While the media laughs, Ron Paul is winning the delegates

[-JC]

GOP Strategist: Ron Paul Will Be on GOP Ticket - YouTube

GOP Strategist: Ron Paul Will Be on GOP Ticket - YouTube

[Fred O'Malley]

'Ron Paul direct threat to US establishment'

Allen Roland, online columnist from Sonoma, says Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul is a direct threat to the U.S. establishment.

Speaking to Press TV's U.S. Desk on Sunday, Roland said, "The only logical candidate of true Conservatives in this race is Ron Paul."

Roland also highlighted Paul's popularity among the U.S. military personnel saying the military backs him by a large margin to any other candidate.

Listen to this audio clip, great!! http://www.presstv.ir/usdetail/226390.html

[Steven L. Akins]

Originally Posted by Hugh

I repeat, can you give an example of what has been achieved by not voting and by not participating in politics?
Politics is not the only solution, but is a vital part of the solution.

Jewish power comes from control of key positions in government, taxation and legislation, which they gained by...putting politicians into office.

The only people who benefit if Whites don't vote, is Jews.

What is your proposed alternative to political power, now, today in real life, that people can do that would have the same power over government, legislation and taxation?

Carlin described the problem, then urged people to do nothing about it. So who benefitted from his shows? Jews.

What a surprise.

My question is, what would happen if every single White voter went out and voted for Ron Paul (or any other candidate)? What do you think would change?

Our cause will never be voted into effect.

The simple truth is, politicians are bought and paid for.

If you hope to ever realize the goals of our cause through the American political system, then you are going to have to spend more money buying politicians than the Jews do.

End of story.

[Fred O'Malley]

Originally Posted by Steven L. Akins

My question is, what would happen if every single White voter went out and voted for Ron Paul

And just where do you think whites would be today if no whites voted and weren't at least somewhat involved in the process?

If you think trying is wrong, try having whites not doing anything and see what happens.

[Steven L. Akins]

Originally Posted by Fred O'Malley

And just where do you think whites would be today if no whites voted and weren't at least somewhat involved in the process?

If you think trying is wrong, try having whites not doing anything and see what happens.

Unless we can buy politicians the way that the Jews do, the Jews will own whatever politician that we may vote for.

[Peer Fischer]

Originally Posted by Steven L. Akins

If you hope to ever realize the goals of our cause through the American political system, then you are going to have to spend more money buying politicians than the Jews do.

RP doesn't need to win any delegates and he knows it. What he is accomplishing so far is keeping in the public eye and maintaining a platform for his views via the debates and mainstream jewsmedia interviews. Right now his goal is to keep up his public profile and cause enough ruckus to be able to negotiate a speaking platform at the convention in August. All this is raising public consciousness about quasi-WN viewpoints and libertarianism. A little Googling on the part of interested individuals will do the rest. Some will find Stormfront (meh), a few will find VNN.

Just a stepping stone.

Edit: A smart individual right now would do everything possible to spam the interwebs with "Ron Paul" comments linked directly to VNN. Also set up free blogs and websites mentioning "Ron Paul" likewise linked to here. People Googling RP will occasionally stumble on a site linking to here. This will work in lieu of actually advertising the forum which is nearly impossible to do due to jew policies that filter out such attempts.

[-JC]

My sense is that this is unfolding as it should. Remember the phenomena of "overreaching?"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lA_Yl_JCdFg" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lA_Yl_JCdFg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lA_Yl_JCdFg" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lA_Yl_JCdFg

[Peer Fischer]

To be brutally frank, the election of the nigger in 2008 was the best thing to happen to WN in years. Even Stormfront's activity rate went through the roof. I remember on election night '08 the board was literally overwhelmed by the amount of activity. Maybe the re-election of the nigger will have a similar effect.

Of course I know this is like saying that the cigarette companies were the best thing to happen to the American Cancer Society, or that Germany's defeat in 1918 was the best thing for the National Socialist movement. It's true, even if it were better not to have to go this route.

[-JC]

The Minority Strategy

By NPI on December 22, 2011 | 0 Comments

The central irony of “The Majority Strategy” (what VDARE calls “The Sailer Strategy” and what could be called “The Francis Strategy“) is that the GOP has been winning elections by means of it for years, while denouncing it and even consciously trying to undermine it. In other words, the GOP is the White People’s Party, whether it likes it or not. And it will win in its current form so long as America’s historic Majority believes (corectly or not) that the Party stands for its interests.
The Democrats also have a winning forumla; it’s called “The Minority Strategy.” Quite unlike the Republicans, the Democrats are willing to talk about their Strategy.

