Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old February 6th, 2016 #21
Frank Toliver
Formerly Cowboy Zeke
 
Frank Toliver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,586
Frank Toliver
Default

Women should be able to vote on the affairs of their immediate community only. They have no clue, or they care to have no idea about how things work from a global perspective or from a long term perspective. Facts are hard and mean to them. Women see one dead muslim shitling on the beach and they are ready to hand over the country. Men rightly see a casualty of negligence on the part of an invading army. The only reason women wanted the right to vote is because they go insane after 40, and moreso if they have no children.



I would change this to 'at 40, no children yet'.
__________________
Channon and Chris; gone but not forgotten.

Fuck you hippie, you are the system.

Jews are not just a race or just a religion; they are a race who worship themselves religiously.
 
Old February 6th, 2016 #22
N.B. Forrest
Senior Member
 
N.B. Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, CSA
Posts: 11,145
N.B. Forrest
Default

Women & Protestant morons gave us Prohibition. They just don't THINK.
__________________
"First: Do No Good." - The Hymiecratic Oath

"The man who does not exercise the first law of nature—that of self preservation — is not worthy of living and breathing the breath of life." - John Wesley Hardin
 
Old February 7th, 2016 #23
John from Canada
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,158
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by keifer View Post
When your property is faced with threat by invasion, are you gonna expect non property owners to help you defend your property and voting rights.
Yes of course.
 
Old February 7th, 2016 #24
Frank Toliver
Formerly Cowboy Zeke
 
Frank Toliver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,586
Frank Toliver
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N.B. Forrest View Post
Women & Protestant morons gave us Prohibition. They just don't THINK.
Women and mental faggots can only go on emotion; only the rarest women use their brain.

This is the reason why the jew must not be allowed to exploit or corrupt our women, or even come in contact with them. Once a thought is embedded in the brain of a woman it is enveloped in their emotion, and attacking a woman's 'ideas' (whatever was told to her by an authority figure/coached as good to her or pounded into her brain via propaganda as being the cool/trendy/right thing to do/be) is attacking a woman's emotions which are the core of their being. So attacking a woman's bad ideas is considered equal to attacking her. That makes you the bad person. So many women go to the grave with false beliefs, and that is why they must be protected from jewish influences just like a gun needs to be locked up, lest it be used against you.
__________________
Channon and Chris; gone but not forgotten.

Fuck you hippie, you are the system.

Jews are not just a race or just a religion; they are a race who worship themselves religiously.
 
Old February 7th, 2016 #25
Darkvictory
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 190
Darkvictory
Default

STUPID PEOPLE regardless of sex should not vote. Only people with advanced degrees should vote.
 
Old February 7th, 2016 #26
keifer
Senior Member
 
keifer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,216
keifer
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John from Canada View Post
Yes of course.
Don't call me when your barn is burning.
 
Old February 7th, 2016 #27
Bev
drinking tea
 
Bev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,247
Bev
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John from Canada View Post
During World War 1 not enough men were volunteering to get killed so the conservative government introduced "conscription" (the draft). It was very unpopular so they came up with the idea of allowing women whose husbands, fathers or sons were away fighting to vote, thinking they would support the government as a means of increasing their own husband's chances of returning home alive.
Which was my point exactly when I also mentioned the nurses dealing with the fallout of the war. Again, the male in their lives dominated the vote.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote.
 
Old February 7th, 2016 #28
JeffreyWaffenSS
Senior Member
 
JeffreyWaffenSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,513
JeffreyWaffenSS
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkvictory View Post
STUPID PEOPLE regardless of sex should not vote. Only people with advanced degrees should vote.
And those people tend to be more liberal and non white today. Granted you have whites with high technical degrees, doctors and such. Even whites with J.D degrees tend to act like money hungry jew lawyers.
 
Old February 7th, 2016 #29
Bev
drinking tea
 
Bev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,247
Bev
Default

Quote:

Angry white men are increasingly backing populist candidates in Europe and the US. But electoral data shows they will fall short of their goals without also winning the votes of women.

Support for the rightwing anti-immigration party Alternative for Germany (AfD) has hit a record 13%, according to a poll by Insa for newspaper Bild, making it the third most popular political party in Germany.


The party has averaged 10.5% in polls carried out this year, more than doubling its popularity since the 2013 general election, when it failed to pass the 5% threshold needed to enter parliament.

Support for the AfD is driven primarily by men; only 37% of its supporters are women. No other German party has such a wide gender divide among its voters. The trend is even starker among AfD’s 20,120 members, 81% of whom are male.

The party’s support base also tends to be younger than the wider electorate. The average age of members is 47, making the AfD the second youngest party in Germany after the Pirate party. The AfD is most popular with men under 50, with an approval rating of 19%. The party’s lowest approval rating is among women over 50, with 7%.


