Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old March 8th, 2016 #1
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Karl Radl
Default The Jewish War on Free Speech

The Jewish War on Freedom of Speech


To begin this new weekly segment, to be published every Tuesday, I thought I'd briefly state that with Twitter's Orwellian 'Trust & Safety Council' being disproportionately made up of jewish organizations as I have recently documented. (1) It is necessary to document the ongoing jewish war on free speech around the world, but with a particular focus on the internet.

To begin with the UK based 'Campaign against Antisemitism' has gotten four British people arrested. (2)

What for you might ask?

Tweeting opinions.

The comments that are apparently worth of an arrest are as follows:

Case 1:

'We need to root out the fifth column American/British Jews who’s loyalty is to Netanyahu and racist Israel.'

'Massacre, slaughter and revenge are deeply ingrained in the collective Jewish psyche from the moment of birth onwards.'

'Very rich powerful Jews can get away with being paedophiles, while Jewish journalists/bloggers can get away by simply not writing about it.'

Case 2:

'Jews are nasty murdering bastards'

'We don’t want a Jew [Ed Miliband] to lead our country'

'Let me be clear. If all Jews died today I’d be happy. Would I do it? No. Would I applaud? Yes'

Case 3:

'We evicted the Jews in the past and we took their property because of their thievery. So not a problem. Excise the cancer.'

'When we chucked the Jews out we prospered hugely, they weedled their way back and it turned to s***.'

Case 4:

'Pedophilia is all about having power to humiliate someone smaller… The Jewish Talmud positively endorses it'

'I want the Jews in exile as they have been thrown out of every country so far for their bulls***'

Notice something? They are all opinions and they don't advocate violence either. In fact some of them are pretty darn tame by the standards of the internet. I must own I have been told a lot worse by jewish/Israeli activists (as well as a prominent Sephardic rabbi) on numerous occasions, including an expressed desire to rape my wife, castrate me, murder my children and so forth.

However because I am a grown up rather than a cry bully. I shrug off this kind of stuff. Jews however – like the true Social Justice Warriors they are – scream loudly and demand immediate censorship.

'Campaign against Anti-Semitism' justifies their extra-judicial activities with the following bit of Orwellian double-speak: 'Freedom of speech comes with obligations, not just rights. When people choose to incite hatred or intimidate others in public, they must face the consequences of their choices under the law of the land.' (3)

Oh dear.

Well you see my dear self-chosen self-castrated friends; the problem with that statement is that Freedom of Speech doesn't have any obligations attached to it. It is exactly what it says it is: that's the beauty of it. You say what you want and unless you directly libel or incite physical attack (i.e. tell someone to attack someone else) then you are exercising your freedom of speech.

Words do not hurt people; they only hurt reputations, which is covered by the libel and slander laws. There are no 'obligations' within freedom of speech and you can say what you like (otherwise it isn't freedom of speech by definition). There is no come back to that.

If you think otherwise then is it not you who lives on tenterhooks in fear of the slightest criticism because you are unable to answer it not people like me?

After all if jews are so sensitive to any criticism – strongly worded or otherwise - then perhaps they ought to go live in their own national 'safe space' otherwise known as Israel.

Awww diddums... do our opinions and criticisms bring you out in a flood of jewish tears?

Poor precious little special snowflakes.

But before we leave this perhaps I should point out that 'Campaign against anti-Semitism' claims to be a grass roots volunteer organization as well as a charity, (4) but yet apparently has 'top criminal lawyers' in its employ. So either someone somewhere has a lot of money - oh wait sorry that's an 'anti-Semitic canard' isn't it? - or they are telling porkies about their own organization.

Answers on a postcard please!


References


(1) http://www.semiticcontroversies.blog...ter-trust.html
(2) https://antisemitism.uk/first-four-a...es-on-twitter/
(3) Ibid.
(4) http://jpupdates.com/2016/03/07/camp...ed-on-twitter/

----------------------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://www.semiticcontroversies.blog...ee-speech.html
__________________
 
Old April 3rd, 2016 #2
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Karl Radl
Default

The Jewish War on Free Speech

(03/04/2016)


The jewish assault on free speech has continued this week with the story that the FBI no longer needs to legally compel Apple to help them crack the iPhone's security software. In order to access the San Bernadino shooter Rizwan Farook's smartphone. This is because an Israeli company called Cellebrite, as reported by Israeli newspaper 'Yedioth Ahronoth', claims has found a way to crack the iPhone's security, (1) which has now been used in an ongoing murder case in Arkansas. (2)

If true – and it seems likely – then the implications of this discovery for privacy and free speech are huge. Since it therefore follows an Israeli military/security contractor has had the ability to crack iPhone security for an unspecified amount of time.

This per force means, as Richard Silverstein has noted, that the Israeli government has had this ability for approximately this unspecified amount of time, because Israeli companies are effectively compelled to share such breakthroughs with the Israeli government and it is difficult to see Cellebrite not turning this ability into a profit-making enterprise via such cooperation. (3)

Meanwhile at Ohlone College in California a 'Holocaust Survivor' named Magda Brown has been advocating the suppression of skeptical/critical inquiry into the 'Holocaust'. She is quoted by the 'Ohlone Monitor' as follows:

'At the end of her lecture, Brown urged the audience to protect their freedom, to think before they hate, and to stand up to skeptics and deniers of the Holocaust.' (4)

What Brown is effectively here is that in order to 'protect freedom' students, and American citizens more broadly, need to 'stand up to skeptics and deniers of the Holocaust.' This is obviously a semi-religious argument, but Brown is necessarily advocating suppression as she doesn't believe that 'skeptics and deniers of the Holocaust' have a right to hold a different point of view on the subject.

At the University of California a new Orwellian rule is now in force, which states that strong anti-Zionism is in fact anti-Semitism. (5)

That isn't going to curtail freedom of speech on the subject of Israel now is it?

Meanwhile in the United Kingdom the former mayor of Bradford, one Khadim Hussain, has been suspended from the left-wing Labour Party for 'decrying the fact the deaths of millions of Africans are not taught in schools' and that 'your [British] school education system only tells you about Anne Frank and the six million Zionists that were killed by Hitler.' (6)

I might disagree with Hussain since as far as I know – and my aunt is head of the history department at a secondary school in England so I should – the slave trade is a subject that is taught. However I agree with Hussain about the absolute obsession with the so-called 'Holocaust' in the history curriculum taught in schools. Even if were the unvarnished truth: it isn't even that important in the context of the time especially since Stalin's atrocities and the Holodomor (which killed far more in the same time period) barely even figure in most British history syllabi I have seen.

