Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old April 11th, 2012 #1
Alexander M.
Senior Member
 
Alexander M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,236
Default Lessons for liberals

"When will they ever learn?"

http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Index-Liberal.html
__________________
Experience molds perception.
 
Old November 20th, 2012 #2
Alexander M.
Senior Member
 
Alexander M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,236
Default My Letter to a White Liberal

by Teutonic Viking

You admit you have been hearing that we white people will be a minority in the United States by 2040 or so they say. (Actually, it will be lot sooner than that. Perhaps as soon as 2016 – especially if Obama gives Amnesty to 30+ million illegal mestizos by Executive Order??) And you have observed the similar changes yourself, as your recent trips to California (or should I say Mexifornia?) reflect. Now your brother in California has retired and he’s about to commit what they call “white flight”. Additionally, you say you will do the same by the time you retire, though you won’t see it as white flight, as you haven’t connected the dots – yet.

Anyway, the prospect of being a white minority has been on my mind constantly (daily) for several years now. The USA went from nearly 90% white as late as 1970 to about 55 to 60+ percent today (though the US census and other “official sources” say we’re around 65-70+ percent white). What the hell happened??? Additionally, same thing is happening in Europe (& Canada/Australia/NZ) as those white countries are importing third-world people, too. For example, when I visited Sweden in 1989, it was nearly 100% white. Today, a Swedish white man tells me it’s now about 70 % white and the percentage is dropping with time. (g-a-s-p !)

In 1900, Whites were about one-third (30-35%) of the world’s population. Today, we whites are down to about 7 to 12 % of the world’s population. Quite a drop. And White women of child-bearing age is about 2 to 3 % of the world’s population. Why aren’t our leaders telling us to reproduce so we can have more white kids?

I wish to remind you that I sent you that 30+ pages of the study done by the late Dr. Phil Rushton http://www.harbornet.com/folks/theed...shton/Race.htm a few years ago while your mom was still alive. That study simply showed how different the 3 major races are. Despite the ‘leftist’ propaganda, we aren't equal!!

Now back to your email – I thoroughly understand you not wanting to discuss race issues. Being fair and treating other races well is a very stereotypically white trait. It’s perfectly ok to be anti-racist, as long as you don’t do it at the expense of your fellow whites, who are basically your kin.

It is the genetic nature of the non-white races to be ethnocentric and favor their own. Every race out there is out for its own kind, except for whites, who by their nature are individualistic and concerned with universal principles of fairness. Do you think that Arabs are concerned with issues of fairness with regard to Jews? Are the Chinese concerned with fairness with regard to Black Africans? Are Mexicans or Blacks concerned with fairness with regard to Whites?

Only whites continue to believe that it is possible or even desirable to transcend race and try to make the United States a nation in which race does not matter. Whites have little sense of racial solidarity, and most whites strongly condemn any signs of it in white people (your last email is an example of it).

“We need to understand racial identity, something most people who are not white take for granted. They come to it early, feel it strongly, and make no apologies for it. Most Whites do not have a racial identity, but they would do well to understand what race means for others. Most Whites should also ponder the consequences of being the only group for whom such an identity is forbidden and who are permitted no aspirations as a group.” [Jared Taylor in his book, White Identity]

Indeed, I’ve also noted that only white people have been deracinated, while other races have not abandoned their racial consciousness. Hence the non-whites are not likely to reciprocate becoming as deracinated as whites.

Most importantly, what do you think is going to happen to our political rights once we lose our majority status, given the fact that American public (including non-whites) has been bombarded for decades in the schools and the mainstream media with continuous information blaming whites for every single injustice??? Non-whites in positions of power don't always see us whites as good/nice people and will treat us accordingly, as evidenced by anti-white statements by guys like Attorney General Eric Holder.
Secondly, whites are precluded from organizing along racial lines – why is it white people are NOT allowed to form our group identity and civil rights support group, let alone any organizations for whites? There are hundreds of non-white race-based organizations and societies for blacks, Hispanics (their big civil rights group is called La Raza – which is Spanish for The Race), Hindus, East Asians, Arabs, Filipinos, Jews and every other non-white ethnicity under the sun.

But, if we whites decide to join something as innocuous as White Engineers (or Teachers) Society, liberals and their Jewish friends would probably take us to the court, as they did in other white countries. Do you realistically expect blacks, mestizos, and other non-whites to fight for the rights – of white people????!!? If whites do become a minority, would we whites be allowed to form our own white organizations?

In closing, I'll let a former Reagan appointee, Bob Whitaker, say some good words about anti-racism:

ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and “assimilating” with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, liberals and respectable conservatives would call me a Nazi.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

http://www.wvwnews.net/content/index...e_liberal.html
__________________
Experience molds perception.
 
Old December 6th, 2012 #3
Alexander M.
Senior Member
 
Alexander M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,236
Default Nefarious Origins of Liberals’ Moral Degeneracy

Warning: This essay deals with adult subject matter and includes graphic content.


Freudian Worldview

In an effort to uncover the type of mental pathology afflicting white liberals, let’s turn our attention to the work of Sigismund Schlomo Freud, who became known as the founding father of psychoanalysis.

The following is Wikipedia’s summary of this Jewish gentleman’s theories:

‘On the basis of his early clinical work Freud postulated that unconscious memories of sexual molestation in early childhood were a necessary precondition for the psychoneuroses (hysteria and obsessional neurosis), a formulation now known as Freud's seduction theory. By 1897, however, Freud had abandoned this theory, now arguing that the repressed sexual thoughts and fantasies of early childhood were the key causative factors in neuroses, whether or not derived from real events in the child's history. This would lead to the emergence of Freud's new theory of infantile sexuality, and eventually to the Oedipus complex.
Oedipus complex denotes the emotions and ideas that the mind keeps in the unconscious, via dynamic repression, that concentrate upon a child's desire to sexually possess his/her mother, and kill his/her father. Sigmund Freud, who coined the term "Oedipus complex" believed that the Oedipus complex is a desire for the mother in both sexes (he believed that girls have a homosexual attraction towards their mother).

