Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old July 26th, 2014 #1
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default Jewish Hoax Crimes

The 2014 Riverdale Swastikas


As a new feature on Semitic Controversies I have decided to start writing up jewish claims of various 'hate crimes' which, as far as I can see, are rather fishy. The justification for this is that there have been rash of fake 'anti-Semitic hate crimes' that were in fact perpetrated by jews to pretend there is more anti-Semitism in the world than there in fact is.

Recent example include Sarah Marshak (who drew swastikas on her own door and claimed she was being 'targeted'), David Haddad (who made anti-Semitic phone calls and scrawled 'All Jews should die and go to Hell' on a wall) and Dr. Lisa Rosenberg (who made up the anti-Semitic abuse that she was allegedly subjected to on a Jetblue plane before being removed from the flight).

This doesn't mean of course that every 'hate crime' is a fake, but rather that a significant proportion of them seem to be so. The latest 'hate crime' in Riverdale is a good example of this.

Briefly the facts are these:

On Friday 11th July four swastikas and the words 'Kill Jews' were inscribed in chalk on the McLaughlin playground in Riverdale, New York. (1)

That's it boys and girls: they have no idea who inscribed the swastikas and wording onto the playground, but since it was done on the floor it seems unlikely that it was a piece of anti-Semitic vandalism by one of the many evils Nazis who supposedly inhabit American according to the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai Brith and the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Why, if you are aiming to abuse jews, do it on the floor of a playground in chalk?

Wouldn't it be far more effective to spray paint whatever you are going to do onto a wall that is highly visible (and also make it far harder to remove)?

Of course it would and as such it seems unlikely that there is anything particularly 'anti-Semitic' in this, because its placement and the type of graffiti makes no sense for those who hate jews. It seems rather more likely, as Riverdale is a heavily jewish area, that this was either a few bored kids (who may or may not have been jewish) or a jewish hate crime hoax intended to stoke the latent fears of the jewish community of Riverdale into feeling that the 'Nazis are out to get them'.

It is the kind of thing that local Zionist true-believers would do to encourage Aliyah from the United States since unless a jew feels threatened then they aren't likely to want downgrade their lives and jobs by going to live in Israel unless they have general romantic or specific ideological notions about life there.

The irony of all this is that so far the police can find no suspect in all probability because they are probably looking at the wrong people: if they checked out local jewish fundamentalists and radicals then quite frankly they'd be more likely to find the culprit(s).


References


(1) See the following articles: http://jpupdates.com/2014/07/18/rive...tic-incident/; http://bronx.news12.com/news/anti-se...ale-1.8836157; http://bronxboropres.nyc.gov/press/r...14-07-18a.html

-------------------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot...swastikas.html
__________________
 
Old March 16th, 2015 #2
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default

The Congregation Toras Chaim Swastika in Dallas (2015)


It is another day and there has been yet another 'hate crime'. This time the alleged 'hate crime' has occurred in Dallas and the 'target' was an Orthodox Rabbi named Yaakov Rich. From what has been reported on Breitbart Texas (1) it appears that Rich's car was spray-painted (badly) with a swastika in the early hours of Wednesday.

It seems like a kosher 'hate crime' incident now: doesn't it?

Well the problem is that when you get into the details it turns out that it sounds awfully like Rabbi Rich spray-painted his own car with a swastika. Leaving aside the fact that a swastika is an odd symbol to use on a car in order to 'cause distress to jews' and that this particular swastika was done really badly (obviously by someone who has never drawn one in their life), which suggests that Rich may have done them himself.

Evidence is found in his assertion that:

'As a Jew, the swastika is the most offensive symbol that there is.'

In other words Rabbi Rich thinks a swastika is the 'most offensive symbol' that could have been drawn in spray-paint on his car and then one magically appears on said vehicle.

Why not something a little traditional like 'Jew' or 'Kike Scum'?

Why on earth would an 'anti-Semite' spray-paint a swastika to 'offend' jews?

After all the swastika is the symbol of National Socialism, which is not what people generally draw/write when they want to stick it to jews, because many of them find it to be an odious symbol to themselves.

Why draw what you find personally offensive when you could do draw and/or write something equally offensive to your target without offending yourself or opening yourself up to claims of being a literal 'Nazi'?

It gets even better though when we read that Rabbi Rich has been illegally conducting an Orthodox synagogue in his home. This congregation is called Toras Chaim and consists of only 20 families.

The city authorities of Dallas served Rabbi Rich with legal papers on March 2nd this year to the effect that he needed make improvements to the building in order to comply with building, fire, safety and parking codes or face fines of $1,000 a day for being in breach of said codes.

The week after these papers were served a 'hate crime' against Rabbi Rich happens in the early morning with no warning whatsoever.

In spite of claims that people 'drove past shouting obscenities' at the members of the Congregation. These incidents have likely simply been invented to lend substance to Rabbi Rich's 'hate crime victim' status (After all why were they not reported to the police earlier? Why suddenly report them now?) and without actual evidence the alleged incidents occurred they not admissible as they are simply hearsay by highly partisan witnesses no less.

On this basis then it sounds awfully like Rabbi Rich couldn't afford either the improvements required by the law for a public building or the $1,000 a day fine for not complying. So instead he came up with a not-very-original way to avoid the loss of face caused by having to shut down his little davening freak show in Dallas. He spray-painted the 'most offensive symbol' he could think of (as he has already informed us was the case) onto his own car and cried 'Anti-Semitism!'

Scratch one more jewish hoax.


References

(1) http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2015/...as-rabbis-car/

-------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot...ras-chaim.html
__________________
 
Old March 17th, 2015 #3
Bobby Bandanza
The anti-Jew.
 
Bobby Bandanza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,539
jewsign 3 Swastikas Found at Jewish Fraternity House

Quote:
Vanderbilt University officials have launched a hate crime investigation after three swastikas were found spray-painted inside a Jewish fraternity house.

The Tennessean (http://tnne.ws/18BVyzK) cited a statement that Provost Susan R. Wente sent to students Monday reporting that the graffiti was found Saturday after a party at the Alpha Epsilon Pi house.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/s...house-29692294
__________________
http://macseafraidh.wordpress.com/

"Whatcha gonna do when Trumpamania and the largest rats of Judea Jew wild on you?!" - Me
 
Old March 20th, 2015 #4
Bobby Bandanza
The anti-Jew.
 
Bobby Bandanza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,539
jewsign Jewish Student Admits Swastika Hoax In Jewish Frat Dorm At George Washington U.

Quote:
A student at The George Washington University posted a swastika on a residence hall bulletin board belonging to a Jewish fraternity on Monday.

