Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old October 28th, 2013 #1
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,382
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default #1 Heidi Beirich Thread

Ok...She has been PMing me, but I won't speak to her in private. If she has questions to pose, she can pose them here.

If any of you have questions for her, pose them here.

She wants to keep things professional and not personal. She believes she has a lot of embarrassing personal information about me, but she tells me she and the SPLC have never used it. Or never published it.

Nothing about me is off the table, Heidi. Don't restrict yourself on my account.

I am willing to take your somewhat gruesome appearance off the table for my posters - but not for me, as I feel your looks play a role in your beliefs, and your beliefs are as germane to this discussion as mine.

So, VNN posters, leave her alone on the personal insults stuff, leave anything in that regard to me. Anything you want to know about SPLC, Beirich or related matters, fire away. She is here and there, I gather, so it won't happen immediately, but we'll see what we can get.

Last edited by Alex Linder; October 28th, 2013 at 03:31 PM.
 
Old October 28th, 2013 #2
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,382
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

[she may not be around so, i'll post her PM, since it contains her questions, later i'll respond in blue]

Following is a PM to me from Heidi Beirich, 10-23-2013

Quote:
Ok Alex. Been thinking about this. Let’s stick with nothing personal. Our mutual interest relates to our professional work.

Your posters write nasty things about me. And, as I’m sure you can imagine, some of them tell us horrible things about you. Let's not publicly discuss any of it and let’s try to stay civil.

We try to read everything you write. I especially enjoyed your essays on childcare. No questions about family. I agree not to discuss or ask questions about the young legal eagle you met from Stormfront and have two children with. (Do you really call her "baby mama"? Ironic.)

Women have contacted us about you for more than a decade. I agree not to discuss or ask questions about any females who may have come forward over the years talking about their often short-lived relationships with you. Again, we have
never published any of it.

Health issues are off the table. I was saddened to read your essay on what it took to get yourself physically prepared for the "Canadian film crew" interview. It sounds terribly debilitating to have to go through all that.

I agree not to discuss or ask questions about your medical issues even if they border on movement paranoia. Prior to your eventual diagnosis, for example, we were told you originally suspected Jews or Mexicans had poisoned you in a restaurant you and your family visited on a vacation to south Texas. We have never printed anything about it.

That's the deal. We don't talk about your siblings or the race of their spouses, your health, your habits or your odd and charming fascinations with snakes and South Park. All of it is off the table.

Otherwise, tell me what you would like to know. I may answer.

Here’s what I’m interested in. How you got to where you are—-your intellectual journey, so to speak. Your fascination for Mencken how he influenced you. How you think journalism has changed since your American Spectator days. Do you believe forums like VNN have coarsened public venting about racial issues, as found on the news comment boards these days.

I would also like to know how you and your forum readers manage to stay out of jail, despite openly advocating genocide, which, as you may know, is a federal felony. (18 USC §1091.) Have you ever considered that?

I would like to know how someone as educated as you are could advocate something as heinous as genocide? Are you really serious? If so, how did you get to that insane and utterly inhumane position?

I would like to know why you cooperated with federal law enforcement in the Hal Turner, William White, Kevin Harpham and other cases. Why did you not seek legal assistance from Baby Mama, Kalamaros, Caston, Draco or others to at least make an effort at quashing a single subpoena?

I would particularly like to ask how you square giving "ZOG" access to IP data and PM exchanges of your users when they are prosecuted, while you and your members encourage violence with your advocacy that Jews are worthy of mass murder and extermination as though they were termites.

Seems when a VNN user attempts to follow up with the shared intentionality advocated by your site, you are the guy the feds come see to help lock them up. Or when a VNN user gets outed for writing some of the ugliest racist comments
online you refuse to remove their posting history. Even guys that have given a lot of money to you over the years get no break from this rule. No exceptions? Ever?

As a leader of WN's, I would also like to get a better understanding of why you do what you do. In Knoxville, you evidently spontaneously decided to cross the police line in the middle of the street and got, in my opinion, brutally arrested by heavy-handed riot police.

The situation was a little tense but they seemed to go out of their way to make an example of you. We saw the whole thing. You were not resisting, yet, you were slammed to the ground, your face was bloodied and your glasses looked
broken. We are told you decided to do this act of street theatre, (basic civil disobedience,) only seconds before you crossed the line. Is that true, and, in hindsight, what are your thoughts about the whole incident?

Can you also speak to the animus between you and former posters? What they say about you at White Nations and Stormfront is a lot uglier than anything we’ve ever published.

Sorry it took so long to get back to your PM. Very busy right now.

Thanks to FGM for the JPF interview. Hope he is not too disappointed.

Last edited by Alex Linder; October 28th, 2013 at 03:48 PM.
 
