|February 13th, 2008||#1|
Jews Retail History's Biggest Lie
Why I believe the Jews are lying about the Holocaust
Written by Andrew Winkler, The Rebel Media Group
Monday, 04 February 2008
From time to time I get asked why I believe that the Jews are lying about the Holocaust. After all, they argue, if they lied about it, it would be such a gigantic lie, that if found out, it would do incredible damage to the Jewish people. Apart from being utterly immoral, why would the Jews be so crazy to take such a huge risk?
The 10 Commandments
First of all, I would like to comment on the morality question. Jews, of course, like Christians and Muslim consider lying as one of the cardinal sins, forbidden by Moses’ 10 commandments. Where Judaism differs from Christianity and Islam though, is in its limitation of the application to those 10 commandments to fellow co-religionists. While some people argue that the Torah (Old Testimony) is still ambiguous on that matter, the Talmud – Judaism’s authoritative interpretation of the Torah - leaves no doubt: Gentiles, are not protected by the ‘Law’. The Talmud literally declares Gentiles to be non-human, but cattle in human shape, created by God for the enrichment and comfort of Jews. From the point of view of many Jews, even though they will rigorously deny that this is the case, it is no sin to deceive, defraud, exploit, enslave, prostitute, torture, kill, as long as the victim is not Jewish. This is precisely the reason why Jews historically have been dominating slave trade and usury. This is also the reason why Jews are dominating up to this day and age every vice and crime you can make money with: sex slavery, human trafficking, prostitution, drug trade, weapon trade, gambling, you name it. In other words, moral considerations are not the slightest obstacle for Jews to lie about the Holocaust.
A history of lies and deception
If it wasn’t for the Jewish control of mainstream media, it would be common knowledge that Jews are constantly lying for financial and political gains. Just a few examples:
Jews deny that Jews dominate Western media.
Jews deny that Jews dominate the financial sector.
Jews deny that Jews control the U.S. government.
Jews deny that the ‘Young Turks’ behind the Armenian genocide were in fact Jewish.
Jews deny that the vast majority of Bolsheviks were Jewish and that the Ukrainian genocide was a Jewish anti-Christian progrom.
Jews deny that the Israeli government has committed numerous false-flag attacks including the attack by the Israeli Airforce on the U.S.S. Liberty
Jews deny that there has ever been human sacrifices of Christian children as part of their Passover ritual.
Jews deny that historic events of the past 100 years follow precisely the blueprint of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, irrespective of the question whether they are genuine or forgery.
Jews deny the involvement of Israel’s Mossad in the false-flag terrorist attacks on 9/11 and 7/7.
Jews not only vigorously deny those facts, in spite of overwhelming evidence, they do everything in their power to harm or even destroy anyone daring to give them the slightest credibility.
A history of ruthless pursuit of political and financial goals
Jews have a well known history of ruthlessly pursuing their political and financial goals. Just a couple of examples:
The spreading of false rumours about a victory of Napoleon in the battle of Waterloo with the purpose of crashing the London Stock Exchange, enabling the Rothschild to buy the entire English market for less than 5% of its value.
The creation of World War I and II for the purpose of spreading communism and the creation of the Jews-only state.
The systematic use of torture, ethnic cleansing and extra-judicial killings against the Palestinian people.
The systematic use of lies and deception including false-flag terrorism.
Flimsy evidence and lack of due process
During the series of war crimes tribunals conducted in post-war Germany, it was common practice to admit hearsay evidence. Witnesses of the prosecution could not be cross-examined. Confessions of the defendants were frequently the result of torture, including the crushing of testicles, and mock trials, of threats of handing over family members to the Russians or refusing desperately needed food rations. In the most prominent case of the commander of the Auschwitz concentration camp, the confession was written in English, with no attached translation, in spite of the fact that the commander didn’t know any English.