The Oedipus complex occurs in the third — phallic stage (ages 3–6) — of five psychosexual development stages: (i) the oral, (ii) the anal, (iii) the phallic, (iv) the latent, and (v) the genital — in which the source of libido pleasure is in a different erogenous zone of the infant's body.

Sigmund Freud further proposed that girls and boys resolved their complexes differently — he via castration anxiety, she via penis envy; and that unsuccessful resolutions might lead to neurosis, pedophilia, and homosexuality.

The boy directs his libido (sexual desire) upon his mother, and directs jealousy and emotional rivalry against his father — because it is he who sleeps with his mother. The boy remains ambivalent about his father's place in the family, which is manifested as fear of castration by the physically greater father.’

Freud’s fraudulent theories, which reflect the levels of sickness and perversion that vastly exceed the degeneracy we would customarily expect from a Jew, are basically a roadmap for pedophiles, child molesters, homosexuals and other types of sexual deviants.

Unfortunately, Freudian degeneracy underlies the entire liberal worldview that envisions the destruction of white families, murder of white children, pedophilia, miscegenation, prostitution, sexual slavery, rampant homosexuality and more.


Homosexuality, Child Molestation, Incest and Bestiality

Among thousands of documented cases of child molestation by priests, 100% of the victims were young boys. This unequivocally proves that children are disproportionately molested by homosexuals, as there have hardly been any cases of young girls being molested by heterosexual priests. Even though the evidence establishing the link between homosexuality and child molestation is indisputable, not a single healthcare professional, politician, researcher or reporter has ever pointed this out due to their fear of retribution by an unforgiving liberal juggernaut.

Liberals say that they support ‘marriage equality’, but what they implicitly support is pedophilia and child molestation.

Homosexual ‘marriages’ are currently in effect in several U.S. states, eight European countries, Canada and Argentina. “Marriage equality’ is now part of the platform of the party of Thomas Jefferson.

France, under the leadership of black Justice Minister Christiane Taubira, is set to ban the words ‘mother’ and ‘father’ from official documents as part of a plan to legalize homosexual marriage and give adoption rights to homosexual couples.

But, why do blissful homosexual ‘marriages’ exist only in overwhelmingly white countries? Why isn’t this virtuous institution present in Arab countries, where homosexuals are persecuted, in sub-Saharan Africa, where they are incarcerated or in Iran, where they are executed? Why isn’t homosexual ‘marriage’ introduced in India, China and the Far East, areas inhabited by one half of world population? The reason is obvious:

Utterly degenerate Jewish ideas are promoted and implemented only in white countries in order to destroy white societies and our people once and for all.

But why are Jews such staunch supporters of child molestation in the first place?

To answer this puzzling question we will consult the Talmud (Hebrew: instruction, learning), which is the basis of all codes of rabbinic law. This document, finalized around 500 A.D., contains consensus opinions of rabbis on a variety of subjects, including law, ethics, philosophy, customs, history, theology and many other topics.

In the Babylonian Talmud, tractate Kehuboth, on page 11b it is written: ‘When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl, it is nothing, for when the girl is less than three years old, it is as if one puts the finger into the eye.’

Tractate Sanhedrin 55b clarifies the age limit: A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabits with her, she becomes his.

However, this leaves a critical question unanswered: Is a Jew allowed to rape a newborn baby in order to acquire her as his wife?

This tantalizing prospect is addressed in Yevamoth 60b: ‘A proselyte [non-Jewish born convert to Judaism, which is apparently a euphemism for a gentile baby] who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest.’

To summarize: Judaism allows rabbis to rape female newborns. However, child raping privileges of grown up Jews are limited to victims who are older than three. The rationale for this distinction is that according to Talmudic teachings, women reach sexual maturity at the age of three.

However, if a Jew gets carried away and rapes a girl younger than three there is no problem, since the entire episode is harmless anyway.

What about the boys? Is sodomizing young boys a Jewish man’s prerogative as well?

Absolutely! This practice is covered in Sanhedrin 54b and 55a: ‘Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. He who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot be a passive subject of pederasty.’

According to Talmudic law, male newborns, toddlers and boys who have not reached sexual maturity may always be sodomized by grownups without any repercussions.

However, ‘Pederasty at the age of nine years and a day is liable to punishment.’ In other words, a boy who survives his 9th birthday is considered an adult and from that point on Leviticus 20:13 applies ‘If a man lies with a man as with a woman, both of them shall be put to death for their abominable deed; they have forfeited their lives.’

Are incestuous relationships permitted under Talmudic law as well?

Of course! That scenario is covered in Sanhedrin 69b: ‘If a woman sported lewdly with her young son [older than nine years], and he committed the first stage of cohabitation with her, he thereby renders her unfit to the priesthood.’ [i.e. she becomes a harlot whom a priest may not marry]. But, the ‘first stage of intercourse’ of a boy younger than nine years and one day with his mother is harmless and she may subsequently marry a priest.

In other words, it is totally fine for a Jewish mom to have sex with her son before his 9th birthday. She may continue to have sex with him for many more years, but with an understanding that it would make her ineligible to marry a rabbi as she would be deemed her son’s prostitute.

Jews apparently believe that incest is best!

After being exiled to Babylon in 597 B.C. Jews absorbed the immorality of the Babylonian culture and engaged in many Babylonian sexual perversions, including bestiality—sex with animals.