Old October 28th, 2013 #3
Fred
Commie Killer
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,504
Fred
Default

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1091

18 U.S.C. § 1091 : US Code - Section 1091: Genocide

(a) Basic Offense.— Whoever, whether in time of peace or in time of war and with the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such—
(1) kills members of that group;
(2) causes serious bodily injury to members of that group;
(3) causes the permanent impairment of the mental faculties of members of the group through drugs, torture, or similar techniques;
(4) subjects the group to conditions of life that are intended to cause the physical destruction of the group in whole or in part;
(5) imposes measures intended to prevent births within the group; or
(6) transfers by force children of the group to another group;
shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).

(b) Punishment for Basic Offense.— The punishment for an offense under subsection (a) is—
(1) in the case of an offense under subsection (a)(1), where death results, by death or imprisonment for life and a fine of not more than $1,000,000, or both; and
(2) a fine of not more than $1,000,000 or imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or both, in any other case.

(c) Incitement Offense.— Whoever directly and publicly incites another to violate subsection (a) shall be fined not more than $500,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(d) Attempt and Conspiracy.— Any person who attempts or conspires to commit an offense under this section shall be punished in the same manner as a person who completes the offense.

(e) Jurisdiction.— There is jurisdiction over the offenses described in subsections (a), (c), and (d) if—
(1) the offense is committed in whole or in part within the United States; or
(2) regardless of where the offense is committed, the alleged offender is—
(A) a national of the United States (as that term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101));
(B) an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States (as that term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101));
(C) a stateless person whose habitual residence is in the United States; or
(D) present in the United States.

(f) Nonapplicability of Certain Limitations.— Notwithstanding section 3282, in the case of an offense under this section, an indictment may be found, or information instituted, at any time without limitation.
 
Old October 28th, 2013 #4
Hunter Morrow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,802
Hunter Morrow
Default

What a lark. A jew asking Whites about genocide penal codes!

The jew-dicial system wrote that drivel and enforces it against Whites only.

Meanwhile, their whole race is nothing but a crime against mankind.

Jews=Penal Code Violation.

 
Old October 28th, 2013 #5
Henry.
Senior Member
 
Henry.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,387
Henry.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hunter Morrow View Post
What a lark. A jew asking Whites about genocide penal codes!

The jew-dicial system wrote that drivel and enforces it against Whites only.

Meanwhile, their whole race is nothing but a crime against mankind.

Jews=Penal Code Violation.

If you're talking about HB she's not a Jew. I'm sure Alex will correct this if I'm wrong.
 
Old October 28th, 2013 #6
Rounder
Senior Member
 
Rounder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 12,684
Rounder
Default Question for Heidi Beirich

How can you believe Germans committed a holocaust, since you know it's a criminal offense for Germans to deny it ?? Germans are gagged by the threat of prison. They are forbidden by law from defending their own grandfathers and people against blood libels by jews, and by every other people on earth. Consequently, the very word "German" has become synonamous with evil.

And aren't you an ethnic/racial German yourself, who works for a jew-run organization that not only preaches the holocaust was real, but also never mentions that it's a criminal offense for Germans to deny it ?? Don't you see the deception and anti-German hatred you devote your working life to advancing ??

And doesn't that make you a racist of the very worse kind - a racist against your own people ??
__________________
“To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize” —–Voltaire





Last edited by Rounder; October 28th, 2013 at 06:12 PM.
 
Old October 28th, 2013 #7
varg
...
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,703
varg
Default

  • Do you believe people should be prosecuted for their ideas, like the various "hate speech" and holocaust laws in Canada and Europe ?

  • Do you deny that there are biological differences between races?

  • Do you deny that blacks disproportionately commit interracial hate crimes against Whites rather than vice versa?

  • How racially diverse is your neighborhood?

  • In your opinion, how is racial diversity a strength?

  • What do you have against Whites trying to secure their people's futures while not a word against the jews who do the same thing for their people?

    Israel's New Racism: The Persecution of African Migrants in the Holy Land - YouTube

  • Can jews be racist?

    Are they not the ultimate supremacists for claiming to be Gods chosen people? What about what they say in their Talmud? What about their racial apartheid state in Israel? Why hasn't the SPLC brought these issues up?

  • What do you make of jews like Barbara Spectre who admits openly that jews are behind displacing/genociding Whites in White countries? What about established jews who admit that jews own and control the media?

  • What do you make of Shulamit Aloni saying that jews claim others are "anti-semites" as a trick to distract criticism away from jews and Israel? "It's a Trick, We Always Use It." (calling people "anti-Semitic") - YouTube

  • Why, in your opinion does the SPLC exaggerate "hate crimes" committed by "neo-nazis" which is nominal, while ignoring the vast majority of interracial crimes that are black-on-white? (I know why you do it, but I'd like to hear your reasoning)

  • Why are these "anti-hate" (code for anti-white) groups like the SPLC and ADL almost always established by jews? (again, I know the answer but I want to hear your reasoning)

Last edited by varg; October 28th, 2013 at 06:30 PM. Reason: formatting.
 