The Future of the Obama Coalition

New York Times
By Thomas B. Edsel
November 27, 2011

For decades, Democrats have suffered continuous and increasingly severe losses among white voters. But preparations by Democratic operatives for the 2012 election make it clear for the first time that the party will explicitly abandon the white working class.

All pretense of trying to win a majority of the white working class has been effectively jettisoned in favor of cementing a center-left coalition made up, on the one hand, of voters who have gotten ahead on the basis of educational attainment — professors, artists, designers, editors, human resources managers, lawyers, librarians, social workers, teachers and therapists — and a second, substantial constituency of lower-income voters who are disproportionately African-American and Hispanic.

The implication of an explicit Minority Strategy and implicit, unspeakable Majority Strategy is that no White ruling coalition will be allowed to exist in these United States.

[littlefieldjohn]

Ron Paul's spoken intent to detract power from the Federal Reserve is a direct threat on the Jew control of the financial aspect, the money, the real power, he is a 'troublemaker'. When you boil it down, this is all that really matters.The man has courage to have taken it this far.
The rest- monkeys jacking off in the zoocage, wits of cheats and courage of whores.

[Steven L. Akins]

Originally Posted by Peer Fischer

RP doesn't need to win any delegates and he knows it.

Well, that's a good thing, since he only has 19 delegates so far compared to Romney's 123 and Santorum's 72. Even Gingrich comes in ahead of Paul with his measley 32 delegates.

[Steven L. Akins]

Originally Posted by littlefieldjohn

Ron Paul's spoken intent to detract power from the Federal Reserve is a direct threat on the Jew control of the financial aspect, the money, the real power, he is a 'troublemaker'. When you boil it down, this is all that really matters.The man has courage to have taken it this far.
The rest- monkeys jacking off in the zoocage, wits of cheats and courage of whores.

Most American voters don't have a clue what the Federal Reserve is, or who runs it.

Unless Paul (or anyone else for that matter) can manage to get elected, then they are simply pissing in the wind.

[littlefieldjohn]

Originally Posted by Steven L. Akins

Most American voters don't have a clue what the Federal Reserve is, or who runs it.

.

Yep, dunces who worship dullness. Well-intentioned but stupid. Which is what happens when the joo media is making everything straight for them.

[-JC]

Dear Liberty Activist,

Don’t let anyone ever tell you citizen-activists like you at Campaign for Liberty cannot make a difference.

In 2010, the R3volution was smack dab in the middle of an historic election, where scores of statist politicians were swept out of office.

In fact, the victory was so overwhelming, that Ron Paul is in line to become the chairman of the powerful House Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy and Technology, which provides regular oversight of the Federal Reserve.

This upcoming Congress is our best chance to finally force passage of Audit the Fed and bring accountability and transparency to the secretive deliberations and policies that have wrecked our economy.

It is astounding that Ron Paul has come so far in these last couple of years, but, without a doubt, none of this success would have been possible without you.

Ron Paul has led the charge to reclaim our Republic and restore our Constitution for over thirty years, but never before has he had the R3volution’s army of dedicated and tireless grassroots activists to spread the liberty message in their neighborhoods and hold their elected officials accountable.

No one in the political establishment would have ever believed that eighty percent of the American people would support Audit the Fed.

No one in the political establishment would have ever believed Ron Paul supporters would stay engaged in the process after the 2008 presidential election.

You have proven them wrong with your refusal to sit back and watch the rest of your liberties be taken away, and with every phone call you make, flier you pass out, door you knock on, and vote you cast, you are continuing to prove them wrong.

As further evidence of the gains our movement is making on the national stage, Rand Paul crushed his statist opponent in the Kentucky U.S. Senate race.

The freedom movement has never been so strong. And we are only getting started.

If you are able, please click here to contribute to Campaign for Liberty to help ensure we can continue our fight to Reclaim the Republic and Restore the Constitution.

Thank you for all of the hard work you do in defense of freedom, and I look forward to all the successes this new year will bring!


In Liberty,



Matt Hawes

Vice President


P.S. Unlike the Fed, Campaign for Liberty cannot just print money out of thin air. Only your ongoing financial support allows us to do the work we do.

[Fred O'Malley]

Ron Paul not ready to accept second place in Maine,
expects to win straw poll once all the votes are counted

Mitt Romney was declared the winner in Maine, but Ron Paul won't accept second place. (Amber Waterman / Associated Press)

Ron Paul’s campaign declared today they are confident he ultimately will win Maine’s Republican presidential caucuses, despite the fact that GOP officials already have declared Mitt Romney the winner of the straw poll.

