Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old February 13th, 2008 #1
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,453
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default Jews Retail History's Biggest Lie

Why I believe the Jews are lying about the Holocaust

Written by Andrew Winkler, The Rebel Media Group

Monday, 04 February 2008

From time to time I get asked why I believe that the Jews are lying about the Holocaust. After all, they argue, if they lied about it, it would be such a gigantic lie, that if found out, it would do incredible damage to the Jewish people. Apart from being utterly immoral, why would the Jews be so crazy to take such a huge risk?

The 10 Commandments

First of all, I would like to comment on the morality question. Jews, of course, like Christians and Muslim consider lying as one of the cardinal sins, forbidden by Moses’ 10 commandments. Where Judaism differs from Christianity and Islam though, is in its limitation of the application to those 10 commandments to fellow co-religionists. While some people argue that the Torah (Old Testimony) is still ambiguous on that matter, the Talmud – Judaism’s authoritative interpretation of the Torah - leaves no doubt: Gentiles, are not protected by the ‘Law’. The Talmud literally declares Gentiles to be non-human, but cattle in human shape, created by God for the enrichment and comfort of Jews. From the point of view of many Jews, even though they will rigorously deny that this is the case, it is no sin to deceive, defraud, exploit, enslave, prostitute, torture, kill, as long as the victim is not Jewish. This is precisely the reason why Jews historically have been dominating slave trade and usury. This is also the reason why Jews are dominating up to this day and age every vice and crime you can make money with: sex slavery, human trafficking, prostitution, drug trade, weapon trade, gambling, you name it. In other words, moral considerations are not the slightest obstacle for Jews to lie about the Holocaust.

A history of lies and deception

If it wasn’t for the Jewish control of mainstream media, it would be common knowledge that Jews are constantly lying for financial and political gains. Just a few examples:

Jews deny that Jews dominate Western media.

Jews deny that Jews dominate the financial sector.

Jews deny that Jews control the U.S. government.

Jews deny that the ‘Young Turks’ behind the Armenian genocide were in fact Jewish.

Jews deny that the vast majority of Bolsheviks were Jewish and that the Ukrainian genocide was a Jewish anti-Christian progrom.

Jews deny that the Israeli government has committed numerous false-flag attacks including the attack by the Israeli Airforce on the U.S.S. Liberty

Jews deny that there has ever been human sacrifices of Christian children as part of their Passover ritual.

Jews deny that historic events of the past 100 years follow precisely the blueprint of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, irrespective of the question whether they are genuine or forgery.

Jews deny the involvement of Israel’s Mossad in the false-flag terrorist attacks on 9/11 and 7/7.

Jews not only vigorously deny those facts, in spite of overwhelming evidence, they do everything in their power to harm or even destroy anyone daring to give them the slightest credibility.

A history of ruthless pursuit of political and financial goals

Jews have a well known history of ruthlessly pursuing their political and financial goals. Just a couple of examples:

The spreading of false rumours about a victory of Napoleon in the battle of Waterloo with the purpose of crashing the London Stock Exchange, enabling the Rothschild to buy the entire English market for less than 5% of its value.

The creation of World War I and II for the purpose of spreading communism and the creation of the Jews-only state.

The systematic use of torture, ethnic cleansing and extra-judicial killings against the Palestinian people.

The systematic use of lies and deception including false-flag terrorism.

Flimsy evidence and lack of due process

During the series of war crimes tribunals conducted in post-war Germany, it was common practice to admit hearsay evidence. Witnesses of the prosecution could not be cross-examined. Confessions of the defendants were frequently the result of torture, including the crushing of testicles, and mock trials, of threats of handing over family members to the Russians or refusing desperately needed food rations. In the most prominent case of the commander of the Auschwitz concentration camp, the confession was written in English, with no attached translation, in spite of the fact that the commander didn’t know any English.

Hundreds and thousands of nonsensical claims

The more light is thrown on the Holocaust accusations, the more obvious it becomes how ridiculous many of them are. Some of them have been debunked for decades, such as the gruesome soap and lamp shades horror stories. That doesn’t prevent the ‘Holocaust Industry’ though from continuing to spread them. Others are so obviously wrong, such as claims that 1.5 million Jews were gassed by exhaust fumes of a Russian diesel tank engine, that you have to wonder how the Jews could get away with them for 60 years. Any medical student can tell you that you have to be a severe asthma sufferer to die from diesel exhaust fumes.

What's in it for the Jews?

The answer to the question why the Jews would make up such a gigantic lie is pretty obvious. It gave them a free pass for the pursuit of their various political and financial goals. It gave them virtual immunity for their criminal activities. Most importantly it destroyed all resistance against the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine and the genocidal treatment of the Palestinian people. Yes, the Jews took an enormous risk by making up the biggest lie in human history. They must have had a lot of trust in their grip on Western governments and corporate media and their ability to cover up the obvious truth.


What amazes me most about the entire Holocaust saga is how the Jews can get away with their refusal to allow any examination of the veracity of their claims. How they can get away with doing everything in their power to silence and destroy anyone who argues that their accusations don’t make sense. In Germany, Austria and a dozen other countries revisionists get even imprisoned for questioning the Holocaust claims. Given the appalling Jewish record with regards to lies and deception and their history of ruthless pursuit of financial and political gains it’s fairly obvious who is telling the truth. That’s why I believe that the Jews are lying about the Holocaust.

Andrew Winkler is the editor/publisher of Sydney based dissident blog and founder of Jews Anonymous. He can be contacted on [email protected]. This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it You can find more of his articles in the Editorial Section of the site.
Old November 11th, 2008 #2
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mazonnawar Citadel
Posts: 775

Faurisson: The secular religion of 'the Holocaust' is a second-rate product of the consumer society
Tuesday, 19 August 2008 12:02 Robert Faurisson
Bookmark it:

The “Holocaust” religion is secular: it is part of the lay world; it is profane; in practice it makes use of the secular arm, that is, of a temporal authority wielding formidable power. It has its dogma, its commandments, its decrees, its prophets, and its high priests, as well as (as one revisionist noted) its collection of saints, including, for example, St. Anne (Frank), St. Simon (Wiesenthal), and St. Elie (Wiesel). It has its holy sites, its rituals, and its pilgrimages. It has its sacred (macabre) buildings and its relics (in the form of bars of soap, shoes, toothbrushes, …). It has its martyrs, its heroes, its miracles and those upon whom its miracles have worked (in their millions), its Golden Legend, and its righteous. Auschwitz is its Golgotha. According to it, God is called Yahweh, protector of his Chosen People, who (as explained in Psalm 120 — invoked recently by public prosecutor Anne de Fontette during a legal action brought against a French revisionist) punishes “lying lips” (punishes, bear in mind, with “sharp arrows of the mighty, with coals of juniper”). In this religion Satan is called Hitler, condemned, like Jesus in the Talmud, to boil in excrement for eternity. This religion knows neither pity, nor forgiveness, nor mercy, only the obligation of vengeance. It amasses fortunes through blackmail and extortion, and obtains unheard-of privileges. It dictates its law to nations. Its beating heart is in Jerusalem at the Yad Vashem monument, in a country torn from the inhabitants; in the shelter of a great wall eight yards high dedicated to the protection of a people who are the salt of the earth, the “Holocaust” faithful impose on the goy a law which is the purest expression of militarism, racism, and colonialism.