The student is Jewish and had been — until this week — an active member of the fraternity.
http://dailycaller.com/2015/03/19/je...-washington-u/
__________________
http://macseafraidh.wordpress.com/

"Whatcha gonna do when Trumpamania and the largest rats of Judea Jew wild on you?!" - Me
 
Old March 20th, 2015 #5
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default

Hoax Confirmed: George Washington University Swastika (2015)


On Monday 16th March jewish students at George Washington University found a swastika posted to the bulletin board of the jewish fraternity Zeta Beta Tau. Naturally the jewish students screamed 'Oy Vey' loudly and promptly went into accusative overdrive about 'anti-Semitism', 'Nazis' and the so-called 'holocaust'. (1)

The matter was naturally referred to the local 'Hate Crimes Unit' (whatever that is) and the whole 'Anti-Semitism on Campus' industry was just gearing up to go into high pitch nasal squeals about 'hate' and how any criticism of jews/Judaism/Israel is 'anti-Semitism' and then it just all came crashing down around them.

The problem was that it was discovered that the perpetrator was a jewish undergraduate student who had been to South India for spring break and brought back a swastika pendant. (2) This he confessed to having promptly pinned on the bulletin board of the Zeta Beta Tau fraternity and was almost immediately expelled by the national leadership of said society. (3)

Aside from being another case of 'I told you so' to the world from the members of the jew-wise fraternity (like myself). This instance caught the rabid Zionist crowd out (again) as the David Horowitz collective (the Israel-Firster version of the Borg) plus the Zionist Organization of America had been agitating for 'stronger responses to anti-Semitism' by George Washington University. (4)

This was caused by a spate of mysterious swastikas that were drawn over the same jewish fraternity's buildings. Naturally the Horowitz collective threw their toys out of the pram and demanded the culprit be executed immediately for daring to do some urban guerrilla art of which they disapproved.

However as no culprit has been apprehended one suspects that this was either the same jew or another member of the tribe trying 'raise awareness of hate on campus' or some such.

It has however had the significant positive effect of causing the 'Daily Caller' to point out there has been an absolute stampede of fake swastikas affecting jews lately. Further they have rightly pointed out that swastikas turn up like clockwork every year on university campuses when jews in the media have been screaming about 'rising global anti-Semitism' or before some local or national jewish event/symposium (for which it oft acts like free PR). (5)

I rather suspect that jews screaming 'hate' and 'anti-Semitism' like this all the time is going to have same effect as the crying wolf has on non-jews.

We simply don't believe their claims anymore.


References


(1) http://dailycaller.com/2015/03/19/je...-washington-u/
(2) http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/g...wpisrc=nl_buzz
(3) Ibid.
(4) Ibid.
(5) http://dailycaller.com/2013/08/27/fa...ue-campuses/2/

Hat-tip to Bobby Bandanza at VNN for putting me onto this.

------------------------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot...ashington.html
__________________
 
Old March 20th, 2015 #6
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default

Hoax Alert: Vanderbilt University Swastikas (2015)


On Saturday 14th March jewish students at Vanderbilt University discovered that someone had spray-painted two swastikas in the lift they used to get to the jewish Tau chapter in the Alpha Epsilon Pi fraternity house as well as discovering another one on a door in the basement. (1)

Naturally the jews of Vanderbilt University (and beyond) are screaming about 'anti-Semitism', 'Nazis' and the lessons of the so-called 'holocaust' not having been learned.

Yada yada; nothing new there.

It isn't even new that the jews have called the police in to investigate as after all offending jews is a criminal offence dontcha know. (2)

Amusingly the local Lubavitch Chahad representatives (whose divinely-ordained leader and spiritual guide repeatedly referred to non-jews as inferior sub-humans with whom jews should not for preference mingle let alone breed) have been quoted on the subject of how awful 'hate crime' and 'intolerance' is etc.

Apparently our little hysterical hand-wringing crowd of bleeding hearts haven't read a word that the Chabad have written over the years let alone such vile books as the Lubavitcher Rebbe's 'Tanya' (which I have read and is available in a dual English/Hebrew edition so they have no excuse).

Let me quote an official Lubavitch Chabad work on the Rebbe's teachings on the subject of non-jews:

'He read and translated into English. Most of it was beyond me, except for one passage describing how even the lowliest of Jews would sacrifice his life for Kiddush Hashem, to sanctify G-d’s Name. And in a flash I understand what my parents had been hollering about the whole time: even the worst Jew is forbidden to marry a gentile.' (3)

After all if they had (and were being intellectual consistent) then they would have go apocalyptic and drive the Chabad off campus for promoting 'hate', 'nativism' and 'jewish supremacism'.

However it is worth remembering two basic facts about this alleged incidence of 'hate crime':

1) It occurred in a university fraternity house, which presumably only allows fraternity members (or approved guests) entrance.

2) There has been a spate of similar swastikas appearing (4) and a similar one just two days later than this occurrence at a jewish fraternity house at George Washington University has been confirmed as a hoax. (5)

Now if we but connect these two points then we come to the very obvious (and logically simple) conclusion that it wasn't an evil anti-Semite on campus who scrawled these swastikas (after all as I have pointed out elsewhere: why a swastika?) (6) but rather more probably a jewish member of the Tau chapter themselves (just like a 2007 incident at George Washington University). (7)

In summary this smells like yet another 'hate crime' hoax by jews seeking to manufacture 'hate' and 'anti-Semitism' to be 'outraged' at and 'hurt' by.


References


(1) http://www.vanderbilthustler.com/new...0e7dc3683.html
(2) http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/s...house-29692294
(3) Aharon Dov Halperin, Trans: Tuvia Natkin, 2004, ‘Our Man in Dakar and other Stories of the Lubavitcher Rebbe’, 1st Edition, Sifriyat Kfar Chabad: New York, p. 17
(4) http://dailycaller.com/2013/08/27/fa...ue-campuses/2/
(5) http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/g...wpisrc=nl_buzz
(6) http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot...ras-chaim.html
(7) http://www.jta.org/2007/11/06/news-o...dorm-swastikas

Hat-tip to Bobby Bandanza at VNN for alerting me to this.

-------------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot...niversity.html
__________________
 
Old May 16th, 2015 #7
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default

Hoax Alert: Drexel University Swastika (2015)


After a bit of a hiatus of weird supposedly 'anti-Semitic' incidents at univerisites in North America after a rush of them in January and February; we have a new one. This time at Drexel University in Philadelphia.

It appears that on Tuesday May 12th a jewish student returned to their dorm room to discover that the Israeli flag they had stuck on their door had had a swastika and the word 'Jew' taped to it. (1) Now as usual Drexel University's Hillel branch and its faculty have quickly responded in an orgiastic chorus of 'Oy Vey! The Hate!' with condemnations and an open letter to all students. (2)

According to Rabbi Howard Alpert (who is the CEO of the Greater Philadelphia area Hillel organization):

'“The student is someone who is quite open both in the pride in which he takes in being part of a Jewish community and in his support for Israel.”' (3)

Now apparently they 'already know' who did it, but haven't done anything about it. (4) That is in itself rather odd and also notable is the fact that this jewish student's name hasn't been released. No hand-wringing interviews, no nothing.

Call me suspicious, but when a student who is obviously, from Alpert's description, a strident Zionist has the flag they stuck on their door 'vandalized', but the university and the local Hillel chapter stridently condemn the incident, but 'know who it was' and don't act. I tend to think it is yet another case of a jew getting creative about inventing some 'anti-Semitism' to be a victim of.