Old October 28th, 2013 #8
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,382
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Ok Alex. Been thinking about this. Let’s stick with nothing personal. Our mutual interest relates to our professional work.

Your posters write nasty things about me. And, as I’m sure you can imagine, some of them tell us horrible things about you. Let's not publicly discuss any of it and let’s try to stay civil.
There are three different things: nasty, true, relevant. Nastiness doesn't matter. Truth matters on everything, but particularly on the big stuff. That's why we don't allow lying about serious things at VNNF. Relevant - not everything that's true is relevant. Personal qualities, vices, family life, etc., do matter to some degree. There can't be an iron law made in regard to discussing them in relation to politics, as they help us figure out who is principled and who is unprincipled. Yet even unprincipled people may be a positive force.

Quote:
We try to read everything you write. I especially enjoyed your essays on childcare.
I don't recall ever writing an "essay" on childcare, altho I have dispensed various thoughts from time to time. Perhaps your idea of essay is different from mine. But I take your meaning: a veiled threat to reveal something about my personal life.

Quote:
No questions about family. I agree not to discuss or ask questions about the young legal eagle you met from Stormfront and have two children with. (Do you really call her "baby mama"? Ironic.)
I keep trying to believe you're not as dumb as you actually seem to be, and I keep not being able to. Yes, folks, this really is the SPLC's public face, research director, whatever. Clearly the brains are in the back room. Heidi, do you ever have the sinking feeling the lawyers behind you are secretly laughing at you? I'm pretty sure that's what's going on.

Quote:
Women have contacted us about you for more than a decade. I agree not to discuss or ask questions about any females who may have come forward over the years talking about their often short-lived relationships with you. Again, we have never published any of it.
Why not, woman? Grow me a legend, big girl. I can use all the help I can get in my years of comparative feebility. Remember, Heidi, I know the truth about matters where you can only speculate.

Quote:
Health issues are off the table. I was saddened to read your essay on what it took to get yourself physically prepared for the "Canadian film crew" interview. It sounds terribly debilitating to have to go through all that.

I agree not to discuss or ask questions about your medical issues
You can ask whatever you want, doesn't mean I'll answer, but everything is on the table. I don't believe in transparency, but I do believe in basic honesty. I always intended to be a leader in WN, not just a writer. Knoxville was the opening of Act II. But I didn't count on falling into serious physical problems. I've spent 5+ years working through them, and I'm not done. Again, all this I've stated publicly and consistently.

By the way, you can take what I'm doing as answering you, but it's more using you to give our people a chance to see how things work, where I am, where I think we are.


Quote:
even if they border on movement paranoia. Prior to your eventual diagnosis, for example, we were told you originally suspected Jews or Mexicans had poisoned you in a restaurant you and your family visited on a vacation to south Texas. We have never printed anything about it.
I consider everything from all angles. I must think like a paranoid precisely because I lack the paranoid gene. I have more experience dealing with paranoid people than anyone short of a clinical psychologist, and I have observed there is an upside to paranoia - but only for the outsider, not the sufferer. Like the jews who employ you, I look at everything that affects me personally and us (whites) politically from all angles. That's the smart way to do it.

Let me give an example of the difference between paranoid and cautious-realistic. Several years ago a local bar owner credited me and evangelical christians with shutting down his gay bar. Earlier this year, my town, Kirksville, passed some ordinance forbidding discrimination against queers in housing. Right after it passed, someone threw a newspaper with the story on my doorstep. My first thought was that this was directed at me, by someone in the college community as a nyah-nyah. I don't subscribe to the piece of shit local newspaper. Days later, I noticed other apartments also had papers on their steps. They don't subscribe either. It was some kind of marketing by the local fishwrap, not directed at me personally. I allowed reality to correct my false belief. Paranoid people cannot do that. I know, because I've tried to help numerous people, of both sexes, in that regard. They are simply hostage to their false belief, and no amount of reasoning or evidence will move them.

Quote:
That's the deal. We don't talk about your siblings or the race of their spouses,
I have two siblings. One has never married, the other has been married twice, both times to white women. So whatever you're trying to imply is simply false. If you're trying to dig up info, congratulations on your great success.