A new religion whose development has been amazingly rapid

Although in large part an avatar of the Hebrew religion, the new religion is very recent and of astonishingly rapid development. To a historian this phenomenon is exceptional. In most cases a religion of universal scope has its source in the remote obscurity of ages past, which renders the task of the historian of religious ideas and institutions the more arduous. But here is a case where, fortunately for this sort of historian, in the space of some 50 years (1945 — 2000), right before our eyes a new religion, that of “the Holocaust,” has suddenly come into being and developed with astonishing speed, and imposes itself more or less everywhere today. It has conquered the West and aims to impose itself on the rest of the world.

Researchers interested in the historic phenomenon that is the birth, life, and death of a religion should seize upon this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity that is before them, of studying this new religion’s birth and life close-up, then calculating its chances of surviving and the possibilities of its disappearing.

Polemologists watching for signs pointing to a coming conflagration should keep a wary eye on the risk of military crusade on which this conquering religion may lead us.

A religion wedded to the consumer society

As a general rule, consumer society places religions and ideologies in difficulty or in danger. Year by year, growth in industrial production and commercial activity instills new, very concrete needs and desires in men’s minds which distance them from the thirst for the absolute or the striving toward an ideal which are the sustenance of religions and ideologies. Furthermore, advances in the scientific spirit make men more and more skeptical of the truth of the stories and promises offered by religions and ideologies.

Paradoxically only the “Holocaust” religion thrives, reigning undivided so to speak and managing to banish from humanity those skeptics who declare openly, whom it labels “Holocaust deniers,” who call themselves “revisionists.”

In our time, certain ideas are undergoing a crisis, some even dying out: ideas of nation, of nationalism, and of race; also of communism and even of socialism. Likewise, religions of the West including Judaïsm are facing a crisis, as are (though less obviously) non-Western religions which must also face the power of the consumer society’s attraction — and the Moslem religion is no exception, whatever one might think: bazaars are attracting more crowds than mosques, and in certain oil-rich realms consumer society in its most extravagant form defies more and more insolently the rules of life decreed by Islam.

As for Roman Catholicism, it suffers from anemia; as Céline said, it has become “christianemic.” Among those Catholics to whom Benoît XVI speaks, how many are left who still believe in Mary’s virginity, Jesus’ miracles, the physical resurrection of the dead, eternal life, paradise, purgatory, and hell? Catholic churchmen’s language usually limits itself to repeating “God is love” in ever more convoluted detail. Protestant religions and the like dilute themselves with their doctrines in an infinity of sects and variants. The Jewish religion finds its adherents growing increasingly restive before an obligation to observe so many rules or weird prohibitions, and we see its adepts marrying more and more outside the religion or leaving the synagogue.

However, while Western beliefs and convictions have lost much of their substance, faith in “the Holocaust” has strengthened; it has succeeded in creating a bond (a religion, at least according to the accepted etymology, is a bond: religat religio) which makes it possible for disparate groups of communities and nations to share a common faith. One sees Christians and Jews today coöperating with equal devotion in the spread of the Holocaustian religion. One even sees many agnostics and atheists gathered with conviction under the “Holocaust” standard.

“Auschwitz” succeeds in uniting all.

We see this new religion, born in an age when the consumer society first flourished and prevailed, bears the consumer society’s mark. It has the same vigor, the same cleverness, the same inventiveness. It makes use of all the techniques of marketing and communications. The baseness of “Shoah Business” is merely a side effect of a religion which, at bottom, is itself simply a pure fabrication. From scraps of historical reality by and large commonplace in wartime — such as the internment of a large portion of European Jewry in ghettos or camps — its promoters have constructed a gigantic historical deception: that of the supposed extermination of Europe’s Jews, of camps said to have been equipped with execution gas chambers, and finally, of “six million Jewish victims.”

A religion which appears to have found the solution to the Jewish question

Through the ages Jews, generally well received at first in their host countries, ultimately provoked a phenomenon of rejection leading to their expulsion but, often enough, after leaving through one door they re-entered through another.

In several continental European nations around the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th centuries the phenomenon appeared yet again. “The Jewish question” was posed notably in Russia, Poland, Romania, Austria-Hungary, Germany, and France. Everyone, starting with the Jews themselves, set out therefore to seek “a solution” to this “Jewish question.” For Zionists, long a minority among their co-religionists, the solution could only be territorial. It was a matter of finding, agreeable to the imperial powers, some territory where Jewish colonists could settle. Such a colony might, for example, be located in Palestine, Madagascar, Uganda, South America, Siberia, … .

Poland and France envisioned the Madagascar solution, while the Soviet Union created the Jewish Autonomous Region of Birobidzhan in southeastern Siberia. As for National Socialist Germany, it envisioned studying the possibility of a Jewish territory in Palestine but ended by adopting the view, as of 1937, that such a solution was unrealistic and would expose the Palestinians to grave injustice. Thereafter the Third Reich considered the creation of a Jewish colony in part of Poland (the Nisko Jewish Territory, south of Lublin), then in 1940 it, too, looked seriously into the establishment of a colony in Madagascar (the Madagaskar Projekt).

Thereafter, driven by the exigencies of war waged on land, sea, and in the air and absorbed by the increasingly distressing preoccupations of having to save German cities from firestorms, having to safeguard the very lives of their people, having to maintain a whole continent poorly endowed with natural resources economically afloat, Chancellor Hitler, in the spring of 1942, let it be known, mainly through the intermediary of Reich Minister and Chief of the Reich Chancellery Hans-Heinrich Lammers, that he intended to “set aside the solution of the Jewish question until after the war.”

Comprising, within Germany, a population necessarily hostile to Germany at war, the Jews, at least as regards a large portion of them, had to be separated and placed in internment camps. The ablebodied were compelled to work; the rest were confined to concentration camps or transit camps.

Never did Hitler desire or authorize the massacre of Jews, and his military courts went as far as meting out the death penalty, even on Soviet territory, to those who behaved in such a way as to be guilty of excesses against Jews.

As regards the Jews, never did the German government envision anything other than “a final territorial solution of the Jewish question,” and for our establishment historians to endlessly refer to “the final solution of the Jewish question” while deliberately leaving out the all-important adjective “territorial” is incredibly dishonest. Until the war’s end Germany never stopped proposing to the Western Allies that it send them the interned Jews, but on condition that these remain in, for example, Great Britain and not invade Palestine and torment “the noble and valiant Arab people.”

What European Jews went through in that general wartime hell was nothing exceptional. Normally it would have rated but a single mention in the great book of the history of the Second World War. One is therefore justified in being amazed that today, what the Jews went through is taken to have been the essential element of the war.

After the war it was in the land of Palestine, at the Palestinians’ expense, that the exponents of the “Holocaust” religion found, or believed they found, the final territorial solution of the Jewish question.

A religion which gropes its way through salesmanship methods (R. Hilberg’s retraction)

I propose that sociologists undertake a history of this new religion by examining the highly varied sales techniques through which this “product” was created, launched, and sold during the years 1945-2000. They can measure the distance separating the often clumsy early methods from the sophistication, finally, of the packaging used by our current spin doctors (devious PR experts) in their “Holocaust” sales pitch, henceforth transformed into a kosher product of mandatory consumption.

