Anatomy of the Internal Hater - Dr. William Pierce (1999)

[SmokyMtn]

From the National Alliance Members Bulletin, February 1999:

What Makes a Hater?

Christian haters and the authoritarian haters have similar thought patterns but simply express themselves differently.

[keifer]

Is there something to politics that make it more than a simple definition of what is most convenient to a person(s)?
To change a belief is to change the definition of convenience.

[SmokyMtn]

The reason I’m interested in the psychology of these people who write us hate letters is that I believe that they’re only the tip of the iceberg. For every hater who writes to us there are thousands who don’t. And I suspect that most of them are governed by the same psychological laws. If we can understand those laws we can understand what makes much of the opposition tick. Understanding how the opposition thinks doesn’t mean that we can win them over to our side, of course. We may not even want to try very hard to avoid offending them. But we have no hope of influencing them until we do understand them. If authoritarianism is indeed the underlying trait of most of the “normal” White people who oppose us, we need to understand in detail exactly what authoritarianism is, its etiology, what other traits it is correlated with, and so on. I suspect that the media Jews who design television propaganda already know these things.

It would be useful even to have a better understanding of the psychology of hate. I always have assumed that hate is a natural defense mechanism: people hate the things or people they feel threatened by. If that is so, exactly why do some of our fellow White people feel threatened by us? Specifically, what is it in the authoritarian individual’s personality that makes him feel threatened by us?

-- Dr. William Pierce

[Steven L. Akins]

Simply put, "hate" is anger over disappointment.

Hate is anger over failure on the part of others to meet our expectations.

[keifer]

"When men can hate without risk,their stupidity is easily convinced, the motives supply themselves."
Louis-Ferdinand Celine, Journey to the End of The Night

[SmokyMtn]

Originally Posted by Steven L. Akins

Simply put, "hate" is anger over disappointment.

Hate is anger over failure on the part of others to meet our expectations.

I will appreciate it if you will take your stupidity elsewhere. It is obvious that you never even read the commentary by Dr. Pierce, which we are discussing here.

Go away troll.

[Steven L. Akins]

Originally Posted by SmokyMtn

I will appreciate it if you will take your stupidity elsewhere. It is obvious that you never even read the commentary by Dr. Pierce, which we are discussing here.

Go away troll.

You bore everyone to death with your rehashing of the late, great, Dr. Pierce's ramblings.

[Rick Ronsavelle]

Specifically, what is it in the authoritarian individual’s personality that makes him feel threatened by us?

-- Dr. William Pierce


The Authoritarian Personality
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The Authoritarian Personality (TAP, published 1950) is an influential sociology book by Theodor W. Adorno, Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel Levinson, and Nevitt Sanford, researchers working at the University of California, Berkeley, during and shortly after World War II.

TAP "invented a set of criteria by which to define personality traits, ranked these traits and their intensity in any given person on what it called the 'F scale' (F for fascist)."[1] The personality type Adorno et al. identified can be defined by nine traits that were believed to cluster together as the result of childhood experiences. These traits include conventionalism, authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, anti-intellectualism, anti-intraception, superstition and stereotypy, power and "toughness", destructiveness and cynicism, projectivity, and exaggerated concerns over sex.[2][3]

Though strongly criticized for bias and methodology,[4][5] TAP was highly influential in American social sciences, particularly in the first decade after its publication: “No volume published since the war in the field of social psychology has had a greater impact on the direction of the actual empirical work being carried on in the universities today [i.e., in 1954].”[6]

Wikipedia (Links)

The_Authoritarian_Personality

[keifer]

Social sciences, meaning the theories can be explained with the language of a mathematical model dictates that behavior can be predicted like an equation.
Fundamental Attribution Error is jew science that worships the nurture "situationists" theory as to why people hate. Funamental Attribution Error is why your White children must sit at the back of the school bus.

Wikipedia (Links)

Fundamental_attribution_error

http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~dtg/Gilb...CE%20BIAS).pdf

On a side note, would it not be most entertaining that if it were possible to hear a conversation between s.l.akins and Dr Pierce.

[Steven L. Akins]

Originally Posted by keifer

Social sciences, meaning the theories can be explained with the language of a mathematical model dictates that behavior can be predicted like an equation.
Fundamental Attribution Error is jew science that worships the nurture "situationists" theory as to why people hate. Funamental Attribution Error is why your White children must sit at the back of the school bus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundame...ribution_error
http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~dtg/Gilb...CE%20BIAS).pdf

On a side note, would it not be most entertaining that if it were possible to hear a conversation between s.l.akins and Dr Pierce.

Pierce was a brilliant, well-educated man; but he lacked much needed charisma to inspire and instill his ideas in his audience.

His presentations suffer greatly from that deficiency.

Of course I suffer from the same problem myself, my public speaking abilities being on par with those of the late King George VI.

A discussion between us would be about as stimulating as watching a rerun of PBS' Firing Line talk show.

[SmokyMtn]

Originally Posted by Steven L. Akins

A discussion between us would be about as stimulating as watching a rerun of PBS' Firing Line talk show.