That this occurs suddenly when the student is out, but yet is only taped onto the flag rather than written on it directly suggests that whoeever performed the act did not want to actually 'desecrate' the Israeli flag. They used half-measures and stuck removable 'symbols of hate' on the flat with tape so that it wouldn't actually be defaced.

This 'hate crime' is also incredibly well-timed to occur on the very day the 5th Global Forum for Combating Anti-Semitism began in Israel and has been trumpeted by the Israeli Foreign Ministry all over their website. (5)

Too much of a coincidence: no?

A Zionist student faking an 'anti-Semitic hate crime' just as a major Israeli Conference on 'Combating Anti-Semitism' (focusing on liberal/left-wing 'anti-Semitism' in universities no less) (6) is starting...

That could never happen now: could it?


References


(1) http://www.jewishexponent.com/headli...o-israeli-flag
(2) http://drexelhillel.org/news/address...us-may-15-2015
(3) http://www.jewishexponent.com/headli...o-israeli-flag
(4) Ibid.
(5) http://mfa.gov.il/MFA/AboutTheMinist...isemitism.aspx
(6) See http://www.jta.org/2015/05/15/news-o...p-fomenting-it

----------------------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot...-swastika.html
__________________
 
Old May 23rd, 2015 #8
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default Update on the Drexel University Swastika Hoax (23/05/2015)

Update on the Drexel University Swastika Hoax (23/05/2015)


In an article last week I pointed out that the swastika and the word 'Jew' that appeared taped to an Israeli flag on the door of a Zionist student at Drexel University in Philadelphia on 12th May was likely to be yet another jewish hoax. (1)

In support this I adduced several facts, which were as follows; the 'victim' was a strongly pro-Zionist jew, the Israeli flag wasn't actually physically defaced but rather a swastika and the word 'Jew' were taped to it (odd for a vandal: no?), that it occurred on the first day of the 5th Global Forum for Combating Anti-Semitism in Jerusalem and the fact that Drexel University authorities reportedly knew 'who had done it', but had as yet 'taken no action'.

It is now the 23rd May and as of yet Drexel University hasn't even bothered to name either the victim or the perpetrator (or make any further comment for that matter), which suggests that they probably one and the same individual. Drexel University, as well as the associated Hillel chapter, who initially screamed loudly about 'the hate on campus' are now being as quiet as mice on the issue and are probably hoping to bury the story to prevent yet another embarrassing 'anti-Semitic hate crime' being revealed as being committed by a jew against themselves (and therefore a hoax).

As an ironic aside; it took an embarrassing 9 days for the local affiliate of the Anti-Defamation League in Philadelphia to notice the 'hate' at Drexel University though. (2) Meanwhile in the local jewish publication; 'The Jewish Exponent', one Samantha Zipin has been complaining loudly about 'the hate on campus'. (3)

She uses as examples of her 'fear of hate' things like the swastikas painted on jewish fraternity notice boards and lifts as well as the Drexel University swastika. The simple fact is that if Zipin had cared to use a little bit of her critical thinking faculities, which she presumably has considering she wants to go on to higher education, then she might have noticed the fact the Drexel case is being quietly buried, one of the jewish fraternity cases has confirmed having been committed as a jew, (4) the other has been quietly forgotten and no perpertrator talked about and so on.

The simple fact is that if non-jews wanted to scare jews with impromptu graffiti; scribbling or painting swastikas in random places is not the kind of thing you'd do. The swastika doesn't mean a lot to non-jews outside of those who are National Socialists, Hindus or Buddhists (who all regard it as a positive symbol), but if 'haters' (like my august self) really wanted to do some impromptu anti-jewish graffiti then we'd probably a bit move inventive than badly drawn swastikas in random places.

The only people to whom the swastika has the connotation with 'genocide' and as the ultimate 'symbol of hate' is the jews; who exist in a kind of perpetual 1939 'holocaust' cultural bubble.


References


(1) For this see: http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot...-swastika.html
(2) http://philadelphia.adl.org/news/jew...-israeli-flag/
(3) http://www.jewishexponent.com/opinio...college-search
(4) On this see: http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot...ashington.html

----------------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot...-swastika.html
__________________
 
Old June 15th, 2015 #9
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default

Hoax Alert: Northwestern University 'Racist Graffiti' and Swastikas (2015)

Well another week goes by and would you look at that; we have another 'hate crime' on campus' that jewish organizations are ranting and raving about.

This time it happened on the campus of Northwestern University where on Monday 8th June construction workers discovered what has been described as 'racist and anti-Semitic graffiti including at least one swastika' outside the Kellogg School of Management. (1) Some of this was apparently specifically anti-black in content.

This comes off the back of an earlier 'hate crime' circa a month earlier where a swastika and a Star of David were found drawn in ink in a library study room. (2)

I think it is worth stating the obvious here; in the first instance that a swastika is an easy doodle to make and is a common bit of graffiti done by bored students everywhere. I myself used to doodle swastikas on a regular basis when I was bored at school and that was years before I had a positive view of the symbol.

In the second the doodle of a swastika and a Star of David together, assuming they were done by the same person, is obviously a reference to the brutal occupation being inflicted by Israel on the Palestinians. The connection of the swastika and the Star of David is extremely common as an anti-Zionist graphic and meme; it is hardly a 'symbol of hate', but at worst a political protest doodle.

Therefore it is completely unreasonable to even begin to class an ink doodle of both as a 'hate crime'. That this is what is being done per force suggests the sheer intellectual lunacy, and agenda driven nature, of jewish attempts to make any criticism of jews, Judaism and Israel of which they disapprove as a universal form of 'hate crime'.

This is demonstrated rather aptly by the senior rabbi at Northwestern, Dov Klein, who is a member of the Lubavitch Chabad. I quote him from the Algemeiner's article on this subject:

'We need the university to be aware of it, conscientious that it is painful, and vigilant in terms of trying to educate the student population about the importance of diversity and what these types of hurtful symbols mean,” Chabad Rabbi Dov Klein told the Algemeiner. “Whether it’s a symbol against the Jewish community, against the African American community [or] against the Arab community, these things are not tolerated.”' (3)

This is abject nonsense as Rabbi Klein's deceased (but yet current) spiritual leader, the Lubavitcher Rebbe, was extremely racist against non-jews and especially blacks.

I quote:

'At the first opportunity I asked the Rebbe for a blessing, and he answered: ‘Jews have a protective wall against negative matters that separates them from non-Jews…’

“I understood from the Rebbe’s words that the problem was assimilation. Yet, when I told my friend the Rebbe’s message, he was surprised and said he was unaware of anything like that in his family. A more through check revealed that their oldest son had been secretly dating a non-Jewish girl, and was preparing to marry her. The family persuaded him to let her go, informed the Rebbe – who gave his blessing to the ill son – and the disease disappeared.”' (4)

'It was 1952. My brother-in-law was living in Williamsburg with his wonderful Chassidishe family when, one day, tragedy hit: his daughter decided to marry a goy. And to add salt to the wound – not any goy, but an African-American! He was a Professor in his field, and he used his academic credentials as leverage in influencing the young woman.' (5)

Is it not strange that Rabbi Klein doesn't mention that? Or suggest that his spiritual leader needs special lessons in Gan Eden from Hashem about the 'importance of diversity', which he quite clearly would benefit from if we follow Rabbi Klein's logic.