Hundreds and thousands of nonsensical claims
The more light is thrown on the Holocaust accusations, the more obvious it becomes how ridiculous many of them are. Some of them have been debunked for decades, such as the gruesome soap and lamp shades horror stories. That doesn’t prevent the ‘Holocaust Industry’ though from continuing to spread them. Others are so obviously wrong, such as claims that 1.5 million Jews were gassed by exhaust fumes of a Russian diesel tank engine, that you have to wonder how the Jews could get away with them for 60 years. Any medical student can tell you that you have to be a severe asthma sufferer to die from diesel exhaust fumes.
What's in it for the Jews?
The answer to the question why the Jews would make up such a gigantic lie is pretty obvious. It gave them a free pass for the pursuit of their various political and financial goals. It gave them virtual immunity for their criminal activities. Most importantly it destroyed all resistance against the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine and the genocidal treatment of the Palestinian people. Yes, the Jews took an enormous risk by making up the biggest lie in human history. They must have had a lot of trust in their grip on Western governments and corporate media and their ability to cover up the obvious truth.
What amazes me most about the entire Holocaust saga is how the Jews can get away with their refusal to allow any examination of the veracity of their claims. How they can get away with doing everything in their power to silence and destroy anyone who argues that their accusations don’t make sense. In Germany, Austria and a dozen other countries revisionists get even imprisoned for questioning the Holocaust claims. Given the appalling Jewish record with regards to lies and deception and their history of ruthless pursuit of financial and political gains it’s fairly obvious who is telling the truth. That’s why I believe that the Jews are lying about the Holocaust.
|November 11th, 2008||#2|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mazonnawar Citadel
|November 12th, 2008||#3|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mazonnawar Citadel
Another Hackneyed Auschwitz "Revelation"!
Wednesday, 12 November 2008 18:09 Robert Faurisson
The latest issue of the German mass-circulation daily Bild announces the recent discovery of new documents on Auschwitz, writing, in particular, that one of them seems to prove the existence of a homicidal gas chamber in that camp. In Berlin, Hans-Dieter Kreikamp, head of the Federal Archives, thinks that in this "discovery" he has found the way to silence the revisionists.
In reality, there is strictly nothing new about this type of document, and the building plans of the "gas chamber" in question (Gaskammer, fully spelt out) are those of a simple "delousing facility" (Entlausungsanlage, fully spelt out as well).
Besides, a passage in the Bild article demonstrates the unease of our fraudsters. Here it is in German, followed by an English translation: "Dass in der 11,66 mal 11,20 Meter grossen "Gaskammer" nicht Kleidungsstuecke mit dem bei der SS ueblichen Blausaure-Mittel entlaust, sondern Menschen vergast werden sollten, muss als sehr wahrscheinlich angenommen werden." "It must be considered very likely that in this 11.66 by 11.20-meter "gas chamber" it was not garments that were deloused in the SS's usual way with hydrogen cyanide, but that it was human beings who must have been gassed."
The reader will have noted: "It must be considered very likely [!] that it was human beings who must have been gassed."
This passage was left out of the articles in the French or English-language press which have, so far, come to my attention and which claim to quote Bild.
I shall permit here myself to remind readers that I was the first in the world to publish the building plans for the Auschwitz crematoria supposed to have housed homicidal gas chambers; the spaces in question were actually either morgues, an air-raid shelter, or some other innocuous rooms. I discovered those drawings in 1976 in the camp archives and began publishing them with an article in the Spanish magazine Interviu (February 1979), a piece carrying a photo of me holding a sheet with crematorium plans altogether comparable to the ones now shown in Bild. In the nearly thirty years since then, I have never ceased going over the conclusions to be drawn from those plans and from a number of other elements, like the inspection of the purported crime scenes at Auschwitz, or, on the one hand, the scientific bibliography regarding delousing, disinfection or anti-infestation methods using Zyklon B and, on the other hand, the procedure for executing a condemned prisoner with hydrogen cyanide gas as followed in certain American penitentiaries. (Invented shortly after the first world war and still in use today under another name, "Cyanosil" , Zyklon B is a hydrogen cyanide-based substance). From then onwards, nearly all the revisionist researchers (Fred Leuchter, Germar Rudolf, Carlo Mattogno and many others) have made extensive use of those plans or of others still, which Bild discovers today just as someone might discover the moon or the Loch Ness monster. Indeed the anti-revisionists have also, at their end, had to publish these plans and then attempt, though in vain, to challenge the obvious significance thereof. Such was precisely the case with the French pharmacist Jean-Claude Pressac. I'll recall that he, after having deployed the formidable means put at his disposal by the Klarsfeld couple to uphold â€œthe Holocaustâ€ argument in general and that of the alleged homicidal Auschwitz gas chambers in particular, wound up writing that, all things considered, those arguments were fit only "for the rubbish bins of history" (Valerie Igounet, Histoire du negationnisme en France, Paris, Gallimard, 2000, p. 652).