Quote:
your health, your habits or your odd and charming fascinations with snakes and South Park. All of it is off the table.
I'm not fascinated by snakes -- like I'm a closet homo right after you've implied I was a womanizer -- I like them. You know...like you like carbohydrates. I really don't like South Park, let alone am fascinated by it. It's mostly courtier satire, altho I really did like the first half of the movie BASEketball, which was incorrectly lambasted by critics. South Park? No, not a big fan. If I were, I would certainly have written about it on here. I take humor more seriously than almost anything, and have seen virtually every comedy every made, every tv show, and read every comedian's book, as well as all the various literary and journalistic satirists through the ages. South Park to me is not bad, it's just sort of meh. I don't like jewish scataological stuff that much. I like the first few seasons of Simpsons much better. Reno 9/11 was better. Dave Chappelle is much funnier. In Living Color. Nigs aren't as sex-drecky as jews, they're all about sex, but that's because they're niggers, not because they have some political ax to grind. Jew-humor is not as good - for example, Saturday Night Live is vastly inferior to the Wayans' In Living Color, which brought Jim Carrey, a genius, to global prominence. I resent being characterized as some kind of great South Park fan when I am not. Tell your imaginary or made-up sources to get their facts straight.

Quote:
Otherwise, tell me what you would like to know. I may answer.
Let's start with this: how long have you hated your own race? Is your dishonoring your German (white) ancestors and siding with jews based in ugly-girl resentment of her better-looking coracialists?

If it's not a looks-based resentment, did it ever occur to you to doubt that multiracialism is a good thing? Did you ever hear the other side of the story as you got your Ph.D. at Purdue?

See, I went to Pomona, and I heard plenty of liberalism. I know the other side's arguments. I've never heard anything else - in my formal education. But by private reading, I was able to construct an intellectual world and explanation that backed what my personal experience and private reading suggested was a much simpler and more accurate explanation. Nothing I've seen since has persuaded me I'm wrong, quite the opposite. The case for what you communists/jews call racism is so strong and self-evident it has to be suppressed. It's your side that has to throw people in prison, Heidi. Not mine. Did you ever wonder about why that is? Even a little? I mean, you have all the power. But you STILL have to jail people for their opinions. That doesn't make sense. Even a fat Purdue girl should be able to smell something wrong there.


Quote:
Here’s what I’m interested in. How you got to where you are—-your intellectual journey, so to speak.
Gee, it's like I haven't spend my entire life explaining this. What kind of a research director are you? Were you hired for girth? I wrote an essay years ago that lays this out, I'll dig it up if I can find it. I wrote it after the conference in Sacramento in 2005, which I attended courtesy of Rich Brooks of now defunct White Alert. If someone has a link to that essay, please post.

Quote:
Your fascination for Mencken how he influenced you.
It's not fascination. It's love. I love how he writes, his style, his knowledge, his not being the usual lying kike or sniveling, obsequious, maudlin O'McAsslicker that dominate professional conservatism. I am very happy to be a satirist in the Mencken vein. In any honest estimation of things, ie my opinion, I am the only man in the entire world currently alive who is anywhere near deserving the title of his heir. I have my own style, of course, and I prefer it, but I think I exhibit some of the same spirit and love of learning and solid ideas he definitely exhibited.

Quote:
How you think journalism has changed since your American Spectator days.
It hasn't changed at all. Same servile Irish Catholics running the con publications, with real editorial control vested in NYC jews. Same as it ever was. Buckley set the pattern, the rest followed it. Any who kept intellectually honest (one man - Joe Sobran) got booted off the plantation and died miserably.

I'm not an Irish Catholic, I have self-respect. I don't eat toads for jews; they do. I'm not a WASP, I don't grin and shake in public and curse and treacherize in private.


Quote:
Do you believe forums like VNN have coarsened public venting about racial issues, as found on the news comment boards these days.
I believe groups like SPLC have poisoned discourse by getting so many people fired that average people are afraid to speak their very reasonable views about race. Their views amount to: blacks are violent, dangerous, stupid people, and I don't want to live around them or expose my children to their dangers. You at SPLC have made that view illegal, and whites have suffered for it. Hundreds of thousands of white women have been raped by blacks due to the work of hate groups like SPLC, and that's why I consider your working for it, when you're not of jewish descent, to be driven by an ugly girl's revenge motive.

How many white women were raped by blacks before 1960, before "civil rights"? How many after? Same with white women and men and murder.

You have a lot of blood on your hands, Heidi, you and Mo Dees and the gang.

You have some nerve talking about me and us as "haters" and our opinions as "hate" and our organization as "hate groups."


Quote:
I would also like to know how you and your forum readers manage to stay out of jail, despite openly advocating genocide, which, as you may know, is a federal felony. (18 USC §1091.) Have you ever considered that?
No, it isn't. If it were, there's not a person in the country who couldn't be arrested. It's perfectly legal rhetoric to say that this or that group should be exterminated.

Quote:
I would like to know how someone as educated as you are could advocate something as heinous as genocide? Are you really serious? If so, how did you get to that insane and utterly inhumane position?