A discussion between you and Dr. Pierce will last two minutes before he calls Fred Streed to escort you off the property.

[Steven L. Akins]

Originally Posted by SmokyMtn

A discussion between you and Dr. Pierce will last two minutes before he calls Fred Streed to escort you off the property.

Did he receive a burial?

[Karl Lueger]

What Makes a Hater?
Christian haters and the authoritarian haters have similar thought patterns but simply express themselves differently.

some of those topics brought up here also:
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t...highlight=cult

[James Hawthorne]

Originally Posted by Steven L. Akins

You bore everyone to death with your rehashing of the late, great, Dr. Pierce's ramblings.

Dr. Pierce never "rambled" and Smokey doesn't bore any of us with putting Dr. Pierce's words online for all to be educated and awakend. It is a noble effort.

One of the great video's being made by our independent video makers of Dr. Pierce's ADV sitting on many video platforms. I noticed a comment by a young girl that stated, she only had heard of Dr. Pierce's ideas through the You Tube, through the past six months, and thanked the uploader stating, that in those six months she had learned so much.

So as Dr. Pierce joined the Life Force and ended his mortal being on this earthly plane, he still educates and awakens a new generation which we badly need on our side.

"Ramblings" no sir, Education, Elucidation and Emanation.

.

.

[Steven L. Akins]

Originally Posted by James Hawthorne

Dr. Pierce never "rambled" and Smokey doesn't bore any of us with putting Dr. Pierce's word online for all to be educated and awakend. It is a noble effort.

One of the great video's being made by our independent video makers of Dr. Pierce's ADV sitting on many video platforms. I noticed a comment by a young girl that stated, she only had heard of Dr. Pierce's ideas through the You Tube, through the past six months, and thanked the uploader stating, that in those six months she had learned so much.

So as Dr. Pierce joined the Life Force and ended his mortal being on this earthly plane, he still educates and awakens a new generation which we badly need on our side.

"Ramblings" no sir, Education, Elucidation and Emanation.

.

.

I doubt many here find Pierce to be as riveting as you make him out to be. Certainly the vast majority of the White race doesn't.

[James Hawthorne]

Originally Posted by Steven L. Akins

Did he receive a burial?

Yes, his ashes were scattered at his beloved West Virgina compound at his favorite place (view of the mountains). He used to sit and contemplate how he could do more to further awaken the idle masses.

[Yevgeny Morozov]

What or who would you suggest, as an 'alternative' if you will? I believe the lack of constructive criticism on your part has caused some friction on the forum, as of late. (Also because William Pierce just so happens to be held in high regard, including by yours truly.)

I think there have been very few men throughout history who can claim to have 'nailed it' so well, especially as far was the Jew question goes and subjects pertaining race and racialism. Whether he was or wasn't charismatic is hard to say, it's not like he has ever risen to true nation-wide notability. (Which wasn't his fault, nor something he ever had any influence on, the way I see it.)

[keifer]

Originally Posted by Steven L. Akins

Pierce was a brilliant, well-educated man; but he lacked much needed charisma to inspire and instill his ideas in his audience.

His presentations suffer greatly from that deficiency.

Of course I suffer from the same problem myself, my public speaking abilities being on par with those of the late King George VI.

A discussion between us would be about as stimulating as watching a rerun of PBS' Firing Line talk show.

Since you are so bored with Pierce, maybe what you need is a Fiddler On The Roof to get your inspiration.

Here is a book (True Believers) that has received attention on the topic(Hate) of social divisions and their quest for power.

Wikipedia (Links)

The_True_Believer

[James Hawthorne]

Originally Posted by Steven L. Akins

I doubt many here find Pierce to be as riveting as you make him out to be. Certainly the vast majority of the White race doesn't.

I would wager that 99.9% of VNN'ers would disprove that assertion. The majority of the White race haven't found Dr. Pierce yet - but they will be assured of that sir.

[Steven L. Akins]

Originally Posted by Yevgeny Morozov

What or who would you suggest, as an 'alternative' if you will? I believe the lack of constructive criticism on your part has caused some friction on the forum, as of late. (Also because William Pierce just so happens to be held in high regard, including by yours truly.)

I think there have been very few men throughout history who can claim to have 'nailed it' so well, especially as far was the Jew question goes and subjects pertaining race and racialism. Whether he was or wasn't charismatic is hard to say, it's not like he has ever risen to true nation-wide notability. (Which wasn't his fault, nor something he ever had any influence on, the way I see it.)

I have no objection to Pierce's ideas, in fact I agree with nearly everything he says; but reading him is boring, it's like reading your own thoughts on paper, nothing new or exciting is brought to the table.

Listening to him is, well, like listening to a sermon. (I always found church exceedingly dull and couldn't wait to leave when I was obligated to go as a child.)

See (or rather hear) for yourself:

William Pierce - Cowardice And Individualism (Part One) - YouTube

William Pierce - Cowardice And Individualism (Part One) - YouTube