In the end, the Bild reporter has done nothing but recycle an old rumour.
It remains to be seen whether the Jewish authorities find fault with his clumsiness or, instead, congratulate him for being so willing to help with their propaganda.
|August 31st, 2009||#4|
Join Date: Aug 2009
66 questions and Answers about The Holohoax
1. What proof exists that the Nazis killed six million Jews?
None. All we have is postwar testimony, mostly of individual "survivors." This testimony is contradictory, and very few claim to have actually witnessed any "gassing." There are no contemporaneous documents or hard evidence: no mounds of ashes, no crematories capable of disposing of millions of corpses, no "human soap," no lamp shades made of human skin, and no credible demographic statistics.
2. What evidence exists that six million Jews were not killed by the Nazis?
Extensive forensic, demographic, analytical and comparative evidence demonstrates the impossibility of such a figure. The widely repeated "six million" figure is an irresponsible exaggeration.
3. Did Simon Wiesenthal state in writing that "there were no extermination camps on German soil"?
Yes. The famous "Nazi hunter" wrote this in Stars and Stripes, Jan. 24, 1993. He also claimed that "gassings" ofJews took place only in Poland.
4. If Dachau was in Germany, and even Wiesenthal says that it was not an extermination camp, why do many American veterans say it was an extermination camp?
After the Allies captured Dachau, many GIs and others were led through the camp and shown a building alleged to have been a "gas chamber." The mass media widely, but falsely, continues to assert that Dachau was a "gassing" camp.
5. What about Auschwitz? Is there any proof that gas chambers were used to kill people there?
No. Auschwitz, captured by the Soviets, was modified after the war, and a room was reconstructed to look like a large "gas chamber." After America�s leading expert on gas chamber construction and design, Fred Leuchter,examined this and other alleged Auschwitz gassing facilities, he stated that it was an "absurdity" to claim that they were, or could have been, used for executions.
6. If Auschwitz wasn�t a "death camp," what was its true purpose?
It was an internment center and part of a large-scale manufacturing complex. Synthetic fuel was produced there, and its inmates were used as a workforce.
7. Who set up the first concentration camps?
During the Boer War (1899-1902), the British set up what they called "concentration camps" in South Africa to hold Afrikaner women and children. Approximately 30,000 died in these hell-holes, which were as terrible as German concentration camps of World War II.
8. How did German concentration camps differ from American "relocation" camps in which Japanese-Americans were interned during WWII?
The only significant difference was that the Germans interned persons on the basis of being real or suspected security threats to the German war effort, whereas the Roosevelt administration interned persons on the basis of race alone.
9. Why did the German government intern Jews in camps?
It considered Jews a direct threat to national security. (Jews were overwhelmingly represented in Communist subversion.) However, all suspected security risks � not just Jews � were in danger of internment.
10. What hostile measure did world Jewry undertake against Germany as early as 1933?
In March 1933, international Jewish organizations declared an international boycott of German goods.
11. Did the Jews of the world "declare war on Germany"?
Yes. Newspapers around the world reported this. A front-page headline in the London Daily Express (March 24,1933), for example, announced "Judea Declares War on Germany."
12. Was this before or after the "death camp" stories began?
This was years before the "death camp" stories, which began in 1941-1942.
13. What nation is credited with being the first to practice mass civilian bombing?
Britain� on May 11, 1940.
14. How many "gas chambers" to kill people were there at Auschwitz?
15. How many Jews were living in the areas that came under German control during the war?
Fewer than six million.