Babylonian Talmud addresses this peculiar practice in tractate Sanhedrin 55a, footnote (2): If a man commits bestiality, he is liable only for a connection in a natural manner, but not otherwise.

Considering the ambiguity of this situation, such balanced approach seems reasonable.

On the other hand, bestiality involving Jewish women is covered in Yevamoth 59b: ‘A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a priest.’ This nugget of Talmudic wisdom that rhymes in English certainly makes sense, as rabbis correctly observe that ‘Harlotry [prostitution] is not applicable to bestial intercourse.’

The Talmud helps us understand why Freud speaks of ‘sexual molestation in early childhood’, ‘infantile sexuality’ ‘erogenous zone of the infant's body’, ‘a boy directing his sexual desire toward his mother’ pedophilia and homosexuality. These utterly degenerate concepts and practices, explicitly permitted in Judaism, are deeply rooted in Jewish culture and family life.

Their sexual pathology explains why so many Jews that we know personally or watch on TV are profoundly neurotic individuals. For example, Jewish characters from the show ‘Seinfeld’ and those from Woody Allen’s movies are endlessly preoccupied with one thing: their dysfunctional sexuality.

The fact that the Jewish director, whose real name is Allan Konigsberg, cheated on his longtime girlfriend Mia Farrow with actress’s adopted Korean daughter whom he subsequently married certainly fits into the Talmudic narrative. To this day, Mr. Allen indignantly rejects the notion that there is anything wrong with his loving relationship.

His Jewish colleague, world renowned director Roman Polanski also shares interest in young girls. In 1976 he had an affair with actress Nastassja Kinski at the set of one of his movies. But, didn’t Mr. Polanski know that it was terribly wrong for a 43-year old man to have sex with a girl who was 15 at the time? Of course he knew it was wrong—the actress was too old for him! To correct this problem, later that same year, Mr. Polanski had sex with a 13 year old girl, which is a more appropriate age by Talmudic standards.

Unfortunately, this episode created legal trouble for the famed director. Hours before his sentencing for child rape Mr. Polanski fled from Los Angeles to France, a haven for Jewish child molesters. Everything went well for Mr. Polanski over the next 30+ years other than the fact that he could not attend the Academy Awards. Unfortunately for him, in 2009 he set foot in Switzerland, which prompted United States to request his extradition.

French foreign minister at the time, Bernard Kouchner expressed dismay at Mr. Polanski’s incarceration, calling it, according to BBC, a ‘bit sinister’. But why would this distinguished humanist and physician, a prominent member of ‘Doctors Without Borders’, express sympathy for a child rapist?

Could it be because Mr. Kouchner is a fellow Jew?

Fortunately for Mr. Polanski, Switzerland caved in and eventually released him. At that time the Alpine nation was under strong pressure from the Jewish lobby as they were extracting ransom from Swiss banks on account of some murky financial transactions that took place 75 years ago.

An example of Jewish preoccupation with sexual relations with minors is the 1962 movie Lolita, centered around a middle-aged man who becomes obsessed with an underage girl. Due to decency restrictions at the time, the 14 year old actress who played Lolita left much to the audience’s imagination.

Jewish director Stanley Kubrick was outraged that he couldn’t sufficiently dramatize the erotic component of man’s relationship with Lolita and later commented that, had he realized how severe the censorship limitations were going to be, he probably would have never made the film. His frustration is quite understandable, considering that Judaism teaches that girls older than 3 are adults. So what was the problem?

Child rape is such an integral component of Jewish morality that they want to legalize it!

The North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) is a pedophile and pederasty advocacy organization in the United States that works to abolish age of consent laws criminalizing adult sexual involvement with minors. They advocate the release of all men imprisoned for sexual contacts with minors that did not involve coercion, as consensual relationships, in their opinion, are neither harmful nor do they represent sexual abuse of children.

NAMBLA’s most famous member and defender was late Allen Ginsberg, a Jewish poet and one of the leading figures of the Beat Generation. When this reputable organization got in legal trouble, they were represented by American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which supports adoption rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender couples, and whose ally in many legal actions is the American Jewish Congress. ACLU has many Jewish lawyers and is strongly supported by the Jewish community, including the Jewish Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who founded the ACLU’s Women’s Rights Project in 1971.

In 2012, New York City, run by Jewish billionaire mayor Michael Bloomberg, had to address a peculiar Jewish practice called ‘brit milah’ during which male newborn’s private parts end up in rabbi’s mouth. Health authorities did not object to the child molestation aspects of this peculiar Babylonian custom, but expressed concern about documented cases of sexual diseases transmitted to the newborn. Fortunately, they came up with a Talmudic solution to the quandary: The rabbis can continue to engage in child molestation as long as child’s parents do not object!

These high profile cases are just the tip of the iceberg, since Jewish deplorable sexual perversions are shrouded in secrecy surrounding these enigmatic people.

Unfortunately, Jewish sexual degeneracy is no longer confined to their communities, but has metastasized out of control!

The Jerry Springer Show, watched by millions of viewers, specializes in sexual degeneracy. Show participants are often troubled individuals from the fringes of society who are relentlessly manipulated by Mr. Springer. Typical plots are: a man sleeps with his wife’s niece, a man confesses to his girlfriend that he was born a woman or slept with her cousin or slept with a transsexual, a man cheats on his transsexual lover, a godmother sleeps with her godchild’s father, etc. The show’s trademark feature are brawls fueled by disputes over morally repugnant sexual relations, while female guests receive ‘Jerry beads’ for exposing their breasts to the studio audience Mardi Gras style. TV Guide voted The Jerry Springer Show as the ‘Worst Show in the History of Television’.

Are you shocked to learn that Jerry Springer, the purveyor of this disgusting programming, is a Jew?

