) condemned Chávez's interference in the affairs of free trade unions.
In 2002 and 2003, the CTV received funding from the United States' National Endowment for Democracy via the American Center for International Labor Solidarity.
In 2003, a new union federation, the Unión Nacional de Trabajadores de Venezuela (UNT, National Union of Workers) was started by people in the labor movement who supported Chávez. Some unions disaffiliated with the CTV and affiliated with the UNT.."
^^from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confed...s_de_Venezuela

The bold and underlined, once again, the American funders of participants in said Coup. One of many.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marin View Post
[
THE REAL COUP OF HUGO CHAVEZ ON FEBRUARY 4, 1992
http://peoplesvoice.ca/2017/02/15/th...bruary-4-1992/
This is the attempted Coup Chavez participated in against Perez. Good on him, Perez was very corrupt.

The worst thing you could bring up about Chavez was his funding of FARC, and yet you didn't. They were kidnappers, rapists, drug dealers, and so on. They were combatting their government, and the Chavez administration had something like 300 million dollars worth in deals with them, aid to them I believe. They (Venezuela) received funding as well. He ended that support in '08, however, and negotiated the release of some people they had held. Still, that alliance was no good imo. (Not that our Govt doesn't do drug dealin', that's what some of this is about-cocaine and heroin.) Doesn't change the facts on the rest, nor the evidence that supports it:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...rc-rebels.html
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier

Last edited by Emily Henderson; July 7th, 2017 at 06:45 PM.
 
Old July 7th, 2017 #87
Marin
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 131
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emily Henderson View Post

The worst thing you could bring up about Chavez was his funding of FARC, and yet you didn't. They were kidnappers, rapists, drug dealers, and so on. They were combatting their government, and the Chavez administration had something like 300 million dollars worth in deals with them, aid to them I believe. They (Venezuela) received funding as well. He ended that support in '08, however, and negotiated the release of some people they had held. Still, that alliance was no good imo. (Not that our Govt doesn't do drug dealin', that's what some of this is about-cocaine and heroin.) Doesn't change the facts on the rest, nor the evidence that supports it:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...rc-rebels.html
Yes, I forgot about that, another one of the things I forgot to mention, his collaboration with colombian guerrilla, it's incredible how you recognize what a scum he was, yet you like him? well to each his/her own.

Please read this: https://caracasgringo.wordpress.com/...ntold-history/
it's very interesting and it reinforces what I have been saying.
 
Old July 7th, 2017 #88
Emily Henderson
Intellijintly Dezined
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marin View Post
Yes, I forgot about that, another one of the things I forgot to mention, his collaboration with colombian guerrilla, it's incredible how you recognize what a scum he was, yet you like him? well to each his/her own.

Please read this: https://caracasgringo.wordpress.com/...ntold-history/
it's very interesting and it reinforces what I have been saying.
Not incredible at all, it's the truth. He was far less 'a scum' than almost anything the United States has produced, and the documentation conclusively proves we tried to interfere in a Sovereign Nation's Government.

Same with Banzer.

They did that (FARC support) for funding, and it was wrong. However, stopping it in '08 was more moral than what most of the scum at the top ever does, actually. To each his/her own, yes.
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier
 
Old July 8th, 2017 #89
GoldfingerSRB
Member
 
GoldfingerSRB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Srbija
Posts: 274
Default

Quote:
Stalin against NWO

Russia has never fitted well into the plans of those seeking to impose a uniform system upon humanity. Russia has remained untamed in terms of the sophisticated Western liberals seeking to establish a unipolar global world, as were Afrikaners, Iraqis, Iranians, Serbs, et al. The difference is that Russians continue to constitute a significant opposition, which therefore requires subverting.

Russia’s economy was regarded as backward by the Western financiers and this is the reason why many not only welcomed the March and even the November 1917 Revolutions,[2] but also provided backing for the revolutionaries to overthrow the Czarist regime[3] as an anomaly in the world of “progress.”

Industrialists and financiers looked optimistically to a post-Czarist Russia whose regime was set to embark on industrialization, which implied the need for foreign capital and expertise, regardless of the revolutionary rhetoric about foreign capitalists. However, the self-described “foreign policy establishment”, the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR), urged foreign investors to act quickly in Russia, as they perceived that the situation might soon change.