16. If the Jews of Europe were not exterminated by the Nazis, what happened to them?
After the war millions of Jews were still alive in Europe. Hundreds of thousands (perhaps as many as one and a half million) had died of all causes during the war. Others had emigrated to Palestine, the United States, and other countries. Still more Jews left Europe after the war.
17. How many Jews fled or were evacuated to deep within the Soviet Union?
More than two million fled or were evacuated by the Soviets in 1941-1942. These Jews thus never came under German control.
18. How many Jews emigrated from Europe prior to the war, thus putting them outside of German reach?
Perhaps a million (not including those absorbed by the USSR).
19. If Auschwitz was not an extermination camp, why did the commandant, Rudolf Hoess, confess that it was?
He was tortured by British military police, as one of his interrogators later admitted.
20. Is there any evidence of American, British and Soviet policy to torture German prisoners in order to exact "confessions" for use at the trials at Nuremberg and elsewhere?
Yes. Torture was extensively used to produce fraudulent "evidence" for the infamous Nuremberg trials, and in other postwar "war crimes" trials.
21. How does the Holocaust story benefit Jews today?
It helps protect Jews as a group from criticism. As a kind of secular religion, it provides an emotional bond between Jews and their leaders. It is a powerful tool in Jewish money-raising campaigns, and is used to justify US aid to Israel.
22. How does it benefit the State of Israel?
It justifies the billions of dollars in "reparations" Germany has paid to Israel and many individual "survivors." It is used by the Zionist/Israeli lobby to dictate a pro-Israel American foreign policy in the Middle East, and to force American taxpayer aid to Israel, totaling billions of dollars per year.
23. How is it used by many Christian clergymen?
The Holocaust story is cited to justify the Old Testament notion of Jews as a holy and eternally persecuted "Chosen People."
24. How did it benefit the Communists?
It diverted attention from Soviet war mongering and atrocities before, during and after the Second World War.
25. How does it benefit Britain?
In much the same way it benefited the Soviet Union.
26. Is there any evidence that Hitler ordered mass extermination of Jews?
27. What kind of gas was used in German wartime concentration camps?
Hydrocyanic gas from "Zyklon B," a commercial pesticide that was widely used throughout Europe.
28. For what purpose was "Zyklon B" manufactured?
It was a pesticide used to fumigate clothing and quarters to kill typhus-bearing lice and other pests.
29. Was this product suitable for mass extermination?
No. If the Nazis had intended to use poison gas to exterminate people, far more efficient products were available. Zyklon is a slow-acting fumigation agent.
30. How long does it take to ventilate an area after fumigation with Zyklon B?
Normally about 20 hours. The whole procedure is very complicated and dangerous. Gas masks must be used, and only trained technicians are employed.
31. Auschwitz commandant Hoess said that his men would enter the "gas chambers" to remove bodies ten minutes after the victims had died. How do you explain this?
It can�t be explained because had they done so they would have suffered the same fate as the "gassing" victims.
32. Hoess said in his "confession" that his men would smoke cigarettes as they pulled bodies out of gas chambers, ten minutes after gassing. Isn�t Zyklon B explosive?
Yes. The Hoess confession is obviously false.
33. What was the exact procedure the Nazis allegedly used to exterminate Jews?
The stories range from dropping gas canisters into a crowded room from a hole in the ceiling, to piping gas through shower heads, to "steam chambers," to "electrocution" machinery. Millions are alleged to have been killed in these ways.
34. How could a mass extermination program have been kept secret from those who were scheduled to be killed?
It couldn�t have been kept secret. The fact is that there were no mass gassings. The extermination storiesoriginated as wartime atrocity propaganda.
35. If Jews scheduled for execution knew the fate in store for them, why did they go along with the Germans without resisting?
They didn�t fight back because they did not believe there was any intention to kill them.
36. About how many Jews died in the concentration camps?
Competent estimates range from about 300,000 to 500,000.
37. How did they die?
Mainly from recurring typhus epidemics that ravaged war-torn Europe during the war, as well as from starvation and lack of medical attention during the final months of the conflict, when virtually all road and rail transportation had been bombed out by the Allies.