In 1961 Raul Hilberg, the first “Holocaust” historian, “the pope” of extermination science, published the first version of his magnum opus, The Destruction of the European Jews. In it he doctorally expressed the following thesis: Hitler had given orders with a view to the organized massacre of the Jews, and all was explained on the basis of those orders.

This method of selling the merchandise was to result in a fiasco. With the revisionists requesting to see those orders, Hilberg was forced to admit they never existed.

From 1982 to 1985, under pressure from the same revisionists asking for an explanation of exactly how these magical execution gas chambers were supposed to have functioned, Hilberg was induced to review his initial sales pitch for the “Holocaust” product. In 1985, in the “revised, definitive” edition of the same work, instead of waxing assertive and sure before the reader or “buyer,” he tried to fool him with all manner of far-fetched remarks appealing to his supposed taste for the mysteries of parapsychology and the paranormal. He set forth the history of the destruction of Europe’s Jews without anywhere citing an order given, whether by Hitler or anyone else, to exterminate the Jews. He explained it all by a sort of diabolical mystery: spontaneously, German bureaucrats just set themselves the task of killing Jews down to the last man. “Countless decision-makers in a far-flung bureaucratic machine” colluded in undertaking this extermination, in consequence of [or, in accord with] a “mechanism,” and that without “a basic plan” (p. 53); these bureaucrats “created an atmosphere in which the formal written word could gradually be abandoned as a modus operandi” (p. 54); there were “basic understandings of officials resulting in decisions not requiring orders or explanations”; “it was a matter of spirit, of shared comprehension, of consonance and synchronization”; “no one agency was charged with the whole operation”; “no single organization directed or coordinated the entire process” (p.55). In short, according to R. Hilberg this concerted extermination did occur but without the possibility of demonstrating it with specific supporting documentation.

Two years previously, in February 1983, at a conference held at Avery Fischer Hall in New York City, he had put forth this strangely murky thesis the following way: “What began in 1941 was a process of destruction not planned in advance, not organized centrally by any agency. There was no blueprint and there was no budget for destructive measures. They were taken step-by-step, one step at a time. Thus came about not so much a plan being carried out, but an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus-mindreading by a far-flung bureaucracy.” This vast enterprise of destruction came about magically by telepathy and by the diabolical working of “nazi” bureaucratic genius.

One can conclude that with R. Hilberg the science of history has thus become cabalistic or religious.

Serge and Beate Klarsfeld, for their part, endeavored to involve themselves in this same pursuit of pseudo-science by citing French pharmacist Jean-Claude Pressac in support. For several years this poor man tried to sell this dubious product in pseudo-scientific form but, finally realizing it was a deception, J.-C. Pressac in 1995 did a complete about-face and admitted that, when all was said and done, the “Holocaust” claim was “rotten” and good only “for the trash bin of history,” in his own words.

For five years the news would be kept secret, not divulged until 2000 at the end of a work by Valérie Ignouet, another Shoah pedlar and author of A History of Holocaust Denial in France (Seuil, p. 652).

A religion which finally discovers up-to-date sales techniques

It was then the spin doctors entered the picture. The product having become suspect, and prospective buyers starting to ask questions, it was necessary to completely change course and no longer tout the merchandise using scientific-appearing arguments but instead to switch to a resolutely “modern” approach. The new religious proselytizers decided to drop their scarcely defensible claims to logical argument and, in place of careful research, substitute feelings and emotions, that is, art, movies, theater, the historical novel, shows, “storytelling” (a contemporary art form serving to reinforce a narrative or make a “witness account” stand out), the media circus, museum displays, public ceremonies, pilgrimages, reverence for (phony) relics and (phony) symbols (symbolic gas chambers, symbolic numbers [six million], symbolic evidence), incantations, music, and even kitsch, the whole thing accompanied by high-pressure sales methods combined with various sorts of threat.

Director Steven Spielberg, specialist in extravagant and extraterrestrial fiction, has become the great inspirer, both for films about the Holocaust and for assembling 50,000 witnesses.

To better sell their adulterated product, our phony historians (but true merchants) have arranged to instill a taste for it in children starting as young as elementary school, for it is at that tender age that appetites take root which, later, will do away with the need to persuade the buyer: he himself will want what he tasted so much in early childhood, be it sweet or toxic. Thus is he brought to the point where he boldly makes fun of history and places himself solely at the service of a particular Memory (that is, a jumble of malicious hearsay, legends, and calumnies which bring the pleasure of feeling righteous and good), and joins in the choir singing the praises of the poor Jew, curses the intrinsically depraved “nazis,” demands revenge, and spits on the graves of the vanquished.

At this point, one has only to collect a flood of hard cash and new privileges.

Pierre Vidal-Naquet was a rank amateur at it: first, in 1979, he showed himself right away to be too elementary, too crude, in his “Holocaust” promotion. For example, asked by revisionists to explain how in the world, after a gassing with cyanhydric acid (the active ingredient in the insecticide “Zyklon B”), a team of Jews (Sonderkommando) could, without suffering harm themselves, enter a chamber still full of the terrible gas to handle and remove as many as thousands of bodies all permeated with the poison, he answered, together with 33 other academics, that he was under no obligation to furnish an explanation.

As for Spielberg, who is a cleverer man, he would go on to show, in a film of fiction, a “gas chamber” where for once, “by some miracle,” out of the shower heads would come … water, not gas.

Thereafter, in his turn, P. Vidal-Naquet had very clumsily tried to respond to the revisionists on a scientific level and made himself look ridiculous.

For his part, Claude Lanzmann, in his film Shoah, had sought to produce witness accounts or confessions but came across as heavy, clumsy, and very unconvincing; at least he understood that the main thing was “making a movie” and “being there.”

Today there are no more “historians” of “the Holocaust” who attempt to prove the reality of “the Holocaust” and its magical gas chambers. They do as Saul Friedländer does in his latest work (Nazi Germany and the Jews: The Extermination Years, Seuil, 2008): they simply behave as if it all really existed. For them, history is axiomatic, notwithstanding that their axioms aren’t even spelled out. These new historians proceed with such brazenness that the stupefied reader hardly realizes the sleight-of-hand being played on him: these fraudsters comment without end on an event whose reality they haven’t even established. Thus does the buyer, thinking he’s buying a piece of genuine merchandise, really buy snake oil concocted by the same one giving him the sales pitch.

Today’s world-champion “Holocaust” hustler is a shabbat goy, Father Patrick Dubois, an outright charlatan whose various productions dedicated to “the Shoah by Bullets,” notably in the Ukraine, appear to scale the summits of Judeo-Christian publicity hype.

A Big-Power success story

A true success story in the art of salesmanship, the “Holocaust” enterprise has acquired the status of an international lobby. This lobby blends into the U.S. Jewish lobby (of which the premier organization is AIPAC) which itself fights tooth-and-nail in support of the interests of the state Israel, of which “the Holocaust” is its sword and shield. The world’s strongest nations cannot permit themselves to go against such a pressure-group network which, under a religious veneer, was at first commercial, later becoming militaro-commercial and pushing for more and more military adventures. It follows that if other nations, so-called “developing” nations, wish to enter into the good graces of those who are stronger, they would be well-advised to comply with the latters’ wishes. Without necessarily professing faith in “the Holocaust,” they will if necessary contribute to “the Holocaust’s” spread, as well as to the repression of those who question its reality.

