Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Go Back   Vanguard News Network Forum > Executive Summary > The Problem
Donate Register Multimedia Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Login

Thread Display Modes Share
Old January 23rd, 2013 #21
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

– the Barbara Lerner Spectre youtube should be used wherever an opening occurs; I posted it last night to the Washington Post thread about White genocide, with the comment, “The process is global and organized.” In just a little over a minute, we see Jewish deception (“non-denominational Institute for Jewish Learning with the Greek name of Paideia”; we see and hear in Spectre’s facial expressions, tone, and words, the extraordinary Jewish sense of entitlement to walk into a conspicuously White country and set up shop for the express purpose of transforming that country’s population, hence its culture and inevitably it’s genetic composition; we hear out of the horse’s mouth that Jews are self-designated leaders of planned race transformation without which “Europe won’t survive,” which acknowledges Jews as as a distinct group, separate from Whites, with their own objectives which are to the detriment of Whites.

– Jesse Jackson in Sweden is not nearly as potent as the Spectre/Paideia project, but it’s notable for the sheer illogic of the things he says: contrasting American behavior with the “civilized” behavior of the Swedish people, he states “this is what democracy looks like.” Is it possible that he and his audience actually don’t realize that this is not what democracy looks like, it’s what a homogeneous European White society looks like. Jesse Jackson all by himself or with fellow Blacks would not be standing there, telling those Swedes that they must “open their doors” and “embrace multiculturalism” without the awareness of Jewish power behind them.
Old January 29th, 2013 #22
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

The Coudenhove-Kalergi plan - The genocide of the Peoples of Europe

This article is a translation of an Italian article, originally posted on Identità.

Mass immigration is a phenomenon, the causes of which are still cleverly concealed by the system, and the multicultural propaganda is trying to falsely portray it as inevitable. With this article we intend to prove once and for all, that this is not a spontaneous phenomenon. What they want to present as an inevitable outcome of modern life, is actually a plan conceived around a table and prepared for decades, to completely destroy the face of the continent.

The Pan-Europe

Few people know that one of the main initiators of the process of European integration, was also the man who designed the genocide plan of the Peoples of Europe. It is a dark person, whose existence is unknown to the masses, but the elite considers him as the founder of the European Union. His name is Richard Coudenhove Kalergi. His father was an Austrian diplomat named Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi (with connections to the Byzantine family of the Kallergis) and his mother the Japanese Mitsu Aoyama. Kalergi, thanks to his close contacts with all European aristocrats and politicians, due to the relationships of his nobleman-diplomat father, and by moving behind the scenes, away from the glare of publicity, he managed to attract the most important heads of state to his plan , making them supporters and collaborators for the "project of European integration".

In 1922 he founded the "Pan-European" movement in Vienna, which aimed to create a New World Order, based on a federation of nations led by the United States. European integration would be the first step in creating a world government. Among the first supporters, including Czech politicians Tomáš Masaryk and Edvard Beneš and the banker Max Warburg, who invested the first 60,000 marks. The Austrian Chancellor Ignaz Seipel and the next president of Austria, Karl Renner, took the responsibility for leading the "Pan-European" movement. Later, French politicians, such as Léon Bloum, Aristide Briand, Alcide De Gasperi, etc will offer their help.

With the rise of Fascism in Europe, the project was abandoned and the "Pan-European" movement was forced to dissolve, but after the Second World War, Kalergi, thanks to frantic and tireless activity and the support of Winston Churchill, the Jewish Masonic Lodge B'nai B'rith and major newspapers like the New York Times, the plan manages to be accepted by the United States Government. The CIA later undertakes the completion of the project.

The essence of the Kalergi plan

In his book «Praktischer Idealismus», Kalergi indicates that the residents of the future "United States of Europe" will not be the People of the Old Continent, but a kind of sub-humans, products of miscegenation. He clearly states that the peoples of Europe should interbreed with Asians and colored races, thus creating a multinational flock with no quality and easily controlled by the ruling elite.

Kalergi proclaims the abolition of the right of self-determination and then the elimination of nations with the use of ethnic separatist movements and mass migration. In order for Europe to be controlled by an elite, he wants to turn people into one homogeneous mixed breed of Blacks, Whites and Asians. Who is is this elite however? Kalergi is particularly illuminating on this:

The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals. Instead of destroying European Judaism, Europe, against her will, refined and educated this people, driving them to their future status as a leading nation through this artificial evolutionary process. It's not surprising that the people that escaped from the Ghetto-Prison, became the spiritual nobility of Europe. Thus, the compassionate care given by Europe created a new breed of aristocrats. This happened when the European feudal aristocracy crashed because of the emancipation of the Jews [due to the actions taken by the French Revolution]

Although no textbook mentions Kalergi, his ideas are the guiding principles of the European Union. The belief that the peoples of Europe should be mixed with Africans and Asians, to destroy our identity and create a single mestizo race, is the basis of all community policies that aim to protect minorities. Not for humanitarian reasons, but because of the directives issued by the ruthless Regime that machinates the greatest genocide in history. The Coudenhove-Kalergi European Prize is awarded every two years to Europeans who have excelled in promoting this criminal plan. Among those awarded with such a prize are Angela Merkel and Herman Van Rompuy.

The incitement to genocide, is also the basis of the constant appeals of the United Nations, that demands we accept millions of immigrants to help with the low birth rates of the EU. According to a report published on January 2000 in «Population division» Review of the United Nations in New York, under the title "Immigration replacement: A solution to declining and aging population," Europe will need by 2025 159,000,000 migrants.

One could wonder how there can be such accuracy on the estimates of immigration, although it was not a premeditated plan. It is certain that the low birth rate could easily be reversed with appropriate measures to support families. It is just as clear that it is the contribution of foreign genes do not protect our genetic heritage, but that it enables their disappearance. The sole purpose of these measures is to completely distort our people, to turn them into a group of people without national, historical and cultural cohesion. In short, the policies of the Kalergi plan was and still is, the basis of official government policies aimed at genocide of the Peoples of Europe, through mass immigration. G. Brock Chisholm, former director of the World Health Organization (OMS), proves that he has learned the lesson of Kalergi well when he says: "What people in all places have to do is to limit of birthrates and promote mixed marriages (between different races), this aims to create a single race in a world which will be directed by a central authority. "


If we look around us, the Kalergi plan seems to be fully realized. We face Europe's fusion with the Third World. The plague of interracial marriage produces each year thousands of young people of mixed race: "The children of Kalergi». Under the dual pressures of misinformation and humanitarian stupefaction, promoted by the MSM, the Europeans are being taught to renounce their origin, to renounce their national identity.