Romney edged out Paul by about 3 percent last Saturday — at least that’s what the state’s Republican chairman declared early Saturday evening. However, the Texas Republican disputes these results, as several counties have yet to hold their caucuses and others’ votes weren’t counted in the total released Saturday.

More specifically, Paul is looking to win in Washington County, where voting was postponed due to a predicted 3 to 4 inches of snow.

Paul Campaign Manager Jon Tate called the postponement an “excuse.”

“In Washington County – where Ron Paul was incredibly strong – the caucus was delayed until next week just so the votes wouldn’t be reported by the national media today,” he said in a message to Paul supporters. “This is MAINE we’re talking about. The GIRL SCOUTS had an event today in Washington County that wasn’t canceled,” he added.

Washington County voters weren’t the only ones left out. Looking at the results released by the Maine GOP Saturday, it appears as though some communities that held caucuses before Feb. 11 were not counted. For Waldo County, a vast majority of vote totals are missing, despite the fact that results were sent to the state party on Feb. 7, Bangor Daily News reported.

Waldo County GOP Chairman Raymond St. Onge said it probably would not have affected the overall outcome of the poll, however, he was disheartened that the votes were not included, Bangor Daily News reported.

When the votes were tallied Saturday, Paul was 194 votes behind Romney, a margin the Ron Paul Campaign believes it can make up with Washington County’s 200 plus votes. The Washington County caucuses have been rescheduled for this Saturday, and others will be held in the coming weeks.

Maine GOP Chairman Charlie Webster said that while the outcome will likely stay the same, it is up to the state party committee to decide whether or not they will update the state’s preference poll to include these votes, the Bangor Daily News reported.
http://blog.chron.com/txpotomac/2012...s-are-counted/

[Fred O'Malley]

Ron Paul Supporters Gear Up In Maine To Overturn Romney’s Victory On February 18

Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul’s supporters are gearing up to right the wrong done to their candidate by none other than the almighty on Saturday when snow forced the postponement of a county’s GOP caucus that was likely to go for Paul. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney won Maine’s ultra-low turnout Republican caucuses by 194 votes. With Washington County, Maine, rescheduling their caucus for February 18, Paul’s supporters are in crisis mode with preparations to get out the vote and deliver Paul’s first state victory.

Nate Silver, writing at the New York Times, notes that if turnout was higher than the rest of the state (2 percent of registered Republicans came out for the GOP’s non-binding caucuses over the week of February 4 – 10) it is possible although unlikely that Republicans can overturn Saturday’s victory by Romney.

“There are 6,907 registered Republicans in Washington County, and another 8,247 unaffiliated registered voters, who are eligible to participate,” writes Silver. Given that Romney’s forces are already chalking up their victory and moving on, and the only voters likely to turnout in force would be jilted Ron Paul supporters, there is the chance that they could overturn the state’s results.

However, according to State Republican Party Chair Charlie Webster (via The Daily Caller), overturning the state’s caucus results out of Washington County alone is “highly unlikely, almost a miracle.”

“There aren’t enough votes in Washington County to turn this election around,” Webster told the DC. “Even if there is a record turnout of 300 people — it’s usually 113, [or] 140 — he wouldn’t win by 200 votes.”

Still, Paul’s supporters are gearing up to try it. Ron Paul’s campaign is also challenging the state GOP to count the results from special late night caucuses that were sparsely attended but heavily favored Paul. If they are successful, there is the chance that Romney could be yet again robbed of a narrow victory after a recount.

Romney was declared the winner of the Iowa caucuses only to have those results overturned. At the time, it was considered a nominal victory by the new winner, Rick Santorum, because it occurred three weeks after the caucuses and two important contests later. However, Santorum did surge in the polls and his electoral viability was given a strong argument by his come-from-behind victory in Iowa.

Paul and his forces are certainly hoping for a Santorum-like scenario to emerge from the battle for Maine’s non-binding Republican caucus. But the clear winner of all these post-caucus battles – opponents of the caucus system; following debacle after debacle, 2012 is looking like the last year that the caucus structure will be tolerated.
http://www.ology.com/politics/ron-pa...ry-18/02142012

[Fred O'Malley]

Ron Paul supporters to GOP establishment: "No one but Paul"

"No one will stop the corrupt politicians. No one will repeal the Patriot Act. No one has a plan to balance the budget. No one understands the economy. No one but Ron Paul."

Those are sentiments taken from a recent YouTube video promoting a "money bomb" for Ron Paul on February 14th.
"No one but Paul" is the message Ron Paul supporters have for the GOP establishment, and it's the theme for the latest "money bomb" for Ron Paul on Tuesday.