However since the UK is supposed to be a democracy Hussian should be free to hold this opinion even if I disagree with it, which I partially do. The Board of Deputies of British Jews, which is the official representative of the jewish community to the British government, naturally is demanding that the Labour Party get rid of Hussain and suppress all further 'hate speech' on this subject. (7)

In a similar incident a Labour Party counselor in West London named Beinazir Lasharie has been confirmed as being suspended from her official position for the following:

'On the post, she wrote: “Many people know about who was behind 9/11 and also who is behind ISIS. I’ve nothing against Jews . . . just sharing it!” Later, she added: “I’ve heard some compelling evidence about ISIS being originated from Zionists!”' (8)

Again I disagree with her about 9/11 as I've stated many times in the past, but as to Islamic State (i.e. ISIS) I have a similar but less extreme view of the link between its rise and Israel. (9) However I'll say it once again: the UK is supposed to be a democracy and if non-politically correct opinions are to be censored then one wonders at whose will it stop?

The fact is that it won't stop and it will just get crazier until some kind of corrective action ensues or the state crumbles under the consequences of its own idiocy.

And to finish off for this week we have the crazy arrest of a London man for 'inciting racial hatred'. All that for asking a Muslim woman to 'explain Brussels' in the street and then having the apparent audacity to tweet about it. (10)

Oh and I wonder who is heavily involved in pushing the 'hate speech' laws about both 'anti-Semitism' and 'Islamophobia' in Britain?

You guessed it: the jewish community. (11)


References


(1) http://www.inc.com/will-yakowicz/isr...st-iphone.html
(2) http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/f...-case-38041135
(3) http://www.richardsilverstein.com/20...phone-for-fbi/
(4) http://ohlonemonitor.com/news/2016/0....fWL7toFd.dpuf
(5) http://www.jewishaz.com/us_worldnews...8835267d7.html
(6) http://www.jewishnews.co.uk/exclusiv...nd-isis-posts/
(7) Ibid.
(8) http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/15...were-behind-da
(9) http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot...ic-state.html; http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot...s-on-jews.html
(10) http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-35888748
(11) http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net...and-neo-cons/; http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net...h-accelerates/

----------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://www.semiticcontroversies.blog...ee-speech.html
__________________
 
Old May 5th, 2016 #3
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Karl Radl
Default

The Jewish War on Free Speech

(05/05/2016)


There has been a lot of news this week about the Labour Party ‘anti-Semitism’ fiasco, but as this is a vast topic and the amount of different groups who have been dog-piling onto the ‘scandal’ so large. That therefore I have been forced to cover this in a separate article, which will be forthcoming soon.

I will however point out that one Mohammed Butt, Labour leader of Brent Borough Council in north-west London, has been attacked by both jews and the media in general for sharing a politically incorrect Facebook post. (1)

Oh no! He said something someone else didn't like!

Said Facebook post compared the conduct of the Islamic State with that of Israel and noted the hypocrisy of condemning the former, but not the latter.

Butt wrote: ‘A Palestinian girl shot by Israeli soldiers, why doesn't this video start an outrage within western media?

You show videos of the ISIS hitting women for leaving home (which is also disgusting) - but you don’t condemn the terrorist state of Israel when they murder a girl in cold blood while she was on her way to college.’ (2)

That is Butt’s opinion and nor is it particularly controversial, because he is broadly speaking right. Nor is he advocating the hatred or the harm of anyone, but simply voicing anti-Israel rhetorical sentiment.

There is nothing particularly controversial let alone illegal in it. Well that is unless you are a die-hard supporter of Israel in which case you more or less view any criticism of Israel no matter how mild as a precursor to the ‘Holocaust’.

We frequently talk about ‘special snowflakes’ in regards to Social Justice Warriors (SJWs), but we often forget that the prototype for the SJW is the jew. Just as with SJWs the trigger point at which a jew will call you a ‘bigot’ is incredibly low and getting progressively lower to the point of absolute absurdity as time goes on.

Elsewhere in Britain the supporters of Premier League football club Chelsea have been officially warned ‘not to engage in any anti-Semitic or discriminatory behaviour’ after ‘The Jewish Chronicle’ decided to whine about football related banter taking place on Facebook. (3)

This includes rival supporters of the Tottenham Hotspur club – which has traditionally had a very jewish supporter base – who regularly refer to themselves as ‘Yids’. Basically jews are now taking offense that someone who isn’t jewish is calling themselves a jew and are even threatening to press criminal charges if they do so.

I think we are getting close to peak Judeophilia in the West. In the same way that we have gotten to peak SJW and are now seeing push back all over the place. There are signs that this is also happening with jewish behaviour and demands for ‘special treatment’.

Let’s hope so!


References


(1) http://www.express.co.uk/news/politi...real-like-ISIS
(2) Ibid.
(3) http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Chelse...m-match-452682

----------------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://www.semiticcontroversies.blog...5052016_5.html
__________________
 
Old May 24th, 2016 #4
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Karl Radl
Default

The Jewish War on Free Speech

(24/05/2016)


In the past few weeks we've had even more attempts by jews and their organizations to squelch free speech on any subject that they don't like. The United Kingdom is currently one of the principle battle grounds in this war over whether the citizens of Europe and North American should be allowed to criticize jews, Judaism and Israel.

A recent victim of this has been one Musabbir Ali, a former Labour Party campaign officer from East London, whose 'crime' is described by the 'Jewish Daily Forward' and 'The Jerusalem Post' as follows:

'On Tuesday, Ali posted on Twitter a link to a blog post titled “Timeline of the Jewish Genocide of the British People.” The blog claims that Jews “financed Oliver Cromwell’s overthrowing and beheading of Stuart King Charles I after he refused them control of England’s finances” and accuses such British leaders as Neville Chamberlain, Winston Churchill and Tony Blair of being “jewish puppets.”

[…]

In addition to disseminating the anti-Semitic blog post, Ali has claimed on Twitter that Israel was behind the ISIS bombings in Ankara, Turkey, in October, the Jewish Chronicle reported.' (1)

Ali's assertions, such as (Dutch) jews being a major source of funding to the Parliamentarian (aka Roundheads) cause in the English Civil War are actually fairly debatable and I would dare say somewhat accurate, are simply statements of opinions and in no way 'endanger' anyone.

Well other than Ali apparently...

I would also point out that none of Ali's claims are 'anti-Semitic' and it is absolute tripe to describe them as such.