The servants of globalization are trying to convince us that to deny our identity, is a progressive and humanitarian act, that "racism" is wrong, because they want us all to be blind consumers. It is necessary, now more than ever, to counter the lies of the System, to awaken the revolutionary spirit Europeans. Every one must see this truth, that European Integration amounts to genocide. We have no other option, the alternative is national suicide.

Translator's note: Although the reasons due to which Kalergi made the choices he made are of no particular interest to us, we will try to answer a question that will surely our readers have already asked: Why a European aristocrat with Flemish, Polish, Greek-Byzantine roots and even with some samurai blood in his veins (from his mother) was such body plans and organ in the hands of dark forces? The reasons, in our opinion, are multiple, idiosyncratic, psychological and ... women.

We therefore observe a personality with strong snobbish attitudes, arrogance, and, allow me the term, "degenerate elitism." Also, the fact that his mother was Asian, perhaps created internal conflicts and frustrations, something that can happen to people with such temperament. But the most decisive factor must have been the "proper teenager", which incidentally of course, was beside him, and became his first woman (at age 13): The Jewess Ida Roland, who would later become a famous actress.

The award of the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize to President Van Rompuy

On November 16th 2012, the President of the European Council, Herman Van Rompuy, was awarded the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize, during a special conference in Vienna, to celebrate 90 years of pan-European movement. The prize is awarded every two years to leading personalities for their outstanding contribution to the process of European integration.

A decisive factor that helped him win the prize was the balanced way in which President Van Rompuy executed his duties in the new position of President of the European Council, which was established by the Treaty of Lisbon. He handled this particularly sensitive leading and coordinating role with a spirit of determination and reconciliation, while emphasis was also given to his skilful arbitration on European affairs and unfailing commitment to European moral values.

During his speech, Mr Van Rompuy described the unification of Europe as a peace project. This idea, which was also the objective of the work of Coudenhove-Kalergi, after 90 years is still important. The award bears the name of Count Richard Nicolaus von Coudenhove-Kalergi (1894-1972), philosopher, diplomat, publisher and founder of the Pan-European Movement (1923). Coudenhove-Kalergi was the pioneer of European integration and popularized the idea of ​​a federal Europe with his work.

Among the winners of the award, the Federal Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel (2010) and the President of Latvia Vaira Vike-Freiberga (2006), are included.

Old February 7th, 2013 #23
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 192
Blog Entries: 18
jewsign Spanish And Jive Talk

Deporting every person who does not speak correct English might sound cruel but it will add to the quality of American life. Unless this policy is enforced immediately only Spanish or Jive will be the only language spoken by the year 2060.
Old February 28th, 2013 #24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,424

The 1924 Immigration Restriction Law redux

The Jewish Telegraph Agency puts out an archive edition every Sunday, featuring historical articles from the Jewish media. This week marks the 89th anniversary of Congressional debate on the 1924 Immigration Restriction Law. JTA introduces the article, from February 11, 1924, as follows:

State of Immigration: President Obama’s State of the Union address emphasized immigration reform as one of his major platforms. In the early years of JTA’s State of the Union coverage, presidents Calvin Coolidge and Warren Harding advocated for restrictive immigration policy in front of Congress.
Yes, times have changed—from presidents advocating restriction to presidents advocating amnesty for millions of illegals and continued displacement-levels of legal immigration. The 1924 article presents a reasonably fair coverage of the basics of the debate.

The Majority Report states that despite the unfavorable condition of international exchange and prevailing high steamship rates, between 1,500,000 and 2,000,000 immigrants would have entered the country during the past two years had there been no restriction immigration measure such as the 3% law which is now in effect.

The report pictures an alleged alarming condition which requires an even greater restriction than at present. It especially warns of the necessity of passing a new law to replace the present law if the 3% measure is allowed to lapse.

The report predicts the largest movement of immigration in the history of the world, beginning July 1st, 1924, if the 3% law is allowed to expire and if no other legislature is enacted, stating that the exclusion clause of the act of February 5,1917, will be powerless to stay the tide.

“Such a situation should not be permitted to arise”, the report reads. “The country demands the restriction of immigration. The public demand is not only for restriction but for more rigid and more effective restriction than that imposed at present.

Note that the Majority Report emphasizes that immigration restriction is in response to widespread public concern. Congress was under intense pressure to restrict immigration.

This contrasts markedly with the passage of the 1965 immigration law which was not at all in response to public outcry but to prolonged pressure that was organized, funded and led by the organized Jewish community; it also occurred in the context of the dominance of Jewish-dominated intellectual movements that undercut the intellectual basis for immigration restriction rooted in the legitimate ethnic interests of the traditional people of America (see here, passim).

In the nearly 50 years since the passage of the 1965 law, massive non-White immigration has never been the result of popular demand; it has always been a minority opinion among White Americans. Indeed, elite control of immigration policy in opposition to popular attitudes has been a theme of immigration policy throughout the West in recent decades. Immigration policy is a prime example of the anti-democratic, anti-populist sympathies of the Jewish intellectual movements discussed The Culture of Critique, perhaps most notably, the New York Intellectuals.

The JTA article continues:

The decision to base the 2% quota on the census of 1890 was reached after a long and careful consideration of every element of the immigration problem, “the Committee reports. The change in the census basis is made to slow the stream of those types of immigrants not easily assimilated which crowd in the larger cities with a slight knowledge of America and American institutions. There has grown to be a great indigestive mass of aliens with alien sympathies and alien purposes. It is a menace to the social, political and economic life of the country. It creates alarm and apprehension and breeds a racial hatred which should not exist and will not exist when the balance is restored.”
Note the explicit concern about lack of assimilability. Although the bias toward Northern Europeans did indeed discriminate against Southern and Eastern Europeans, it was obvious from the debates that the main concern was Eastern European Jewish immigrants, large percentages of whom were radicals(see here, p. 271 ff) and none of whom identified with the people or culture of Christian, Northern European America. Support for immigration restriction was centered in rural America, particularly in the South and West; as John Higham noted, “Jews, as a result of their intellectual energy and economic resources, constituted an advance guard of the new peoples who had no feeling for the traditions of rural America” (Send These to Me: Immigrants in Urban America, rev. ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984, 168–169). Lack of rapport with the traditional people and culture of America was apparent among the New York Intellectuals and among Jewish radicals, supporters of immigration generally. In the immigration debates of 1924 Representative Knud Wefald of Minnesota emphasized lack of sympathy with traditional American culture:

I for one am not afraid of the radical ideas that some might bring with them. Ideas you cannot keep out anyway, but the leadership of our intellectual life in many of its phases has come into the hands of these clever newcomers who have no sympathy with our old-time American ideals nor with those of northern Europe, who detect our weaknesses and pander to them and get wealthy through the disservices they render us.

