Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old November 13th, 2008 #41
Mack Bartlow
Senior Member
 
Mack Bartlow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,029
Default

"The point of this thread is to prove that the top ten law schools, from which the lower ones take their lead, discriminate against heterosexual White men and in favor of jews and coloreds. It will be seen that jews as a percentage of the law school professoriate at these schools never falls under 25% and usually is around 50%."

Affirmative Action is code for discrimination against the White Male.
 
Old November 13th, 2008 #42
Kind Lampshade Maker
The paranormal silent type
 
Kind Lampshade Maker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Where you least expect
Posts: 8,265
Default Sounds Jew to me?

Here's something a little off-topic. But, for archiving, I thought this might fuel the discussion:

http://www.law.georgetown.edu/news/r....11.2007b.html

Oy! Sounds more than a little Jewey tom me:

Quote:
...Georgetown University Law Center Dean T. Alexander Aleinikoff



is pleased to announce the appointment of Georgetown Law Associate Dean Lawrence O. Gostin...
...Gostin is visiting professor of public health (faculty of medical sciences) and research fellow (Centre for Socio-Legal Studies) at Oxford University, as well as a fellow of the Royal Institute of Public Health. Additionally, he serves as the health law and ethics editor and contributing writer for the Journal of the American Medical Association...
...In 2006, the IOM awarded Gostin the Adam Yarmolinsky Medal...
...In the U.K., Gostin was the legal director of the National Association for Mental Health...


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Yarmolinsky

Quote:
...Professor Adam Yarmolinsky (November 17, 1922 - January 5, 2000), son of Babette Deutsch and Avrahm Yarmolinsky...


This is how Oxford students entertain themselves with:

http://www.bild.de/BILD/news/vermisc...nachtklub.html

__________________
 
Old November 29th, 2008 #43
Adi18
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mazonnawar Citadel
Posts: 775
Default

Quote:
The Judaization of American Politics and Universities, the Jewish Controlled Opposition to Jewish Communism, and the Jewish Use of Black Traitors
Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

The Jewess Alisa Zinov'yevna Rosenbaum, a. k. a. Ayn Rand, is perhaps the World's most famous member of the Jewish controlled opposition to Jewish Communism know as "The Trust". She taught the gullible Goyim to become disunited, disloyal, and psychopathically selfish, in the name of "fighting Communism." Of course, the Jewish Communists have a much easier time wrecking a nation of self indulgent, uncooperative and disorganized Goyim, than one in which each citizen bands together with each other citizen for the common good.

But Rosenbaum was by no means the only Jew who came to America to corrupt our society and use it for Zionist/Communist causes. In fact, the influx of Eastern European Jews into America from the early 1880's onwards infused a general Judaization into American life. The Jews began to overwhelm the universities and implemented their tribal loyalties to one another in the awarding of scholarships and appointments in the universities. Harvard openly objected to the infection.

Today, the Christian universities Harvard University and University of Chicago are in fact Jewish universities which train Jews and Shabbas Goys to take over positions of power in America and to ensure that America will always and only take into account "what is good for the Jews". The Jews did not exhibit greater talent or creativity than non-Jews, rather, the Jews took over through corruption and tribalism, and to a large degree destroyed the university system and replaced scholarly thought and discourse with Jewish dogmatism, Jewish mysticism, Zionism, Communism, Freudianism, Einsteinianism, homosexuality, etc. The supposedly "Jewish" innovations in academia are frequently the product of degeneration, plagiarism from Gentiles, or both.

The crypto-Jewess Madeleine "Albright's" father Josef Korbel was another totalitarian Jew who came to America and promoted Jewish Communism and Jewish Zionism in the name of combating Communism. Korbel's students spread war on behalf of Israel in the name of spreading "Democracy", a tactic employed by the Zionist puppet Presidents Woodrow Wilson and FDR long ago.

The foreign Jew Josef Korbel taught his daughter, who became Secretary of State, to corrupt America to favor the interests of Israel, not America. He also taught her to be a genocidal and psychopathic mass murderer who endorsed the genocidal Jewish attack on the Iraqis, in particular the Jewish mass murder of Iraqi children. Josef Korbel also taught the Judaized black traitor Condoleezza Rice, who has likewise endorsed the mass murder of Iraqis for the benefit of the Jews.