The fact that a Chabad Rabbi felt the urge to speak out about 'hate' is quite frankly hilarious. Since anyone who has read even a small selection of the written publications of the Lubavitch Chabad knows that they veritably reek of gentile hatred and the belief that non-jews are sub-humans born to serve jews as their slaves.

Indeed you need but to read the Lubavitcher Rebbe's 'Tanya', which is available in a Hebrew-English facing edition (although some of the sting is taken out by the slightly economical English translation), to know that.

Unlike Rabbi Klein, who apparently is clairvoyant or divinely-inspired, the administration of Northwestern appear to be confused about just how the vandals gained access to the area concerned. (6) I can't help with how they did it, but I think it is possible to suggest who was responsible by simply inferring from the facts.

Given the amount of noise jewish organizations are making about 'hate on campus' at the moment and the fact it seems likely that a student or faculty member drew this graffiti. It seems reasonable to suggest that a jewish student or faculty member was responsible.

In the first instance because, as I have commented before, the swastika is a symbol that is only really offensive to jews and which seems to be the staple of jewish hate crime hoaxes. (7) The far right, who are usually supposed to be responsible (as is implied by the news coverage in this case), rarely if ever use the swastika to make their point.

After all it communicates no real political message and only confirms the jewish narrative of an eternal tsunami of 'hate' directed at the three hundred pound jewish bully who is subject to the delusion that he is currently a helpless child in Auschwitz.

In the second because when you combine the swastika(s) with the random anti-black scrawl it is just too stereotypical to be taken seriously. Surely if someone on the far right wanted to graffiti something to make a point; they would use one of the popular memes from the far right's sub-culture like 'Anti-Racist is Codeword for Anti-White' or some such, not swastikas and 'Go Back to Africa' or some such.

In the third because the graffiti, from how it has been described, was in a location that was difficult to access and presumably not particularly visible, which rather defeats the object of political graffiti outside as a way to positively massage 'hate crime' statistics and feel 'victimized'.

In other words it is likely to have been someone trying to be a stereotypical 'Nazi' that actually did it (i.e. someone who isn't on the anti-jewish far right) and when one uses of the logical tests of cui bono (who benefits); then it is quite clear that the likeliest contender are the jews.

It is as simple as that.


References


(1) http://www.chicagotribune.com/suburb...611-story.html
(2) Ibid.
(3) http://www.algemeiner.com/2015/06/12...tic-vandalism/
(4) Aharon Dov Halperin, 2004, 'Our Man in Dakar and other stories of the Lubavitcher Rebbe', 1st Edition, Sifriyat Kfar Chabad: New York, p. 58
(5) Ibid, p. 172
(6) http://www.chicagotribune.com/suburb...611-story.html
(7) For example: http://www.dailystormer.com/george-w...indu-swastika/

--------------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot...niversity.html
__________________
 
Old December 2nd, 2015 #10
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default

Hoax Alert: Jewish Bookstore Attack (2015)


According to NBC New York on Monday 30th November the following occurred in a heavily jewish district of the city:

'The manager of a Jewish bookstore on the Upper West Side was threatened and punched outside of his business by a man claiming to be a Muslim, police said.

The beating happened around 1:15 p.m. Monday outside West Side Judaica and Bookstore at 2412 Broadway, council member Mark Levine and police confirmed.

Bookstore manager Salmon Salczer, 52, saw the suspect pacing and screaming outside the store. When he went to check on him, the suspect allegedly screamed, "F--- you Jew. I'll kill you. I'm a Muslim!"

The suspect then punched Salczer in the face before taking off on a scooter, according to police.' (1)

The problem with this supposed 'hate crime' is that it relies on what one jewish individual claims happened and there doesn't appear to be any other witnesses to the event. This already makes it suspect given the incident is alleged to have happened at lunch time in the street outside the book shop; in other words the busiest time of the day.

I also note with interest that the story alleges the assailant was acting like a stereotypical crazy guy outside of the shop before the incident, but no one appears to have noticed. Nor for that matter is what is claimed to have occurred likely; after all he allegedly shouted 'Fuck you Jew. I'll kill you. I'm a Muslim!' and then punched the jewish manager before escaping on a scooter.

I mean come on; the first two elements ('Fuck you Jew. I'll kill you.') are likely enough, but then when you add in 'I'm a Muslim!' element it becomes so counter-intuitive as to stretch credulity beyond all reasonable limits.

The only ways that this alleged crime report actually works as a plausible sequence of events is if one of the following is true:

A) The perpetrator is actually insane.

B) The perpetrator wasn't Muslim and wanted to claim he was for whatever reason.

C) The incident didn't actually happen.

I err towards the last interpretation for the simple reason that not only is the act itself unlikely (shouting 'I'll kill you, because I'm a Muslim' but then scarpering after throwing a quick punch in the street), but from what there no witnesses to the event at the busiest time of day in New York.

It also bears more than passing resemblance to actual attacks by Muslims in France and the Low Countries (i.e. attack happens then suspect escapes on scooter), but in this case the alleged suspect goes from crazy (ranting and raving while pacing up and down) to pre-planned cold-blooded rationality in an instant (he escapes via his scooter which is parked nearby).

Therefore it is not likely that he was actually insane (as a crazy person would have just continued being crazy or made a sustained attack), but while it possible the perpetrator wasn't a Muslim and wanted to claim he was (for whatever reason). This seems unlikely again for the same combination of a lack of any other witnesses and the radically different exhibited behaviours; crazy ranting and then pre-planned cold-blooded rationality.

Who on earth carefully plans an attempt to frame Muslims for a weird 'hate crime' and then acts like a crazy person in front of the shop where he is to do said 'hate crime'?

They don't.

It just seems... well... exactly the kind of thing someone would make up to be perfectly honest as no actual harm has been done and it can be chalked up to 'anti-Semitism', while the NYPD are rather unlikely to ever arrest anyone for it.

Scratch one so-called 'hate crime'.


References


(1) http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local...359604121.html

------------------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://www.semiticcontroversies.blog...re-attack.html
__________________
 
Old December 11th, 2015 #11
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default Hoax Alert: Menorah Vandalism in New York (2015)

Hoax Alert: Menorah Vandalism in New York (2015)


Near Carl Shurz park in the Upper East Side of Manhattan in New York a Hanukkah menorah was knocked over sometime on Saturday night (5th December) and then knocked over again on Sunday night (6th December). This caused significant damage to the menorah and the organization responsible for erecting it, the Lubavitch Chabad, are livid about it. (1)

The local jewish population are predictably angry and producing rather sordid reports like the following being quoted by at least two news sources:

'“There’s no way it came down by accident, it kind of sat on a platform and clearly somebody pushed it over,” Alex Goldstein, who lives in the area, told 1010 WINS.' (2)

Some people pushed a public menorah next to a park over twice at night.