Our whole system of amusements has been taken over by men who came here on the crest of the south and east European immigration. They produce our horrible film stories, they compose and dish out to us our jazz music, they write many of the books we read, and edit our magazines and newspapers. (Cong. Rec., April 12, 1924, 6272)
Without mentioning them specifically, Cong. Wefald was clearly referring to Jewich influence on the media, and on culture generally—themes also apparent in Henry Ford’s The International Jew (reviewed here):

Not only the ‘legitimate’ stage, so-called, but the motion picture industry—the fifth greatest of all the great industries—is also Jew-controlled, not in spots only, not 50 per cent merely, but entirely; with the natural consequence that the world is in arms against the trivializing and demoralizing influences of that form of entertainment as at present managed. As soon as the Jew got control of American Liquor, we had a liquor problem with drastic consequences. As soon as the Jew gained control of the ‘movies,’ we had a movie problem, the consequences of which are not yet visible. It is the genius of the race to create problems in whatever business they achieve a majority. . . . Millions of Americans every day place themselves voluntarily within range of Jewish ideas of life, love and labor; within range of Jewish propaganda, sometimes cleverly, sometimes cunningly concealed” (1/01/1921). “Frivolity, sensuality, indecency, appalling illiteracy and endless platitude are the marks of the American State as it approaches its degeneracy under Jewish control. (1/01/1920)
Thus, by1924 there was concern that the intellectual high ground and the media had been profoundly influenced by the newcomers who were out of touch with traditional American culture.

The JTA article continues:

The report quotes President Coolidge’s last message to Congress when he said that a continued policy of restrictive immigration is necessary. It also quotes the late President Harding’s message to the previous Congress, recommending legislation for the registration of aliens in order to show Mr. Harding’s recognition of the danger of non-assimilation.

The report states that the original quota law was passed in 1921 to meet an emergency and that this emergency is as great now as it was then. The report states that 39,730 Jews were admitted to the country during the period from July to November, 1923. Provisions of the Johnson Bill were summed up in the report as follows: Preserves the basic immigration law of 1917; retains the principle of numerical limitation as inaugurated in the act of May 19, 1921; changes the quota base from the census of 1910 to the census of 1890; reduces the percentage from 3 to 2, plus a small base quota for each country; counts certificates, not persons; provides for preliminary examination overseas; exempts wives, children under 18 and parents over 55 of American citizens; reduces classes of exempted aliens; places burden of proof on alien rather than on the United States; Meets the situation with reference to admission of persons ineligible to citizenship; carries numerous sections to lessen hardships of immigrants.
Changing the quota basis to 1890 resulted in increasing the bias in favor of Northwestern Europe even more than the 1910 law because the great surge of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe occurred after 1890.

The two Jewish Congressmen on the committee, Adolph J. Sabath and Samuel Dickstein were the only committee members who did not sign the Majority Report. (Speaking of Jewish radicalism, Dickstein was on the payroll of the USSR while a member of Congress.) The JTA article:
“The bill”, said Mr. Dickstein, who declined to sign the committee report, “puts a premium upon one type of immigrant and a discount on every other type. It creates among the Hungarians, the Czecho-Slovaks, Serbians and Jews of Eastern Europe the sense of inferiority which is instinctively felt when a man is proscribed against as if he will not be helpful and serviceable to America.

“Our country’s policy should be, and has been since its origin, to open its gate without fear or favor to all men who may become good Americans, good citizens, and men calculated to enhance the wealth and the moral and spiritual resources of the United States.”
But Nordic superiority played no part in the Congressional debates. Indeed, one is struck in reading the 1924 congressional debates by the rarity with which the issue of Nordic racial superiority is raised by those in favor of the legislation, whereas virtually all the anti-restrictionists raised this issue.

After a particularly colorful comment in opposition to the theory of Nordic racial superiority, restrictionist leader Albert Johnson remarked, “I would like very much to say on behalf of the committee that through the strenuous times of the hearings this committee undertook not to discuss the Nordic proposition or racial matters” (Cong. Rec., April 8, 1924, 5911). [see here, p. 267]

Framing the debate in terms of Nordic superiority was thus a strategy of the anti-restricionist forces. In fact, the debate was couched in terms of the legitimate ethnic interests of the people already in the U.S. in retaining their political power and their ability to control the the culture of America. They also had legitimate concerns about the radicalism and unassimilability of so many of the immigrants, particularly the Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe. My favorite expression of the legitimate ethnic interests comes from Representative William N. Vaile of Colorado, one of the most prominent restrictionists:
Let me emphasize here that the restrictionists of Congress do not claim that the “Nordic” race, or even the Anglo-Saxon race, is the best race in the world. … What we do claim is that the northern European, and particularly Anglo-Saxons made this country. Oh, yes; the others helped. But that is the full statement of the case. They came to this country because it was already made as an Anglo-Saxon commonwealth. They added to it, they often enriched it, but they did not make it, and they have not yet greatly changed it. We are determined that they shall not. It is a good country. It suits us. And what we assert is that we are not going to surrender it to somebody else or allow other people, no matter what their merits, to make it something different. If there is any changing to be done, we will do it ourselves. (Cong. Rec., April 8, 1924, 5922)
Nevertheless, Dickstein’s statement reflects the continuing attitudes of American Jews that the 1924 law represents the apex of evil in the United States—often blamed for the deaths of European Jews in the Holocaust. And we still see echos of the arguments made by Sabath and Dickstein in contemporary rhetoric that labels any assertion of the legitimate interests of White Americans as “White supremacist” and based on theories of “White superiority.” It’s a fallacious argument. All propaganda, all the time.
Old April 6th, 2013 #25
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,048
Default Jew Groups Endorse 'Kwa Immigration Amnesty