Stalin, even at this embryonic stage of the Soviet regime, was the spoiler. While Trotsky wished to pursue foreign investment[7], as had been the case under Lenin’s New Economic Policy,[8] Stalin dealt some swift blows to the broadly termed opposition bloc led by Trotsky, and pursued a course not as amicable to foreign capital.

With the outbreak of war between Germany and the USSR, there was renewed hope for Russia being integrated into a post war new world order. Stalin relied on Western technological wherewithal for his war machine in fighting the Germans.[9] However Stalin was too hard-headed and authoritarian to be subordinate or even become a corporate equal partner in any post-war global re-organization envisaged by the USA.
 
Old July 8th, 2017 #90
GoldfingerSRB
Member
 
GoldfingerSRB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Srbija
Posts: 274
Default

Stalin's fight against the Globalists

Konstantin P. Petrov (August 23, 1945, Noginsk, Moscow Region - July 21, 2009, Moscow) - Soviet and Russian military leader, a Russian social and political activist. Candidate of Technical Sciences. Member of International Informatization Academy. Major-General. Prematurely discharged from the Armed Forces in November 1995. Chairman of the Presidium of the Central Council of the political party "Course of Truth and Unity." Head of the department at the Udmurt State University.

 
Old July 10th, 2017 #91
GoldfingerSRB
Member
 
GoldfingerSRB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Srbija
Posts: 274
Default

A very inspiring text I received from my Russian comrade in Serbia: "100 years of Jewish reign in Russia: Stalin standing against Kahal alone".

Quote:
Jews would have lived happily - if Stalin hadn't appeared in the political scene by the will of God.

Jewish bankers dragged Hitler out of prison, financed the RSHA, built industry for the Third Reich, and then moved Hitler against Russia - how they financed the entire Europe of Napoleon to attack Christian Russia.

Stalin before the war began to sweep the Jews from power - the whole of the world Zion because of this enraged - unknown Georgian was removing their Jew Trotsky!

But Stalin still managed to remove the Jews-the infamous cosmopolitans and potential spies from all posts-and replaced them with faithful Russian military commanders, stopping the extermination of the Russian people in the Jewish Gulag.

And won the war.

And the Jewish Leninist Red Jew - executed.

Jewish America entered the war in the last place when it saw that Stalin and in Europe would clean out their Jewish elite.

The Jews of the United States capitalized on the blood of Russians and Germans - for them it is, in their Talmud, simply goyim, cattle and meat.

Because our Jews in the media hate Stalin so much - they remember how in 1937 they were all separated.

Stalin closed the Jewish concentration camp for the Russians in 1937.

After his death, all the Jews sinned on him. The usual Jewish reception and gesheft in all countries for 2000 years.

So all that everyone writes about politics or history is simply a rehear of the century-old lies of all Jewish media.

Read more Jewish media and pee 140 million in their mediaeval office!

Here - with whom Stalin fought until 1941.

Comrades of grandfather Lenin:



Stalin managed to take power over the international Kagal in the USSR only in 1937.
 
Old July 10th, 2017 #92
Fico
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 974
Default

You can be against jews as communist as you can be against jews as Christian but all this ideology are orginally designed by jew. If you have high taxed state it mean that white are same as niggers who can not survive without help from tax what mean rule of the worst and genetic downfall.

Lot of communist are for Palestinians but they are not capable for recognize that they follow jewish ideology and jews always create ideology for their benefit so Stalin was just jewish puppet who hate jews as many christians but they could not do nothing,he had mission destroy Europe and this is reason why Hitler attacked him. Without Hitler,communism would be in Germany,Spain,France,probably only andlo-saxon would be outside. Problem of west is not globalism than high taxation of state who support poor class of niggers and Stalin school is much higher taxation and americans can become niggers and after that jungle.
 
Old July 11th, 2017 #93
GoldfingerSRB
Member
 
GoldfingerSRB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Srbija
Posts: 274
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fico View Post
You can be against jews as communist as you can be against jews as Christian but all this ideology are orginally designed by jew. If you have high taxed state it mean that white are same as niggers who can not survive without help from tax what mean rule of the worst and genetic downfall.