Anti-Semitism (criticism of jews as a biological group) is not the same as anti-Judaism (criticism of jews as a religious group [i.e. followers of Judaism]), which in turn is not the same as anti-Zionism (criticism of the state of Israel). (2)

What jews are doing here equating any criticism of anything to with jews (i.e. Judaism and/or Israel) as being the same as criticizing jews as a ethnic/racial group, which is simply absurd.

Similarly Jacqueline Walker, Vice-Chair of the left-wing campaign group 'Momentum', has been attacked for saying: 'the Jews were the “chief financiers” of the African slave trade.' (3)

I mean come on: Walker has made a historical claim and one that is certainly worth a debate considering that there is a considerable body of evidence supporting said assertion. Although naturally there have been a plethora of vehement denials from (primarily jewish) historians that it could ever have been the case.

Since as we all know: jews have never ever done anything wrong.

Is Walker's statement 'anti-Semitic'?

Nope.

It isn't even anti-Zionist or critical of Judaism either, but is simply an assertion concerning the subject of history and is little different from an Afrocentrist claiming that the ancient Egyptians were black people. The former is now a 'hate crime' apparently unworthy of any intellectual consideration whatsoever, while the latter is a 'legitimate opinion' that is worthy of discussion.

You see what I mean?

Dare to make an assertion regarding history that jews don't like and you automatically become an 'anti-Semite'.

This is the attitude taken in Germany by an Evangelical pastor named Volker Keller who, in a letter to 'The Jerusalem Post', sarcastically lampooned the jewish hysteria about so-called 'anti-Semitism' by writing:

'Yesterday evening the anti-Semite Arn Strohmeyer delivered a lecture to me... Best wishes to Israel, Yours truly, Volker Keller, anti-Semite.' (4)

Naturally 'The Jerusalem Post' and the jewish community leaders in Bremen didn't see the sarcasm – or rather chose to studiously ignore it – and loudly claimed that Keller had 'admitted that he was an anti-Semite' and therefore he should removed from his position forthwith. (5)

What are Keller's 'anti-Semitic activities' you ask?

To quote the histrionic piece in 'The Jerusalem Post':

'The Jewish leaders wrote that Keller “works with haters of Israel whose criticism of Israel is clearly anti-Semitic.” Keller co-founded the NGO Nord-Bremer Citizens against War, whose members demonstrate in front of stores in Bremen calling for Germans to not buy products from Israel. According to critics, Keller is part of a large anti-Israel network in Bremen that seeks to demonize and delegitimize the Jewish state.

The Bremen Social Democratic Mayor Carsten Sieling and the church have been swamped with criticism from Jewish human rights groups and from journalists who write about contemporary anti-Semitism. In a separate letter to Sieling, the Berlin office of the American Jewish Committee wrote, “In addition to his activity as a pastor in the city council for integration, Mr. Keller is active in the BDS movement, which calls for a total cultural, economic, academic boycott of the State of Israel.”' (6)

So to translate that god awful spiel into plain English: if an individual is arbitrarily branded as a 'hater of Israel' by jews then they are an 'anti-Semite' and if you dare make common cause with such an individual then you are guilty by association.

Right... so one wonders how Keller's anti-Zionism, and who his friends and associates are, equate his being an 'anti-Semite'.

Simply put: it doesn't.

What is disturbing however is just how low the bar to being called an 'anti-Semite' by jews is being pushed. Add to that the fact that jewish organizations are seeking to force governments outside of Israel to make criticism of jews, Judaism and Israel illegal and thus a criminal offense.

Then you have a truly disturbing Orwellian situation, which is what is developing.

No wonder it is, according to 'The Jewish Press', one of the best times ever to be jewish. (7)


References


(1) http://forward.com/news/breaking-new...ixzz48lZKHaQ3; also http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/UK-Lab...British-453889
(2) Cf. Albert Lindemann, 1997, 'Esau's Tears: Modern Anti-Semitism and the Rise of the Jews', 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press: New York
(3) http://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/2018...el-behind-isis
(4) http://www.jpost.com/Christian-News/...-pastor-453385
(5) Ibid.
(6) Ibid.
(7) http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/o...sh/2016/05/08/

------------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://www.semiticcontroversies.blog...-24052016.html
__________________

Last edited by Karl Radl; May 26th, 2016 at 06:16 AM.
 
Old May 24th, 2016 #5
Emily Jane
Junior Member
 
Emily Jane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: New England
Posts: 48
Emily Jane
Default

Karl, may I re-post your "The Jewish War on Free Speech" to a political discussion forum or two?
 
Old May 26th, 2016 #6
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Karl Radl
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emily Jane View Post
Karl, may I re-post your "The Jewish War on Free Speech" to a political discussion forum or two?
Of course.
__________________
 
Old June 14th, 2016 #7
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Karl Radl
Default

The Jewish War on Free Speech

(14/06/2016)


In the latest instance of jewish attempts to crush any and all criticism of them as a group as well as any negative commentary about Israel whatsoever. A young lady named Emily Austen – formerly a Fox Sports sideline reporter – has been fired for making 'racist' and 'anti-Semitic' comments in a Barstool Sports video that appeared on Facebook and which is completely unrelated to her work at Fox Sports. (1)

Austen's 'insensitive and derogatory comments' were to suggest that Mexicans weren't particularly intelligent – which is true incidentally – and making a 'stereotypical remark' about Chinese people. However I cannot help but feel that Austen's real 'crime' was making a couple of harmless negative comments about jews explicitly based on her own experiences with them.

I quote:

'Austen’s broadcast Thursday included a rant about Jewish customers at an establishment where she worked in Boca Raton, Florida: “The way I used to talk to the Jews in Boca. … I just didn’t care. They would complain and b—- about everything. I gave a guy, delivered his beer, and he was complaining to me that there was too much head. I knew that he was a stingy a– and he wasn’t going to give me a tip.”' (2)

Notice that Austen is talking from her own experience here and she even said 'Jews in Boca [Raton]' which is a qualified generalization. Clearly she is talking about behaviour she witnessed and was subject to from customers who she knew, or supposed, to be jewish.

There is not anything particularly negative in her comments as she says the jewish customers who she said 'complained and bitched about everything'.

The irony is that this type of behaviour is so common in the jewish community that they even have their own word for it: kvetching.

Anybody who has spent any time around jews or in Israel knows that jews very regularly kvetch (especially when it has to do with a good or service they purchasing/using) so I really don't see what anyone is getting on their high horse about here. Austen is making a perfectly correct comment the truth of which is even validated by the own members of the subject community and while it is negative: it doesn't make it any less true.