Do you ask the jews behind open borders in white lands the same questions? Do you ask Noel Ignatiev and Tim Wise those questions?

If not, why not?

Why ask me?

I advocate counter-genocide because, well, my enemy advocates my people's genocide. If someone punches me, would you have me not fight back?


Quote:
I would like to know why you cooperated with federal law enforcement in the Hal Turner, William White, Kevin Harpham and other cases. Why did you not seek legal assistance from Baby Mama, Kalamaros, Caston, Draco or others to at least make an effort at quashing a single subpoena?
I live on $400 a month. Yeah, let me call my crack legal staff and depute a few lawdogs to wage my legal battles. Not everyone is paid 200k a year, Heidi. The feds had all the IP info already, and our sign above the door says you must stand behind what you post. All we've ever had is confirmation that this poster name posted from this IP. Big deal. That doesn't get anybody convicted, it's already known. The feds already had the computers of the people in question.

You're out there trying to scare off my donors, then asking why I don't try to quash subpoenas? With what resources? You think lawyers are out there ready to help me pro bono? You think I can reasonably ask that of them? I had to pay $1500 to my Knoxville lawyer, not to mention transportation costs. This stuff isn't free - only to people like you who live within the System, and live well off your hyped up fears of people like me who have never done anything more than express First Amendment-legal political opinions in their entire life, so far as you know and can prove. I would say it's the ultimate irony, Heidi, except it's not. The ultimate irony is you are paid hundreds of thousands a year, and you aren't 1/10th as competent at I am to argue racial politics. Which you know. And is why you refuse a live debate. You and your Purdue Ph.D. do nothing but traffic in gossip, much of which springs from personal circumstances the hardships your Systemic oppression has created in the first place.

The greatest mistake I ever made related to White Nationalism was not being rich before I got into it.

Most of the genuine problems I've had sprang directly from that circumstance.


Quote:
I would particularly like to ask how you square giving "ZOG" access to IP data and PM exchanges of your users when they are prosecuted
I never gave them any PMs, that's a lie. I have never looked at anyone's PMs, I don't even know how to do it, nor do I care. We confirmed IP data in maybe two cases, under direct subpoena. Once in Bill White case, and once for the Harpham trial that never occurred. The information we confirmed was never in doubt, nor were there any secrets involved. Only people who hate VNN or me act like we hurt anyone or helped any ZOG arm. In general, notice, we have very few mods, and that's precisely so there are fewer people involved in the loop. Of course, I know you're only doing your job, which involves both direct lying about what people like me do, and our motives, as well as insinuating that we are selling our own people out behind their backs.

People have to stand behind what they post here. That's the best I can do. The feds have many ways of getting data, I would not assume anything is private, and I would be very careful what I posted online. That goes for anyone anywhere, really. No one has cause to blame VNN for anything immoral or dishonorable when it comes to material they've posted on our forum, and that is the bottom line.


Quote:
while you and your members encourage violence with your advocacy that Jews are worthy of mass murder and extermination as though they were termites.
I don't tell others how they should act. Inciting others to commit crimes is illegal, and I don't do it. But I don't refrain from doing it because it's illegal, I refrain from telling others what to do because it's un-Aryan. It's dishonorable. It's an intellectual argument I make that jews should be genocided, not a call to arms or an incitement to an act. It's my conclusion after a careful stufy of jew-European interactions over 2,000 years. I believe the only way to safeguard the white race is to exterminate jews. Most WN, even, don't believe that. I DO BELIEVE THAT. A belief is not an action, though, no matter how much you leftists and white-haters try to pretend it is. It is perfectly legal, 100% legal, for me to express the views that whites should counter-genocide the jews, and that this is the only way by which we can ultimately prevent them from exterminating us. SPLC is full of lawyers. You go ask them whether what I say is legal or not, and see what they tell you.

SPLC, people not Heidi will want you to remember, knew about the Oklahoma City bombings before they happened. Yet this woman has chutzpah to suggest I'm the killer!


Quote:
Seems when a VNN user attempts to follow up with the shared intentionality advocated by your site, you are the guy the feds come see to help lock them up.
Whom did I get locked up? Heidi here demonstrates her exceptional dishonesty. Her natural bent is for insinuating things that aren't so in order to destroy trust.


Quote:
Or when a VNN user gets outed for writing some of the ugliest racist comments online you refuse to remove their posting history. Even guys that have given a lot of money to you over the years get no break from this rule. No exceptions? Ever?
Posters know the rule going in. When someone has a long posting history, one can't simply erase it all because every thread they started would disappear. i don't falsify history like your jew bosses, Heidi. People know the rules here when they sign up. If they don't agree with them, they shouldn't come in the door. We have those rules in large measure because it is unfair to other people to mess with their memories, and to delete posts they didn't want deleted, all because some guy, knowing the rules, later decides he wants to pretend he never said what he said. And worst of all, he believes every last thing he said. It's not like his ideas even changed. Well, that won't fly here.