Lot of communist are for Palestinians but they are not capable for recognize that they follow jewish ideology and jews always create ideology for their benefit so Stalin was just jewish puppet who hate jews as many christians but they could not do nothing,he had mission destroy Europe and this is reason why Hitler attacked him. Without Hitler,communism would be in Germany,Spain,France,probably only andlo-saxon would be outside. Problem of west is not globalism than high taxation of state who support poor class of niggers and Stalin school is much higher taxation and americans can become niggers and after that jungle.
Says who? The pathetic apologist of jewish SF site? Don't touch the questions you have no clues about.
This sort of criticism come from trotskist section of the communist party that lately infiltrated the global economy and European states. Stalin was no perfect, we can say he had lots of disadvantages but he kept Russia white and anti-zionist.

 
Old July 11th, 2017 #94
Emily Henderson
Intellijintly Dezined
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fico View Post
You can be against jews as communist as you can be against jews as Christian but all this ideology are orginally designed by jew. If you have high taxed state it mean that white are same as niggers who can not survive without help from tax what mean rule of the worst and genetic downfall.
Truth there--except if we had a one-race country in the US, and our tax dollars were for things that you can only do in a 'collective' way, like roads and fire dept. and whatnot. It is as you say, to prop up the riff raffs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fico View Post
Lot of communist are for Palestinians but they are not capable for recognize that they follow jewish ideology and jews always create ideology for their benefit so Stalin was just jewish puppet who hate jews as many christians but they could not do nothing,he had mission destroy Europe and this is reason why Hitler attacked him. Without Hitler,communism would be in Germany,Spain,France,probably only andlo-saxon would be outside. Problem of west is not globalism than high taxation of state who support poor class of niggers and Stalin school is much higher taxation and americans can become niggers and after that jungle.
I don't know on 'Jewish puppet', but the part I put in bold-yes, there are lots of 'Free Palestine' left in the USA, yet they don't really call out the Jew in any other areas, so that's where they are completely dishonest.
I think Globalization and the 'Nanny State' you speak of are actually the same thing ultimately, as a handful of people own you in either system.
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier
 
Old July 11th, 2017 #95
Fico
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 974
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldfingerSRB View Post
Stalin was no perfect, we can say he had lots of disadvantages but he kept Russia white and anti-zionist.
You really think that Stalin wanted keep Russia white? Stalin state USSR had lot of mongrels so he did not be Russian patriot,racialist and of course that communist can be anti-zionist because zionists are nationalists and they are against all nationalism but his idea high taxation is anti-white because white are in global better class and when you have high tax you put your money for worst class of whites who are wild and they dream about rebelion with niggers. Similar as communist who are white but they want open borders for their brothers proleterians. If you want to know more about that you can hear SS song "Sieg heil victoria" where they mentioned Stalin,Churchill,Roosenvelt who were their enemy so he cooperated with globalists while Israel expanded their territory and jews celebrate red army openly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emily Henderson View Post
Truth there--except if we had a one-race country in the US, and our tax dollars were for things that you can only do in a 'collective' way, like roads and fire dept. and whatnot. It is as you say, to prop up the riff raffs.
Of course,when in USA whites still have best stock, in communism including Stalin you have whites who act like nigger in USA. Example how you can not solve nothing without eugenic. I know this because I live in post-communsit state where exist lot of whites who are not good stock,ancestor of communist soliders who survived. All good stock were killed or are minority because of Stalin and their communist who also killed anti-communist Russians.

Last edited by Fico; July 11th, 2017 at 03:38 PM.
 
Old July 11th, 2017 #96
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,679
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fico View Post

Of course,when in USA whites still have best stock, in communism including Stalin you have whites who act like nigger in USA. Example how you can not solve nothing without eugenic. I know this because I live in post-communsit state where exist lot of whites who are not good stock,ancestor of communist soliders who survived. All good stock were killed or are minority because of Stalin and their communist who also killed anti-communist Russians.

http://www.zombietime.com/up_your_al...full/index.php
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race