These demographic trends are not unique to the AfD. Relatively new populist parties in Germany have recently been more popular with younger men, and similar trends are taking place elsewhere.


Further north, the popularity of the Sweden Democrats has continued to increase since they won a record 49 of the Riksdag’s 349 seats in 2014. The Swedish party has hit 20% in several polls, on a par with the country’s two main political forces, the Social Democrats and the Moderate party.

At the last election, the Sweden Democrats won the votes of 10% of men and 6% of women, according to exit poll data.

In France’s recent regional elections, the Front National (FN) won 34% of the male vote compared with 27% of the female vote. Voters over 65 were the only age group with which the FN did not come out on top, winning only 23% of the vote compared with 31.5%-35.7% among all other age groups.

The same trend is evident in presidential polls, which the FN leader, Marine Le Pen, currently leads. Nationwide support for Le Pen is about 27%, but this ranges from less than 20% among over-65s to more than 30% with 35- to 64-year-olds. The same polls show that support for the FN leader is 30% among men, but 24% among women.


Rightwing populist parties also lead the polls in the Netherlands and Austria, while in Italy support for the Five Star Movement (FSM) and the Lega Nord remains strong. Beppe Grillo’s populist FSM movement is the second largest political force in the country and the most popular among voters under 50.

Meanwhile in the US, support for the current Republican frontrunner Donald Trump is particularly strong among angry, frustrated, white, less-educated men in their 40s.

Comparing different countries is complicated. Every nation has a different political system and electoral dynamics. And in order to win an election, parties and candidates need to bring together a diverse coalition of voters. Ultimately, parties with a narrower and skewed appeal will always struggle to win elections.

There are two common challenges that many of these parties and candidates face.

First, older voters tend to be more influential in shaping electoral outcomes because a greater proportion of them tend to cast ballots compared with the rest of the population.


Second, in western Europe, where figures are available – in Sweden, Germany and the UK – data shows there is no significant difference in turnout between men and women.

Indeed, in every US presidential election since 1980, the proportion of eligible female adults who voted has exceeded the proportion of eligible male adults, while the actual number of female voters has exceeded the number of male voters in every election since 1964.

At the last German election, more than a third of voters were aged 60 and over – more than twice the number of those aged under 30.

If only men voted, the AfD would have entered parliament – it won 5.5% of votes among men in west Germany, and 7.1% among those in the east. But among women the party won only 3.4% and 4.7% of the vote respectively – and ultimately failed to enter parliament.

Young, angry white voters may be on the rise – but without the votes of women and older people they will always hit a ceiling.
Despite the fact that I disagree with the Guardian on what constitutes a rightwing party, I thought this article germane to this thread since it contains valuable statistics and the conclusion, for as long as women have the right to vote, is one that needs taking note of and addressing.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote.
 
Old February 7th, 2016 #30
JeffreyWaffenSS
Senior Member
 
JeffreyWaffenSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,513
JeffreyWaffenSS
Default

Here is one last idea. What about finding someone, a man to run and run on liberal issues like Onigger, Billary, Sanders and get all the women votes, then when in office turns out to be the total opposite like David Duke? Sure they might be re-elected but at least we get four years of him.
 
Old February 7th, 2016 #31
Bev
drinking tea
 
Bev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,247
Bev
Default

In the UK, the monarch has the power to dissolve government in an emergency. Does the US have similar powers?
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote.
 
Old February 7th, 2016 #32
Meg Kafka
Senior Member
 
Meg Kafka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Lake Tahoe
Posts: 1,184
Meg Kafka
Default

It wasnt Jefferson and Washington that gave them the vote. That should tell you all you need to know.

Obviously, the full fruition of the female vote came to roost when Johnson, Carter, and Klinton--2 of them early metrosexuals---came in and nearly caused financial and political collapse. So I'd include **most modern men in the equation of "females". Whether they have a penis or not, theyre basically chicks with a vote.

The only thing that can return things to 'as nature intended' would be some kind of catastrophe that sends most people back into a survival mode.

In lieu of that not happening, the best men can hope for is to outsmart the whole thing, avoid the libtards, and become part of a community that is left alone somewhere like Wyoming. THey need some really good lawyers. Such as creating a "religious community" or a "tax free" non profit, or whatever. As the world becomes less stable and scary, there would be droves and droves of women trying to get into the compound.

You dont want a target on your chest like those dumb asses in Oregon.

I dont agree with your denominational conclusions here, this had nothing to do with Christianity. If anything, Christianity has been the only force to retain the nuclear family the past 50 years since the socialistas got all the womyn wanting to be "equal" by working 10 hours a day. Evangelical Christians have consistently voted as a block for the ability of the father in the home to be the head of the house, and that he should work while the woman raises the kids. Not only that, but against "TRANS GENDER" bullshit, and against faggotry. But whatever.