38. What is typhus?
This disease always appears when many people are jammed together under unsanitary conditions. It is carried by lice that infest hair and clothes. Ironically, if the Germans had used more Zyklon B, more Jews might have survived the camps.
39. What is the difference if six million or 300,000 Jews died during the Second World War?
40. Some Jewish "death camp" survivors say they saw bodies being dumped into pits and burned. How much fuel would have been required for this?
A great deal more than the Germans had access to, as there was a substantial fuel shortage during the war.
41. Can bodies be burned in pits?
No. It is impossible for human bodies to be totally consumed by flames in this manner because of lack of oxygen.
42. Holocaust historians claim that the Nazis were able to cremate bodies in about ten minutes. How long does it take to incinerate one body, according to professional crematory operators?
About an hour and a half, although the larger bones require further processing afterwards.
43. Why did the German concentration camps have crematory ovens?
To dispose efficiently and sanitarily of the corpses of those who had died.
44. Given a 100 percent duty cycle of all the crematories in all the camps in German-controlled territory, what is the maximum number of corpses it would have been possible to incinerate during the entire period such crematories were in operation?
45. Can a crematory oven be operated 100 percent of the time?
No. Fifty percent of the time is a generous estimate (12 hours per day). Crematory ovens have to be cleaned thoroughly and regularly when in heavy operation.
46. How much ash is left from a cremated corpse?
After the bone is all ground down, about a shoe box full.
47. If six million people had been incinerated by the Nazis, what happened to the ashes?
That remains to be "explained." Six million bodies would have produced many tons of ashes, yet there is no evidence of any large ash depositories.
48. Do Allied wartime aerial reconnaissance photos of Auschwitz (taken during the period when the "gas chambers" and crematoria were supposedly in full operation) show evidence of extermination?
No. In fact, these photographs do not even reveal a trace of the enormous amount of smoke that supposedly was constantly over the camp, nor do they show evidence of the "open pits" in which bodies were allegedly burned.
49. What was the main provision of the German "Nuremberg Laws" of 1935?
They forbid marriage and sexual relations between Germans and Jews, similar to laws existing in Israel today.
50. Were there any American precedents for the Nuremberg Laws?
Years before Hitler�s Third Reich, most states in the USA had enacted laws prohibiting marriage between personsof different races.
51. What did the International Red Cross have to report with regard to the "Holocaust" question?
An official report on the visit of an IRC delegation to Auschwitz in September 1944 pointed out that internees were permitted to receive packages, and that rumors of gas chambers could not be verified.
52. What was the role of the Vatican during the time six million Jews were allegedly being exterminated?
If there had been an extermination plan, the Vatican would most certainly have been in a position to know about it. But because there was none, the Vatican had no reason to speak out against it, and didn�t.
53. What evidence is there that Hitler knew of an on-going Jewish extermination program?
54. Did the Nazis and the Zionists collaborate?
As early as 1933, Hitler�s government signed an agreement with the Zionists permitting Jews to emigrate fromGermany to Palestine, taking large amounts of capital with them.
55. How did Anne Frank die?
After surviving internment in Auschwitz, she succumbed to typhus in the Bergen-Belsen camp, just a few weeks before the end of the war. She was not gassed.
56. Is the Anne Frank Diary genuine?
No. Evidence compiled by Dr. Robert Faurisson of France establishes that the famous diary is a literary hoax.
57. What about the familiar photographs and film footage taken in the liberated German camps showing piles of emaciated corpses? Are these faked?
Photographs can be faked, but it�s far easier merely to add a misleading caption to a photo or commentary to apiece of footage. Piles of emaciated corpses do not mean that these people were "gassed" or deliberately starved to death. Actually, these were tragic victims of raging epidemics or of starvation due to a lack of food in the camps toward the end of the war.
58. Who originated the term "genocide"?
Raphael Lemkin, a Polish Jew, in a book published in 1944.
59. Are films such as "Schindler�s List" or "The Winds of War" documentaries?
No. Such films are fictional dramatizations loosely based on history. Unfortunately, all too many people accept them as accurate historical representations.