NPR reports:


"Josef Korbel may be one of the most influential Americans you've never heard of. He died in 1977, but his legacy lives on in his two most famous students: his daughter, Madeleine Albright, and his star pupil at the University of Denver, Condoleezza Rice."--Guy Raz, "For Albright and Rice, Josef Korbel Is Tie that Binds", www.npr.org, (28 June 2006), http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...toryId=5516648

Colin Powell is another Judaized totalitarian, who has put Israel's interests above those of America. Colin Powell--like the Zionist Jew, and former Democrat who endorsed Republican John McCain, Joe Lieberman--left the Republican Party to endorse Barack Obama. Like Obama, Powell was close to the Jewish community and even spoke some Yiddish.

Powell served Jewry well as the Shabbas Goy who twice led Americans into an unprovoked illegal aggressive attack on Iraq. He also served the Jews very well, when he endorsed the Jews' puppet Barack Obama.

Obama's grooming in the Jewish community and the Jewish figures who catapulted Obama into the White House are described in the following article:

Pauline Dubkin Yearwood, OBAMA AND THE JEWS: A look at why some Jews love him and some don't trust him; and at the key role Chicago Jews played in getting him to where he is, http://www.chicagojewishnews.com/sto...2226&id=252218, (10/24/2008)

Another Jew who came to America to corrupt America and promote Communism and Zionism in the name of combating Communism, was Leo Strauss. Strauss' philosophy is seen by some as the guiding force behind the Jewish attack on Iraq.

NPR reports:


"[. . .]Leo Strauss, a political philosopher who happened to educate -- among others -- president of the World Bank and former Bush official Paul Wolfowitz, writer Robert Kagan, academic Allan Bloom and journalist William Kristol."--Guy Raz, "A Tale of Two Korbels", www.npr.org, (28 June 2006), http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...toryId=5516648

and,


"By some accounts, the U.S. road to Iraq can be traced back to Leo Strauss, a refugee of Nazi Germany who taught political philosophy at the University of Chicago in the 1950s and '60s."--"Talk of the Nation", www.npr.org, (25 October 2004), http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...toryId=4125689

It well be good to bear these facts in mind as the crypto-Jews in the Jewish controlled "alternative media" attempt to confuse you by claiming that the British and Brzezinski are to blame for the coming Jewish war on the human race. These crypto-Jews are cut from the same prayer shawl cloth as the crypto-Jews who attempt to scapegoat Catholics for Jewish crimes against the human race.
http://jewishracism.blogspot.com/200...itics-and.html
 
Old December 8th, 2008 #44
Antiochus Epiphanes
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
 
Antiochus Epiphanes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
Default

question is why isnt it completely freakin obvious that the Jews are all in it together when a socalled liberal like alan dershovitz becomes the attack dog of zion in academe?
 
Old December 8th, 2008 #45
Jim Anderson
Junior Member
 
Jim Anderson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 171
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antiochus Epiphanes View Post
question is why isnt it completely freakin obvious that the Jews are all in it together when a socalled liberal like alan dershovitz becomes the attack dog of zion in academe?
Because the average White is too drunk to spell, much less study Law.

A White Media needs to glamorize the Law profession. Until know the Jew Hollywood has been showing smart Jewboy lawyers getting the White woman.

We need to change that to interest more Whites in Law.
 
Old December 9th, 2008 #46
Mike Parker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,311
Default

Legal Tyranny

by Daniel W. Drezner
12.02.2008

Last month, Dani Rodrik looked at the initial slate of Obama administration appointees and observed that a surprisingly large fraction of them were lawyers. As a professor at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, he found this somewhat perturbing:

If you are bright and are contemplating a potential career in American politics, you go to a top law school—not a public policy school. This does not seem to have changed much in recent decades despite everything [Harvard's Kennedy School of Government] has done to make itself visible and relevant.
When one looks at the people picked for foreign-policy positions in particular, Rodrik might be onto something. The top two nominees for the State Department—Hillary Clinton and James Steinberg—both earned degrees from Yale Law School. Tom Donilon, the rumored deputy NSC adviser, and Janet Napolitano, the nominee for Secretary of Homeland Security, earned their J.D.s from the University of Virginia.

As a professor at a rival public-policy school I share Rodrik's concern (though we can claim at least one cabinet appointment). Why do law school grads get the foreign-policy jobs coveted by public-policy school grads?