This attitude, which is utterly commonplace in the Jewish community, shows no concern for the interests of other Americans. Only Jewish interests matter. Old historical grudges, no matter how unreasonable, must never be forgotten. Why not focus on the good aspects of the Jewish experience in America—the dramatic decline in anti-Semitism after World War II, and and the rise of Jews to elite status all the important aspects of Aamerican Society?
March 22, 2013
Dear President Obama and Members of Congress:
We, the undersigned Jewish organizations and leaders, strongly believe that our country would
benefit from an overhaul of our nation’s broken immigration system. Our views are shaped by
our Jewish religious and ethical traditions, as well as our own history in this country and by core
American values. The commandment to ‘welcome the stranger’ is mentioned 36 times
throughout the Torah, more than any other commandment.
Our current immigration system does not reflect our history as a nation of immigrants, does not
meet today’s security and economic needs, and is not fair and humane. The estimated 11 million
undocumented immigrants living in the U.S. without legal status are vulnerable to
exploitation. There are few, if any, legal channels for U.S. employers to hire immigrant workers,
and tremendous backlogs in the family visa system have resulted in families being needlessly
separated for years or even decades.
In the face of federal inaction, state and local legislatures have started passing restrictive laws
designed to make life so uncomfortable for immigrants that they leave their homes and
communities. Many of these laws have delegated immigration enforcement authority to state
and local law enforcement agencies, undermining their ability to work cooperatively with
immigrant communities.
American Jews know too well the impact of restrictive immigration policies, and we have seen
how the immigration issue can become a flashpoint for xenophobia. We are concerned the
failure of national leaders to fix the broken immigration system has fueled racist, nativist, and
extremist groups who blame immigrants for our country’s problems, and has been a central
factor in the spread of state and local policies and laws that legalize discrimination against
Our leaders must enact laws that reflect the fact that immigration fuels our economy –
immigrants and their children who come to the U.S. to join family or enter as refugees fleeing
persecution strive for success and are responsible for some of this country’s most innovative and
job‐creating businesses. Comprehensive immigration reform would serve our national security
interests by bringing people out of the shadows, allowing federal law enforcement to focus its
resources on those who wish to do us harm. Immigration reform that emphasizes integration
would create diverse and thriving communities that help position the U.S. as a model for the rest
of the world.
Based on the American and Jewish values to which we strongly adhere and our proud history as
immigrants to this country, we urge Congress and the President to enact legislation that:
 Brings undocumented immigrants out of the shadows by providing a pathway to
citizenship, creates safe and legal avenues for future flows of immigrants, reunites

families, establishes border protection and enforcement policies that enhance our

national security, and accords all immigrants the responsibilities and rights required for
full integration into American society.
 Fixes the broken system for admitting and integrating refugees and asylum seekers who
have fled persecution to build new lives in this country.
 Includes a fair, inclusive, realistic, and achievable channel for immigrants to earn
permanent residency and citizenship within a reasonable timeframe of years, not
 Ensures that immigration detention laws are consistent with humanitarian values and
with the need to treat all individuals humanely and with respect.
 Ensures that immigration enforcement laws respect immigrant and worker rights and civil
liberties and reflect the values of pluralism and fair treatment under the law.
 Includes measures to effectively identify and prevent the entry of those who are
dangerous and who pose a risk to our national security.
We look forward to working together to improve our country’s immigration system in a way that
honors our American and Jewish values.
National Organizations
 American Forum of Russian Jewry (AFRJ)
 American Jewish Committee
 Anti‐Defamation League
 Bend the Arc: A Jewish Partnership for Justice
 B’nai B’rith International
 Bukharian Jewish Congress of the USA and Canada
 HIAS (Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society)
 Jewish Council on Public Affairs
 Jewish Federations of North America
 Keshet
 National Council of Jewish Women
 Orthodox Union
 Rabbinical Assembly
 Reconstructionist Rabbinical College
 Tikkun Olam Commission of the Jewish Reconstructionist Movement
 T'ruah: The Rabbinic Call for Human Rights
 Union for Reform Judaism
 Uri L’Tzedek
 Women
Old May 31st, 2013 #26
Senior Member
KraftAkt's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 926

"The rest of the party has to understand what we as Jews have always understood — that this is a nation of immigrants and to ignore them is to end up losing.


On the morning after, Jewish Republicans advise the party

By Ron Kampeas November 12, 2012 3:50pm

Sheldon Adelson, a major donor to Republican candidates, attending a Republican Jewish Coalition event at the partys convention in Tampa, Fla., on Aug. 27. 2012. Jewish Republicans say the party should expect to hear from donors about how to do better in the next election.

WASHINGTON (JTA) – Think immigration through — again. Forget about gay marriage. And for heaven’s sake, when it comes to rape, shut up!

The Republican Party as a whole is having the morning-afters, reconsidering how it might have done better in an election that saw the party fail to win the White House and suffer modest losses in Congress, and Jewish Republicans and conservatives are coming forward with their own insights.

“There will be a lot of very frank conversations between our organization and its leadership and the leadership within the party,” Matt Brooks, the director of the Republican Jewish Coalition, said last week in a conference call that otherwise addressed gains that Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney appeared to have made among Jewish voters.

A number of Romney’s financial backers — including Fred Zeidman of Texas, Mel Sembler of Florida and Sheldon Adelson — are among the RJC’s leadership, and Brooks made clear that their voices would be heard.

“A lot of the major financial support the candidates received was from the members of this organization,” Brooks said. “There is a lot of weight behind their message on that.”

William Daroff, the Washington director of the Jewish Federations of North America and a former deputy to Brooks at the RJC, said Republican Jews would likely advise the party to moderate.

“The conventional wisdom is that the election will result in the shift of the Republican Party to the center, particularly on issues of immigration,” Daroff said. “To the extent that the party does shift, it would make Republican candidates more appealing to Jewish voters who may be inclined to vote Republican on foreign policy and homeland security issues but who have been turned off by conservative Republicans rigidity on social issues.

Some of the leading voices counseling moderation of hard-line Republican policies have been Jewish conservatives. One of the first post-election posts from Jennifer Rubin, who writes the Right Turn blog for the Washington Post, said it was time to stop opposing gay marriage in the political arena.

“Republicans for national office would do well to recognize reality,” Rubin said. “The American people have changed their minds on the issue and fighting this one is political flat-earthism. As with divorce, one need not favor it, but to run against it is folly, especially for national politicians who need to appeal to a diverse electorate.”

Charles Krauthammer, the syndicated columnist, noted sharp Democratic gains among Hispanic voters and counseled a change in immigration policy, making clear that the current GOP emphasis on securing the borders should be followed by amnesty for illegal immigrants already in the country.

