Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old September 15th, 2017 #1
ColdFire
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Bremen ,Germany
Posts: 2,393
Default Communism explained

Still , many people out there do not seem to understand what is so wrong with Communism or why it should be opposed .. This is true even for some people in our movement who do not have such a deep understanding of politics ..

The reason I'm posting this thread in Opposing Views is so that maybe even Antis and uninformed people can give their 2 cents ....

In the following I will try to explain what is the thought behind Communism and why it should be opposed by patriots at all costs ..

I am a National Socialist ..

Even I had my phase in life where I wondered what is wrong with Communism ..

As I became more and more aware of the New World Order movement and started to dig more and more into politics I realised what the true intention behind Communism was ....

At the surface it is a movement supposedly aiming at bettering the position of the worker in society ....

But the intention behind it much darker ..


Let's examine the root of Communism ..

It did start out as an idea by Karl Max in the 19th century at a time when high capitalism ruled Europe and with time was in fact exported all across the globe ..

Marx claimed that there were ultimately two final hostile classes confronted with each other : Bourgeoisie and proletariat , the first one being comprise of the capitalists and the second one being comprised of the workers ..
In order to create a better world he claimed ( in fact he called it the ideal world .. ) that in a final revolution the workers should establish themselves as the sole ruling class through a revolution and that that would create a better world ..


So far the theory ..

But there is a darker side to Communist thought ..

Communism is an idea contrived by the NWO jews ( Marx himself was jewish .. ) in order to actually form the blueprint for a New World Order where everyone is subservient to them ..

What Marx failed to mention when he claimed that the two hostile classes where the bourgeoisie and the proletariat is that , in the background , there was ( and in fact , to this day , is ) a third power , properly called 'high finance' , a supranational cartel of mega-capitalists ..


Communism was , from the beginning , a jewish movement ....

What Communism actually aims at is that international jewish high finance use the workers , indoctrinating them with the thought that nation is the root of all evil and that it should be smashed .. They further indoctrinate them with the thought that the revolution of the workers should be international , promoting 'proletarian internationalism' ..

What all this aims at is that the national states are destroyed in order to achieve the New World Order of no borders and that EVERY competition towards international high finance is smashed by using the workers to smash national capital ..

In the end two things are achieved ..

A world with no borders and a sole capital of the New World Order jews over the rest of mankind ..

That's what Communism really aims at ..

An ideology supposedly aiming at creating a world ruled by workers really aims at destroying national borders and give the NWO jews in the background a sole capital .....

I hope every patriot knows why they should oppose it and why National Socialism is the real alternative to Capitalism ..

Just wanted to give my two cents concerning this subject and again leave this explanation open to discussion ..

Know your enemy ..



"Death to the lie"
The connection between Marxism and high finance


ColdFire
 
Old September 15th, 2017 #2
Fico
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 974
Default

I am going to put some key thesis against communism but also against national-socialism through wn point of view.

Hitler answered on communist workers with national-socialism who did not solve problem with crony capitalism because lot of state intervention is still cultural marxism and phase for communism. Members of SA were killed because they wanted final fight against german crony capitalist traitors who just formally became national-socialist while in heart they were liberals and just defended capital of them and did not have interest for german workers until fire of national-socialist ideology did not become powerfull. Liberals who became national-socialist wanted keep crony capitalism or it will be army on power who will solve problem with SA.

What is wrong with crony capitalism? He just support communism what we can see today with many crony capitalist states who are in attack by libertarians. Big form of government ownership does not matter is it communism or not redistributed wealth and can burn fire of communism.

Communism is just last form of brutal tiyranny against all productive people including workers. That is all and if you want to say something against big government while you feel like a fool who work a lot and do not have money for that,you will be killed or in pirson. I as worker study a lot communism. They see problem in savings because if you do not spend full of money per month you have self-proclaimed surplus and it must be redistributed to lot of fools and their masters who lick ass each other to top possition with big salaries who they steal from productive people mainly conservative.

Communism destroy also family. He promote feminism for example,they think that women work more when she is in house so she must get more money by government in fact she must steal money form her husband and be in top possition. Control freak people. Klassen,Stoddard speak openly against big government because white man is individual with more brain than strenght and he mus just do where he is best ie. producing and do not have some control freak under his nose. Lot of WNs are socialist and they accept cultural marxism while they can unite best white mens who are liberals and who just smile on socialist stupidity dose not matter where it come.
 
Old September 15th, 2017 #3
Mike in Denver
Enkidu
 
Mike in Denver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Under the Panopticon.
Posts: 4,297
Default

I despise marxism. Particularly the form we have in the US, today. It is called corporate capitalism. It is a perfected form of communism. Communism with the bugs worked out.