Wow: that is just such a huge surprise.

It is a temporary display right next to a place in which people who consume copious amounts of alcohol tend to congregate. It was obviously pushed over by drunk people unless we have evidence to the contrary, which we don't (i.e. using Occam's razor to derive the probable solution to this whodunit).

That said this minor bit of vandalism, which I should add is a weekly occurrence even in the nicer streets of New York (as churches routinely have a similar problem), (3) should be a minor incident as unworthy of notice in the news as someone throwing glass bottles at a house as they pass by.

However this story has been picked up by both local news outlets (4) as well as by the two big Israeli papers: Haaretz and the Jerusalem Post. (5)

In addition to the fact that the Mayor of New York, Bill de Blasio, made a public statement ardently condemning a minor bit of vandalism (this fact being reported in both Israel and the United States), which he didn't do when a local church, St. Anthony of Padua, was the subject of similar vandalism recently. (6)

De Blasio's statement on the petty criminality of vandalizing a public menorah was as follows:

'When we see an act of prejudice, when we see an act of hate, we must respond to it,” he said.' (7)

In other words De Blasio magically knows that the menorah was pushed over because it was menorah, that this was done by non-jews not by other jews, that said non-jews did it because they were 'prejudiced' against jews not from any other motive and as such was part of nefarious anti-Semitic campaign to vandalize menorahs.

Further he has announced that the NYPD's 'Hate Crimes Task Force' are now investigating; the obvious question is why given that it is fairly obviously not a 'hate crime'. The Lubavitch Chabad did something manifestly dumb; in that they erected a public menorah next to a park that is filled with drunken undesirables at night and expected nothing to happen to said object.

The fact that it was likely nothing to do with 'hate crime' is shown by the fact that a similar menorah erected by the Lubavitch Chabad was stolen in Salt Lake City in Utah and then found outside of a student fraternity house. (8)

No 'hate crime' there and I wonder who might have filched it?

Hmm.... drunk students maybe?

Now the Lubavitch Chabad are trying to cover the fact that they did something stupid and blame it on 'anti-Semitism' instead.

However doesn't the fact that the Mayor of New York immediately scrambled to condemn an obvious minor bit of vandalism as a 'hate crime' (as well as the international reportage concerning the incident), but not do it for other groups experiencing similar problems, tell you who really runs New York?


References


(1) http://www.metro.us/new-york/menorah...3EdUQoyHg9YYU/
(2) Ibid.
(3) http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2015/12/...-park-menorah/
(4) Ibid.
(5) http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/news/1.690675 ; http://www.jpost.com/printarticle.aspx?id=436650
(6) http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2015/12/...-park-menorah/
(7) Ibid.
(8) http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/news/1.690675

-----------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://www.semiticcontroversies.blog...sm-in-new.html
__________________
 
Old February 27th, 2016 #12
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default Hoax Alert: Rutgers University Swastika (January 2016)

Hoax Alert: Rutgers University Swastika (January 2016)


Another week and yet another fake 'hate crime' is in the news. Once again this occurred at Rutgers university with a swastika being taped the ceiling in a communal space at a university residence at the Livingston Apartments in mid-January 2016.

The jewish student who 'discovered' the swastika on the ceiling – one Sara Rosen – promptly reported it as so-called 'hate crime' to the police and campus authorities. (1) Rosen apparently knew immediately who had done the deed and that it was 'targeted' at her.

Sara Rosen apparently has ESP. Who knew?

Naturally every jewish organization and media outlet has taken her side in the matter, because... well... she is jewish don't you know. Therefore her feelings must never be hurt and if you do in fact dare to hurt them. Then you are clearly an anti-Semitic hate criminal in need to immediate punishment.

The most vehement of the varied condemnations has come from the permanently offended Anti-Defamation League – whose local representative Joshua Cohen was quoted by NJ.com - who immediately jumped on the 'hate crime' bandwagon and began riding it for all it was worth (sometimes with hilarious results). (2)

Unusually it does actually appear that it wasn't the jewish supposed target-cum-victim who did it to themselves, but rather someone else. This certainly makes a change from the lurid assortment of patently invented or self-inflicted 'hate crimes' against jews that are reported and blown up into major 'scandals' by the media.

In this case two of Rosen's flatmates appear to have admitted to having taped up the swastika on the ceiling of the communal area. They claimed that it wasn't related to Rosen being jewish, but rather was a Buddhist peace symbol. (3)

Now what is not stated is whether the students who taped up the swastika were themselves jewish or not. All the media coverage assumes not, but we have absolutely no reason to assume this other than one of students concerned claims to have been, or currently to be, a Buddhist. (4)

They could very well be jewish themselves, but we simply don't know either way.

The students concerned claim they were putting up a Buddhist peace symbol and that the 'Nazi swastika' is the other way around. This nonsensical myth has been debunked many a time, (5) but clearly this information hasn't found its way into the hallowed halls of Rutgers or the media in general. Since both endorse the myth that the swastika spins different ways depending on the meaning, which is just well... complete nonsense.

Oh dear...

However whatever way you wish to spin the incident. It clearly isn't a 'hate crime', but rather what the Dean of Rutgers, Mark Schuster, concluded it was: a 'joke gone bad'. (6)

The simple fact is that putting up a swastika in a communal area is an act of freedom of expression and not a 'hate crime'. After all putting up a 'Star of David' on a wall would offend a great many people (Muslims, Christians and Atheists/Agnostics alike), but no one treats that as a 'hate crime'.

I wonder why?

The only hatred evident in the whole incident is that of Rosen and her father who are campaigning to have the students concerns expelled from university housing or kicked out of the university. (7)

It is the Rosens (along with the ADL), and not the students who taped up the swastika, who are conducting an orchestrated campaign motivated by bias (i.e. because they are jewish and therefore hurting their feelings or offending them is a heinous crime) against those who disagree with them and have the gall to express it. (8)

This is yet another clear example of jewish privilege in action, but remember folks: it is all sheer coincidence.

Nothing to see here; now move along.


References


(1) http://www.nj.com/middlesex/index.ss...for_respo.html
(2) Ibid.
(3) http://www.dailyrecord.com/story/opi...robe/80799610/
(4) Ibid.
(5) For example: http://jrbooksonline.com/HTML-docs/T...s_Swastika.htm
(6) http://www.dailyrecord.com/story/opi...robe/80799610/
(7) Ibid.
(8) Ibid; http://www.nj.com/middlesex/index.ss...or_respo.html; http://forward.com/news/breaking-new...ka-classmate/; http://newjersey.adl.org/news/rutger...dent-adl-says/

------------------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://www.semiticcontroversies.blog...-swastika.html
__________________
 
Old June 11th, 2016 #13
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default Hoax Alert: The Burning of the John Henry Patterson Memorial (2016)

Hoax Alert: The Burning of the John Henry Patterson Memorial (2016)


On Thursday the 9th June the 'Irish News' reports that the following incident took place in Belfast:

'A MURAL of an Irishman who advocated the creation of an Israeli state has been damaged in an attack which is being treated as a hate crime by police.