Or are we to believe that jews don't ever engage in behaviours which cause them to be viewed in a negative light now?

Austen also states that she knew he – the specific but anonymous jew that she is referring to – wouldn't give her a tip because he was stingy with money. This is certainly an opinion that has been raised on many other occasions by other people (who were predictably also immediately accused of anti-Semitism). (3)

I wish that we could be grown up about this and simply acknowledge that jews can and indeed do bad things, but oh no. Any commentary that may cast the chosen people in anything less than a totally favourable light must be ruthlessly suppressed no matter how unimportant or tangential it is to individual jews and/or their group interests.

Moving on it has emerged this week that a spate of DDoS (Dedicated Denial of Service) and hacker attacks on websites associated with the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement have been coming from Israel. (4)

There is no particular surprise there. However according to 'Electronic Intifada' these attacks have come just days after the Israeli government has pledged to 'fight BDS'.

Coincidence?

I doubt it.

Therefore I think we may reasonably expect there to be marked increase in Israeli government sponsored cyber-crime. As part of their ever more difficult battle against the twin hostile forces of the pro-Palestinian left and the nationalist populist insurgency that is taking North America and Europe by storm.

After all: what has Israel got left of its reputation to lose? If you go around threatening to nuke other countries – a-la the infamous Samson Option – then it is hardly an ethical stretch to go around committing an assortment of cyber-crime against your ideological enemies.


References


(1) http://www.haaretz.com/world-news/americas/1.724407
(2) Ibid.
(3) http://jewcy.com/post/are_jews_bad_tippers
(4) https://electronicintifada.net/blogs...-linked-israel

--------------------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: https://semiticcontroversies.blogspo...ee-speech.html
__________________
 
Old July 13th, 2016 #8
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Karl Radl
Default

The Jewish War on Free Speech

(13/07/2016)


It has been another week of dictatorial mutterings and Orwellian demands to immediately censor their critics from Yahweh’s holy horrors. To begin with let’s take the case of Facebook.

Now I know what you are thinking: Facebook was created and is run by members of the tribe. So therefore why on earth are jews laying metaphorical siege to it?

What this view doesn’t account for is the fact that the jews generally disagree amongst themselves about what exactly needs to, and how much it should, be censored. In this instance the battle is between hard-line Zionist groups backed up by the Israeli government and the less hard-line jews of Facebook.

Thus we have had the Israeli Public Security Minister Gilad Erdan declaring that because Palestinians post footage of attacks on Israeli soldiers and settlers on Facebook. It therefore means that Mark Zuckerberg, the founder of Facebook, is responsible for inciting violence against Israel and its citizens. (1)

Erdan’s words were subject to much cheerleading from mainstream Israeli and jewish media sources, which tells you as much as you need to know about how popular the idea of stifling free speech among non-jews is among the Judeo-Israeli establishment. (2)

Nitsana Darshan-Leitner, Director of Shurat HaDin, (3) is currently filing a suit against Facebook in New York on behalf of ’20,000 Israeli victims’. Specifically in order to get Facebook to remove content that Shurat HaDin arbitrarily deems to be ‘hateful’. (4)

In a related legal move five Israeli families with the assistance once again of Shurat HaDin have announced that they are suing Facebook for a billion dollars in damages under the U.S. Anti-Terrorism Act, because Facebook have allowed Palestinians (and therefore Hamas members) to post on their social media network. (5)

The problem here is obviously that because Israel is categorically losing the information war: it has decided to resort to a popular historic jewish strategy of trying to sue and create legal precedents to make criticism of Israel illegal. (6)

Our concern has to be that this is a bald attempt to Israel, and part of desperate broader offensive to stop the ‘explosive growth’ of ‘Online Hate’, (7) to suppress criticism of its policies and regain the initiative in the information war.

I think we can trust Facebook’s lawyers to eviscerate Shurat HaDin’s legal case against them, but what worries me is that continual frivolous lawsuits of this kind directed at those that Israel regards as standing in the way of its agenda (i.e. what Zionists like to call ‘lawfare’). Therefore will cause companies like Facebook to seek a compromise with Israeli authorities, which could well be what the Israeli and jewish groups are seeking to do: bring Facebook to the table and begin dictating to them what is and is not acceptable.

In other news Miko Grimes, the wife of former Miami Dolphins quarterback Brent Grimes, has been accused of anti-Semitism for making the following comment on Twitter:

‘Gotta respect ross for keeping his jew buddies employed but did he not see how tannenbaum put the jets in the dumpster w/that sanchez deal?’ (8)

The problem of course is that both Stephen Ross and Mike Tannenbaum are jewish. Therefore according to the mainstream media any criticism of them is automatically ‘anti-Semitism’.

However what Grimes said is not actually anti-Semitic. It is critical of two individuals yes, but it doesn’t attack jews as a biological group. The latter is anti-Semitism: the former is not.

We can this in how Grimes is only actually saying that Ross has kept Tannenbaum on strength because they are friends and not because they are both ethnically jewish.

Besides what has Grimes said that is not wrong or a normal opinion expressed in more incendiary wording

Both Ross and Tannenbaum are jews.

Yes: that’s right.

So she’s not libelling anybody.

She hasn’t said being jewish is a bad or negative thing, but rather that she disagrees with the behaviour of two jewish individuals.

So what? Grimes is expressing an opinion about two jewish individuals.

Get over it, because it isn’t anti-Semitic!


References


(1) http://www.israelhayom.com/site/news...n.php?id=16603
(2) For example: Ibid; https://www.jewishnews.net.au/facebook-fire/54627
(3) A hard line pro-Zionist organization with ties to the Israeli government hiding behind a neutral sounding name: https://electronicintifada.net/blogs...-mossad-proxy; http://antiwar.com/blog/2016/07/11/s...on-as-warfare/
(4) http://www.israelhayom.com/site/news...n.php?id=16603
(5) http://www.jewishaz.com/us_worldnews...9864afdf5.html
(6) On this cf. Richard Levy, 1975, ‘The Downfall of the anti-Semitic Political Parties in Imperial Germany’, 1st Edition, Yale University Press: New Haven; Peter Pulzer, 1988, ‘The Rise of Political Anti-Semitism in Germany & Austria’, 2nd Edition, Peter Halban: London and Robin Judd, 2007, ‘Contested Rituals: Circumcision, Kosher Butchering, and Jewish Political Life in Germany, 1843-1933’, 1st Edition, Cornell University Press: Ithaca
(7) For example see my analysis of the Twitter Trust & Safety Council: http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot...ter-trust.html
(8) https://www.theguardian.com/sport/20...emitism-tweet; http://forward.com/the-assimilator/3...-picks-2-title


--------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot...ee-speech.html
__________________
 
Old July 20th, 2016 #9
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Karl Radl
Default

The Jewish War on Free Speech



(20/07/2016)

Another week of yet more demands and calls for censorship from the self-chosen people. First up we have Germany where according to the BBC:

‘German police have carried out a series of raids, targeting people suspected of posting hate content on social media.