The first reason is historical legacy. When the United States became the global hegemon after World War II, public-policy schools were exceptionally rare. The original gangsters of the foreign-policy community—think Dean Acheson, John Foster Dulles, Clark Clifford, John J. McCloy—were lawyers. This matters because the best way to get a top foreign-policy job is to make your mark by serving as a loyal deputy to past top foreign-policy makers. Since people are more likely to hire their own, it is hardly surprising that lawyers would hire other lawyers.

The second reason has to do with signaling. Presidents want their foreign-policy appointees to be politically successful, which requires a complex, interlocking set of skills. Analytical rigor and policy expertise are obviously necessary but hardly sufficient (expertise can be earned via a public-policy degree, but there are also other avenues). Dedication, determination and political discipline count for a lot as well.

Earning a law degree and then working on foreign-policy issues sends two powerful signals to prospective presidents that earning a public-policy degree does not. Simply put, a law degree is much less fun to earn than a law degree. One-L courses require a tolerance of a high level of drudgery. A public-policy degree, on the other hand, is much more fun to earn than a law degree. Which means that it requires less discipline. By getting a law degree, aspirants to top policy-making jobs are signaling to observers that they can grind their way through a serious amount of drudgery.

By going into public policy, lawyers are also signaling the monetary sacrifices they are willing to make. Compared to the median wage, most public-policy jobs pay a decent salary. Compared to the median legal wage, most public-policy jobs pay peanuts. Most Fletcher graduates would be delighted at the prospect of a six-figure salary in the corridors of power. Most Harvard law school graduates would be appalled at any job with the phrase "low six figures" attached to it.

So there are logical reasons why lawyers might be getting the top foreign-policy posts. Are these substantively good reasons, however? As a professor with an interest in seeing his graduates thrive in the public sector, I think attending a public-policy school should send an even stronger signal. It should say that the person in question is well-trained and has the other traits necessary for a leadership position.

Perhaps the next step should be to make the first year of a public-policy degree more like the first year of law school. After all, why should one-Ls have all the fun?

Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and a senior editor at The National Interest.

http://www.nationalinterest.org/Article.aspx?id=20322
 
Old December 20th, 2008 #47
Brian Foley
Member
 
Brian Foley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Top End Australia
Posts: 282
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
The point of this thread is to prove that the top ten law schools, from which the lower ones take their lead, discriminate against heterosexual White men and in favor of jews and coloreds.
That is indicative of a corrupt and manipulative legal system , I hasten to add from what I have read about Americas legal system and their lawyers , all Americas Top Lawyers have been White's not Jews or Asians . Namely
F. Lee Bailey
Melvin Belli
Vincent Bugliosi .
All of the above possesed fantastic legal minds .

The only prominent Jewish lawyer is that dunce Alan Dershowitz who was cahrged with plagiarism which sums up Jewish lawyers for you . So wha ever list their is I wouldnt worry to much us Gentiles still rule .
 
Old December 20th, 2008 #48
MikeTodd
Pussy Bünd "Commander"
 
MikeTodd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: land of the Friedman, home of the Braverman
Posts: 13,329
Default

Quote:
So wha ever list their is I wouldnt worry to much us Gentiles still rule .
Yes, but the jew reigns!
__________________
Worse than a million megaHitlers all smushed together.
 
Old December 21st, 2008 #49
Brian Foley
Member
 
Brian Foley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Top End Australia
Posts: 282
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeTodd View Post
Yes, but the jew reigns!
They are self corrupting they always in the end fail .
 
Old December 22nd, 2008 #50
Antiochus Epiphanes
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
 
Antiochus Epiphanes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
Default were talking about jews here

Oh, we have some top gooks too. The one that wrote the Constituttion shredding patriot act for one. but lets not get distracted eh?


Viet Dinh,



http://www.globalsecurity.org/securi...0129-voa02.htm
 
Old December 27th, 2008 #51
rod crowley
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North dakota
Posts: 332
Default

id be willing to bet the top medical schools arent fairing much better.
 
Old December 27th, 2008 #52
rod crowley
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North dakota
Posts: 332
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Nemeth View Post
The jew prides himself as an expert in law as well as experts in greed
Yup,thus explaining our biased JEWDICIAL SYSTEM!
 