Romney had advocated disincentives, including making it more difficult for illegal immigrants to get jobs and educations, that would push them to leave, or “self deport.”

“Many Hispanics fear that there will be nothing beyond enforcement. So, promise amnesty right up front,” Krauthammer wrote in his Nov. 9 column. “Secure the border with guaranteed legalization to follow on the day the four border-state governors affirm that illegal immigration has slowed to a trickle.”

Zeidman, the fundraiser, said Jewish Republicans had a special role in making the case for immigration reform.

"The rest of the party has to understand what we as Jews have always understood — that this is a nation of immigrants and to ignore them is to end up losing," he said.
Old July 19th, 2013 #27
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,048
jewsign Eric Cantor(R-VA) to push for immigration reform at african burial ground national monument

Later this month, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) is slated to visit New York to stump for an immigration bill as part of the bipartisan Becoming America tour.

Among Cantor’s stops: Ellis Island, the Museum of Jewish Heritage, and the African Burial Ground National Monument.

Canter, among other Congressmen, is scheduled to speak at a naturalization and dine with New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg. The African Burial Ground National Monument was discovered in 1991 while building a federal office building; as the website describes it, “From about the 1690s until 1794, both free and enslaved Africans were buried in a 6.6-acre burial ground in Lower Manhattan, outside the boundaries of the settlement of New Amsterdam, later known as New York.” The grounds were originally buried under a landfill.
Old December 21st, 2013 #28
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,048
Default Illegal Immigrants in Israel and America: A Tale of Jewish Supremacist Hypocrisy

Hypocrite Jew Media Ignores Israel’s Illegals

“American Jews know too well the impact of restrictive immigration policies, and we have seen how the immigration issue can become a flashpoint for xenophobia,” says the bottom paragraph from the “Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society.” What TOTAL JEW BULLCRAP!
While Jewish Supremacists in America continue to push as hard as they can for ever-increased immigration and the legalization of those who have flouted US immigration laws, in Israel they continue to arrest and detain scores of Africans who have broken the law in that country.

This hypocritical disparity in Jewish Supremacist tactics has been highlighted once again with the mass arrest of a over 150 African asylum seekers who deserted from a concentration camp prison in the Negev desert, south Israel.

The Africans managed to reach Jerusalem to take part in a protest at their continued detention and Israel’s refusal to even consider granting them asylum.

The protest was however short-lived, as Israeli police and immigration authorities arrested them all and put them on buses back to prison.

The protest, held outside the Prime Minister’s Office and then the Knesset, took place on Tuesday this week—but there has been absolutely no coverage of the events in the Jewish Supremacist controlled western mass media—unlike the case with any similar protests anywhere else in the world.

According to a report in the Jewish news source, Ynet News,,7...466574,00.html
Benjamin Netanyahu said in his response to the pretest that the “infiltrators who were transferred to the special detainment facility can either stay there or go back to their home countries.”

It is bad enough that the Jewish Supremacists in America ensure a media blackout on Israel’s anti-gentile immigration policies—but at the same time they openly push for exactly the opposite policies in the U.S.

For example, a report in the Jewish Telegraphic Agency
from earlier this year

revealed that an “array of Jewish groups urged President Obama and Congress to ease the path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants” in America.

The call was made in a letter signed by nineteen national Jewish groups, timed for the celebration of Passover.

“American Jews know too well the impact of restrictive immigration policies, and we have seen how the immigration issue can become a flashpoint for xenophobia,” said the letter, which was spearheaded by the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society.

Signatories represented all four major Jewish religious streams as well as the major Jewish civil rights groups, and the federation and public policy umbrellas.

“We are concerned the failure of national leaders to fix the broken immigration system has fueled racist, nativist, and extremist groups who blame immigrants for our country’s problems, and has been a central factor in the spread of state and local policies and laws that legalize discrimination against immigrants,” the letter says.

Notice the incredible hypocrisy: in fact it is the Zionist extremists who are the true racists and have the most restrictive immigration policies in the world in their country—yet the only time the Jewish Supremacists talk about “racism” is when they mean other, non-Jewish, people.
Old January 15th, 2014 #29
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

even the filthy kike Auster admitted the truth, on his deathbed

auster's last ride
Old January 15th, 2014 #30
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,048
Default Feds and Media Helping Africans Get to America


The media never tells you this. They don’t want you to know that your Federal tax dollars are being used to bring African refugees to the United States and that private citizens make money off of it. The Federal grants pay for the salaries and administrative costs of the profiteers who bring the refugees to the USA.

The media touted him as an “engineer,” but he is really just a glorified repairman.

The first thing you need to know about African Refugees in the United States is that they are being brought here at tax payer expense. The Federal government gives “grants” to private charities to bring them to the United States and provide them with benefits above and beyond what they will also receive from conventional welfare. Even if Maine cuts off their welfare, they will still be getting Federal funds from the Obama administration.

The media never tells you this. They don’t want you to know that your Federal tax dollars are being used to bring African refugees to the United States and that private citizens make money off of it. The Federal grants pay for the salaries and administrative costs of the profiteers who bring the refugees to the USA.

Then the media prints dramatically one-sided arguments to promote the refugees. The overwhelming majority of African refugees already in Maine collect welfare. A large percentage have committed serious criminal offenses.

Yet the Portland Press Herald interviews Maxwell Chikuta. They insinuate that he has a master degree in Engineering and works as “an engineer” at a Portland hospital. We found his resume online.
In reality, he has a masters degree in Industrial Management & Finance. His Bachelors and Masters degrees are both liberal arts degrees. He went to HVAC school to repair air conditioners and boilers. That is what he does at the hospital.

So Maxwell Chikuta has some liberal arts degrees and an HVAC certification and works fixing air conditioners. Does this sound like the same thing as having a “job as an engineer.” In fact Chikuta never describes himself as having an background or education in “engineering” or having ever worked as “an engineer.”

The the Portland Press writes “many asylum seekers are educated and have work skills.” What is “many,” one percent? Most African refugees in Maine collect welfare.

How many White Americans out there miss out on decent paying jobs and well-deserved promotions* because of all this never-ending Jew multiculturism/black/PC crap? Ever ask yourself that one? It’s absolutely now clear the traitorous US government, media and White-hating multicults are hard at work destroying White demographics in America.

Have been for quite some time.

Even your so-called “conservative” FOX news doesn’t report on this kind of thing. Oh, sure, some will blame it all on “PC” and would be right to a point. But the fact of the matter is, all of mainstream media carefully keeps the White race in the dark — as they rapidly work to turn our White race into a spat-upon minority.