The Chinese, for example, who in principle have nothing to do with this nonsense, keep their distance from any questioning of the concept of “the Jewish Holocaust”; this allows them to cast themselves as the “Jews” of the Japanese during the Japanese invasion of their country, and to stress that they too have been victims of genocide which, they hope, will open the door to reparations payments and political advantages for them as it has for the Jews.

A particularly mortal religion

The problem for the “Holocaust” religion lies in the fact that it is too secular. Think of the papacy which during centuries past drew its political and military force from a temporal power that, such was the cost, ended by causing its decline.

The new religion is of a common party with, at the same time, the state of Israel, the United States, the European Union, NATO, Russia, the big banks (which it forces into submission when, as seen with the Swiss banks, it shows its displeasure), international big business, and the arms-merchant lobbies. At that rate, who can assure it of a solid foundation in the future? It has weakened itself by backing, in effect, the policies of nations or groups possessed of huge appetites, whose spirit of global crusade, as seen notably in the Near and Middle East, has become adventurist.

In the past, religions have disappeared together with the empires they dominated. Religions, like civilizations, are mortal. The “Holocaust” religion is doubly mortal: it incites military crusade, hastening its own end — but it will hasten it even if, in a final outcome, the Jewish State disappears from the land of Palestine: the Jews who will then disperse themselves around the world will have only, as their ultimate expedient, the cry of “the Second Holocaust.”

References: Robert Faurisson, “La ‘Mémoire juive’ contre l’Histoire, ou l’aversion juive pour toute recherche approfondie sur la Shoah”; also, “Le prétendu ‘Holocauste’ des juifs se révèle de plus en plus dangereux”; Etudes révisionnistes, vol. 5 (595 p.), p. 61-71, 86-90; Ed. Akribeia, Route de Vourles, 69230 ST-GENIS-LAVAL, 35 euros.

Source: The Civic Platform
Old November 12th, 2008 #3
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mazonnawar Citadel
Posts: 775

Another Hackneyed Auschwitz "Revelation"!
Wednesday, 12 November 2008 18:09 Robert Faurisson
Bookmark it:
The latest issue of the German mass-circulation daily Bild announces the recent discovery of new documents on Auschwitz, writing, in particular, that one of them seems to prove the existence of a homicidal gas chamber in that camp. In Berlin, Hans-Dieter Kreikamp, head of the Federal Archives, thinks that in this "discovery" he has found the way to silence the revisionists.

In reality, there is strictly nothing new about this type of document, and the building plans of the "gas chamber" in question (Gaskammer, fully spelt out) are those of a simple "delousing facility" (Entlausungsanlage, fully spelt out as well).

Besides, a passage in the Bild article demonstrates the unease of our fraudsters. Here it is in German, followed by an English translation: "Dass in der 11,66 mal 11,20 Meter grossen "Gaskammer" nicht Kleidungsstuecke mit dem bei der SS ueblichen Blausaure-Mittel entlaust, sondern Menschen vergast werden sollten, muss als sehr wahrscheinlich angenommen werden." "It must be considered very likely that in this 11.66 by 11.20-meter "gas chamber" it was not garments that were deloused in the SS's usual way with hydrogen cyanide, but that it was human beings who must have been gassed."

The reader will have noted: "It must be considered very likely [!] that it was human beings who must have been gassed."

This passage was left out of the articles in the French or English-language press which have, so far, come to my attention and which claim to quote Bild.

I shall permit here myself to remind readers that I was the first in the world to publish the building plans for the Auschwitz crematoria supposed to have housed homicidal gas chambers; the spaces in question were actually either morgues, an air-raid shelter, or some other innocuous rooms. I discovered those drawings in 1976 in the camp archives and began publishing them with an article in the Spanish magazine Interviu (February 1979), a piece carrying a photo of me holding a sheet with crematorium plans altogether comparable to the ones now shown in Bild. In the nearly thirty years since then, I have never ceased going over the conclusions to be drawn from those plans and from a number of other elements, like the inspection of the purported crime scenes at Auschwitz, or, on the one hand, the scientific bibliography regarding delousing, disinfection or anti-infestation methods using Zyklon B and, on the other hand, the procedure for executing a condemned prisoner with hydrogen cyanide gas as followed in certain American penitentiaries. (Invented shortly after the first world war and still in use today under another name, "Cyanosil" , Zyklon B is a hydrogen cyanide-based substance). From then onwards, nearly all the revisionist researchers (Fred Leuchter, Germar Rudolf, Carlo Mattogno and many others) have made extensive use of those plans or of others still, which Bild discovers today just as someone might discover the moon or the Loch Ness monster. Indeed the anti-revisionists have also, at their end, had to publish these plans and then attempt, though in vain, to challenge the obvious significance thereof. Such was precisely the case with the French pharmacist Jean-Claude Pressac. I'll recall that he, after having deployed the formidable means put at his disposal by the Klarsfeld couple to uphold “the Holocaust†argument in general and that of the alleged homicidal Auschwitz gas chambers in particular, wound up writing that, all things considered, those arguments were fit only "for the rubbish bins of history" (Valerie Igounet, Histoire du negationnisme en France, Paris, Gallimard, 2000, p. 652).

In the end, the Bild reporter has done nothing but recycle an old rumour.

It remains to be seen whether the Jewish authorities find fault with his clumsiness or, instead, congratulate him for being so willing to help with their propaganda.

Germany’s Bild Zeitung "Proves" That Auschwitz Was An Extermination Camp
Monday, 10 November 2008 14:33 Andrew Winkler, The Rebel Media Group
Bookmark it:

Germany's biggest tabloid, BILD, famous for its daily breast baring playmates on page 3, finally fulfilled a demand that landed countless revisionist historians such as Ernst Zuendel, Germar Rudolf and Fredrick Toeben in prison: Provide "proof" that the Nazi concentration camp in Auschwitz was in fact an extermination camp. [1] Not surprisingly, the Jerusalem Post frohlocks, "The evidence provided by BILD rebuts the last of those who would deny the Holocaust." [2]

As someone who has been struggling for years to believe a government and media promoted “truth” that is so "self-evident" that contradicting it, regardless how well documented, will land you in prison or at least ruin your career, I couldn’t wait to study the "evidence" provided by BILD. Having said that, my expectations weren’t all that high. In Germany, BILD has a reputation of systematically distorting the truth, if not blatantly lying, in pursuit of its commercial and political agenda. In fact, the name of Jewish owned BILD - in the eyes of most Germans - is almost synonymous with lying media. Could this really be a genuine attempt to prove holocaust revisionists wrong?

Have a read for yourself.

BILD shows documents of horror recently discovered in Berlin
The constructions plans of Auschwitz
They are documents of horror. Accurately drawn. Locations plans, outlines and side views of buildings, all on yellowed paper, mostly on a 1:100 scale. They are the plans of the Nazi extermination camp Auschwitz

The original documents that BILD publishes on the 70th anniversary of Crystal Night on 9 November 1938, were allegedly discovered during the cleanup of a Berlin apartment. They are from the years 1941 to 1943 and were now made available for BILD.