Supporters of other candidates often ask Paul supporters if they will vote for whomever the Republican nominee is, assuming Paul fans will ultimately "fall in line" when November arrives in order to prevent another Obama presidency. But their answer is almost always the same: "No."

Chris Adler, 44, of Sandy, Utah, told Examiner, "I will write in Ron Paul if he's not on the ballot. That's what I've done in the past. I will never vote for the 'less crappy' candidate. I will always vote for the one I want to be president."
Advertisement

Adler, a film maker and computer programmer, continued,


Personally I feel Ron Paul is the only candidate running who has a spotless track record for believing in something and sticking to it. He doesn't change his position based on polling or because of the crowd he's addressing. While I don't agree 100 percent on every issue, he's the only person with integrity and a complete vision for the wellness of the U.S.


Non-Paul supporters generally do not understand why Paul fans would run the risk of President Obama getting reelected. They frequently argue that it will be Paul's supporters' fault if Obama is put back in the White House to continue shredding the Constitution. However, Paul supporters might contend that the shredder stays in the Oval Office, regardless of who is sitting behind the desk.

In 2009, Ron Paul bluntly stated, "The two-party system doesn't exist; there's only one political party."

For many, that statement is shocking and might not compute. Todd Gladieux, 56, a chiropractor in Yuba City, California pointed to a paragraph in historian Carroll Quigley's book, Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time that could clarify why Democrats and Republicans appear so different during the election season, but strangely similar after elected.

Quigley wrote,


The argument that the two political parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one perhaps of the Right and the other the Left, is a foolish idea. Instead the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy…It should be able to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which…will pursue with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies.

After the Maine election results were announced Saturday, CNN's Wolf Blitzer asked Ron Paul if any of the GOP candidates would be better than Obama. Paul replied,


No, I don’t think any one would be a lot better. That’s my problem, and that’s the problem with the country. When you put people in office — you put a Democrat in, he acts like a Republican too much, and when you put a Republican in, they act like a Democrat, and they spend too much money. So I just don’t see a whole lot of difference with them.


Brian Parsons, 30, of Salt Lake City, agrees with Paul. He told Examiner,


The political system in this country thrives on maintaining a two party oligarchy that is self-empowering. There is a reason that no matter the party in power, this country generally stays on the same path. Both parties favor the centralization of power, irresponsible monetary policy, and overspending to please constituencies. This system, however, cannot last and is quickly coming to an end. The system is a big sham, and people need to wake up and pay attention.


For Paul supporters, he is a fundamentally different candidate than the status quo politicians Americans are usually given to pick from. Todd Gladieux felt the "No one but Paul" theme resonated with him. He told Examiner,


It is time to take a stand. I will not vote for anyone but Ron Paul. The lesser of two evils is no longer an option. I am sick and tired of watching the establishment and their controlled media hand pick candidates and call them 'front-runners' and top tiered' candidates. No more of this 'they select, we elect' game they play on us. Regardless if he wins or loses the nomination it won't matter. The Ron Paul movement is here, and it's only going to get bigger.

I will be donating to the 'No one but Paul' money bomb in the hopes that more people will become a part of the Ron Paul Revolution.


Parsons, an Information Systems graduate student at the University of Utah, said he and his wife will also participate in the "Money Bomb" Tuesday, as they do with every donation day for Ron Paul. He said, "We try to spread out our donations as to be able to participate as frequently as possible." He told Examiner,


We are in fact a 'No one but Paul' household. I have always been a Republican of the staunchest nature. I was raised a Southern Baptist in the heart of Georgia, and the South is notoriously 'Red'. In 2007, I cancelled cable TV and was forced to research candidates online. I was amazed at the nature of things Paul talked about. He was a lone voice amongst his peers, so there were really only two positions to research. Paul's, and then the rest. I, like most, called him crazy and kooky, but nonetheless was intrigued. I did the due diligence and researched much of what both sides were saying. I was astonished that what Paul was saying was absolutely correct.

Often his ideas are contrary to what the public is generally led to believe by the mainstream media pundits and establishment politicians. If any person would devote 10 minutes a day for a week to research the 'absurd claims' of Ron Paul, they would understand that though he might not be eloquent, he is principled. Those principles he stands on are correct, time-tested, and Biblical.


In 2008, Ron Paul was mocked frequently by the press and the other candidates. His loyal supporters were passionate in getting the liberty message out to others, though, and as a result, his support has increased substantially in 2012. When Ron Paul chose not to attend CPAC this month and his supporters stayed away also, the Washington Times reported that high-profile Republican leaders realize the party can’t afford for them to be absent in November if the GOP is to win the White House.