What do other TV and radio personalities who endlessly debate perverted sexual practices on their reprehensible shows, such as Maury Povich, Dr. Drew Pinsky, Dr. Ruth Westheimer, Joan Rivers and Heraldo Rivera have in common? They are all Jews!

Paul Reubens, also known as Pee-wee Herman, is an actor whose Emmy Award winning children series ran on CBS from 1986-1991. In July 1991, while visiting relatives, Mr . Reubens was arrested in Sarasota, Florida for publicly engaging in lewd behavior in an adult theater.

Guess what’s the ethnicity of this actor, who was born Paul Rubenfeld? He is a Jew!

So is Sasha Baron Cohen, whose fictional movie characters Borat and Bruno engage in graphic homosexuality while contemplating child molestation, incest and necrophilia.

Have you ever wondered why our beautiful white children are bombarded by sexual content including government mandated ‘sex education’ and homosexual indoctrination in grade school and condoms and birth control options in high school?! Do you have any idea why the fashion industry is sexualizing our preteen daughters or why gender bending toy catalogues in Sweden feature boys with dolls and girls with machine guns?

Because Jewish controlled entertainment industry, media, academia, pressure groups and courts relentlessly impose abominable Jewish views on sexuality on us and our children, thus destroying white societies from within. Jews are the masterminds of these despicable campaigns, while much more numerous white liberals, who have internalized Jewish sexual degeneracy, are their foot soldiers.

Since homosexuality among adults is considered a grave sin, the Torah teaches that God destroyed sodomites residing in Sodom and Gomorra with fire and brimstone. That is why Jews have not legalized homosexual marriages in Israel. Yet, they wholeheartedly support this concept in white countries through their favorite tools, white liberals, who slavishly labor to destroy the institution of marriage and replace traditional values with their Judeo-Babylonian morality.

But why would white liberals support perverted views on sexuality promoted by a degenerate race of child rapists, whose incestuous relationships generate multiple obscure genetic disorders unheard of among other ethnicities? Can’t our estranged liberal kin realize that wallowing in decadence and debauchery is not a sign of progressiveness, tolerance, or righteousness, but of profound mental sickness?


Miscegenation, Rape, Prostitution and Sexual Slavery

Promotion of sexual degeneracy in Jewish-run media facilitates something even more detrimental to the future of our people: miscegenation. To a promiscuous young white person who is open to homosexuality, orgies and gender bending, having sex with nonwhites is just another (Freudian) step in broadening his or her horizons.

Nowhere is that more obvious than in beautiful Scandinavia, the land of blue-eyed, blond peoples who are being overrun by Arabs and Africans. De-Christianized Sweden, famous for its lax sexual mores, where teenagers are encouraged by government-sponsored ads to get sexually active as soon as possible, is at the epicenter of this trend.

Not surprisingly, Sweden has twice as many rapes per capita than any other European country, rapes committed by an out-of-control nonwhite population. Ordinarily, feminists and other liberals would speak against these atrocious attacks on dignity of all women, but in this case, they remain silent.

Holland has long been infamous for legalized prostitution, with troubled, semi-naked white women sitting in storefront windows, waiting to sell their services to an increasingly nonwhite clientele. Have you ever heard liberals raise their voice against this abomination? Of course not, since they view legalized prostitution and drug use as just another wholesome aspect of sexual liberation they fought for and won in the 1960s, the movement which was spearheaded by Jewish luminaries such as Susan Sontag, Gloria Steinem and Robin Morgan. The same dynamic is present in neighboring Belgium.

Bill Gates, the world’s richest and most famous philanthropist refers to these unfortunate souls as ‘sex workers’ engaged in a profession which, in his opinion, deserves to be regulated in terms of work conditions and benefits like any other occupation. But, would you like your daughter, your sister, or your mother to become a ‘sex-worker’? Since the answer is an unequivocal ‘No!’ doesn’t this demonstrate just how sick liberal ideas really are?

Liberal efforts to promote prostitution are fully supported by the United Nations as well. The 210-page U.N. study “Sex Work and the Law in Asia and the Pacific” published in October 2012 and authored by an Australian ‘human rights lawyer’ calls for decriminalization of prostitution and states the following:

‘The terms ‘prostitution’ and ‘prostitute’ have negative connotations and are considered by advocates of sex workers to be stigmatizing. The term ‘sex work’ is preferred.

Problems are exacerbated when reformers and authorities voice shrill warnings about human trafficking and forcibly ‘rescue’ prostitutes who do not want to be ‘saved’. Often, sex workers are portrayed as passive victims who need to be saved. Assuming that all workers are trafficked denies the autonomy and choice of people who sell sex.

The UNAIDS Advisory Group on Sex Work has noted that there is no evidence that anti-prostitution initiatives reduce sex work or HIV transmission, or improve the quality of life of sex workers.’

United Nations’ liberal bureaucracy residing in Jewish-run New York City implicitly supports human trafficking and sexual slavery in order to ‘improve the quality of life of sex workers’! Unfortunately, an alarming number of white women, including minors, are victims of these horrific crimes.

But who runs human trafficking, sexual slavery and prostitution rings in Israel, the Ukraine, Moldova and much of Eastern Europe, enterprises that impose terrible suffering on their innocent, white victims? The Jews!

If you look up ‘Zwi Migdal’ on Jewish-friendly Wikipedia, you will see this:

‘Zwi Migdal was an organization of Jewish white slave traders based mostly in Argentina, which engaged in trafficking of women from the shtetls of Eastern Europe. The organization operated from the 1860s to 1939 [when operations apparently ground to a halt due to unfortunate German interference]. In the 1920s 430 rufian, or pimps controlled 2000 brothels with 4000 women in Argentina alone.