The documents are 28 big format plans on paper. They show amongst other things the infamous entrance at the end of the railway ramp.

Prisoner barracks. The "delousing facility" with "gas chamber". A crematory and overviews of "areas of interest" of the SS.

One of the plans was personally annotated and signed by the then "Reichsführer SS“ and chief-organiser of the genocide, Heinrich Himmler, using a green pencil.

The Managing Archive Director of the Federal Archive in Berlin, Dr. Hans-Dieter Kreikamp, considers the found documents to be of "extra-orderinary" significance. Kreikamp to BILD: „The plans are authentic evidence of the planned systematic genocide of European Jewry.“

The documents also reveal that anybody involved in the planning and construction of the concentration camp knew that it was intended to gas humans on an industrial scale. The documents also rebut the very last holocaust deniers.

The most moving document of horror: the plan for a "delousing facility". Doors lead from an "undressing room" to a "wash and showerroom" and from there to a "dressing room".

The undressing room also had doors leading to two "entrance rooms" and from there to "airgates" and from there to „gas chambers“. The plan says there black on white: "gas chamber".

It must be assumed as highly likely that in the 11,66 by 11,20 meter gas chambers humans and not lice were gassed with the preferred cyanide product of the SS. The plan, drawn by a "Prisoner No. 127" in Auschwitz was from from 8 November 1941. At that point of time, camp commander Rudolf Höß was already experimenting with cyanide product "Zyklon B", murdering sick prisoners and Russian prisoners of war in the original Auschwitz camp.

Something else is notable about the plan which was commissioned by the construction management of the "Waffen-SS and Police": It documents once more that the the industrial scale mass murder of the Eurepean Jewry wasn't only decided during the so-called Wannsee conference in January 1942, but much earlier.

It is uncertain whether the "delousing facility" in Auschwitz-Birkenau were built exactly according to those plans. Certain is that the the mass gassing of European Jews in Auschwitz began in spring 1942 in a former farm, the so-called "Red House".

The camp commander Höß said on that topic during his trial, "The arriving prisoners had to undress. Initially they walked quite calmly to the rooms... until some started getting suspicious and talking about suffocation, extinction. That at once caused a panic. However they were quickly driven into the chambers and the doors locked by screws."

Höß added, "The following transports, we investigated from the beginning who were the troublemakers and kept an eye on them. If tehy were making noises, they were immediately lead behind the building and shot with a small gun that couldn't be heard from the other prisoners."

In 1942, the murdered Jews were initially burnt in trenches. Already in October the year before the building of a big crematory had been considered. In November, the first blueprints were drawn. The one available to BILD shows a first draft with side view and outlines, again on a 1:100 scale.

Especially revealing: the drawing of the basement. It shows the foundation of the crematories, that were later supplied by Erfurt company "Topf und Söhne".

On the blueprint there was a drawing of the "L.Keller“ (Leichenkeller, i.e. cellar for the dead body). It measures a width of eight meters. The Waffen-SS didn't decide on the lenght. "Length as needed", it says there.

Altogether, four big crematories were built in the extermination camp. The majority of the murdered in the Auschwitz, in total over a million people, were burnt there, after cutting off the hair and pulling out the gold teeth.

All that is left of them are the names in the death books and the warning memories.

What strikes me most about the BILD article is that it admits only to assume that the gas chamber on the blueprint were intended to kill prisoners, not de-louse prisoner uniforms, because at the time of the drawing camp commander Höß was supposedly already trialing Zyklon B on sick prisoners and Russian POW. Apart from that, BILD bases its genocide accusations on the confessions made by Auschwitz commander Höß.

If the BILD reporter had bothered reading any of the revisionist standard literature such as Artur Butz's "Hoax of the twentieth century" or Germar Rudolf's "Lectures on the holocaust", he would know that Höß's confession was written in English, a language he didn't understand, with no translation attached. In other words, Höß didn't know what he was signing. If he had done his research, the BILD reporter would also know that most, if not all confessions in the Nuremberg war crime tribunal were the result of torture and coercion.

Given those facts, I remain unconvinced that the gas chambers on above blueprints had any other purpose than desinfecting the prisoner clothes. BILD and Federal Archive Director in fact did the cause of the Holocaust promoters more harm than good. Far from giving holocaust revisionism the promised final blow, it provides further evidence that the genocide accusations made against Germany have no leg to stand on.

Old August 31st, 2009 #4
Junior Member
MrWhite's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 59
Default 66 questions and Answers about The Holohoax

1. What proof exists that the Nazis killed six million Jews?
None. All we have is postwar testimony, mostly of individual "survivors." This testimony is contradictory, and very few claim to have actually witnessed any "gassing." There are no contemporaneous documents or hard evidence: no mounds of ashes, no crematories capable of disposing of millions of corpses, no "human soap," no lamp shades made of human skin, and no credible demographic statistics.

2. What evidence exists that six million Jews were not killed by the Nazis?
Extensive forensic, demographic, analytical and comparative evidence demonstrates the impossibility of such a figure. The widely repeated "six million" figure is an irresponsible exaggeration.

3. Did Simon Wiesenthal state in writing that "there were no extermination camps on German soil"?
Yes. The famous "Nazi hunter" wrote this in Stars and Stripes, Jan. 24, 1993. He also claimed that "gassings" ofJews took place only in Poland.

4. If Dachau was in Germany, and even Wiesenthal says that it was not an extermination camp, why do many American veterans say it was an extermination camp?
After the Allies captured Dachau, many GIs and others were led through the camp and shown a building alleged to have been a "gas chamber." The mass media widely, but falsely, continues to assert that Dachau was a "gassing" camp.

5. What about Auschwitz? Is there any proof that gas chambers were used to kill people there?
No. Auschwitz, captured by the Soviets, was modified after the war, and a room was reconstructed to look like a large "gas chamber." After America�s leading expert on gas chamber construction and design, Fred Leuchter,examined this and other alleged Auschwitz gassing facilities, he stated that it was an "absurdity" to claim that they were, or could have been, used for executions.

6. If Auschwitz wasn�t a "death camp," what was its true purpose?
It was an internment center and part of a large-scale manufacturing complex. Synthetic fuel was produced there, and its inmates were used as a workforce.

7. Who set up the first concentration camps?
During the Boer War (1899-1902), the British set up what they called "concentration camps" in South Africa to hold Afrikaner women and children. Approximately 30,000 died in these hell-holes, which were as terrible as German concentration camps of World War II.

8. How did German concentration camps differ from American "relocation" camps in which Japanese-Americans were interned during WWII?
The only significant difference was that the Germans interned persons on the basis of being real or suspected security threats to the German war effort, whereas the Roosevelt administration interned persons on the basis of race alone.

9. Why did the German government intern Jews in camps?
It considered Jews a direct threat to national security. (Jews were overwhelmingly represented in Communist subversion.) However, all suspected security risks � not just Jews � were in danger of internment.

10. What hostile measure did world Jewry undertake against Germany as early as 1933?
In March 1933, international Jewish organizations declared an international boycott of German goods.