60. How many books have been published that refute some aspect of the standard "Holocaust" story?
Dozens. More are in production.
61. What happened when the Institute for Historical Review offered $50,000 to anyone who could prove that Jews were gassed at Auschwitz?
No proof was submitted as a claim on the reward, but the Institute was sued for $17 million by former Auschwitz inmate Mel Mermelstein, who claimed that the reward offer caused him to lose sleep and his business to suffer, and represented "injurious denial of established fact."
62. What about the charge that those who question the Holocaust story are merely anti-Semitic or neo-Nazi?
This is a smear designed to draw attention away from facts and honest arguments. Scholars who refute Holocaust story claims are of all persuasions and ethnic-religious backgrounds (including Jewish). There is no correlation between "Holocaust" refutation and anti-Semitism or neo-Nazism. Increasing numbers of Jewish scholars openly admit the lack of evidence for key Holocaust claims.
63. What has happened to "revisionist" historians who have challenged the Holocaust story?
They have been subjected to smear campaigns, loss of academic positions, loss of pensions, destruction of their property and physical violence.
64. Has the Institute for Historical Review suffered any retaliation for its efforts to uphold the right of freedom of speech and academic freedom?
The IHR had been bombed three times, and was completely destroyed on July 4, 1984, in a criminal arson attack. Numerous death threats by telephone have been received. Media coverage of the IHR has been overwhelmingly hostile.
65. Why is there so little publicity for the revisionist view?
Because for political reasons the Establishment does not want any in-depth discussion about the facts surrounding the Holocaust story.
66. Where can I get more information about the "other side" of the Holocaust story, as well as facts concerning other aspects of World War II historical revisionism?
The Institute for Historical Review, P.O. Box 2739, Newport Beach, CA 92659, carries a wide variety of books, cassette and video tapes on significant historical subjects.
"Had I foreseen these results of subjugation, I would have preferred to die at Appomattox with my brave men, my sword in my right hand." - Robert E Lee
|August 31st, 2009||#5|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Saratoga, WY
Great compilation, but you should add sources. I've already seen the sources and these questions before but new people won't know if they're real or not.
|August 31st, 2009||#6|
Join Date: Aug 2009
"Had I foreseen these results of subjugation, I would have preferred to die at Appomattox with my brave men, my sword in my right hand." - Robert E Lee
|October 8th, 2009||#7|
[Jews use their invented 'holocaust' as excuse for their crimes, including child rape.]
But perhaps the worst aspect of the Polanski affair is the competition of victimhoods. It is testimony to the domination of the victim culture in contemporary society that both Polanski haters and Polanski defenders, both sides in this bizarre re-enactment of the Culture War of the 1960s and its aftermath, have used the language of victimology to make their case. For many American and British commentators this is all about Samantha Gailey, whom they have transformed into the archetypal and eternally symbolic victim of the alleged great evil of our time, Child Abuse. ‘Remember: Polanski raped a child’, says a headline in Salon, in an article that provides sordid, misery-memoir-style details of what Polanski did with his penis to Gailey’s vagina and anus (9). For European observers, by contrast, Polanski’s actions can be explained by his own victimised past, especially during the Holocaust. We have to understand his ‘life tragedies’ and how they moulded him, says one filmmaker (10). Anne Applebaum [with characteristic jewish dishonesty], the American commentator who spends much of her time in Europe, says Polanski fled America in 1978 because of his ‘understandable fear of irrational punishment. Polanski’s mother died in Auschwitz. His father survived in Mauthausen. He himself survived the Krakow ghetto.’ (11) (Applebaum fails to disclose that she is married to the Polish foreign minister, Radoslaw Sikorski, who is actively campaigning against Polanski’s extradition.)
|October 10th, 2009||#8|
Hates Jews,and Non-Whites
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Southern Mexifornia
Another jew gets a pass from whining about the holocaust.OY VEY!!!
He needs a good ass fucking like he gave Sharon Tate, and all the other goyum he has enjoyed in his life.
TheTalmud says all goyum are fair game, that pretty much says it all,typical jew.
Lets start reciprocating.