Well-mannered and elegant-looking Jewish men would recruit girls from poor villages in Poland and Russia by posting ads in the local synagogue, ostensibly looking for maids to work in the homes of wealthy Jews in Argentina. The girls bade their families farewell and boarded ships to Argentina believing they were on their way toward a better future.

Their period of training as sex slaves often started on the ship. The rufianes held a ‘meat market’ in which newly arrived girls were paraded naked in front of traders. Prostitutes who failed to satisfy their clients were beaten, fined or sent to work in provincial houses. Every business transaction was logged. Although there were brothels all over Argentina, most were in Buenos Aires, in the Jewish quarter on Junin Street.’

Zwi Migdal is just a minor episode in centuries old Jewish practice of sexual slavery that continues to this day.

The following is a witness account from Vienna around 1910, when about 10% of the city’s population was Jewish:

‘In no other city of western Europe could the relationship between Jewry and prostitution, and even now the white slave traffic, be studied better than in Vienna, with the possible exception of southern France. An icy shudder ran down my spine when seeing for the first time the Jew as a cool, shameless, and calculating manager of this shocking vice.’

Is it really surprising that this young man, who observed their horrific trade firsthand, was not overly supportive of Jewish slave traffickers—once he became a German Chancellor?

Let’s skip 100 years and review a couple of BBC News articles from the 21st century:

March 24, 2005

Israel women trafficking soars

‘Between 3000 and 5000 women have been smuggled into Israel in the past four years to work as prostitutes, according to the parliamentary inquiry.

The report described how the women are sold at public auctions for as much as $10,000 and forced to work up to 18 hours a day. On average the women receive only three percent of the money they earn from prostitution, the report said.

Most of the women are from the former Soviet Union. Many are raped and beaten as they are smuggled into Israel over the Egyptian border, the inquiry found.’


November 6, 2007

Israel’s fight against sex trafficking

‘Marina—not her real name—was lured to Israel by human traffickers.

“I was taken to an apartment in Ashkelon, and other women told me I was now in prostitution. I became hysterical, but a guy started hitting me and then others there raped me. I was then taken to a place where they sold me—just sold me!” she said, recalling how she was locked in a windowless basement for a month, drank water from a toilet and was deprived of food.

Sometimes the women are subjected to degrading human auctions, where they are stripped, examined and sold for $8,000—$10,000.

Last year, the United Nations named Israel as one of the main destinations in the world for trafficked women; it has also consistently appeared as an offender in the annual U.S. State Department Trafficking in Persons (TIP) report.’

Isn’t it amazing that Israeli Jews run identical sexual trafficking/slavery operations today as Argentinean Jews did in the 19th century? The only notable differences are that there are many more victims today and that they are no longer Jewish, but white.

Heidi Fleiss, the madam who ran the most notorious prostitution ring in the United States is a Jew. The second most famous patron of prostitutes in the United States, former New York Governor Elliot Spizer is also a Jew.

But how can we possibly imply that Jews are the kings of prostitution considering that Charlie Sheen is a gentile?

In an interview with Access Hollywood in March 2011 this warlock with tiger blood and Adonis DNA clarified his ancestry: ‘My mom is Jewish. So, I guess that would make me Jewish, and my children Jewish. And Brooke [Mueller], my ex-wife is Jewish… I am proud of it. There you have it.’

Considering the fact that Jews have dominated sexual slavery and prostitution for many centuries, is it really a surprise that these horrific crimes are not high on the list of concerns of white liberals, these students of Judeo-Babylonian moral degeneracy?

An additional reason why white liberals ignore horrible crimes against white women is the unspoken hierarchy of liberal catechism: The most sacred group of people is nonwhites, whose virtues cannot be questioned even when they behave like animals. Whether they harm their victims in the course of committing ordinary crimes, or by committing sexual crimes against women, liberals are fine with their predatory behavior as long as the victims are white. In rare cases when the roles are reversed, Judeo-liberals consider the incidents ‘hate crimes’.

Homosexuals are a favored constituency as well. Liberals turn a blind eye toward homosexuals’ urge to engage in child molestation because the victims of these predators are overwhelmingly young white boys, our children.

Jews run not only Hollywood, but much of the porn industry as well, enterprises that ruthlessly exploit, abuse and debase white women. Unfortunately, you will never hear feminists or other liberal organizations and individuals protest against these despicable Jewish endeavors because—you guessed it—the victims are innocent, vulnerable white women.

What liberals passionately believe in and act upon is neither anti-sexist nor anti-violent, it is simply anti-white!

But why do our enemies mercilessly target white women?

Because to destroy the white race they must first and foremost, eliminate white children.


Genocide of White Children

Contraception

The sordid tale of genocide of white children starts with Margaret Sanger, the contraception pioneer who founded American Birth Control League in 1921. Her organization evolved into Planned Parenthood, an institution that is responsible for infanticide of millions of unborn children in the United States.

But why would Margaret Higgins, the 6th out of 11 children from a good Irish Catholic family devote her entire life to preventing births of white children?

Because in 1902. she married a Jew, William Sanger, an architect with an interest in radical politics who introduced her to the world of Jewish dominated revolutionary artists and activists in New York City. The couple soon became immersed in the radical bohemian culture that was then flourishing in Greenwich Village and became involved with local intellectuals, artists, socialists, and activists for political reform, including John Reed (a communist played by Warren Beatty in the 1981 movie Reds), Upton Sinclair, Mabel Dodge, and Emma Goldman.

According to Wikipedia, in her efforts to disseminate information about various methods to prevent birth of our beautiful white children Margaret Sanger received aggressive support from Emma Goldman, a Lithuanian Jew who played a pivotal role in the development of anarchist political philosophy in North America and Europe at the beginning of the twentieth century. In 1915 Goldman conducted a nationwide speaking tour to raise awareness about contraception options.