Whether a real possibility or not, the idea of Ron Paul being on the GOP ticket as vice president has been suggested by some. Parsons said he would only view that as an attempt to buy his support, without any genuine intentions of change.

The phrase "Ron Paul or none at all" is not just catchy; for many Paul supporters, it is the truth as well.

Continue reading on Examiner.com Ron Paul supporters to GOP establishment: "No one but Paul" - Salt Lake City Independent | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/independent-...#ixzz1mPsnQWzY

[Fred O'Malley]

Ron Paul Campaign "We May Be In First Place In Delegates!"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...v=7yFONCMur1I#!

[Fred O'Malley]

FACT: 15% of Ron Paul votes WERE NOT COUNTED!

Should Ron Paul demand a new vote count in Maine?

Evidence is mounting that the vote totals for the Maine caucuses, in which Mitt Romney edged out Ron Paul, were pretty messed up. In addition to towns that hadn't voted yet, others' totals were not recorded.

Should Ron Paul demand a new vote tally for the Maine caucuses? On Feb. 12, state GOP officials announced that Mitt Romney had won the Pine Tree State confabs by a narrow 194 votes. But since then there’s been increasing evidence that Romney’s margin of victory was somewhat notional.

Maine’s Washington County canceled its caucuses due to weather, yet the state party went ahead and called the election without them, for instance. A few other towns had previously scheduled their caucuses for the post-Feb. 12 period, and their totals weren’t included either.

Now it appears that some towns which did caucus did not have their vote totals listed in the state’s final count. The vote for most Waldo County towns was entered as “0,” pointed out the Bangor Daily News on Feb. 14. Waterville’s numbers were similarly omitted.

(Maine’s Republican Gov. Paul LePage was Waterville’s mayor. Will he be happy about the apparent disenfranchisement of his home town?)

Five budget realities no politician will talk about (not even Ron Paul)

Plus, in Portland, votes involving the second part of the caucus process, the choice of delegates to the state GOP convention, somehow got messed up. Officials have declared that vote void.

“Mistakes were made. Something tells me it’s going to take some time to sort this out,” wrote University of Maine political scientist Amy Fried on her Pollways blog.

Two quick points need to be made.

First, this is much ado about a beauty contest. The Maine results are nonbinding in terms of delegate selection. It’s that second process – the state delegate selection – that leads to allocation of Maine’s votes for the GOP convention in Tampa in August.

That’s why Ron Paul himself has been noncommittal about the mess. He thinks in the end his supporters stayed behind at the caucuses, after the presidential preference vote, and then dominated the delegate selection process, Portland’s process notwithstanding.

Last Sunday Rep. Paul told Bob Schieffer on CBS Face the Nation that he was “disappointed” about the preference poll vote, but that “we’re in a good position to win a good majority of [Maine’s national delegates].”

Second, it’s unlikely there’s going to be a full recount, because caucuses are a party-run thing. They’re not overseen by professional state election officials, as are primaries. They don’t have the time or the money to go through all the ballot slips again, no matter how many angry tweets Paulites send state GOP chair Charlie Webster.

That said, we think it’s still possible that Maine Republicans will be forced to announce an updated preference poll adding in towns that got skipped or have yet to vote. It’s also possible that Paul will win Maine after this announcement, as Rick Santorum won the Iowa caucuses after the fact.

Yes, The New York Times' polling analyst toted up the figures, and he thinks otherwise. He’s pointed out that the total number of votes cast in Washington County caucuses in 2008 is less than Romney’s current margin of victory.

But as we’ve noted it’s no longer just about Washington County. There are towns whose votes went uncounted, and other towns whose caucus dates are yet to come. Plus – and here’s the big finish – the Paul forces are now fully alerted, and if you’ve ever been on their wrong side, you know what that means. Their social media organizations are going to be focused on turning out more caucus attendees than the Washington County GOP has ever seen.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politic...count-in-Maine

[Fred O'Malley]

CNN Poll: Romney's likability fading

Ron Paul: 42%
Romney: 34%
Santorum: 32%
Gingrich: 25%

http://ronpaulnews.net/2012/02/poll-...ble-among.html

Texas Rep. Ron Paul and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich received positive reviews from roughly half of all Republicans.

But those numbers declined when Americans of all political affiliations were surveyed. In that case, Paul came in at 42%, ahead of Romney and Santorum, and Gingrich's favorable rating fell to 25%.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...bility-fading/