Quote:
As a leader of WN's, I would also like to get a better understanding of why you do what you do. In Knoxville, you evidently spontaneously decided to cross the police line in the middle of the street and got, in my opinion, brutally arrested by heavy-handed riot police.
Yes, that's accurate. They would not have treated some black leader the way they treated me.

That was a one-time deal, that approach. I got the results I hoped for, although it was only partly under my control.

It was spontaneous, but it was also somewhat predictable. I didn't ask for a permit, as I'm not a criminal and don't need one, per the First Amendment right to peaceably assemble. Everyone - police and my people - were informed of this ahead of time. When I saw the metal detector, I knew what I had to do. It's not my fault people duly cattle-tramped into their holding pen, they could have followed me and copied my example. Then the cops would be forced to deal with us all in a rather different way, unless they enjoy a lot of paperwork.

I had to teach my people that rallies are not forms of entertainment, they are serious. I had to do this by example. The lesson has not yet taken.


Quote:
The situation was a little tense but they seemed to go out of their way to make an example of you. We saw the whole thing. You were not resisting, yet, you were slammed to the ground, your face was bloodied and your glasses looked
broken.
Yeah, my prescription sunglasses were fucked up, but I still have them. I had to get a chest x-ray, which is not free, cuz I thought I'd broken something. And my lip was ground up. Whatever. Cost of doing business. I thought the cop might choke me to death. He could have. And the media would have covered for him. I give him credit for subtlety. Instead of punching me in the head, he used his meaty forearm to grind my head into the pavement, which is not nearly as camera-friendly a form of violence, but just as effective.

Yeah...if I were the cops, I would have given me at least one chance to be talked out of staying there, but they didn't do that, they went for the attack right off. I did resist. Passively. In the so-called civil rights manner. By steeling my muscles. And when they were processing me, they were talking about how I punched a cop. I guess that's why cops have a reputation for honesty. You can't punch someone when you only have two hands and both are holding a sign.


Quote:
We are told you decided to do this act of street theatre, (basic civil disobedience,) only seconds before you crossed the line. Is that true, and, in hindsight, what are your thoughts about the whole incident?
As above. My intention was to confront my enemy, which this day happened to be clowns in wedding gear. Confront them directly. So the few of them capable of human reason could see what they were dealing with, as well as any public - the people I'm there to speak to. I'm not a criminal, I don't have to file into some cage to speak my mind because that's more convenient for the head of the Knoville Police Department. I wasn't threatening anybody, I was bantering the heckling of a bunch of communist lightheads. There was no fight about to break out, no imminent threat, and the cops let plenty of non-me people walk through the area I was arrested in. The entire thing was grossly and ridiculously unfair. I just don't have the money and legal team to purchase that verdict.

Eh...that's life in the big city. No tears for their clowns, no tears for this clown.

I never did really write up that whole scene, but...there are things you have to experience to know. I do not mean things personal or peculiar to me, but to men generally. Being arrested is, like being in a physical fight, a sort of hurdle or birth canal. It has to be undergone and felt in order to know the price of things, to see the reality.


Quote:
Can you also speak to the animus between you and former posters? What they say about you at White Nations and Stormfront is a lot uglier than anything we’ve ever published.
I ban people for telling gross lies, and I've also learned that it's necessary to ban people for paranoia and pursuing nutty vendettas. Once they're banned, I pay no attention to them. Those types do what they do, and they won't change. The only thing that can be done is keep them away from solid folk. The best way to deal with them is ignore them and go one's way. Never let people drive you off your own agenda is a very solid principle, and one I always keep in mind.

Quote:
Sorry it took so long to get back to your PM. Very busy right now.
I took the liberty of speeding things up by posting this PM and responding. I won't apologize for posting it since you insist on ignoring my statement that I will not speak to you in private.

Last edited by Alex Linder; October 28th, 2013 at 06:03 PM.
 
Old October 28th, 2013 #9
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,382
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred View Post
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1091

18 U.S.C. § 1091 : US Code - Section 1091: Genocide

(a) Basic Offense.— Whoever, whether in time of peace or in time of war and with the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such—
(1) kills members of that group;
(2) causes serious bodily injury to members of that group;
(3) causes the permanent impairment of the mental faculties of members of the group through drugs, torture, or similar techniques;
(4) subjects the group to conditions of life that are intended to cause the physical destruction of the group in whole or in part;
(5) imposes measures intended to prevent births within the group; or
(6) transfers by force children of the group to another group;
shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).