Last edited by Meg Kafka; February 7th, 2016 at 01:29 PM.
 
Old February 7th, 2016 #33
JeffreyWaffenSS
Senior Member
 
JeffreyWaffenSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,513
JeffreyWaffenSS
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Meg Kafka View Post
It wasnt Jefferson and Washington that gave them the vote. That should tell you all you need to know.

Obviously, the full fruition of the female vote came to roost when Johnson, Carter, and Klinton--2 of them early metrosexuals---came in and nearly caused financial and political collapse. So I'd include **most modern men in the equation of "females". Whether they have a penis or not, theyre basically chicks with a vote.

The only thing that can return things to 'as nature intended' would be some kind of catastrophe that sends most people back into a survival mode.

In lieu of that not happening, the best men can hope for is to outsmart the whole thing, avoid the libtards, and become part of a community that is left alone somewhere like Wyoming. THey need some really good lawyers. Such as creating a "religious community" or a "tax free" non profit, or whatever. As the world becomes less stable and scary, there would be droves and droves of women trying to get into the compound.

You dont want a target on your chest like those dumb asses in Oregon.

I dont agree with your denominational conclusions here, this had nothing to do with Christianity. If anything, Christianity has been the only force to retain the nuclear family the past 50 years since the socialistas got all the womyn wanting to be "equal" by working 10 hours a day. Evangelical Christians have consistently vote as a block for the ability of the father in the home to be the head of the house, and that he should work while the woman raises the kids. But whatever.
At least Carter is wiser towards Israel and that terror state. Can't say that about patriotard heroes like Reagan and both Bush presidents. Granted Carter wasn't that good of a president but to say he was as bad as Onigger is a big stretch.

Reagan is to blame too for a lot of the economic shit going on and his "trickle down" capitalist bullshit that in reality favors big companies and moving their plants overseas claiming the money will "trickle down" to the average joe.
 
Old February 7th, 2016 #34
N.B. Forrest
Senior Member
 
N.B. Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, CSA
Posts: 11,145
N.B. Forrest
Default

Quote:
Meanwhile in the US, support for the current Republican frontrunner Donald Trump is particularly strong among angry, frustrated, white, less-educated men in their 40s.
The commie Guardian oozes condescension & contempt when talking about this demographic - uniquely: the demands of perpetually pissed, city-destroying niggers are 100% legit & Must Be Addressed; those of Whites are just the whinings of "less-educated" losers who used to be on top and don't like getting a taste of their own medicine....

Quote:
Young, angry white voters may be on the rise – but without the votes of women and older people they will always hit a ceiling.
Women & the old are both easily frightened by jew-skewing & as self-centered as fuck. As for the Young Angry Whites & that allegedly perpetual "ceiling" the Guardian-type fags think will protect them & their genocidal agenda: today's deadwood aged are keeling over every day, to be replaced by the more politically astute who can see that their complacency allowed the jews to run roughshod & destroy the basics of our survival.

In short: you'll get yours, bastards.
__________________
"First: Do No Good." - The Hymiecratic Oath

"The man who does not exercise the first law of nature—that of self preservation — is not worthy of living and breathing the breath of life." - John Wesley Hardin
 
Old February 7th, 2016 #35
JeffreyWaffenSS
Senior Member
 
JeffreyWaffenSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,513
JeffreyWaffenSS
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N.B. Forrest View Post
The commie Guardian oozes condescension & contempt when talking about this demographic - uniquely: the demands of perpetually pissed, city-destroying niggers are 100% legit & Must Be Addressed; those of Whites are just the whinings of "less-educated" losers who used to be on top and don't like getting a taste of their own medicine....



Women & the old are both easily frightened by jew-skewing & as self-centered as fuck. As for the Young Angry Whites & that allegedly perpetual "ceiling" the Guardian-type fags think will protect them & their genocidal agenda: today's deadwood aged are keeling over every day, to be replaced by the more politically astute who can see that their complacency allowed the jews to run roughshod & destroy the basics of our survival.

In short: you'll get yours, bastards.
I agree. Especially younger women under 50 are very self centered, really don't give a shit except for themselves, unless there is a rich guy then they care about his money. That's why you see a lot of nigger and spic ball players with white girlfriends and wives because they want his money and be famous.

To be honest though I almost want Bernie Sanders to be president and if somehow he gets a democrat congress to try and pass his spending shit and all the whites and everyone gets hand outs and eventually the system crashes and a revolution. That is the only way this country is going to change is something radical to happen.

As long as the white man has his porn, internet, TV, and cheap American beer he's happy.
 