The co-ordinated raids on 60 addresses were the first time the authorities had acted on this issue in such a way.

The aim is to tackle what police called "a substantial rise in verbal radicalism".

Typical crimes included "glorification of Nazism [and] xenophobic, anti-Semitic and other right-wing extremism", they said.

Holger Munch, president of Germany's federal criminal police authority, the Bundeskriminalamt (BKA) said: "Today's action makes it clear that police authorities of the federal and state governments act firmly against hate and incitement on the internet."

He said politically motivated hate crime on the internet had increased significantly in the wake of the European refugee crisis.

Last year, Germany took in up to one million migrants and refugees.

"Attacks on refugee shelters are often the result of radicalisation which begins in social networks," Mr Munch said.’ (1)

Right… so basically Herr Munch is trying to tell us that because someone has ideas that he and the German government don’t like. This therefore means that the German police need to smash in their door and arrest them in the small hours of the morning.

So I take it that expressing an opinion online is now a crime, because it could cause someone else in a specially protected minority group to become offended or might possibly in some remote way add to another individual’s political radicalisation?

So since when did political crimes exist in a so-called democracy?

Well apparently they do now.

I wonder who benefits from this given that it is only ‘right wing’ ideas that have been targeted not jewish groups spewing hatred of non-jews or militant Islamists discussing bombing churches.

It couldn’t be the jews and Muslims could it?

Surely not: after all the jews and Muslims dindu nuffin… ever.

Meanwhile in the United Kingdom: there have been mixed goings on this week. Newport Counsellor Miqdad Al-Nuaimi has been cleared of anti-Semitism by a Labour party committee after he said bad things about Israel and therefore jewish groups immediately complained loudly about ‘anti-Semitic statements’ having been made. (2)

Unfortunately Labour MP Naz Shah lacks Al-Nuaimi’s backbone and has begged the forgiveness of the Israel Lobby in an public apology, which states that she didn’t ‘understand modern anti-Semitism’ (i.e. anti-Zionism equals anti-Semitism according to the jewish community anyway) and didn’t realise that she had ‘offended the jewish community’. (3)

The simple fact is that what Shah did – making unflattering comparisons regarding Israel – was and is in no way anti-Semitic, but rather simply anti-Zionist. They are not the same thing and it is really that simple.

Breezing over to Canada we have the case of Monika Schaefer – a former Green Party political candidate – who has been kicked out of the party and subjected to a vindictive campaign of defamation by the media for… having an unorthodox opinion on the ‘Holocaust’. (4)

Future politicians in Canada take note: you are not allowed to hold the wrong opinions on subjects to do with the jewish people. If you do then you will be systematically eliminated by a ‘powerless religious minority’s’ political and media clout.

In the United States we’ve also seen a continuation of the jewish campaign against Facebook for being insufficiently pro-Israel this week. In this instance the liberal Zionist ‘Jewish Daily Forward’ has been kvetching that Facebook allows you to donate money to ‘Jews for Jesus’ but not ‘actual’ jewish groups. (5)

The question of an ‘actual jewish group’ is and why a bunch of jews who have converted to Christianity isn’t one – when the Forward routinely defines jewishness by ancestry – isn’t addressed, but rather taken as received truth.

The simple fact is that some groups – some very pro-Israel like Christians United for Israel and the Jewish National Fund – have been pre-approved by Facebook to use this donation scheme, while others like the Anti-Defamation League haven’t.

Oh and you clearly can donate to ‘actual jewish groups’ as what on earth is the Jewish National Fund if not an ‘actual jewish group’?

Whining about it and claiming it is all an anti-Semitic conspiracy is just so… jewish.

Lastly we have the hilarious fact that the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations has demanded that the White House’s Press Secretary Josh Earnest apologise. (6)

Why?

Because he publicly compared Ron Dermer, the Israeli ambassador to United States (and former Republican strategist [how on earth does that work?]), to the new part jewish British Foreign Secretary: Boris Johnson. (7)

So I guess we cannot even compare jews to other jews now lest we offend them and be called anti-Semitic by major jewish organisations?

And people wonder why I sometimes think that we live in the proverbial lunatic asylum…


References


(1) http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-36804363
(2) http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-politics-36826119
(3) http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.731724
(4) http://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/green...aust-1.2991310
(5) http://forward.com/news/national/345...al-jewish-gro/
(6) http://forward.com/news/breaking-new...on-to-ron-der/
(7) http://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/At-...ncestry-432666

-----------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot...speech_20.html
__________________
 
Old August 2nd, 2016 #10
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Karl Radl
Default

The Jewish War on Free Speech

(02/08/2016)


We’ve had yet another week of shrill attacks on free speech by the circumcised special snowflakes. This week Hadley Freeman – a jewess from New York City – (1) writing for British left-wing media outlet ‘The Guardian’ has been arguing that there should be a clampdown on unacceptable speech on social media, while supporting the banning of Milo Yiannopoulos as a ‘professional troll’ for making impolite observations to a third-rate black actress. (2)

Meanwhile in the Emirati ‘The National’ an Israeli jew named Joseph Dana (3) has been spewing bile against Donald Trump for not apologising for supposed ‘anti-Semitic’ material that he tweet or re-tweeted in his official campaign Twitter feed. (4)

During the Democratic National Convention a piece of merchandise that was on sale sparked the ire of a jewish delegate from California named Karen Bernal. The item concerned was a t-shirt, which featured an artist’s rendition of Bernie Sanders’ head. Bernal believes that said rendition was a case of lese-majestie and therefore 'Nazi anti-Semitism'.

You’ve got to laugh really: haven’t you?

When the best you’ve got is that an image is offensive to your personal sensibilities then you’ve really got one heck of a thin skin. Of course no group of individuals and organizations has quite so thin a skin as the jewish people and their communal advocacy groups.