Old January 13th, 2009 #53
Vaughn
Junior Member
 
Vaughn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 122
Default

I was a student not too long ago. "They" were everywhere.
 
Old January 28th, 2009 #54
HaleyBurgh
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1
Default

You guys belong in law school! You all seem so smart and worldly.
 
Old January 29th, 2009 #55
Antiochus Epiphanes
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
 
Antiochus Epiphanes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Foley View Post
........ So wha ever list their is I wouldnt worry to much us Gentiles still rule .
Gentiles rule? Wake the fuck up man!

melvin belli was just an ambulance chaser with a big ego, a personal injury lawyers out to line their pockets off big plaintiff awards. f lee bailey was a decent crminal defense lawyer and represented a lot of high profiles but he didnt and doesnt rule jack shit. vincent bugliosi is a talking head on tv end of story.

No the matter of RULE and RULING is the province of CONSTITUTIONAL LAW which is ultimately decided by the US Supreme Court.

Which has had Jews on it for decades. Do these names mean anything to you?

Quote:
Justice Years of Service
Louis Brandeis (1856-1941) 1916-1939
Benjamin Cardozo (1870-1938) 1932-1938
Felix Frankfurter (1882-1965) 1939-1962
Arthur J. Goldberg (1908-1990) 1962-1965
Abe Fortas (1910-1982) 1965-1969
Ruth Bader Ginsburg (b. 1933) 1993-
Stephen Breyer (b. 1938) 1994-
Not to mention Jews are thick as fleas in "Civil Rights." Which is very much about cosntitutional rights under the bill of rights and the fourteenth amendment. Cimrinal defense, discrimination suits, free speech aclu type, blah blah blah. I'll bet over half the lawyers doing real cases at ACLU behest are Jews.

As Linder said-- they are framing the terms of our debate. We need to break out of that.

Last edited by Antiochus Epiphanes; January 29th, 2009 at 02:59 PM.
 
Old January 30th, 2009 #56
Larry Heinberg
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 615
Default

Quote:
The point of this thread is to prove that the top ten law schools, from which the lower ones take their lead, discriminate against heterosexual White men and in favor of jews and coloreds.
This isn't the way to approach a question. You should ask "what is the situation?" not "is this the situation?".

Otherwise you bias your information gathering.
 
Old February 4th, 2009 #57
Antiochus Epiphanes
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
 
Antiochus Epiphanes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Heinberg View Post
This isn't the way to approach a question. You should ask "what is the situation?" not "is this the situation?".

Otherwise you bias your information gathering.
You butted into this thread with some kind of criticism but failed to communicate a coherent thought. What the fuck are you trying to say?
 
Old February 4th, 2009 #58
Larry Heinberg
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 615
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antiochus Epiphanes View Post
You butted into this thread with some kind of criticism but failed to communicate a coherent thought. What the fuck are you trying to say?
Just pointing to an example of confirmation bias - the tendency to look for evidence which supports your view, rather than looking at the evidence, then forming a view.

Be nicer please.
 
Old February 6th, 2009 #59
Antiochus Epiphanes
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
 
Antiochus Epiphanes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
Default

Quote:
Be nicer please
are you a fucking jew feinberg? because I am not here to be nice to fucking kikes. go to a law school if you want somebody to kiss your kosher tuchus. If you're not a Jew then say so. Are you a matzo eater?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Heinberg View Post
Just pointing to an example of confirmation bias - the tendency to look for evidence which supports your view, rather than looking at the evidence, then forming a view.
there's no confirmation bias, just a good catalogue of EVIDENCE that JEWS are, to use a phrase you may know from title VII disparate impact cases, Jews are "OVERREPRESENTED" in law school faculty.

Wish we could get the admissions data!
 
Old February 6th, 2009 #60
notmenomore
Senior Member
 
notmenomore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,632
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antiochus Epiphanes View Post

Wish we could get the admissions data!

Suffice it to say, they're vastly overrepresented there also.

On the upbeat side (if there is one) is recent news that there are NO JOBS for law school graduates this year. None of the firms are hiring.

I guess when the world is broke there's no shekels to be picked up by counsel. In that case counsel dosen't have the wherewithal to continue affording legal flunkies to do all the work while the senior partners fuck off. A sad state of affairs, itz.
__________________
No way out but through the jews.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 AM.
Page generated in 0.27615 seconds.