(b) Punishment for Basic Offense.— The punishment for an offense under subsection (a) is—
(1) in the case of an offense under subsection (a)(1), where death results, by death or imprisonment for life and a fine of not more than $1,000,000, or both; and
(2) a fine of not more than $1,000,000 or imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or both, in any other case.

(c) Incitement Offense.— Whoever directly and publicly incites another to violate subsection (a) shall be fined not more than $500,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(d) Attempt and Conspiracy.— Any person who attempts or conspires to commit an offense under this section shall be punished in the same manner as a person who completes the offense.

(e) Jurisdiction.— There is jurisdiction over the offenses described in subsections (a), (c), and (d) if—
(1) the offense is committed in whole or in part within the United States; or
(2) regardless of where the offense is committed, the alleged offender is—
(A) a national of the United States (as that term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101));
(B) an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States (as that term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101));
(C) a stateless person whose habitual residence is in the United States; or
(D) present in the United States.

(f) Nonapplicability of Certain Limitations.— Notwithstanding section 3282, in the case of an offense under this section, an indictment may be found, or information instituted, at any time without limitation.
I don't see anything about verbal statements in here, but I do see much in the first few items that could be used to prosecute jews globally. They are definitely through open borders and diversity propaganda trying to cause whites to cease to exist as a group, through mixing. And they are very definitely reducing the white birth rate by making white areas increasingly violent, dirty and unlivable. It's like this code was written by a WN precisely to describe and forbid what jews are actually doing.

Last edited by Alex Linder; October 28th, 2013 at 06:05 PM.
 
Old October 28th, 2013 #10
Fabrizio
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 272
Fabrizio
Default

Quote:
IP address
I’ve had telephone calls made to me just for politely expressing my opinion on yahoo chatrooms on politics and world events.
White people aren’t given the opportunity to believe by anti-white whose agenda is genocide.
 
Old October 28th, 2013 #11
Henry.
Senior Member
 
Henry.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,387
Henry.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
I'm not fascinated by snakes...I like them. You know...like you like carbohydrates
No one likes snakes that much....
 
Old October 28th, 2013 #12
Fabrizio
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 272
Fabrizio
Default

NSA knows who the people are online . The IP address links with the cell phones, Credit cards, Driven license traffic camera snap shot of plates link to ip address.

Run for the mountain.
 
Old October 28th, 2013 #13
Hunter Morrow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,802
Hunter Morrow
Default

Heidi, do you alert Black Supremacist groups and La Raza that advocating for White genocide is against "the law?"

 
Old October 28th, 2013 #14
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Joe_Smith
Default

Questions for Heidi:

A) How does it feel to be publicizing the lives of hundreds if not thousands of individuals on your website, simply because they have a different opinion on gay marriage, race, religion, philosophy, or any other topic that brings out various perspectives in people? Catholics, Muslims, ethnic nationalists, paleo-conservatives, and other groups are listed on your website as hate groups which provokes violence against them and suppression of their civil rights, yet most of the time these groups simply want to practice their constitutional rights to free speech and assembly.

B) What do you think of the fact that the Southern Poverty Law Center's top paid and most powerful people, are with the exception of you and Morris Seligman Dees, Jewish, who make up only 2% of the population? Furthermore, do you recognize the irony of NAACP, SNCC and other groups with an immense amount of Jewish overrepresentation and funding, playing a central role in undermining self-starting and highly popular black rights movements created by Elijah Muhammod and Marcus Garvey?

Isn't it the basic definition of white (but actually Jewish) supremacy to try and tell blacks what's good for them, then actively work to dismantle their organic political organizing because it strayed from the path wealthy Jews set for the West? How is your work any different from the Spanish and British forcing their language, worldview, and religion on people in Africa and Indians in Latin America?

C) I have a radically different political agenda than you Heidi. How would you like it if I was paid 6 figures to spy on your every day life, then give this information to violent elements directly or indirectly (paramilitary groups like Anti-Racist Action use the information from the SPLC to plot violence and harassment) to terrorize you? How would you like to have masked thugs throwing bricks through your windows, cornering you while you are out with your family, harassing your employer (if you had a real job) until he caved to intimidation and fired you, defaming your character, or even beating and killing you? That is the only thing your work actually does.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona
 
Old October 28th, 2013 #15
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Joe_Smith
Default

If Heidi really is a gentile, then my only explanation for her being able to sleep at night is that she is naive and ignorant. Often times Leftists are very well versed in sanctioned ideology, but because they are only moderately above average in intelligence and blinded by their College indoctrination, have a difficulty reading between the lines and thinking for themselves.