11. Did the Jews of the world "declare war on Germany"?
Yes. Newspapers around the world reported this. A front-page headline in the London Daily Express (March 24,1933), for example, announced "Judea Declares War on Germany."

12. Was this before or after the "death camp" stories began?
This was years before the "death camp" stories, which began in 1941-1942.

13. What nation is credited with being the first to practice mass civilian bombing?
Britain� on May 11, 1940.

14. How many "gas chambers" to kill people were there at Auschwitz?

15. How many Jews were living in the areas that came under German control during the war?
Fewer than six million.

16. If the Jews of Europe were not exterminated by the Nazis, what happened to them?
After the war millions of Jews were still alive in Europe. Hundreds of thousands (perhaps as many as one and a half million) had died of all causes during the war. Others had emigrated to Palestine, the United States, and other countries. Still more Jews left Europe after the war.

17. How many Jews fled or were evacuated to deep within the Soviet Union?
More than two million fled or were evacuated by the Soviets in 1941-1942. These Jews thus never came under German control.

18. How many Jews emigrated from Europe prior to the war, thus putting them outside of German reach?
Perhaps a million (not including those absorbed by the USSR).

19. If Auschwitz was not an extermination camp, why did the commandant, Rudolf Hoess, confess that it was?
He was tortured by British military police, as one of his interrogators later admitted.

20. Is there any evidence of American, British and Soviet policy to torture German prisoners in order to exact "confessions" for use at the trials at Nuremberg and elsewhere?
Yes. Torture was extensively used to produce fraudulent "evidence" for the infamous Nuremberg trials, and in other postwar "war crimes" trials.

21. How does the Holocaust story benefit Jews today?
It helps protect Jews as a group from criticism. As a kind of secular religion, it provides an emotional bond between Jews and their leaders. It is a powerful tool in Jewish money-raising campaigns, and is used to justify US aid to Israel.

22. How does it benefit the State of Israel?
It justifies the billions of dollars in "reparations" Germany has paid to Israel and many individual "survivors." It is used by the Zionist/Israeli lobby to dictate a pro-Israel American foreign policy in the Middle East, and to force American taxpayer aid to Israel, totaling billions of dollars per year.

23. How is it used by many Christian clergymen?
The Holocaust story is cited to justify the Old Testament notion of Jews as a holy and eternally persecuted "Chosen People."

24. How did it benefit the Communists?
It diverted attention from Soviet war mongering and atrocities before, during and after the Second World War.

25. How does it benefit Britain?
In much the same way it benefited the Soviet Union.

26. Is there any evidence that Hitler ordered mass extermination of Jews?

27. What kind of gas was used in German wartime concentration camps?
Hydrocyanic gas from "Zyklon B," a commercial pesticide that was widely used throughout Europe.

28. For what purpose was "Zyklon B" manufactured?
It was a pesticide used to fumigate clothing and quarters to kill typhus-bearing lice and other pests.

29. Was this product suitable for mass extermination?
No. If the Nazis had intended to use poison gas to exterminate people, far more efficient products were available. Zyklon is a slow-acting fumigation agent.

30. How long does it take to ventilate an area after fumigation with Zyklon B?
Normally about 20 hours. The whole procedure is very complicated and dangerous. Gas masks must be used, and only trained technicians are employed.

31. Auschwitz commandant Hoess said that his men would enter the "gas chambers" to remove bodies ten minutes after the victims had died. How do you explain this?
It can�t be explained because had they done so they would have suffered the same fate as the "gassing" victims.

32. Hoess said in his "confession" that his men would smoke cigarettes as they pulled bodies out of gas chambers, ten minutes after gassing. Isn�t Zyklon B explosive?
Yes. The Hoess confession is obviously false.

33. What was the exact procedure the Nazis allegedly used to exterminate Jews?
The stories range from dropping gas canisters into a crowded room from a hole in the ceiling, to piping gas through shower heads, to "steam chambers," to "electrocution" machinery. Millions are alleged to have been killed in these ways.

34. How could a mass extermination program have been kept secret from those who were scheduled to be killed?
It couldn�t have been kept secret. The fact is that there were no mass gassings. The extermination storiesoriginated as wartime atrocity propaganda.

35. If Jews scheduled for execution knew the fate in store for them, why did they go along with the Germans without resisting?
They didn�t fight back because they did not believe there was any intention to kill them.

36. About how many Jews died in the concentration camps?
Competent estimates range from about 300,000 to 500,000.

37. How did they die?
Mainly from recurring typhus epidemics that ravaged war-torn Europe during the war, as well as from starvation and lack of medical attention during the final months of the conflict, when virtually all road and rail transportation had been bombed out by the Allies.

38. What is typhus?
This disease always appears when many people are jammed together under unsanitary conditions. It is carried by lice that infest hair and clothes. Ironically, if the Germans had used more Zyklon B, more Jews might have survived the camps.

39. What is the difference if six million or 300,000 Jews died during the Second World War?

40. Some Jewish "death camp" survivors say they saw bodies being dumped into pits and burned. How much fuel would have been required for this?
A great deal more than the Germans had access to, as there was a substantial fuel shortage during the war.

41. Can bodies be burned in pits?
No. It is impossible for human bodies to be totally consumed by flames in this manner because of lack of oxygen.

42. Holocaust historians claim that the Nazis were able to cremate bodies in about ten minutes. How long does it take to incinerate one body, according to professional crematory operators?
About an hour and a half, although the larger bones require further processing afterwards.

43. Why did the German concentration camps have crematory ovens?
To dispose efficiently and sanitarily of the corpses of those who had died.

44. Given a 100 percent duty cycle of all the crematories in all the camps in German-controlled territory, what is the maximum number of corpses it would have been possible to incinerate during the entire period such crematories were in operation?
About 430,600.

45. Can a crematory oven be operated 100 percent of the time?
No. Fifty percent of the time is a generous estimate (12 hours per day). Crematory ovens have to be cleaned thoroughly and regularly when in heavy operation.

46. How much ash is left from a cremated corpse?
After the bone is all ground down, about a shoe box full.

47. If six million people had been incinerated by the Nazis, what happened to the ashes?
That remains to be "explained." Six million bodies would have produced many tons of ashes, yet there is no evidence of any large ash depositories.

48. Do Allied wartime aerial reconnaissance photos of Auschwitz (taken during the period when the "gas chambers" and crematoria were supposedly in full operation) show evidence of extermination?
No. In fact, these photographs do not even reveal a trace of the enormous amount of smoke that supposedly was constantly over the camp, nor do they show evidence of the "open pits" in which bodies were allegedly burned.

49. What was the main provision of the German "Nuremberg Laws" of 1935?
They forbid marriage and sexual relations between Germans and Jews, similar to laws existing in Israel today.

50. Were there any American precedents for the Nuremberg Laws?
Years before Hitler�s Third Reich, most states in the USA had enacted laws prohibiting marriage between personsof different races.

51. What did the International Red Cross have to report with regard to the "Holocaust" question?
An official report on the visit of an IRC delegation to Auschwitz in September 1944 pointed out that internees were permitted to receive packages, and that rumors of gas chambers could not be verified.