Niggers aren't human. Humans don't behave that way.
"Remember my children, that all the Earth must belong to us, Jews, and that the Gentiles being mere excrements of animals, must possess nothing".
|November 10th, 2009||#10|
[George Lincoln Rockwell:]
In 1957 I sat down and wrote the most atrocious bunch of lies I could concoct about Nazi medical experiments. I just made them up.... I sent it into Sir! magazine, a Jewish magazine in New York and I sold it for 75 dollars. And they printed it with a whole bunch of photographs that I had never seen in my life before, which they said were photographs of the events in my story...by Master Sergeant Lew Cor, which is Rockwell spelled backward.
[p 202-3 of "Hate: George Lincoln Rockwell & the American Nazi Party"]
|November 11th, 2009||#11|
Join Date: Nov 2007
" Der jude ist der Dämon hinter der Korruption von mankind."
anything thats a threat to jews will be a target for ruin,
basically Western institutions, from academia to the White family,
have been infiltrated or corrupted by jews.
"You let in the jew and the jew rotted your empire,
the jew has rotted every nation he has wormed into."
"There is one thing above all of which we must always keep in mind," he tendered, "one thing of which we must always remind ourselves:
'Great masters of the lie'!
One need only forget Schopenhauer's words for an instant in order to begin slipping under the influence of their deceptions.
A Jew is only embarrassed when he inadvertently blurts out the truth.
If he should happen to deliberately tell the truth, it is always with a mental reservation, thus making a lie even of the truth."
"Indeed, Luther," I replied, "said to the Jews:
'You are not a German, but a deceiver, not a Frenchman, but a faker.' (42) His synonym for Jew was 'liar'!"
"To survive a war, you gotta become war."
Rambo, John J.
|July 5th, 2012||#13|
Join Date: May 2012
People who know me know that I've been consistent since day one about Putin and the Russians. During the WW2, the USSR could have easily handled the demonic seed of Jewry. Instead, here we have Putin, just last week, taking part in a Red Army memorial ceremony in Israel.
Yet all the Putin and Russian lovers who sit on their "Russians are fellow Aryans" mantra have temporarily clammed up, hoping that Putin's symbolic act of betrayal fades from people's memory. Up until last week, all I heard was that Putin was a Russian nationalist, a staunch Russian Orthodox Christian, anti-Zionist, etc. etc etc.
Ask yourself, would Hitler have flown to Israel for such a publicity stunt? How about George Lincoln Rockwell? How about any of our contemporary White Nationalist leaders?
|July 5th, 2012||#14|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: knee deep and surrounded
well, he did refuse to wear the jew beannie once when he went to piss on the whining wall.
Dr. William Pierce
|June 10th, 2017||#17|
Join Date: May 2009
US Holohoax Museum To “Only” Get $54 Million In Taxpayers’ Money
June 10 2017
Last edited by littlefieldjohn; June 11th, 2017 at 05:40 PM.
|June 14th, 2017||#18|
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: New England
"Jewish pressure groups are outraged that the US Holocaust Museum in Washington DC has been slated to get “only” $54 million in taxpayers’ money in 2018—instead of the $57 million it currently gets."
So the kikes get billions in US taxpayer dollars every year -- not even counting interest on the national debt and all the other money their usury gets them -- and they're whining about $3 million less? From a bankrupt government, no less?
... the seed has been sown that will grow one day . . . to the glorious rebirth of the National Socialist movement ... A.H. 1945
|September 24th, 2017||#19|
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: The Deep South of the USSA
I'm not an architect: therefore I defer to those who have knowledge of the construction and design of the "death camps." However, I have seen several publications that state that the HCN gas was cleared, and the exhaust fumes passed through the heat of the "crematoriums."
I do feel well qualified in chemistry, however, B. S. in Chemistry, B. S. Chemical Engineering. I submit the following for examination:
IMHO the CDC has better chemists than I am, and their data is well documented.
Whites are afraid to speak out against their enemies, let alone act out. This must change ~ Alex Linder
Sweat saves blood, blood saves lives, but brains saves both. ~ Erwin Rommel