These lousy bastards have no problem with us White men dying in foreign wars for the Zionist agenda (ginning up patriotism to kill enemies of Israel); while back at home they feel free to slime our race (just look at TV commercials, for crying out loud), open our borders and push immorality and faggoty crap all over the place.

The lefty Jewish media and Zionist-corrupted US government have been quietly at war with the White race. No doubt, whatsoever.
Old January 17th, 2014 #31
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

While opening borders in white lands, jews in Israel treat Africans (and Asians) like complete shit.

Jews are the most despicable people even CONCEIVABLE, let alone the fact they actually exist.
Old April 7th, 2014 #32
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

While they're opening our borders, they're closing theirs...

Israel's March Deportations: As If America Had Deported 277,000 illegals!
By Patrick Cleburne on April 6, 2014

Israelis protest illegal immigation.

The Israelis (predictably) are not flinching in their determination to protect their citizens from immivasion:

Since the new policy’s initiation, 3,988 migrants have left the country, including 1,510 in March alone.

Report: Migrants leaving Israel being sent to Rwanda, Uganda By YONAH JEREMY BOB, SHULAMIT WASSERSTROM The Jerusalem Post 04/04/2014

Using the conventional estimates of 60,000 “infiltrators” in Israel and 11 million illegals in America (certain to be a serious underestimate since this is the number the Treason Lobby uses) this means to match the Israelis the Feds would have had to deport 277,000 people in March.

The Obamacrats congratulate themselves on deporting 367,000 people for the entire year of 2013: and that number was more than doubled by accounting fraud as Paul Nachman recently demonstrated.

However the Israelis fell short of February’s achievement which I reported in Israeli Deportations of Illegals Hits Record: As If U.S. Deported 330,000 Last Month.

The reason for this was probably touched on in The Jerusalem Post’s story

V., an Eritrean who was living in Israel until he received payment to leave and was sent to Rwanda... told that once he landed in Rwanda, he was only given a 10-day tourist visa. That didn't matter to him, however, because he wasn't optimistic of finding work within the country anyway.
Haaretz, which is doing a commendably thorough job of following this story, amplifies

Asylum seekers have no arranged status in these countries, are not granted basic rights and, for the most part, they do not have any official documents or permits, the testimonies indicate.

They also say that they have no contact with any official representatives from Israel or the country to which they were sent after their arrival, and no one assists them or deals with their needs.
Israel is sending asylum seekers to Rwanda without status, rights By Ilan Lior Apr 4, 2014
Communications amongst these people are incredibly good, usually by cell phone. Those detained in Israel are quickly learning that nothing good has been arranged for them if they leave.

However the political pressure on the Israeli Authorities to act is not diminishing. The Israel National News Service Arutz Sheva has reported Data: Infiltrators Cause Crime Rates to Skyrocket in Tel Aviv by Shimon Cohen and Tova Dvonn 4/1/2014 from the Israeli Police, which reportedly shows correlation between infiltration and crime. Sexual offenses in neighborhoods with large percentages of infiltrators are recorded to be occurring at a rate 3.5 times higher than found in the general population, violent crime 2.5 times higher than in the general population, and robbery 6 times higher than in the general population.

Residents of working-class neighborhoods in southern Tel Aviv, as well as those of other cities like Eilat, say they have been suffering from endless harassment, fear and violence perpetrated by the many illegal Eritrean and Sudanese infiltrators who enter Israel to find employment and come to live in their neighborhoods.

Exactly the same stories could of course have been written by the American national news services for hundreds, perhaps thousands, of American neighborhoods in recent years - but for some reason were not.

For enlightenment on this curious contrast, I commend Kevin MacDonald’s latest piece.
Old June 20th, 2014 #33
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

because of jews and their christian helpers, there is such a thing as 'Minnesota Somalis' and America-originated jihadists

Six months ago the father of nine from Minnesota was shooting hoops in Uptown Minneapolis. He was neither overtly religious nor politically vocal.

Today he is one of as many as 15 young Somali -Americans from the Twin Cities currently under investigation by the FBI for having travelled to Syria and Iraq to fight alongside the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).
Already 7,500 foreigners are believed to be fighting in Syria and Iraq. Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, has told Congress that there are more than 50 Americans among them, believed to be waging jihad in Syria.
Mr Bjelopera added that ‘jihad cool’ may have played a role in pushing five young Northern Virginia Muslim men who were arrested in Pakistan in 2009 for allegedly trying to join jihadist organisations.

Last edited by Alex Linder; June 20th, 2014 at 12:16 PM.
Old June 22nd, 2014 #34
Bread and Circuses
RickHolland's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Jewed Faggot States of ApemuriKa
Posts: 6,666
Blog Entries: 1

Ted Kennedy’s Immigration Act? NOT!

How often have you heard America’s Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 — the one that set the country on its subsequent path of destruction — described as ‘Ted Kennedy’s Immigration act?’ It’s standard practice either by way of deliberate tendentiousness or else a cowardly avoidance of upsetting Those-Who-Cannot-Be-Upset by careerist pseudo-journalists (Ann Coulter springs to mind).

In actual fact Teddy’s role was peripheral. He was a Junior Senator, one mainly interested in booze and chicks, who was sold the idea that the Act would find favour with his heavily Irish-American Boston constituency. In practical terms the Act had the polar opposite effect in that it removed the hitherto favourable consideration of would-be immigrants from Northern Europe.

Study the subject and you’ll see that the bill was written by Norbert Schlei and pushed through the Senate by Emmanuel Celler and Jacob Javits. Behind the scenes various presidential advisors and policy makers worked on the same project. These included Julius Edelson and Harry Rosenfield in the Truman administration and Max Rabb in Eisenhower’s.

During a recorded interview (@9:30 in), the Jew Norbert Schlei, laughed about how his 1965 Immigration Act “inadvertently” led to the decline of White people’s demographics in America. (INCOG)

It was a Jewish project from start to finish.

In fact for half a century beforehand, and right up to the present day Jewish organisations have relentlessly — and by now quite openly — pursued immigration “reform.” In reality a plot to substitute European immigration with that from the Third World, while massively increasing the actual numbers. The net effect being to reconstitute the ethnic makeup of the whole country whereby Whites would decline from a massive majority to that of a minority within a few generations.