52. What was the role of the Vatican during the time six million Jews were allegedly being exterminated?
If there had been an extermination plan, the Vatican would most certainly have been in a position to know about it. But because there was none, the Vatican had no reason to speak out against it, and didn�t.

53. What evidence is there that Hitler knew of an on-going Jewish extermination program?

54. Did the Nazis and the Zionists collaborate?
As early as 1933, Hitler�s government signed an agreement with the Zionists permitting Jews to emigrate fromGermany to Palestine, taking large amounts of capital with them.

55. How did Anne Frank die?
After surviving internment in Auschwitz, she succumbed to typhus in the Bergen-Belsen camp, just a few weeks before the end of the war. She was not gassed.

56. Is the Anne Frank Diary genuine?
No. Evidence compiled by Dr. Robert Faurisson of France establishes that the famous diary is a literary hoax.

57. What about the familiar photographs and film footage taken in the liberated German camps showing piles of emaciated corpses? Are these faked?
Photographs can be faked, but it�s far easier merely to add a misleading caption to a photo or commentary to apiece of footage. Piles of emaciated corpses do not mean that these people were "gassed" or deliberately starved to death. Actually, these were tragic victims of raging epidemics or of starvation due to a lack of food in the camps toward the end of the war.

58. Who originated the term "genocide"?
Raphael Lemkin, a Polish Jew, in a book published in 1944.

59. Are films such as "Schindler�s List" or "The Winds of War" documentaries?
No. Such films are fictional dramatizations loosely based on history. Unfortunately, all too many people accept them as accurate historical representations.

60. How many books have been published that refute some aspect of the standard "Holocaust" story?
Dozens. More are in production.

61. What happened when the Institute for Historical Review offered $50,000 to anyone who could prove that Jews were gassed at Auschwitz?
No proof was submitted as a claim on the reward, but the Institute was sued for $17 million by former Auschwitz inmate Mel Mermelstein, who claimed that the reward offer caused him to lose sleep and his business to suffer, and represented "injurious denial of established fact."

62. What about the charge that those who question the Holocaust story are merely anti-Semitic or neo-Nazi?
This is a smear designed to draw attention away from facts and honest arguments. Scholars who refute Holocaust story claims are of all persuasions and ethnic-religious backgrounds (including Jewish). There is no correlation between "Holocaust" refutation and anti-Semitism or neo-Nazism. Increasing numbers of Jewish scholars openly admit the lack of evidence for key Holocaust claims.

63. What has happened to "revisionist" historians who have challenged the Holocaust story?
They have been subjected to smear campaigns, loss of academic positions, loss of pensions, destruction of their property and physical violence.

64. Has the Institute for Historical Review suffered any retaliation for its efforts to uphold the right of freedom of speech and academic freedom?
The IHR had been bombed three times, and was completely destroyed on July 4, 1984, in a criminal arson attack. Numerous death threats by telephone have been received. Media coverage of the IHR has been overwhelmingly hostile.

65. Why is there so little publicity for the revisionist view?
Because for political reasons the Establishment does not want any in-depth discussion about the facts surrounding the Holocaust story.

66. Where can I get more information about the "other side" of the Holocaust story, as well as facts concerning other aspects of World War II historical revisionism?
The Institute for Historical Review, P.O. Box 2739, Newport Beach, CA 92659, carries a wide variety of books, cassette and video tapes on significant historical subjects.
"Had I foreseen these results of subjugation, I would have preferred to die at Appomattox with my brave men, my sword in my right hand." - Robert E Lee
Old August 31st, 2009 #5
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Saratoga, WY
Posts: 1,710

Great compilation, but you should add sources. I've already seen the sources and these questions before but new people won't know if they're real or not.
Old August 31st, 2009 #6
Junior Member
MrWhite's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 59

Originally Posted by Justin View Post
Great compilation, but you should add sources. I've already seen the sources and these questions before but new people won't know if they're real or not.
I will. Real Tired and just cut and pasted last night. Found these the other day and they really blow open just how much of a bullshit made up story the holohoax is. We must band together and Destroy the parasites.
"Had I foreseen these results of subjugation, I would have preferred to die at Appomattox with my brave men, my sword in my right hand." - Robert E Lee
Old October 8th, 2009 #7
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,453
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

[Jews use their invented 'holocaust' as excuse for their crimes, including child rape.]

But perhaps the worst aspect of the Polanski affair is the competition of victimhoods. It is testimony to the domination of the victim culture in contemporary society that both Polanski haters and Polanski defenders, both sides in this bizarre re-enactment of the Culture War of the 1960s and its aftermath, have used the language of victimology to make their case. For many American and British commentators this is all about Samantha Gailey, whom they have transformed into the archetypal and eternally symbolic victim of the alleged great evil of our time, Child Abuse. ‘Remember: Polanski raped a child’, says a headline in Salon, in an article that provides sordid, misery-memoir-style details of what Polanski did with his penis to Gailey’s vagina and anus (9). For European observers, by contrast, Polanski’s actions can be explained by his own victimised past, especially during the Holocaust. We have to understand his ‘life tragedies’ and how they moulded him, says one filmmaker (10). Anne Applebaum [with characteristic jewish dishonesty], the American commentator who spends much of her time in Europe, says Polanski fled America in 1978 because of his ‘understandable fear of irrational punishment. Polanski’s mother died in Auschwitz. His father survived in Mauthausen. He himself survived the Krakow ghetto.’ (11) (Applebaum fails to disclose that she is married to the Polish foreign minister, Radoslaw Sikorski, who is actively campaigning against Polanski’s extradition.)
Old October 10th, 2009 #8
Proud White Guy
Hates Jews,and Non-Whites
Proud White Guy's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Southern Mexifornia
Posts: 4,205
Proud White Guy

Another jew gets a pass from whining about the holocaust.OY VEY!!!

He needs a good ass fucking like he gave Sharon Tate, and all the other goyum he has enjoyed in his life.

TheTalmud says all goyum are fair game, that pretty much says it all,typical jew.

Lets start reciprocating.
Niggers aren't human. Humans don't behave that way.

God Bless Elon Musk, Donald Trump, and America, and God Damn the anti-white, anti-christian, and anti-American jewish controlled media.
Old October 27th, 2009 #9
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,453
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

[Gallery of Jewish Holocaust Frauds/Liars/Swindlers: Irene Weisberg Zisblatt, the diamond-shitteress]
Old November 10th, 2009 #10
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,453
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

[George Lincoln Rockwell:]

In 1957 I sat down and wrote the most atrocious bunch of lies I could concoct about Nazi medical experiments. I just made them up.... I sent it into Sir! magazine, a Jewish magazine in New York and I sold it for 75 dollars. And they printed it with a whole bunch of photographs that I had never seen in my life before, which they said were photographs of the events in my Master Sergeant Lew Cor, which is Rockwell spelled backward.

[p 202-3 of "Hate: George Lincoln Rockwell & the American Nazi Party"]
Old November 11th, 2009 #11
Karl Lueger
Senior Member
Karl Lueger's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Beograd
Posts: 3,186
Karl Lueger

" Der jude ist der Dämon hinter der Korruption von mankind."

anything thats a threat to jews will be a target for ruin,
basically Western institutions, from academia to the White family,
have been infiltrated or corrupted by jews.