A good example of how thin this skin is in the fact that jews – specifically the Zionist Federation and the Jewish Chronicle - in Great Britain are trying to ban Hezbollah’s flag and yet despite campaigning for several weeks. (6) They have only managed to get 1,500 signatures – i.e. only a slither of their respective membership (50,000) (7) and readership (22,500) (8) – is indicative of how even the jewish community thinks hypersensitivity to a flag is a bit much.

The right-wing British newspaper ‘The Express’ has also been documenting that jews in Scotland are feeling ‘vulnerable’ because of ‘unbalanced political comment’. (9) This the paper concludes is an ‘alarming’ turn of events, but yet fails to note that what it is effectively demanding is that any ‘political comment’ that jews find to be ‘unbalanced’ (read as ‘critical’ of jews and/or Israel) should be illegal in Great Britain.

It is therefore little surprise to find that ‘The Express’ is owned by Richard Desmond: who is jewish. (10)

Meanwhile one Stephen Pollard - the editor of the ‘Jewish Chronicle’ which is the same outfit that has been demanding Hezbollah’s flag be banned as being offensive to jews – has taken to the pages of the British right-wing daily ‘The Telegraph’ to demand the immediate censorship of any and all opinions that he personally does not like on social media. (11)

This type of attitude is rather neatly demonstrated in the recent article on a Belgian tennis player averring that ‘All jews should have been gassed’, while playing at a private tournament. The article from the World Jewish Congress then makes the following notation:

‘Belgian law not only prohibits any public expression of racism, religious intolerance, anti-Semitism and xenophobia, but also the denial, trivialization, justification or approval of the Holocaust.’ (12)

Right… so that basically adds up to the fact that in Belgium you are now allowed to criticise jews, Judaism or subject claimed historical events that jewish groups hold up as the rationalization for their views/demands to critical scrutiny.

One wonders if the World Jewish Congress knows how Orwellian that sounds and in fact is.

Do they even care?

I doubt it if Taki Theodoracopulos reminisces about his time as a journalist at the British periodical ‘The Spectator’ is anything to go by. I quote:

‘Dominic was my third editor at The Spectator—Fraser Nelson is my seventh and saintliest of bosses, as I always refer to the editor I happen to be writing for at the moment—and upon being named editor following Charles Moore, the first call he received was from the Israeli ambassador, who congratulated him for being the first Speccie editor of the Jewish faith. He then recommended my immediate firing.’ (13)

Say it all really: doesn’t it?


References


(1) https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...r-antisemitism
(2) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...hadley-freeman
(3) https://ukmediawatch.org/2011/11/17/...ation-program/
(4) http://www.thenational.ae/opinion/co...rs-the-racists
(5) http://sputniknews.com/politics/2016...nc-racism.html
(6) http://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/...zbollah-flags/
(7) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zionis...in_and_Ireland
(8) http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/magazi...irst-half-2013
(9) http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/695...s-anti-semitic
(10) http://www.thejc.com/35583/richard-desmond-new-tv-bid
(11) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016...r-jews-online/
(12) http://www.worldjewishcongress.org/e...onent-8-1-2016
(13) http://takimag.com/article/a_humble_...thy_cause_taki

------------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://bit.ly/2aQZzE7
__________________
 
Old August 9th, 2016 #11
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Karl Radl
Default

The Jewish War on Free Speech

(09/08/2016)

The Jewish War on Free Speech has continued this week with the release of a report by an anti-free speech group named in true Orwellian fashion: the ‘Canary Mission’. Said document has accused the University of Tennessee of permitting ‘unacceptable speech’ on campus, (1) which the university has since strenuously denied. (2)

The speech that said group is concerned about is only that related to jews and Israel, (3) but jews spouting nonsense about how they are superior race and goyim are meant only to serve them is apparently just fine and dandy. The irony of this is of course that ‘Canary Mission’ is trying to actively restrict free speech in institutions which are predicated on the free exchange of ideas.

However much one may disagree with someone else; it is contrary to the very spirit and function of a university to brand ideas ‘unacceptable’ and demand they be expunged from the intellectual corpus. Naturally ‘Canary Mission’ don’t tell us who they are (preferring to describe themselves obliquely as ‘students and concerned citizens’), but yet their singular concern tells us exactly what if not who they are: jews.

Over at Oberlin College an Associate Professor named Joy Karega for, and I quote, ‘anti-Semitic Facebook posts claiming that ISIS is a creation of Mossad, and accusing Israel of responsibility for 9/11. In January, Karega posted an image of an ISIS terrorist removing a mask from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, accompanied by the message, “France wants to Free Palestine? Time for a false flag.”’ (4)

Firstly nothing Karega posted is anti-Semitic since it doesn’t criticise jews as a biological group (i.e. anti-Semitism), but rather the content is simply if militantly anti-Zionist (i.e. anti-Israel not anti-jewish). They are not the same thing however much the Israel Lobby and their amen corner would like to conflate them.

After all if criticism of Israel is ipso facto anti-Semitic – which is claimed often enough both directly and indirectly – then doesn’t that mean that the Israeli state (as being equated with jews both individually and collectively) is also responsible and liable for the behaviour of jews like multi-billion dollar fraudster Bernie Madoff?

Why yes.

So when will all the people in the United States, Canada, Europe and elsewhere be receiving billions of dollars in reparations from Israel for the actions of the jewish people both there and in the Diaspora?

So who disciplined Karega and why?

I quote:

‘In a letter released by the university, Oberlin College president Marvin Krislov wrote that, “Academic freedom is ‘the indispensable quality of institutions of higher education’ because it encourages free inquiry, promotes the expansion of knowledge, and creates an environment in which learning and research can flourish.”

“Cultivating academic freedom can be difficult and at times painful for any college community,” Krislov acknowledged.

“The principles of academic freedom and freedom of speech are not just principles to which we turn to face these challenges, but also the very practices that ensure we can develop meaningful responses to prejudice,”

Krislov noted that he himself is a practicing Jew, as well as the grandson of an Orthodox rabbi, and that many of his family members perished in the Holocaust.

Over 250 Oberlin alumni have signed a letter to Krislov, expressing concerns about acceptance of anti-Semitism and incidents at the school, including an anti-Israel protest on Rosh Hashana.’ (5)

So Marvin Krislov is himself jewish and has put one of his staff on administrative league because she exercised her freedom of speech in a private capacity on Facebook, but also expressed ideas that - per Krislov’s point about free speech being the cornerstone of academic life – cannot be suppressed without endangering the very purpose of a university in the first place.

Hypocritical: much?