Goldman was also an advocate of free love, a strong critic of marriage and an outspoken critic of prejudice against homosexuals. Her belief that social liberation should extend to gay men and lesbians was virtually unheard of at the time, even among anarchists. She was the first and only woman, indeed the first ‘American’, to take up the defense of homosexual love before the general public. In numerous speeches and letters, she defended the right of gay men and lesbians to love as they pleased and condemned the fear and stigma associated with homosexuality.

This Jewish lady was about 100 years ahead of her time! Unfortunately, she was imprisoned several times for her subversive activities in the U.S. and eventually deported to communist Russia in 1919.

Please note that all degenerate and destructive ideas always originate among Jews: Marxism, Bolshevism, sexual ‘revolution’, infanticide, homosexual ‘marriage’, child molestation, incest, miscegenation etc. To implement these perverted ideas in their host societies, Jews routinely co-opt thoroughly brainwashed white liberals, who enthusiastically work to destroy their kin, as is the case today throughout the Western world.

Margaret Sanger secured funding for research that led to the discovery of oral contraceptive pill in 1950s by Gregory Pincus.

And what was Mr. Pincus’s ethnicity? He was a Jew!

The introduction of birth control pill decimated white birth rates and ushered sexual revolution, promiscuity and miscegenation that collectively destroyed traditional morality and white societies in general.

‘The Population Bomb’ is a best selling book written by Stanford University Professor Paul R. Ehrlich in 1968. The book warned of the mass starvation of humans in 1970s and 1980s due to overpopulation and advocated immediate action to limit population growth. Mr. Ehrlich proposed adding mass sterilizing agents in our water supply and staple foods, taxation of children like luxury goods, legalization of abortion and many other humanistic ideas.

Aside from the fact that 40+ years later Americans are dying of obesity rather than starvation, what is notable about Professor Ehrlich’s ideas is that they are unmistakably Jewish.

Abortion on Demand

Contraception is not always effective and often times it is not used. As a result, many unplanned pregnancies occur each year. In healthy societies, where children are considered a blessing, unplanned pregnancies result in childbirths. But decadent Judeo-liberal societies consider unborn children their worst enemies who deserve to be mercilessly butchered.

To enable their demonic trade, abortionists successfully pushed for legalization of infanticide in the United States in ‘Roe vs. Wade’ which was decided in their favor by the Supreme Court in 1973. Since that time, more than 40 million unborn Americans, probably half of them white children, were brutally butchered!

The main provider of abortion in the United States, Planned Parenthood, was led by Dr. Alan Guttmacher from 1962 through his death in 1974, as his tenure coincided with the tumultuous period of ‘sexual revolution’. He was a staunch supporter of abortion and also the vice president of the American Eugenics Society as well as the founder of association of physicians who were performing abortions.

And what was Dr. Guttmacher’s ethnicity? He was a Jew!

Morning After Pill

The gentleman credited with the discovery of the so called ‘morning after pill’ that induces early abortion is French biochemist and endocrinologist Etienne-Emile Baulieu.

This piece of information is quite alarming since it suggests that the father of the abortion pill, a gentile with an unmistakable French name, broke the Jewish monopoly on demonic business of murdering white children. Is that possible?

No it’s not! Thankfully, this was just a false alarm. Mr. Baulieu is a Jew whose birth name is Emile Blum. This gentleman, who looks very Semitic, must be very proud of his discovery considering that he wrote a book called ‘The Abortion Pill’ along with his coauthor, Mort Rosenblum. Poisoning white fetuses on a massive scale is an accomplishment certainly worth celebrating!

Partial-Birth Abortion

This abortion procedure involves completely delivering the baby’s body except for the head. While the head is still inside the mother, a sharp instrument is forced into the back of the baby’s head to make an opening for a suction instrument to siphon the brain out of the skull. After the brain is removed, the skull is crushed and the rest of the baby’s body is delivered.

In 2003, ban on this abhorrent practice was passed by both Congressional chambers and signed into law by President Bush.

Senators Diane Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, Joe Lieberman, John Kohn (aka Kerry), Carl Levin, Frank Lautenberg, Chuck Schumer, Ron Wyden, Russ Feingold and Herb Kohl voted against the ban on partial birth abortion.

What do these senators have in common? They are all Jews!

According to the Catholic League, all 25 Jewish Congressmen serving in 108th Congress voted against the ban on partial birth abortion!

The constitutionality of the law was challenged immediately after the signing. On April 18, 2007 the Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision, Gonzales v. Carhart, held that the statute does not violate the Constitution. Jewish Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the dissent, joined by her Jewish colleague Stephen Breyer.

Leading Jewish elected representatives and judges are united in their passionate support for drilling holes in the heads of our beautiful white babies, siphoning their brains out and crushing their little skulls!

As a result of the genocide of white children, white nations are experiencing plummeting birth rates. What’s the ‘Jewish Solution’ to our demographic catastrophe? Massive importation of alien races!

International Jewry wants our beautiful white children dead and our white countries turned over to alien races!

Unfortunately, white liberals are slavishly assisting their Jewish masterminds in butchering our own, beautiful white children. Liberals support homosexuals, bisexuals, metrosexuals, transvestites, gender benders, prostitution, pornography, sexualization of children and every other degenerate Jewish initiative designed to destroy our people!

Since they turn a blind eye on pedophilia, one of the wickedest crimes of all, on harrowing gang rapes of white women by Africans, mestizos and Arabs, is it really a surprise that liberals wholeheartedly support race-mixing—the final nail in the coffin of the white race?

http://www.wvwnews.net/content/index...egeneracy.html
__________________
Experience molds perception.
 
Old December 18th, 2012 #4
Alexander M.
Senior Member
 
Alexander M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,236
Default Why do Liberals Seem Impervious to Racial Facts?