Police said that at around 1.30am on Thursday, two containers were set alight close to the memorial to Lieutenant-Colonel John Henry Patterson at the junction of Beverley Street and Northumberland Street, off the Shankill Road.' (1)

This strikes me as strange precisely because the Belfast police are investigating this incident as a 'hate crime'. When Patterson was an Anglo-Saxon Christian not jewish and nor do we know why the memorial has been defaced or more importantly by whom.

The fact that this is being treated as a 'hate crime' is a hoax in and of itself since no 'hate' is even suggested by the act.

Indeed there is reason to suspect that it has nothing to do with 'hate'. Since the fact of matter is that the Israeli flag wasn't even defaced nor the target of the burning, but rather the individual(s) responsible for this attempted arson simply tried to burn the memorial from the centre without specifically targeting the photographs of Patterson or the Israeli flag.

Thus we may suggest that in all likelihood this is a random attack of random criminal damage and not a political act. Even if it was a 'political act' it wouldn't even be classifiable as a 'hate crime' since no living person or 'religious minority' is the target and at worst it is simply a political statement not an act of 'hate'.

Therefore treating it as a 'hate crime' is simply downright absurd.


References


(1) http://www.irishnews.com/news/northe...-crime-555811/

--------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://www.semiticcontroversies.blog...ohn-henry.html
__________________
 
Old August 27th, 2016 #14
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default Hoax Alert: Lakewood Yeshiva Swastikas (2016)

Hoax Alert: Lakewood Yeshiva Swastikas (2016)


On Thursday 25th August the playground of the Yeshiva Ketana School in Lakewood, New Jersey had their playground-cum-jungle gym vandalised with ‘anti-Semitic messages’ and swastikas.

Naturally when I saw this my first thought based on my experience was: here we go again and quickly realised that this initial reaction was more than justified.

I will list the facts as they are currently known: (1)

A) Lakewood is a heavily Hasidic (i.e. ultra-Orthodox) town in New Jersey.

B) The Yeshiva Ketana School is a Hasidic primary school.

C) The graffiti was only discovered at 2 p.m.

D) In addition to swastikas; the equipment had ‘Hail Hitler’ spray-painted in black on it.

Now if this was the work of ‘anti-Semitic vandals’ then the obvious question is: why didn’t they know it is ‘Heil Hitler’ not ‘Hail Hitler’?

‘Hail Hitler’ is the sort of Jungian slip of a misspelling that suggests that the person who is writing it doesn’t really know all that much about Hitler.

Maybe they have heard ‘Heil Hitler’ a few times on an Israeli documentary, but they don’t know very much else. As their secular education is usually extremely limited although it is far better than that of their compatriots in Israel. (2)

This would make it more likely that the ‘hateful graffiti’ is actually jewish and more specifically Hasidic in origin. Not the work of ‘evil anti-Semites’ who are apparently living in a majority Hasidic township (with a mayor, Menashe Miller, of the same origin).

After all how else would they know to target the school unless they resided close-by?

Also interesting is the fact that the graffiti was only noticed at 2 p.m. and not earlier. This is odd precisely because the graffiti was in prominent and completely unhidden locations within the playground and on the building itself.

This makes it odd precisely because it suggests the graffiti happened during the day. When no self-respecting ‘anti-Semitic vandal’ with half a brain is going to be out causing mayhem for the rather obvious reason that they are very likely to get caught.

What does that suggest is that it was either done by a rather illiterate and careless anti-Semitic vandal or a Hasidic jew who wanted to ‘raise awareness of anti-Semitism’ or some such nonsense.

It isn’t like jews have quite the history of doing this sort of thing or anything… is it?


References


(1) Derived from: http://forward.com/news/breaking-new...wood-yeshiva/; http://abc7ny.com/news/lakewood-play...fiti/1486190/; http://www.nj.com/ocean/index.ssf/20...s_hail_h.html; http://www.thelakewoodscoop.com/news...layground.html
(2) Yuval Elizur, Lawrence Malkin, 2014, ‘The War Within: Israel’s Ultra-Orthodox Threat to Democracy and the Nation', 1st Edition, The Overlook Press: New York, pp. 93-107

-------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://bit.ly/2byi9Rx
__________________
 
Old August 27th, 2016 #15
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default Hoax Alert: The Havertown Swastika (2016)

Hoax Alert: The Havertown Swastika (2016)


On Friday 19th August a lady named Esther Cohen-Eskin discovered a swastika on her bin in Havertown, Pennsylvania. It was a well-drawn symbol, but the facts of the incident as related by Cohen-Eskin make me doubt very much that it is a genuine ‘hate crime’. (1)

Why do I doubt her claim?

In the first instance – as she says – Cohen-Eskin has lived in the neighbourhood for 20 years. Therefore it is unlikely she is being singled out by someone for reasons related to ‘anti-Semitism’, because she is likely to have built up some (if any) enemies based on her behaviour/conduct not just due to her being jewish.

In the second the criminal party concerned would have to know not only that Cohen-Eskin was jewish, but also which house and bin was hers.

Thirdly it is rather odd to just draw a single swastika on the side of someone’s bin and that’s it. There is no other message just a single swastika in an odd colour for spray paint (i.e. greenish yellow rather than the far more common black or white).

It is the second fact that weighs most heavily against Cohen-Eskin’s story being true, because it is very hard to believe that some ‘evil anti-Semite’ knew she was jewish as well as which house and bin was hers. In addition to having sufficient reason and personal agency to go out and spray paint a swastika on the side of her bin.

I find it very difficult to believe that any ‘anti-Semite’ would spray a single swastika on her bin without an additional message. It appears to me likely that either Cohen-Eskin did this herself or it was the result of a conflict she had had with someone in the neighbourhood.

However we can largely rule out the second possibility for the simple reasons that:

A) Cohen-Eskin and/or the police have yet to mention any kind of suspect some eight days after the event, which suggests there is no obvious conflict in the neighbourhood between her and anyone else, which could have potentially given rise to this graffiti.

B) The way that Cohen-Eskin has been milking this as part of a coordinated local campaign against ‘bigotry’ and ‘anti-Semitism’. To the extent that she decided to send dozens of letters around her neighbourhood calling on her neighbours to stand in solidarity with her.

To quote the Times of Israel:

‘Hearing that, Cohen-Eskin, an artist, decided to paint over the swastika with flowers, and to stick letters in mailboxes asking her neighbors to paint their trash bins as well, turning symbols of hate into symbols of love.’ (2)

Doesn’t that sound a little too convenient?

It is also interesting that Cohen-Eskin is an artist given that - as mentioned above - the swastika on the bin is neither haphazard (as one might reasonably expect) and is spray painted in an unusual colour (greenish-yellow), which is the sort of paint that only an artist is likely to have.

Is it really likely that someone came and spray painted a swastika onto Cohen-Eskin’s bin rather well in an unusual colour for no conceivable reason; only for her to them go on a campaign against ‘bigotry’ and ‘anti-Semitism’, which also happens to show case her art to the world?