The reason and the contrived nature of the letter writing campaign is made obvious in the fact that the main reason mentioned in the article for the ‘over 250 Oberlin alumni’ being upset – other than Karega posting anti-Zionist material on Facebook in her capacity as a private citizen - is that an anti-Israel protest was held on the jewish holiday of Rosh Hashana.

In other words: jewish Oberlin alumni are offended because Karega criticised Israel on Facebook and current Oberlin students dared to hold an anti-Israel event on a jewish holiday.

Therefore completely conflating – to the point of there being no differentiation whatsoever – jews and Israel, which is intellectually absurd but has a rather dangerous side effect for both Israel and the jewish people more generally. Since by this some logic they have to be held accountable for the actions of each other, which renders Israel responsible for the actions of individual jews in the same way that attacks on Israel are held to be attacks on jews.

A similar deliberate conflation of jews and Israel as being one and the same thing is behind the Canadian government’s rescinding its permission to use its official logo at the ‘World Social Forum’ conference in Montreal. This occurred after Canadian MPs were poked and prodded into vocally complaining about it (7) by B’nai B’rith Canada (aka Canada’s Anti-Defamation League) after it publicly condemned the conference. (8)

And what was B’nai B’rith Canada’s objection to the ‘World Social Forum’?

It was hosting what B’nai B’rith Canada described as ‘anti-Israel workshops’.

You see B’nai B’rith Canada claims to be opposed to lies, but it has been accused in the past by seasoned and widely-respected observers of the Middle East of deliberately peddling lies to fit their agenda. (9)

I wonder?

In this case they are claiming that criticism of Israel is… well… simply unacceptable on both the intellectual and moral planes. Apparently the Canadian government and a great many of its MPs agree.

Meanwhile in the German city of Hildesheim a seminar that explored ‘the social situation of the young people in Palestine’ at the University of Applied Sciences and Arts (aka HAWK) has been suppressed. (10)

This comes after the Central Council of Jews in Germany, the Simon Wiesenthal Center and a single faculty member loudly claimed that it was ‘anti-Semitic’ and ‘anti-Israel’ because, among other things, it examined allegations that the IDF harvest organs from dead Palestinians. (11)

In Belgium a government official has been forced to apologise and grovel, because he dare to compare Israel to Islamic State. (12) Yet this is merely said official opinion and he has every right to express it… well except in Belgium where daring to voice a criticism of a certain ‘eternally persecuted’ and apparently powerless religious minority or their self-described homeland lands you in hot water in a matter of seconds.

I think Orwell would have had a heart attack if he could only see how his worse prophecies in the novel ‘Nineteen Eighty-Four’ have come to fruition in ways that are far more frightening and seamlessly totalitarian then anything he could have ever dreamed of.

Few places are more Orwellian these days on the subject of criticism of the jews and Israel than Eric Arthur Blair’s own homeland: Great Britain.

The leader of the Labour Party Jeremy Corbyn has been attacked once again by the Daily Mail in the ongoing manufactured ‘scandal’ about so-called ‘Labour anti-Semitism’ (i.e. strong criticism of Israel branded by Israel’s supporters as ‘jew hate’). (13)

On this occasion one Grahame Morris - Corbyn’s Communities spokesman – has suggested that ‘British jews’ who serve in the IDF should be treated as suspected terrorists. While Corbyn’s Justice spokesman – Richard Burgon – has said that Zionism was the ‘enemy of peace’.

Dealing with the second comment first; it is simply Burgon’s opinion and obviously a reference to the quite debatable contention that Zionism in general ideological terms opposes peace and any sort of self-determination for the Palestinians (choosing instead to brand them ‘Jordanians’ and/or ‘Arabs’ I might add).

There is nothing ‘anti-Semitic’ or even that controversial in this. It is a position that is freely contended for and against by Israeli historians and political scientists such as Benny Morris and Ilan Pappe. Naturally the Daily Mail doesn’t appear to know this and probably wouldn’t acknowledge it if it did.

As to Grahame Morris’ point concerning what are called ‘lone soldiers’ in the IDF. It is ironic in the extreme for a supposedly patriotic publication like the Daily Mail to be claiming that jews in Britain are ‘British’ (i.e. patriotic), but yet don’t wish to fight in the British armed forces preferring instead to serve in a foreign state’s military.

Think of it this way: if men born in Britain of Russian parentage went to serve in the Russian army.

Would the Daily Mail consider them British patriots?

I doubt it.

Would the Daily Mail consider them traitors?

I rather suspect they would.

So why is it unreasonable for Morris to assert that the jews resident in Britain and serving in the IDF are traitors and, given the fact they act as a military force of occupation, ‘suspected terrorists’?

It isn’t.

So what is the Daily Mail’s objective in this clear instance of utter hypocrisy?

That’s right: equivocate anti-Israel sentiment with anti-Semitism and therefore brand anyone and therefore stifle any and all criticism of Israel.

Staying in Britain a celebrity actor named Christopher Biggins has been kicked off of the latest version of ‘Celebrity Big Brother’ for making… a joke. Apparently using a bit of black humour and making a ‘Holocaust’ joke to an oversensitive jewish housemate named Katie Waissel is now evil incarnate and must result in an immediate purge and public contrition. (14)

To finish up for this week we have the extreme kvetching that occurred when Greater Manchester Police published a tweet featuring a picture of two World War II re-enactors who they had stopped with a joke about stopping them from invading West Yorkshire. (15)

The Daily Mail predictably went nuts for no apparent reason other than ‘Nazi uniforms’ (which aren’t illegal by-the-way) and showed the general historical ignorance of their stable of journalists in describing both the men as ‘wearing SS uniforms’. In fact even those who are but dimly aware of the German armed forces in the Second World War would and did recognise that this was an outright lie.

One man was wearing a senior SS officer’s uniform to be sure, but the other is quite clearly in the uniform of a senior officer in the German army (the Heer) not the SS (Armed or otherwise). I mean for heaven’s sake the lack of all the classic SS insignia should have told any bonehead that.

Instead the ignorant bint (aka Amie Gordon) at the Daily Mail lied and rather pointlessly attacked the whole concept of having fun. Apparently having fun and free speech are just evil goyische things to do.