Old February 7th, 2016 #36
EDLIE Stampton
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pound land
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev View Post
In the UK, the monarch has the power to dissolve government in an emergency. Does the US have similar powers?
Yes they have a emergency rule that says their black boy can decide any fucking thing he wants like KFC has run out of the 3 chicken portions for a dollar 15 is a emergency.

What the fuck has it got to do with you anyway.
 
Old February 7th, 2016 #37
L. Edwards
Migrant White worker
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: looking for next job in the Kwa
Posts: 592
L. Edwards
Default Interesting analogy 137 BC

Quote:
Originally Posted by John from Canada
Only white men who own property should vote.
Quote:
Originally Posted by keifer. When your property is faced with threat by invasion, are you gonna expect non property owners to help you defend your property and voting rights.
Quote:
Originally Posted by keifer View Post
Don't call me when your barn is burning.

That’s interesting.This argument just happened to reminded me of what Plutarch wrote about in his “ Nine Lives” under the chapter, “Tiberius Gracchus. Seems like there is some similarity to what you are saying and what happened in about 137 BC. It was pretty interesting. The Romans were so incredible. I’ll just quote a few paragraphs. Like Alex Linder is fond of saying, "there is nothing new under the sun."

Quote:
Whenever the Romans annexed land as a results of their wars, it was part of their custom to put up a part for sale by auction: The rest was to made common land and was distributed among the poorest and most needy of the citizens, who were allowed to cultivated it on a small payment for rent to be paid to the treasury.

When the rich began to outbid and drive out the poor by offering higher rentals, a law was passed which forbid any one individual to posses more than 500 jugera (about 310 acres) of land. For a while, this law restrained the greed of the rich and helped the poor, who were enabled to remain on the land they rented. So that each of them could occupy the allotment which they were originally granted. But after a time, the rich men in each neighborhood by using the names of fictional tenants, contrived to transfer many of these holdings to themselves, and finally they took possession of a greater part of the land under their own names. The poor when they had found themselves forced off the land, became more and more unwilling to volunteer for military service or even raise a family. The result was rapid decline of a class of free small-holders all over Italy, their place being taken by gangs of foreign slaves, whom the rich employed to cultivate the estates from which they had driven off the free citizens.

Last edited by L. Edwards; February 7th, 2016 at 09:30 PM.
 
Old February 8th, 2016 #38
Meg Kafka
Senior Member
 
Meg Kafka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Lake Tahoe
Posts: 1,184
Meg Kafka
Default

Yeah, thats a familiar smarmy rant. The Tea Party emergence was always attributed to "white racist rednecks". Never mind that if you examined the demographics of the Tea party, they were probably in the top 5 percent of education, income, and charity contributions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by N.B. Forrest View Post
The commie Guardian oozes condescension & contempt when talking about this demographic - uniquely: the demands of perpetually pissed, city-destroying niggers are 100% legit & Must Be Addressed; those of Whites are just the whinings of "less-educated" losers who used to be on top and don't like getting a taste of their own medicine....



Women & the old are both easily frightened by jew-skewing & as self-centered as fuck. As for the Young Angry Whites & that allegedly perpetual "ceiling" the Guardian-type fags think will protect them & their genocidal agenda: today's deadwood aged are keeling over every day, to be replaced by the more politically astute who can see that their complacency allowed the jews to run roughshod & destroy the basics of our survival.

In short: you'll get yours, bastards.
 
Old February 8th, 2016 #39
John from Canada
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,158
Default

If you don't like working for somebody else you should start your own business. Then you'll get fucked over by Jews and become a more informed voter.

America was built by white Europeans who were not content to work as farm hands and domestic servants. So they migrated. To America, to Africa, and even to Asia. And we would have taken it all. As nature intended.
 
Old February 8th, 2016 #40
N.B. Forrest
Senior Member
 
N.B. Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, CSA
Posts: 11,145
N.B. Forrest
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Meg Kafka View Post
Yeah, thats a familiar smarmy rant. The Tea Party emergence was always attributed to "white racist rednecks". Never mind that if you examined the demographics of the Tea party, they were probably in the top 5 percent of education, income, and charity contributions.
The Koch faggots, who clearly imagine themselves as establishment "conservative" Machiavellians, were a big impetus for the original Tea Party: herd the gun-totin' Muh Constitution dupes in such a way as to give the moneyed "elite" even more power - but that sort of blew up in their pinched faces when it split into various branches.
__________________
"First: Do No Good." - The Hymiecratic Oath

"The man who does not exercise the first law of nature—that of self preservation — is not worthy of living and breathing the breath of life." - John Wesley Hardin
 
Reply

Tags
women tools

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:25 AM.
Page generated in 0.14584 seconds.