No: it isn’t.

Is it more likely that Cohen-Eskin did this to get attention for her artistic abilities and/or garner sympathy for herself and promote the idea that ‘anti-Semitism is everywhere’?

Yes: it is.

Scratch another jewish hoax.


References


(1) http://www.timesofisrael.com/town-ra...tika-graffiti/
(2) Ibid.

-------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://bit.ly/2bHcbzb
__________________
 
Old September 11th, 2016 #16
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default Hoax Alert: Echo Lake Park Swastikas (2016)

Hoax Alert: Echo Lake Park Swastikas (2016)


When I wrote my article on the ‘hate crime’ hoax where swastikas and ‘Hail Hitler’ were drawn/written in spray-paint at Yeshiva Ketana in Lakewood, New Jersey: (1) I missed the fact that several days later a similar event occurred nearby.

This occurred at Echo Lake Park in Howell; where nine swastikas were discovered spray painted in white on the horseshoe pit boards some 300 feet from the road and car park. (2) There is little information available on this case other than that it is believed to have happened sometime between 22nd and 28th August, which is obviously extremely vague.

What I do note with interest is that the nine swastikas were drawn close to the roadway and car park on surfaces visible from that distance. This makes it rather surprising that they weren’t noticed till Monday 29th August, but also suggests that the same pattern as the fake ‘hate crime’ graffiti at Yeshiva Ketana a few days earlier has been followed.

Police are certainly treating the incidents as linked since they are in close geographic proximity and have obvious similarities. (3) The ADL is also of the opinion that this is the case. (4)

My theory is that if these are the work of the same individual or group then the likelihood is that this is the work of jews trying to ‘raise awareness about anti-Semitism’ or some such nonsense.

My reasons for taking this position is that the likelihood is that this had to have been committed late on 28th August (Sunday) as the park would have been in use and the graffiti discovered and reported before the 29th August if it was there before the evening of 28th August.

Sunday happens to be a normal day for observant jews (Shabbos runs from sundown Friday to sundown Saturday) and we know the park was heavily used by Orthodox/ultra-Orthodox families.

Therefore a non-religious jew or gentile could have done it on any day, but an observant jew is likely to be at work, shul or a local yeshiva on all days other than Sunday.

The only day of the week they would traditionally have free to do this is the Sunday as the Saturday evening is often taken up in clearing up and cleaning after Shabbos.

While the only people who would benefit from this graffiti (i.e. the principle of cui bono?) would be the local jewish community (i.e. to use as a stick to beat uncooperative non-jews with and a wedge to demand even more town funds go to their community), which compromises over fifty percent of the local population and acts as a highly effective political voting bloc. (5)

Does it seem likely that there are unknown ‘jew haters’ in the Lakewood area who don’t know that it is ‘Heil Hitler’ not ‘Hail Hitler’ while also showing a precise knowledge of exactly when and where to target the religious jewish community?

It isn’t likely: is it?

The probability then is that this yet another jewish hoax crime.


References


(1) http://www.semiticcontroversies.blog...swastikas.html
(2) http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/...391679321.html
(3) http://www.nj.com/monmouth/index.ssf...ce_say.htm006C
(4) http://njjewishnews.com/article/3205...s#.V9FGSPkrLcs
(5) http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/...he_realit.html

------------------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://bit.ly/2cAMZcM
__________________
 
Old October 15th, 2016 #17
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default Hoax Alert: The Temple Beth Shalom Graffiti (2016)

Hoax Alert: The Temple Beth Shalom Graffiti (2016)


On 9th October in the town of Warwick in upstate New York; the cemetery attached to the Temple Beth Shalom reform synagogue had its entrance defaced with swastikas, the emblem of the SS and the words ‘Heil Hitler’. (1)

Normally I’d think this was probably an actual case of anti-jewish graffiti, but for several facts:

A) It occurred a few days before Yom Kippur (Jewish New Year). (2)

B) The local community is heavily jewish. (3)

C) Jon Gottlieb, the President of Temple Beth Shalom, immediately claimed that this was a ‘very well thought out’ attack. (4)

D) The cemetery wall concerned was in need of significant repair and Michael Melasky, co-chairman of the synagogue’s cemetery committee, is already using the opportunity to imply that it will be ‘difficult’ to deal with the graffiti and also the attack had something to do with the supporters of Donald Trump. (5)

When you put all these facts together you have a situation where a Reform synagogue cemetery’s decrepit wall is suddenly vandalised with stereotypical ‘neo-Nazi’ graffiti in a highly visible location without actually doing any damage to the graves.

Oh and this happens just days before one of the most important of jewish holidays and in a neighbourhood where the Reform synagogue is severely out-of-step with the local community (i.e. they are a Reform synagogue with a female rabbi – one Rebecca Shinder – in a heavily Hasidic [i.e. ultra-Orthodox] area) and is thus suffering financially (as indicated by the decrepit cemetery wall).

Then we also have the officials of the synagogue immediately pitching this graffiti as being very expensive to get rid of (it isn’t) and that the issue has been caused by Donald Trump’s ‘anti-Semitic supporters’.

Excuse me for being sceptical, but isn’t it a little convenient that the ‘neo-Nazis’ seem to:

A) Be extremely stereotypical in their choice of symbolism.

B) Have chosen the highly visible wall in front of the cemetery rather than the graves themselves (which would be more emotional and effective as a target as per previous ‘anti-Semitic attacks’ across the world).

C) Just happen to attack the object in the cemetery that is in need of significant repair.

D) Seem to know a lot about the dates of jewish religious holidays.

That doesn’t sound like ‘neo-Nazis’ to me: it sounds like people who wanted to get money to replace or repair their cemetery wall, but couldn’t get it in any other way.

Add to that the immediate pitch for significant funding made by both Jon Gottlieb and Michael Melasky in putting the blame on the Trump campaign. Then you have a strong circumstantial case that this is likely not a ‘crimes by neo-Nazis’ at all, but rather a hoax perpetrated by jews (and likely members of the synagogue’s management and/or staff) who needed money to repair their cemetery’s wall.

Scratch another jewish hoax.


References


(1) http://forward.com/news/351906/right...ay-painted-on/
(2) http://www.recordonline.com/news/201...ery-in-warwick
(3) http://forward.com/news/351906/right...ay-painted-on/
(4) Ibid.
(5) http://www.recordonline.com/news/201...ery-in-warwick

----------------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://bit.ly/2eiMNz4
__________________
 
Old October 15th, 2016 #18
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default Hoax Alert: The Schmock Israeli Restaurant Closure in Munich (2016)

Hoax Alert: The Schmock Israeli Restaurant Closure in Munich (2016)


In yet another example of weird claims of anti-Semitism; a jew named Florian Gleibs has closed his ‘Schmock Israeli’ restaurant in Munich because of ‘rising anti-Semitism’ in the city. (1) Gleibs claims that after sixteen years of business; an increase in Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement activity in Munich has meant that he is ‘suffering anti-Semitic’ abuse and thus has had to wind up his business.