Oh well…


References

(1) http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/08/08...oup-finds.html
(2) http://wate.com/2016/08/09/ut-denies...-antisemitism/
(3) https://canarymission.org/about/
(4) http://jpupdates.com/2016/08/07/asso...semitic-posts/
(5) Ibid.
(6) https://www.algemeiner.com/2016/08/0...el-conference/
(7) http://news.nationalpost.com/news/ca...semitic-events
(8) https://www.algemeiner.com/2016/08/0...l-conference/; http://en.cijnews.com/?p=43138
(9) https://ukmediawatch.org/2014/06/30/...-by-the-nazis/
(10) http://www.timesofisrael.com/german-...mitism-claims/
(11) I have explored this issue here and pointed out that the evidence so far presented suggests it is likely to be true: http://www.semiticcontroversies.blog...arvesting.html and http://www.semiticcontroversies.blog...rmed-once.html
(12) http://www.jta.org/2016/08/09/news-o...sis-apologizes
(13) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ministers.html
(14) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016...fter-kicked-o/
(15) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...i-uniform.html

--------------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://bit.ly/2aJWV6N
__________________

Last edited by Karl Radl; August 9th, 2016 at 04:56 PM.
 
Old December 6th, 2016 #12
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Karl Radl
Default

Jewish War on Free Speech

(06/12/2016)

Kicking off this week’s edition of ‘The Jewish War on Free Speech’: we have the Casey bill. This is a bipartisan bill aimed at officially redefining ‘anti-Semitism’ in the US Department of Education’s lexicon. In order that anti-Israel protests and any kind of strong criticism which even vaguely makes ‘jewish students feel unsafe’ (aka any kind of criticism) is by definition ‘anti-Semitic’. (1) Thus it would make those engaging in such ‘anti-Semitism’ – like protesting the Israeli occupation of Palestine - subject to prosecution under civil rights legislation. (2)

The purpose of this bill - which looks likely to pass both US legislative houses – is to give jewish organisations, particularly ‘watchdog’ groups like the Anti-Defamation League, a legal excuse to shut down and prosecute their critics on and off campus. (3) In the same way that a film documenting the jewish use of the label ‘anti-Semitism’ to silence criticism of Israel has itself been labelled as ‘anti-Semitic’ this week. (4)

It impacts both the political left and right and as such should unite them in joint opposition to this jewish-lead initiative to destroy what is left of free speech in the United States.

Over in the United Kingdom; Home Secretary Amber Rudd has been claiming that those Britons who dare criticise the jewish people are akin to Islamist terrorists. (5)

Meanwhile British Prime Minister Theresa May has been backing a campaign lead by the jewish community to claim that people should know ‘better than’ to dare to criticise jews, (6) while Dr. Moshe Kantor, President of the European Jewish Congress, has been praising May for using scarce government resources to prosecute those who criticise jewry rather than thugs, burglars and rape gangs. (7)

Apparently criticism of jews has the unique ability to make them think they are soon going to be rounded up and murdered as Jewish MP Luciana Berger has been telling us this week. (8)

This is apparently so traumatic that British football fans are once again being accused of holding hard-core anti-Semitic views for singing traditional football songs in public, because they upset the fragile feelings of the jewish community. (9)

In addition to demanding that Swedish MPs who suggest that ethnic and religious minorities shouldn’t have disproportionate ownership of the media be sacked. (10) While getting the President of Kosovo to ban books that contain criticism of them. (11)

If I didn’t know better I would say that jews want to create an echo chamber…


References


(1) http://www.timesofisrael.com/us-lawm...m-for-schools/
(2) http://forward.com/news/355903/free-...d-make-palest/
(3) http://www.readingeagle.com/news/art...sm-on-campuses
(4) http://dailybruin.com/2016/12/04/sub...anti-semitism/
(5) http://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/...remist-threat/
(6) http://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/...ce-hate-crime/
(7) http://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/...mism-measures/
(8) http://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/...-antisemitism/
(9) http://forward.com/news/breaking-new...ts-on-subway/; https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...ncidents-abuse
(10) http://www.thelocal.se/20161205/swed...emitic-comment
(11) http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...886106,00.html

----------------------------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://bit.ly/2hdhYMl
__________________
 
Old January 11th, 2017 #13
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Karl Radl
Default

The Jewish War on Free Speech

(11/01/2017)


The Jewish War on Free Speech has continued this week with Israeli Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked successfully getting a bill passed in the Knesset and enacted into law, which enables the Israeli government to censor and remove social media content to which it objects on nebulous and undefined national security grounds. (1)

Despite the claims of jewish-owned social media giants like Facebook that they have been resisting censorship and protecting the privacy of their users. It is becoming increasing apparent that these are hollow claims with access to this information being increasingly handed over to intelligence agencies and watchdog groups.

Similarly it has also emerged that Israeli government-sponsored firm Cellebrite has been selling its iPhone cracking technology to just about every repressive regime on the planet. (2)

Meanwhile the agents of Israel have been cracking down on the free speech of people across the world.

In the UK we have the case of Alison Chabloz; who is being prosecuted by the ‘Campaign against Anti-Semitism’, an Israeli proxy, for maybe, possibly expressing a historical opinion that they don’t like. (3)

While that has all been going on a political aide to the Israeli Embassy in the UK has been caught on tape with a senior aide to one of the leaders of the Israel Lobby in the UK talking about removing the British Deputy Foreign Minister, calling the British Foreign Minister an idiot and, in effect, advocating regime change in the UK. (4)

Nothing to see here; just the government of Israel attempting to overthrow a supposed ‘fellow democracy’, but hey; it doesn’t matter if jews do it now: does it?

All the time; the Israeli government and their proxies keep pushing more and more Orwellian anti-free speech laws under the guise of ‘combating hate crimes’. (5) This is no more obvious than on the subject of the so-called ‘Holocaust’; on which subject jews have forced Google to take down search results they don’t like (6) and forced Norway’s public broadcasters to apologise for daring to make a spoof that touched on the subject (7) this week.

No wonder jews are in absolute panic mode since Adolf Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf’ is unexpectedly an absolute best seller in Germany. (8)

Apparently the jews have learned absolutely nothing over the last two thousand years.


References


(1) http://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Pol...content-476480
(2) http://motherboard.vice.com/en_ca/re...ech-cellebrite
(3) http://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/...ons-tightened/
(4) https://www.richardsilverstein.com/2...mossad-agent/; http://www.timesofisrael.com/israels...own-lawmakers/
(5) http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Holocau...-people-476703
(6) http://www.msnewsnow.com/story/34145...search-results
(7) http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/222491
(8) http://wdtn.com/2017/01/03/annotated...it-in-germany/

--------------------------------------

This was originally published at the following address: http://bit.ly/2jwYRhF
__________________
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:43 AM.
Page generated in 0.19544 seconds.