This was (and still is) a carefully planned and deliberately implemented program of destruction. Be clear: Ted Kennedy’s unwitting role was that of goyishe window-dressing to divert attention from the real authors and their malign intentions. Correct this grotesque lie whenever and wherever you encounter it.
Read more:

Norbert Schlei—Guilty of Malice Aforethought in America`s Immigration Disaster?

Peter Brimelow writes: One of the nice things about being involved in a nascent political movement like patriotic immigration reform is that that you get to witness epochal moments. I saw one quite recently at an activist meeting in Washington D.C. A speaker showed a clip from George Colburn`s Tomorrow`s America DVD anthology featuring an interview with Norbert Schlei, who as assistant attorney general in the Kennedy and Johnson Administrations played a key role in designing the disastrous 1965 Immigration Act.

It is often said that no-one anticipated the 1965 Act`s floodgate-opening consequences. Certainly its key supporters denied that anything untoward would happen. Senator Edward Kennedy notoriously said:

“…our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same … Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset … Contrary to the charges in some quarters, S.500 will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and economically deprived nations of Africa and Asia. In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think.”

But some specialists in this under-researched area think that key operatives were perfectly well aware of the consequences.

That`s certainly the message conveyed, in an emotive way that no amount of factual analysis can match, by Schlei`s sly smirk that concludes by this brilliantly-chosen excerpt.

At the Washington meeting, the speaker provided this gloss:

“The 1965 Immigration Bill was originally authored by Norbert Schlei.

“The author`s intent is now a narrative of the past.

“Mr. Schlei died on April 17, 2003. The effects of his handiwork persist. On our edge of time, we are left with the memory of a smile.

“Leonardo da Vinci`s Mona Lisa is memorialized by the ambiguity of her smile.

“Was it a smile of reverence or ridicule?

“Did she harbor misgivings for falling from grace or arrogance for ascending to higher ground?

“Was it a smile of convenience or contrivance?

“Triumph or tragedy?

“Kindness or contempt?

“Was she affable or aloof?

“Either way, interpretation is now the province of historians.”

Jews Control U.S. Immigration Policy

Coming Race and Religious Wars
Only force rules. Force is the first law - Adolf H. Man has become great through struggle - Adolf H. Strength lies not in defense but in attack - Adolf H.

Last edited by RickHolland; June 22nd, 2014 at 08:28 AM.
Old July 17th, 2014 #35
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

[meanwhile, jews hate having niggers in israel]

Revenge is now, Aryan brothers and sisters are pushing the "diversity is good for Israel" agenda and we are gaining ground. We need all Aryans and even the degenerates help us push the message! Let them reap what they sow, pass it on as much as possible. I tried to post a thread earlier but I don't have time to wait for approval, here is a quick breakdown of how we are going about this.

We in the vanguard should stride to be progressive and take a stand and advocate a world full of #multiculturalism that's free of #racism and #discrimination, Israel has been called to our attention that theres an agressive discrimination and hate towards black people, particularly of black descent, we should STOP that right NOW!!!

Some 130,000 Ethiopians, most of them Jewish, live in Israel. The community experiences higher poverty and unemployment rates than the rest of the country’s Jewish population. In the past decade, the birth rate among Ethiopian-Israelis has declined by at least 20 percent. Advocacy groups now claim this decline is the result of a birth control regimen forced upon Ethiopian immigrant women.

immigrants get violently attacked by Israelis, this kind of things need to stop NOW

An estimated 125,000 Ethiopian Jews live in Israel, but while they are supposed to be full citizens with equal rights, their community has continued to face widespread discrimination and socio-economic difficulties, according to its leaders.

Cabinet ministers talk in terms of “expulsion by consent or without consent” to “preserve the country's Jewish identity”, and of “taking steps to kick out” the “scourge” of “infiltrators”. A prominent Likud parliamentarian and chair of the “Knesset Caucus to Solve the Infiltrator Problem” urged for this “plague” to be removed “without delay and without mercy”.

>The Ethiopian Jews are commonly known by the slightly derogatory term Falasha but the name they chose for themselves is Beta Israel (Hebrew for The House of Israel). They are today virtually no Ethiopian Jews anymore in Ethiopia. Israel organized mass migrations in the late 80’s (Operation Moses). If you want to know more about Operation Moses read this.

See theres actual black jews in Israel, all this anti immigration is policy is at it's core ANTIBLACK, and it will break up the jewish community, this is why FIGHTING RACISM is important
Old August 13th, 2014 #36
Senior Member
Crowe's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 6,228
jewsign Islamification of Europe a good thing according to Israeli Rabbi,7...299673,00.html

Rabbi Baruch Efrati believes Jews should 'rejoice at the fact that Europe is paying for what it did to us for hundreds of years by losing its identity.' He praises Islam for promoting modesty, respect for God
Old November 11th, 2014 #38
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

Sir Martin Sorrell: Ukip's immigration policy is 'totally unacceptable'
Speaking at the Telegraph Festival of Business, Sir Martin Sorrell, the chief executive of media and advertising giant WPP, says Ukip's immigration policy is not acceptable from a "political, social maybe even moral" point of view
[all that matters is whether UK is good for jews. if you demanded that israel accommodate you and your people, why, this jew would scream antisemitism, and say jews need a place where they can be safe from vile hateful goys like yourself. well, where's your asylum from anti-white yids like him? you wont have one, if we let his kind control our immigration policies]
Old November 11th, 2014 #39
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder


GOP mega-donor and Las Vegas casino magnate Sheldon Adelson is blasting conservatives in the party who are opposed to comprehensive amnesty legislation.
The Washington Post reports that Adelson, who spent nearly $100 million in 2012 and will likely spend a hefty sum in the 2016 GOP presidential primary, "upbraided many in the GOP for their opposition to legalizing millions" of illegal immigrants. He reportedly said that without a "comprehensive overhaul" that would legalize all of the country's illegal immigrants, the nation would not be "the America that I’m proud to live in."

Adelson made his remarks while addressing the Israeli American Council (IAC) in Washington, D.C., along with liberal billionaire Haim Saban, a Hillary Clinton ally. This is not the first time that Adelson has lobbied for comprehensive amnesty legislation.
"Let’s start by instituting a process in which all undocumented immigrants receive permits to legally work here," Adelson wrote in a Politico op-ed earlier this year while the country was facing a flood of illegal immigrant children from South America. "Let’s provide them with the opportunity to get driver’s licenses and bank accounts—simple things that we all take for granted." He also joined billionaires Warren Buffett and Bill Gates in calling for an unlimited number of high-tech guest-worker visas in a New York Times op-ed.