Heidi is nothing more than a low-level NKVD or AVH agent. Of course, what she doesn't know is when there is an uprising like in 1956 Hungary, the Jew shot-callers (like Rakozi and Geros) don fake uniforms and leave the country, while the AVH goyim are left behind to face the lynch mob for following their orders. A small-town Middle America girl like Heidi has never had many Jewish acquaintances, and likely knows little about them aside from what she has seen on television, she doesn't realize they would throw her under the bus and abandon her without the blink of an eye.

How can Heidi fight hate when her bosses and ideological forefathers were raised by a culture of hate? When Klassen founded the World Church Of The Creator, even if he realized it or not, all he did was create a mirror of the Jewish religion. Materialistic, pragmatic to a fault, and intensely racist, only difference is that the World Church Of the Creator has never and will never match even a fraction of the body count or extremism Judaism has.

For example Heidi, did you know that Hannukkah is not really the Jewish Christmas, but actually the Jewish commemoration of a RaHoWa? That's right, Hannukah was a race war for the preservation of Jewish racial and cultural purity, where Jews that tried to take up the culture of Hellenism were deemed race-traitors and executed. Ditto for Yom Kippur and virtually every other Jewish holiday.

I think if Heidi ever delved into intellectual corners that have been marked with star of david caution tape, she would realize she is working for an ethnic group that combines the SPLC's files on the ideology of Creators, the tactics of the Aryan Brotherhood, the respectable appearance (to hide the 'hate'!) of American Renaissance, but only with control of the media, politics, and billions in funding of those who share this ideology.

Political Jewry combines all the SPLC classifications of "Hate Groups", and multiplies them by 100. Heidi, you're just a pawn in their Machiavellian game of racial power.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona

Last edited by Joe_Smith; October 28th, 2013 at 07:24 PM.
 
Old October 28th, 2013 #16
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,382
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Great posts, Joe. I think, without meaning to be obnoxious, the truth is that Heidi simply isn't that intelligent. She was told this story about diversity/hate in school, and swallowed it whole. I believe this because I've seen it in thousands of other cases. Midwesterners think they're getting the real sophisticated deal from these profs they find at Cow U, and no one ever tells them otherwise. Germanics in particular, which is what Beirich is, seem to possess a gullibility gene, almost. They just assume others are well intentioned, and have no reason to lie. Authority is right because it's authority. If it were wrong, it wouldn't be authority. Isn't that obvious?
 
Old October 28th, 2013 #17
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,382
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

I actually do have one question for Heidi, which I hope she'll answer. I'm purely looking for a descriptive answer, HB - what you actually believe would happen - not how you would judge it, or what you like to happen.

What do you, Heidi Beirich, think would happen if the government made a White reservation out of, say, Wyoming? That means, only non-jew white people were allowed to live there. Didn't have to move there, but could. And it would be completely, 100% racially exclusive to white people.

What do you think would happen, if the government passed such a law, and guaranteed the racial exclusivity in perpetuity? What do you think would happen, in the sense, how would white people respond to this new law and reservation, this new possibility?
 
Old October 28th, 2013 #18
MikeTodd
Pussy Bünd "Commander"
 
MikeTodd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: land of the Friedman, home of the Braverman
Posts: 13,329
MikeTodd
Default

Quote:
She was told this story about diversity/hate in school, and swallowed it whole.
Along with everything else.

(sorry, coach, I couldn't lay off that pitch.)
__________________
Worse than a million megaHitlers all smushed together.
 
Old October 28th, 2013 #19
Brad Griffin
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 503
Default

I would like to know what the SPLC is doing to track or stop the "Tsunami of (Black) Violence" here in Montgomery. I snapped the photo below right down the street from SPLC Headquarters two years ago.

The real violence in Montgomery, which can be laid at the doorstep of the black population, has gotten much worse since then:

http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/...unami-Violence
http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/...what-will-help

Quote:
“When we have politicians say that we have a problem down here and it’s young men shooting each other, I really would rather them say it’s black men, and they’re young, and they’re shooting each other,” said Dr. Earnest Blackshear, a licensed psychologist and Alabama State University professor. Blackshear has partnered, free of charge, with the city in an attempt to provide officials with some psychological understanding of what’s driving the violence. …”
 
Old October 28th, 2013 #20
Brad Griffin
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 503
Default

I have three questions:

1.) Does the SPLC inform their donors that their employee, Keegan Hankes, showed up at the League of the South protest in Uvalda, Georgia and held our sign and used racial slurs after our event?

2.) Does the SPLC retract their claim that Matt Heimbach and friends staged the attack on Trad Youth at their Tim Wise protest in Indiana?

http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/1...e-been-staged/

3.) Does the SPLC plan to address the thuggish behavior of the "anti-fa" at the 2013 NPI conference in Washington?

 
Reply

Tags
#1, heidi beirich, splc

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:22 AM.
Page generated in 0.24373 seconds.