"You let in the jew and the jew rotted your empire,
the jew has rotted every nation he has wormed into."

"There is one thing above all of which we must always keep in mind," he tendered, "one thing of which we must always remind ourselves:
'Great masters of the lie'!
One need only forget Schopenhauer's words for an instant in order to begin slipping under the influence of their deceptions.
A Jew is only embarrassed when he inadvertently blurts out the truth.
If he should happen to deliberately tell the truth, it is always with a mental reservation, thus making a lie even of the truth."

"Indeed, Luther," I replied, "said to the Jews:
'You are not a German, but a deceiver, not a Frenchman, but a faker.' (42) His synonym for Jew was 'liar'!"

Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
[George Lincoln Rockwell:]

In 1957 I sat down and wrote the most atrocious bunch of lies I could concoct about Nazi medical experiments. I just made them up.... I sent it into Sir! magazine, a Jewish magazine in New York and I sold it for 75 dollars. And they printed it with a whole bunch of photographs that I had never seen in my life before, which they said were photographs of the events in my Master Sergeant Lew Cor, which is Rockwell spelled backward.

[p 202-3 of "Hate: George Lincoln Rockwell & the American Nazi Party"]
Nicely done Sarge..
"To survive a war, you gotta become war."

Rambo, John J.
Old November 12th, 2009 #12
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,453
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

Jerry Abbott on Red Cross documents
Old July 5th, 2012 #13
Phil Tourney
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 15
Phil Tourney

People who know me know that I've been consistent since day one about Putin and the Russians. During the WW2, the USSR could have easily handled the demonic seed of Jewry. Instead, here we have Putin, just last week, taking part in a Red Army memorial ceremony in Israel.

Yet all the Putin and Russian lovers who sit on their "Russians are fellow Aryans" mantra have temporarily clammed up, hoping that Putin's symbolic act of betrayal fades from people's memory. Up until last week, all I heard was that Putin was a Russian nationalist, a staunch Russian Orthodox Christian, anti-Zionist, etc. etc etc.

Ask yourself, would Hitler have flown to Israel for such a publicity stunt? How about George Lincoln Rockwell? How about any of our contemporary White Nationalist leaders?
Old July 5th, 2012 #14
Senior Member
confederate's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: knee deep and surrounded
Posts: 1,764

well, he did refuse to wear the jew beannie once when he went to piss on the whining wall.

Dr. William Pierce
Old July 5th, 2012 #15
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,896

Originally Posted by confederate View Post
well, he did refuse to wear the jew beannie once when he went to piss on the whining wall.
Old January 29th, 2013 #16
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,453
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

muslims know 'the holocaust' is a Big Lie
Old June 10th, 2017 #17
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,083
jewsign US Holohoax Museum To “Only” Get $54 Million In Taxpayers’ Money

June 10 2017

Jewish pressure groups are outraged that the US Holocaust Museum in Washington DC has been slated to get “only” $54 million in taxpayers’ money in 2018—instead of the $57 million it currently gets.

The proposed budget cut is contained in President Donald Trump’s Fiscal Year 2018 budget proposal called “A New Foundation for American Greatness.”

The White House budget blueprint says that the specific cut “will assist in meeting the President’s budget objectives, while still providing adequate funds to cover pay increases and rising costs for current services for the Museum’s facilities and collections. The decrease is achieved by reductions in staff and selected non-pay areas.”

No less than 64 members of Congress sent a letter to the president last week demanding the budget proposal be amended to maintain the museum’s current funding levels, while the Anti-Defamation League chief Jonathan Greenblatt issued a statement calling the cuts “a mistake.”

“In our view, the mission of the museum has never been more important, particularly as the number of anti-Semitic attacks around the world rises,” the Congressional letter said.

In reality, almost all of the “increased anti-Semitic attacks” around the world to which they refer have been shown to have originated in Israel. Most of the bomb threats have been found to be the work of an 18-year-old Jew in Ashkelon, south Israel, who was paid more than $250,000 in bitcoins by his “anonymous employers” for his work in making the threats and “inciting anti-Semitism.”
Greenblatt said in his statement that the “uptick in anti-Semitism and other hate crimes necessitated a ‘robust and active’ museum.”

“As the events of the past few months have shown, we need a robust and active US Holocaust Memorial Museum more than ever and it would be a mistake to cut funding to the museum,” Greenblatt said.

“In these divided times, with increasing numbers of hate crimes against Jews and other religious minorities, this museum’s mission is as critical as ever. We call on Congress to fully fund the Holocaust Museum.”

Last edited by littlefieldjohn; June 11th, 2017 at 05:40 PM.
Old June 14th, 2017 #18
Emily Jane
Junior Member
Emily Jane's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: New England
Posts: 49
Emily Jane

"Jewish pressure groups are outraged that the US Holocaust Museum in Washington DC has been slated to get “only” $54 million in taxpayers’ money in 2018—instead of the $57 million it currently gets."
So the kikes get billions in US taxpayer dollars every year -- not even counting interest on the national debt and all the other money their usury gets them -- and they're whining about $3 million less? From a bankrupt government, no less?
Old September 24th, 2017 #19
Erik T. White
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: The Deep South of the USSA
Posts: 4,113
Erik T. White

I'm not an architect: therefore I defer to those who have knowledge of the construction and design of the "death camps." However, I have seen several publications that state that the HCN gas was cleared, and the exhaust fumes passed through the heat of the "crematoriums."

I do feel well qualified in chemistry, however, B. S. in Chemistry, B. S. Chemical Engineering. I submit the following for examination:

CHEMICAL DANGERS: ◦Hydrogen cyanide (AC) is unstable with heat, alkaline materials, and water.
◦Hydrogen cyanide (AC) reacts with amines, oxidants, acids, sodium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, caustic substances, and ammonia.
◦Hydrogen cyanide (AC) may polymerize at 122°F to 140°F (50°C to 60°C); polymerization can occur violently in the presence of heat, alkaline materials, or moisture.

•EXPLOSION HAZARDS: ◦Hydrogen cyanide (AC) gas mixes well with air, and explosive mixtures are easily formed.
◦Confined polymerization can cause container failure and a violent explosion.
◦Hydrogen cyanide (AC) can decompose explosively on contact with alkaline materials.
◦Explosive potential is severe when hydrogen cyanide (AC) is exposed to heat or flame or to alkaline agents.
◦Lower explosive (flammable) limit in air (LEL), 5.6%; upper explosive (flammable) limit in air (UEL), 40%.
◦The agent or its vapors present a vapor explosion and poison (toxic) hazard indoors, outdoors, or in sewers.
◦Run-off to sewers may create an explosion hazard.
◦Containers may explode when heated.
◦Ruptured cylinders may rocket.
Read more at:

IMHO the CDC has better chemists than I am, and their data is well documented.



Whites are afraid to speak out against their enemies, let alone act out. This must change ~ Alex Linder
Sweat saves blood, blood saves lives, but brains saves both. ~ Erwin Rommel
Old September 24th, 2017 #20
Senior Member
Gladiatrix's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: In a dystopian nightmare
Posts: 2,274



Display Modes

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 PM.
Page generated in 0.22351 seconds.