I am a National Socialist, but it really doesn't have to be explicit. I'm also a realist who worked for well more than 30 years in the "market." I paid a great deal of attention, and I'm very bright, and very, very objective. There is a truth that few know. This is it:

Even if by some miracle we rid ourselves of all mud people...and there is no hope if we don't...even in the best run of countries, if we try what is sold as honest free-market, there will not be jobs for 30% of adults. There is simply not jobs or work enough for more than 70% of adults...never has been. Before about 1930 this was handled by having nearly 70% of people living on farms. We aren't going back to that.

From the end of WWII we avoided the problem by massive public works projects. The 1956 Interstate Highway act** provided work directly and indirectly for millions of people. It was pure socialism. It lasted about 35 years. The Aerospace industry is pure socialism and from the 60s to now has employed millions. Other than pure weapons oriented industry, the aerospace industry is beginning to dry up.

Without public works...you're fucked. Even those who don't work in these industries benefit. If you're an engineer working in a pure commercial company and the salary and benefits aren't good enough, you quit and find work for an aerospace company paying well.

The truth is, without the government largess you will have 30% systemic unemployment, and as I said, that's if the muds disappear.

This was an epiphany for me about 1986. I got to thinking about the employment picture. I was making huge money at a small aerospace company, and it just hit me that I could barely think of even one person who had a job that would exist in a true free-market. That's when I estimated that maybe only half the employed adults in the US really had jobs. The rest were essentially on the dole, including me, whether they knew it or not. There is no realistic alternative to this.

The trouble is the financial class figured this out about the same time, and being insane, didn't want to continue it, though it worked extremely well. I could see the switch by 1996, or so. Very funny things started to happen. Companies were desperate for engineers and technicians, but salaries and benefits were dropping. Some "supply and demand" there. Small honest companies were folding, and huge corporations were merging into giant monopolies with no competition. With that power they started dialing salaries and benefits way down.

Without power, working people will be nothing but livestock.

National Socialism is the only system that has ever demonstrated the capacity or even the tendency to honestly support blue-collar and white-collar citizens. But we are plagued with a soon-to-be majority of muds. I don't know if there is a realistic answer.

**Based on the Autobahn that Eisenhower saw in Hitler's Germany.

Mike
__________________
Hunter S. Thompson, "Big dark, coming soon"
 
Old September 15th, 2017 #4
Fico
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 974
Default

We have big corporation owned by white people in my state (EU) and similar situation is probably in USA. You talk about 30% of unemployment. We have it yet and more of them are womens. So man can work more for family if he is not feminised. I worked 16 hours (our man ancestors worked 16 hours) one day in one state owned company,they did not respect me as worker in salary and such state owned company want to save one big corporation who employ many people with money of productive firms and workers while are better conditions in private firms where socialist state with harmony on crony capitalists do not want see in develop and employ more people. Hitler prepare people for war and situation in national-socialism will be as today without muds. Crony capitalists who would be socialists only for themselves with tyranny of government. SA members wanted smaller government what I read but just in one nation while real free market you must have in global with open borders without state intervention.

While you have big government,you have small alternatives in other firms,jobs,regulation because if you do not respect their socialism (America is socialists state,ask libertarians) you in msot of jobs can not be employed. My state have communism with 95% of state ownership,we have today less but socialist mentality still work. Marx also supporter French revolution as revolt of proletarians. In monarchy king want 10% and capitalist 10% from salary and 10% to Curch what mean that it was pure free market state and that he is enemy of democracy.

Capitalism is pure white thinking,socialism is thinking of lower whites where you must have revolt against better people from your own race. Examples as bolshevik and french revolutions. How worker can have benefit by free market? For example you can practice eugenic that workers can have less children and capitalists more because redistributed capital in family is natural with high advanced tehnology where would phisycal work replaced with brain work. Read Lothrop Stoddard who explained how big government can destroy civilization does not matter if state is white or not. For example,I met many white trash by working class (I am also worker) who have cultural marxis or communist view basically.

Workers will be always in bad possition in capitalism? Not really,capitalists became better workers who collect their "surplus" and not spend all money from salary on stupidity like bars,hookers,luxury life while you objectively have just cost (for example credit for holoday while you can collect money and invest) etc. and invested it and open firms who he gave to their children who can employ more people.Without their "surplus",socialism will fall because persons who can not create goods can not be financial experts as persons who gave their money on loan or invest for save society. If someone support big government,he support cultural marxism and smell of communism is always here because un-educated persons who do not understand economy of free market who is strictly white economy. Other races are collective and white man is the best when he is individual,it is not strange that desert jew want extreme collectivism and white man as Adam Smith,Friedrich Hayek less collectivism. You can read recognised,respected white persons who were not be wn and give more influence to wn movement. Wn movement basically requited wild working class people who give bad picture of white ideal. They can not produce nothing what mean that they do not have money what mean that they do not work enough for your white society and then white upper class see something in liberalism what is also idea by lower classes,socialism,pro-marxist against monarchism and running from immigration,white flight cowardly because they do not see for what they would give their sacrafice if working class want socialism as other non-white marxist.

Last edited by Fico; September 15th, 2017 at 11:57 AM.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:08 PM.
Page generated in 0.11050 seconds.