He doesn’t provide any actual evidence of this in his comments to Die Welt or the Jerusalem Post, but rather claims that: ‘People from the educated, well-off middle class have decided to hold me responsible as a representative of Israel’. (2)

So reading between the lines here: people in Munich stopped coming to his restaurant for whatever reason(s) (for example bad food, high prices, not finding Israeli style food attractive or whatever) and Gleibs immediately claims that it is none of these, but rather an anti-Semitic conspiracy to bankrupt him because he is a jew.

The logic for Gleibs’ absurd equation of a rejection of his restaurant with ‘jew hate’ is revealed when he claims that ‘antisemitism is, in truth, disguised as criticism of Israel.’ (3)

So if someone doesn’t like Israeli food therefore they don’t like Israel. Since Israeli is a jewish state it therefore follows that they don’t like jews and can thus be labelled as being ‘anti-Semitic’.

That this is absurd is simply demonstrated by pointing out that not liking lasagna doesn’t mean you therefore hate Italians. It just means you don’t like lasagna.

Gleibs claims that he has experienced people on the streets screaming ‘Jew, Jew, cowardly swine, come here and fight alone.’ (4)

Yet this doesn’t seem remotely likely given that had someone actually said this then they would have carted off to prison post haste and one also wonders how said individuals knew that Gleibs was jewish in the first place.

Well apparently they are both telepathic and able to become invisible to CCTV cameras since no actual evidence this ever occurred has been advanced not even a police report. It also sounds how a jew would imagine anti-Semitism to be and not how anti-Semitism would actually be and as an anti-Semite myself I should know.

In other words: the attribution of the closure of the ‘Israeli Schmock’ restaurant to anti-Semitism is likely a smokescreen put up by Gleibs to cover up the embarrassing fact that people had other reasons for not wanting to eat his food.


References

(1) http://www.thetower.org/4031-israeli...semitic-abuse/
(2) http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Munich...el-hate-469759
(3) Ibid.
(4) Ibid.

-----------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://bit.ly/2e7ghAt
__________________
 
Old November 1st, 2016 #19
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default Hoax Alert: Texas A&M University Chabad Center Sign Vandalism (2016)

Hoax Alert: Texas A&M University Chabad Center Sign Vandalism (2016)


In yet another instance of criminal behaviour being labelled as a hate crime: the Texas A&M University’s Lubavitch Chabad Center sign has been stolen.

The Jewish Daily Forward reports the situation as follows:

‘An unknown vandal was caught on surveillance camer first kicking and knocking the sign down and then returning to steal it, local media reported.

The incident occurred between 3 a.m. and 7:30 a.m. on Sunday.

The incident is not being investigated as a hate crime, but the head of the Chabad center, Rabbi Yossi Lazaroff, told local news station KBTX that he believes the Jewish center was targeted.

“This is a very serious matter,” said Lazaroff. “This is a religious center, this is a synagogue and this type of behavior is something that is very surprising to me because in my ten years that I’ve been here we’ve never had something like this happen.”’ (1)

In other words: the Chabad Center’s sign was stolen and the police are treating it as an ordinary piece of vandalism, but Rabbi Yossi Lazaroff is angrily demanding it be treated as an ‘hate crime’ because it happened to jews.

The irony is that sign stealing is an extremely common habit among drunken students and the fact that the event occurred between 3 and 7.30 a.m. on a Sunday suggests precisely this.

Yet it does go to demonstrate once again that jews believe any crime that impacts them is by nature ‘anti-Semitic’ and cannot be just… well… an ordinary crime.


References

(1) http://forward.com/news/breaking-new...alized-stolen/

--------------------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://bit.ly/2f7Ep8t
__________________
 
Old November 17th, 2016 #20
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default

Hoax Alert: Pomona Road Graffiti (2016)


When it comes to hoax crimes; when it rains it pours.

In yet another instance we have the fact that someone wrote ‘No Jews’ in orange spray paint on the road in front of the house of Eric Bard in Pomona, New York. (1)

In the Lohud article, which is incidentally also filled with assorted pointless human interest trivialities in order to bulk it out, the specific details are as follows.

‘Monday morning broke with signs of hate: Graffiti declaring “No Jews” in front of two homes for sale on a quiet street off Concklin Road.

The report came in just before 2 a.m. A nurse, on her way home from a late shift, noticed the bright orange scrawl on Carteret Drive and phoned police.’

[…]

‘Eric Bard is pretty sure he knows who painted the graffiti in front 6 Carteret Drive, his home for 41 years, the one where he and his wife raised their kids. They chose the neighborhood specifically because it was diverse, “because we wanted our kids to grow up in the real world.”

On Monday, the real world had real hate in it, prompting someone — a neighbor, Bard believes — to break out a spray can.

Bard — a Rand Realty Realtor who is selling his longtime home to move to Colorado, where he and his wife can spoil their grandkids — knows about neighborhoods.’ (2)

So let me get this straight: evil anti-Semites write graffiti in an unusual colour for spray paint on the road outside of the house of an apparently secular jew in a ‘diverse neighbourhood’ (and not ‘diverse’ in a good way). (3) Said jew also just so happens to be both selling that house and be a realtor himself.

A couple of obvious questions strike me about this.

Firstly how does Bard ‘know who the perpetrators are’ and if so why haven’t they been arrested?

Secondly what was the point of writing ‘No Jews’ opposite a house the jew concerned is selling to move out of the state to Colorado?

Thirdly why on earth would you write an anti-Semitic graffiti message on the road (i.e. where you are very likely to be seen), but yet not in a more obvious place that Bard could actually see it (for example on the realtor’s sign).

Fourthly how earth did the ‘anti-Semites’ magically know that Bard was jewish? There is nothing about the house that showcases jewishness, Bard is not a stereotypical jewish surname and the man himself doesn’t even wear a Kippah.

It doesn’t make any sense at all: does it?

One rather suspects that Bard himself wrote this graffiti since he is the only individual who has any motive for doing so. The alleged anti-Semites have already achieved their apparent goal of getting him to move out: so they have nothing to gain.

Yet consider that since the house is in a ‘diverse neighbourhood’ and Bard himself makes a strident pitch about the ‘benefits of the area’ in the Lohud article. It suggests that Bard may in fact have written the graffiti himself in order to generate both sympathy and media coverage, which he believed would then enable him to sell his house and thus move to Colorado.

Any other solution to the mystery of this rather convenient ‘anti-Semitic graffiti’ simply makes no sense.

The evidence suggests that Eric Bard drew this ‘anti-Semitic graffiti’ himself in order to generate free advertising via mass media coverage in order to sell his house.

It is that simple.


References


(1) http://www.lohud.com/story/news/crim...mona/93800036/
(2) Ibid.
(3) http://www.lohud.com/story/news/inve...ated/17690721/

--------------------------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://bit.ly/2f94bbz
__________________
 
Reply

Tags
fake hate crime, holocaust fraud, karl radl

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 AM.
Page generated in 2.80501 seconds.