''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers
 
Old July 12th, 2017 #97
Alex Him
Senior Member
 
Alex Him's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 6,834
Blog Entries: 219
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fico View Post
I know this because I live in post-communsit state...
However, you do not provide any knowledge of the realities of Soviet life. Only their monstrous distortion.
The only thing that is clearly visible from your posts is that you are an anti-Russian propagandist.
__________________
Where should they dig the Very Deep Pit?
Piglet said that the best place would be somewhere where a Heffalump was, just before he fell into it, only about a foot farther on.
(c) Alan Alexander Miln
 
Old July 12th, 2017 #98
Fico
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 974
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Him View Post
However, you do not provide any knowledge of the realities of Soviet life. Only their monstrous distortion.
The only thing that is clearly visible from your posts is that you are an anti-Russian propagandist.
I love when western people teach us about communism who lived in communism. Why Serbs celebrate Stalin? Because in communist Yugoslavia Belgrade was capital town who is in Serbia and they are geografically Byzantines or eastern people and it is easy when you do not live in border with eastern pro-communist,anti-western states because you are far away and what about us? We on far western border defend west. If westerns want communistm,well pelease,forget for capitalism and live in high taxed centralized state. West was only hope for as against eastern barbarians and all states in who stay on east borders are guard of western door,capitalist economy and pro-white thinking much than in east I know that on west is not so good racial situation but it is because high taxed where you put money for niggers and this is Stalin economy. So if you continue want to practice it,you will see all paradise of "soviet life". Nazis had posters for them and called them underman (german untermench):




On pictures are your person of white race who are low elements and genetic garbage ie. pictures of Stalin state . Pro-white nazis did not respect them as all mental and physical weak people btw.

American pro-white author Lothrop Stoddard wrote book about underman about them:


This topic is also topic of white underman and anti-Russian because Russian anti-communist fought not for Stalin than for Hitler.

Last edited by Fico; July 12th, 2017 at 05:29 AM.
 
Old July 12th, 2017 #99
Alex Him
Senior Member
 
Alex Him's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 6,834
Blog Entries: 219
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fico View Post
I love when western people teach us about communism who lived in communism. Why Serbs celebrate Stalin? Because in communist Yugoslavia Belgrade was capital town who is in Serbia and they are geografically Byzantines or eastern people and it is easy when you do not live in border with eastern pro-communist,anti-western states because you are far away and what about us? We on far western border defend west. If westerns want communistm,well pelease,forget for capitalism and live in high taxed centralized state. West was only hope for as against eastern barbarians and all states in who stay on east borders are guard of western door,capitalist economy and pro-white thinking much than in east I know that on west is not so good racial situation but it is because high taxed where you put money for niggers and this is Stalin economy. So if you continue want to practice it,you will see all paradise of "soviet life". Nazis had posters for them and called them underman (german untermench):

On pictures are your person of white race who are low elements and genetic garbage ie. pictures of Stalin state . Pro-white nazis did not respect them as all mental and physical weak people btw.

American pro-white author Lothrop Stoddard wrote book about underman about them:

This topic is also topic of white underman and anti-Russian because Russian anti-communist fought not for Stalin than for Hitler.

I once again ask: where can I see any of your real knowledge of the communist states?
Instead of them I see only propaganda theses about "the eastern barbarians".
__________________
Where should they dig the Very Deep Pit?
Piglet said that the best place would be somewhere where a Heffalump was, just before he fell into it, only about a foot farther on.
(c) Alan Alexander Miln
 
Old July 12th, 2017 #100
Fico
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 974
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Him View Post
I once again ask: where can I see any of your real knowledge of the communist states?
States in ex communist states who are in EU live better than under Stalin and you can see this on internet through numbers and in my state we have 45 years of communism and I can tell you somthing about that. In short, big state ownership with poor population who have less or nothing private,they could be self-employed or having firm with max approximately 10 workers and this is all about capitalism. People in villages were unemployed,they must hard work and today they work and have more money. They can easy buy something to eat while they in past worked many hours for that. Communist forcibly with industrialization want all member of village live in town with state owned houses,fats,firms and if you said something against system,you would be unemployed,in pirson,killed,communists made strictly terrorist organization who worked outside and killed many anti-communist in our case. They were ancestors of defeated soliders in ww2 who came in anti-communist states and they had better situation than in communism.
 
Reply

Tags
putin pro-normal, russia, russian nationalism, stalin, ussr

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:06 AM.
Page generated in 0.16429 seconds.