House Republican leaders have expressed a willingness to work on an immigration bill in the GOP-led Congress, while President Barack Obama, who has vowed to enact executive amnesty by the end of the year, said that he felt time has not run out even on a lame-duck amnesty bill. Conservative opponents of amnesty, citing a nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office report, have emphasized that massive amnesty legislation and awarding of guest-worker permits would only lower wages and reduce employment opportunities for U.S.-born Americans and legal immigrants already in the country.

[just look at the brazen arrogance of these jews]
Old December 31st, 2014 #40
Bread and Circuses
RickHolland's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Jewed Faggot States of ApemuriKa
Posts: 6,666
Blog Entries: 1

Jews Object to “Xenophobic” Euro Parties; But Support Ultra-Xenophobic Israel

The Brussels, Belgium-based Jewish organization CEJI (A Jewish Contribution to an Inclusive Europe) has lashed out at what it calls the election of a record number of “xenophobic” candidates at the recent European Parliament elections—but is a firm supporter of Israel, whose prime minister has recently warned that “African immigrants threaten the identity of [the] Jewish State.”

The CEJI, which describes itself as an organization dedicated to promoting a “diverse and inclusive Europe,” is funded by a number of important Jewish institutions in Europe, including the Dutch Jewish Humanitarian Fund, the Edmond de Rothschild Foundation, the Levi Strauss Foundation and the Rothschild Foundation Europe (amongst many others).

It is also an official partner of the World Jewish Congress, the European Jewish Congress, the European Council of Jewish Communities, the Anti-Defamation League – United States, the B’nai B’rith Europe and the B’nai B’rith International, and every single major Jewish organization in each of the EU’s member states. The CEJI therefore, can rightly claim to be representative of European Jewry.

According to the CEJI’s “What We Do” information website, they specialize in “contributing innovative ideas to policy-making processes dealing with anti-discrimination and social inclusion, [and] CEJI actively advocates for policies promoting a diverse and inclusive Europe.”

In a press release issued this week titled “Anti-Semitism and the Future of Europe,” the CEJI condemned the recent European Parliament election results, which, it said, “saw 77 new MEPs from xenophobic parties, up 50% from five years ago.

“This does not bode well for the future of Europe. The European Union is rooted in the value of respect for diversity,
” the CEJI said.

It went on to urge its “European political representatives” to implement a number of measures which include “Comprehensive hate crime monitoring” and “Obligatory educational curriculum against anti-Semitism, racism and all forms of hatred which is absolutely essential to give room to the many cultures and religions in Europe.”

The CEJI is, like all major Jewish organizations across the world, being blatantly hypocritical. Israel, the country to which they are all loyal, is the most extreme “xenophobic” nation on earth:

1. Anti-African racism in Israel.

On May 29th the prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, said he was adding African “infiltrators” to his list of threats to the Jewish homeland. He said he shared the rioters’ pain and promised to solve the problem by completing a wall along the border with Egypt. He said he would also build the world’s largest detention center—and deport all those within, starting with the South Sudanese.

Until 2009 the 15,000 or so asylum-seekers entering via Sinai every year were banned from coming within a radius of 30km (19 miles) of Tel Aviv. Since the government revoked that order, the security forces, after catching immigrants crossing, verify their identity and then pack them off to Tel Aviv.

Israeli officials say they are loth to improve conditions in case even more are encouraged to come. The interior ministry bans the immigrants from work and refuses to process asylum applications from friendly countries such as Eritrea, though it is a dictatorship.

Source: The Economist, “Keep Out: Racial Tension Is Rising As Black Asylum-Seekers Pour In,” June 2, 2012.

2. Israel’s Mixed Marriages Act

Marriage between Jews and non-Jews is illegal in Israel.

In order to get married in Israel, applicants have to prove their Jewishness, and this is sometimes done with DNA testing, a leading rabbi in Israel specializing in the issue has told the Haaretz newspaper.

Rabbi Naftali Schreiber, who runs a private office for the clarification of Jewishness called “A People Alone” in Israel, revealed the extent of the “checks” undertaken by the Jewish state to make sure that no Gentiles are allowed to marry Jews in their country.

It then moves on to an interview with Rabbi Schreiber, who is specifically asked “How does one prove Jewishness?”

His answer is as follows:

We base ourselves on the documentation people provide—part of the profession is to authenticate documents.

We have criminological machinery for authenticating documents, and we also carry out a personal inquiry in which we hear their story.

We have a way to be in touch with archives abroad, or to refer the applicants themselves to the archives.

Sometimes DNA testing is needed, and people agree to that, too.

Source: Haaretz, “So you think you are Jewish enough for an Israeli wedding? Prove it,” July 11, 2013.

3. Israelis attack African migrants during protest against refugees

Demonstrators have attacked African migrants in Tel Aviv in a protest against refugees and asylum-seekers that indicates an increasingly volatile mood in Israel over what it terms as “infiltrators.”

Miri Regev, a member of the Israeli parliament, told the crowd, “the Sudanese are a cancer in our body.” The vast majority of asylum-seekers in Israel are from Sudan and Eritrea.

Around 1,000 demonstrators took part in the demonstration on Wednesday night, waving signs saying: “Infiltrators, get out of our homes” and “Our streets are no longer safe for our children.” A car containing Africans was attacked and shops serving the refugee community were looted. Seventeen people were arrested.

A reporter for the Israeli daily Maariv described it as an “unbridled rampage” and explosion of “pent-up rage.”

Source: The Guardian, “Israelis Attack African Migrants During Protest Against Refugees,” May 24, 2012

4. Africans “threaten identity of Jewish State,” says Netanyahu

The Israeli prime minister has stoked a volatile debate about refugees and migrant workers from Africa, warning that “illegal infiltrators flooding the country” were threatening the security and identity of the Jewish state.

“If we don’t stop their entry, the problem that currently stands at 60,000 could grow to 600,000, and that threatens our existence as a Jewish and democratic state,” Binyamin Netanyahu said at Sunday’s cabinet meeting. “This phenomenon is very grave and threatens the social fabric of society, our national security and our national identity.”

Source: The Guardian, “Israel PM: Illegal African Immigrants Threaten Identity of Jewish State,” May 20, 2012.
Only force rules. Force is the first law - Adolf H. Man has become great through struggle - Adolf H. Strength lies not in defense but in attack - Adolf H.

the jew cries out in pain


Display Modes

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:42 AM.
Page generated in 0.25921 seconds.