Racism, like witchcraft, does not exist. The very word defines itself in terms of things that are not real because the definition hinges on the non-factual belief that races are identical in all but skin color. Like the old-time church used the charge of heresy to limit science and any other non-conforming thought that posed a threat to the dogma of the power structure, the word racism denotes non-conformity with a non-factual dogma that the power structure wants us to believe and espouse.

http://www.wvwnews.net/content/index...ial_facts.html
__________________
Experience molds perception.
 
Old February 27th, 2013 #5
Alexander M.
Senior Member
 
Alexander M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,236
Default Equality: A Justification of Privilege, Oppression, & Inhumanity

It is a cliché in our Left-leaning liberal society that we must all remain vigilant against any ideology that rejects equality as a morally desirable aim, because, should that ideology achieve political power, we would soon find ourselves back in the slippery slope that begins with a justification of racism and ends with the gas chambers in Auschwitz-Birkenau.

Both liberals and their Marxist critics present themselves as forces of liberation and emancipation, and their historiography portrays the time before their advent as one of privilege, oppression, and inhumanity.

Yet, the history of the last one hundred years has shown that, contrary to the conceit of liberals and the Left, and contrary to the fine rhetoric that emanates from their camp, the moral logic of egalitarianism also justifies privilege, oppression, and inhumanity, exactly the same ills it claims to have opposed.


http://www.counter-currents.com/2013...ty/#more-36821
__________________
Experience molds perception.
 
Old March 14th, 2013 #6
Anders Hoveland
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 86
Default

If you want to see into the future, we have only to look at the young.

White babies are already a minority in the USA !

http://www.theroot.com/buzz/black-an...mber-whites-us

After another three decades, as the older whites die off and the hispanics keep breeding exponentially, it is a near certainty that whites, of all ages, will become a minority.
 
Old March 21st, 2013 #7
Alexander M.
Senior Member
 
Alexander M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,236
Default Equality as an Evil

The dominant ideology of modern Western societies upholds equality as an absolute moral good, which must, therefore, be pursued for its own sake. The morality of egalitarianism is never questioned by the establishment power structure or by the vast majority of citizens; it is, in fact, a taken-for granted assumption that exists outside the scope of acceptable debate. Predicated on the arbitrary assertion that all humans are born equal in dignity and rights, and bearer of such rights by the mere fact of being human, able to reason, or endowed with dignity (note the circular reasoning) it makes of anyone questioning the moral goodness of equality into an individual of questionable humanity. Even conservatives dare not question the moral goodness of equality, focusing instead on critiquing the methods of application. Yet, equality, despite the high-flown rhetoric surrounding it, is far from an absolute moral good. On the contrary, when we examine the consequences of equality, it is an evil. This article will first explore some of the ways in which equality is an evil and will then put forth an alternative paradigm, founded on a theory of difference.

http://alternativeright.com/blog/201...ity-as-an-evil
__________________
Experience molds perception.
 
Old April 6th, 2013 #8
Alexander M.
Senior Member
 
Alexander M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,236
Default How Liberal Brain Damage Produced the Steubenville School Rape Video

The recent case of Steubenville high school students callously making a video of the rape of a classmate is an excellent case study of Liberal brain damage – how the Liberal’s pursuit of a pacifistic, r-selected society produces an atrophy of the very brain structure needed to fight evil. This purposefully created Liberal brain damage produces a surreal abandonment of values and traits that we would normally hold dear, if left to our own devices.

http://alternativeright.com/blog/201...ool-rape-video
__________________
Experience molds perception.
 
Old April 6th, 2013 #9
Alexander M.
Senior Member
 
Alexander M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,236
Default Racial Discourse: The land where liberals support closed borders

I think of racial discourse as the land of liberals. It is a 'nation' where conservatives are deemed unwelcome illegal aliens and race realists are hated as outright subversives. Both are promptly expelled upon entry.

It is a possession obsession.

Liberals 'own' the national conversation about race and they obsessively chatter about it, often salting their conversations with racial code words and 'dog whistles' such as 'diversity,' 'social justice,' and 'equality.'

http://dailykenn.blogspot.com/2013/0...ilyKenn.com%29
__________________
Experience molds perception.
 
Old April 16th, 2013 #10
Alexander M.
Senior Member
 
Alexander M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,236
Default The Egalitarian Oversight

In undertaking their grand scheme to deconstruct “whiteness” and usher in a multicultural paradise, the greatest oversight the liberal establishment makes is the refusal to foresee the rejection of minority races to uphold egalitarianism once whites become a minority.

This oversight, in turn, reveals a truly astonishing state of collective cognitive dissonance. How can liberals not be aware of this glaringly conspicuous error in the contemplation of demographic projections? Furthermore, how can purportedly educated adults be unable to make the next logical extension of thought in considering what unbelievably tragic results will come from this demographic shift?

http://alternativeright.com/blog/201...rian-oversight
__________________
Experience molds perception.
 
Old April 29th, 2013 #11
Alexander M.
Senior Member
 
Alexander M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,236
Default The Moral Hollowness of the Elites

The Establishment presents itself as moral and opposed to low things like "prejudice," "narrow-mindedness," and "bigotry." This helps create a sense of arrogance that prevents them from questioning whether they have actually created a multiracial utopia or not. They are prejudiced, but against their own people. Furthermore, their unrealistic and irrational policies have brought about the very same situation that the ideology of the last sixty years was designed to prevent.

http://alternativeright.com/blog/201...-of-the-elites
__________________
Experience molds perception.
 
Old June 1st, 2013 #12
Norman Bean
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 157
Default A long ago conversation

About 20 years ago, I had a conversation with a fellow white on what year us whites will become a minority in America. He thought it would be a good thing, because then we would be the ones enjoying the afermitive action privilages.Since then, I have wondered, just how many whites out there, beleave ,as he did? Needless to say, there will NEVER be any such benifits given to us.
 
Old November 7th, 2013 #13
Alexander M.
Senior Member
 
Alexander M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,236
Default Liberalism is Based on a Logical Fallacy

Logical fallacies are not the end-all be-all of logic. In fact, they’re just a handy shorthand for recognizing common mistakes made in argument.

However, if you find one present in an argument someone is making, like “we should all be liberals,” you should proceed with caution. Where the basic assumptions are logical errors, more are sure to follow. And worse, those who accept logical errors can’t tell the difference between insanity and sanity, so you’re in for a rough ride.

http://alternativeright.com/blog/cat...ogical-fallacy
__________________
Experience molds perception.
 
Old November 19th, 2013 #14
Alexander M.
Senior Member
 
Alexander M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,236
Default The Essence of Liberalism: The Cheerleader Effect and Self-Esteem

It caught everyone by surprise, how successful liberalism has been.

I should clarify: liberalism is successful at taking over societies. It is not successful at making them thrive. In fact, it tends to destroy them and leave behind burnt shells with third-world levels of social order, hygiene, corruption and morality.

http://alternativeright.com/blog/cat...nd-self-esteem
__________________
Experience molds perception.
 
Old November 22nd, 2013 #15
Alexander M.
Senior Member
 
Alexander M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,236
Default Girl Who Got Punched in Head Gives Lame Liberal Speech Humanizing Her Attackers [VIDEO]

Is this what we’re becoming as a country? Violent hooligans run rampant in our streets like out of some kind of dystopian fantasy and we all have to “move past” it and appreciate that they just need some more pointless after-school activities mostly funded by wasted taxpayer dollars that could have gone to police budgets?

http://www.wvwnews.net/content/index...her_attackers_[video].html
__________________
Experience molds perception.
 
Old February 13th, 2014 #16
Alexander M.
Senior Member
 
Alexander M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,236
Default Do Liberals Care if Third World Illnesses Infect Americans?

One of the favorite pastimes of liberalism is to try to inflict guilt on people of European descent for being part of a lineage that they believe, in the words of Bill Ayers at the Dartmouth Debate with Dinesh D'Souza, "murdered" the American Indians by way of contagious disease.

Even though Indian tribes were slaughtering each other, lefties argue that their lack of immunity was solely responsible for American Indians dying en masse after exposure to infectious diseases, and are persuaded that 80-90 percent of the Native American population perished after Europeans landed in the New World.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/...#ixzz2tFVXv0T6
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
__________________
Experience molds perception.
 
Old February 16th, 2014 #17
Alexander M.
Senior Member
 
Alexander M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,236
Default Science defeats liberalism

Our modus operandi for the past century has been to pretend that race doesn’t exist, thus pretend that diversity can work despite all historical evidence to the contrary, and thus to assume everything’s A-OK and we can continue shopping.

http://www.amerika.org/science/scien...ts-liberalism/
__________________
Experience molds perception.
 
Old February 20th, 2014 #18
Alexander M.
Senior Member
 
Alexander M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,236
Default Conspicuous Compassion: Liberals, Lunacy and Mass Mutilation

The Guardian has been performing a key liberal ritual: gazing adoringly into a mirror. Narcissism is central to liberalism and nothing is more gratifying to liberals than a chance to display their Conspicuous Compassion and Concern for Oppressed Minorities:

Today, on the UN’s first day of Zero Tolerance on FGM [Female Genital Mutilation], the Guardian is launching a national and international campaign to end FGM. We are not the first to try. There are ministers in government – Jane Ellison at the Department of Health and Lynne Featherstone at International Development – who have prioritised action. The efforts of others – in London, Glasgow, Manchester, Cardiff and Birmingham – are slowly bringing greater recognition of the problem. But too many young girls – perhaps 20,000, the daughters of mothers who have themselves been cut – remain at risk. After discussions with campaigners and among communities where it is practised, it became clear that an education programme delivered through every school in the country could provide the breakthrough in cultural attitudes that could make a real difference. We want everyone to be aware that FGM is illegal. We want potential victims – and parents who are perhaps under pressure from family elders – to know there are people and organisations ready to offer support. (Female genital mutilation: end it, Editorial in The Guardian, 5th February 2014)

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net...ss-mutilation/
__________________
Experience molds perception.
 
Old August 26th, 2014 #19
Alexander M.
Senior Member
 
Alexander M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,236
Default Why the left is obsessed with race

For years they kept it under wraps by accusing anyone who mentioned the topic of being a "racist." Simultaneously they concealed their own intent toward topics regarding race by giving them pleasant names. But now the leftist agenda stands revealed as it becomes clear that their policy is exclusively racial, and aims to replace the American white population with a third-world group.

http://alternative-right.blogspot.co...with-race.html
__________________
Experience molds perception.
 
Old September 15th, 2014 #20
Alexander M.
Senior Member
 
Alexander M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,236
Default Progressivism: The Truth After the Lie

There is nothing progressive about progressiveness. NOTHING.

Progressivism is a leftist thought process implemented into society via media, academia, politics and entertainment. It desires a world with no white European people, no traditional families, no religion, no pride, and no identity. It promotes degeneracy, immorality, ugliness, miscegenation, false history and self loathing. Progressivism is societal rot, it eats away at the foundations of a civilisation until it falls in on itself. What is left is the decayed remnants of a once great civilisation, the one time envy of the world and eternal enemy of the progressives.

http://www.wvwnews.net/content/index...r_the_lie.html
__________________
Experience molds perception.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56 AM.
Page generated in 0.39849 seconds.