Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old March 20th, 2011 #1
SmokyMtn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 8,506
Default The VNN "hard-liners" and Pierce loyalists thread.....

"I’ll take Dr. Pierce’s intellectual honesty and single-minded, positive leadership every time over what we have today. Our tires may need rotating but WNs do not need to reinvent the wheel."


I doubt this has been republished on the Internet, so, fans of Dr. Pierce, feel free to copy and pass around.



[...]
From: Letters to Editor, NV No. 103, Jan-Feb. 1985

“No” to Socialism

I read the article in Issue No. 102 by William Simpson twice. I’ve read all of his articles very carefully since you first began printing them, and I am greatly impressed by his conclusions.

I was raised in a Christian home. Both my parents were very religious, and I started reading the Bible, at my mother’s urging, when I was 12 years old. From the beginning I had some doubts about both the Old Testament and the New Testament, and ever since then I’ve had struggles with myself about the Bible’s teachings.

After reading William Simpson’s articles in NATIONAL VANGUARD I have come to agree with him that Christianity is not a suitable religion for the Germanic peoples. It is leading our nation to destruction. Our civilization is being wrecked by Biblical doctrines and the fuzzy thinking of church leaders. Their acceptance of all the inferior races into America has convinced me of this. Jesus’s own teachings are partly responsible.

What I cannot accept in NATIONAL VANGUARD, however, is your affinity for Hitler and his National Socialism. I detest any socialism, national or otherwise. I do not believe that it is necessary to establish a socialistic government in Washington in order to break the Zionist hold over our politicians and rid ourselves of the international pests. Do you agree?

C.L.C.
Van Buren, AR


Editor’s Reply:
The Second World War was the great watershed in the collapse of the West. Had any major Western nation — in particular, Britain, France, or America — had the integrity to resist the Jews and avoid being drawn into their worldwide conspiracy against Germany, there would have been no world war, but only a war between National Socialist Germany and the Marxist Soviet Union. Germany would have won, Marxism would have been eradicated, and it would have been the beginning of the end for the Jews everywhere.

Instead, Western men were persuaded by their bought politicians, their Judeo-Christian priests, and the Jewish manipulators of public opinion in their midst to take up arms against their German brothers in an unholy crusade to eradicate National Socialism, so that the Jews and the Marxist cancer they had unleashed on the world could survive. Before the Second World War the West was still viable; afterward it was not.

The catastrophe of 1945, with the triumph of the Jew and his allies, made inevitable the opening up of the immigration floodgates for non-Whites into Britain and the United States; the destruction of American White public schools; the enactment of laws curtailing White freedom of association and the rights of White employers and renters (and with them the rights of White employees and tenants); the rise of feminism, homosexuality, and drug use; the breakdown of the traditional family structure; a soaring miscegenation rate; and the displacement of healthy White art, music, literature and drama by a Judeo-democratic-Hollywood ’schlock’ culture. It also led to the metastasis of the Marxist cancer throughout huge areas of Europe and the rise of malignant Zionist power in Palestine — a power which surely would be the instigator of the Third World War.

It behooves those of us who still hope that enough healthy genes for a new beginning can be salvaged from the coming chaos, therefore, to understand everything we can about the Second World War; about its preeminent personality, Adolf Hitler; and about his ideology, National Socialism, from the eradication of which logically followed the evils briefly accounted above. That’s why NATIONAL VANGUARD often has articles on these subjects and will do so in the future.

As for the “socialism” in National Socialism, don’t let yourself be deceived by its enemies, among whom are the adherents of the Judeo-capitalists New Right [aka neo-CONs]; it certainly has nothing to do with the Semitic socoalism Marx and his kinsmen peddled. The first slogan of Hitler’s National Socialists was: “The common interest before self-interest!” They believed that every German, whether a factory owner or a janitor, should put the interests of his nation and his race ahead of his personal interests. That was really what they meant by the “socialism” in National Socialism.

They also believed that it was the responsibility of the nation’s leaders to concern themselves with the physical health of every member of the nation — not to cater to special-interest groups or to win popularity contests with the fickle and easily swayed masses.

These beliefs determined the racial, economic, and educational policies of Hitler’s government. That government was “socialist,” in that it devoted much of its efforts to improving the economic welfare of working-class and middle-class Germans, as well as the racial quality and racial consciousness of the whole nation. But it did not attempt to enforce any sort of artificial “equality” on its citizens, either of status or income. And it did not discourage the entrepreneurial activities of individual Germans, so long as those activities were not harmful to national interests. Private property not only remained sacrosanct in National Socialist Germany, but the government instituted new policies to enable small farmers to avoid losing their land to moneylenders.

Whether that is “socialism,” or not, NATIONAL VANGUARD certainly is not against it. To go further: We will not break the Zionist hold on America until White Americans have made a conscious decision to put their common racial interests ahead of their private interests.

Last edited by SmokyMtn; March 20th, 2011 at 11:27 PM.
 
Old March 20th, 2011 #2
SmokyMtn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 8,506
Default

Dr. William Pierce Audio Archive (308 Radio Broadcasts)

Download all 308 broadcasts here.

Or click on the heading of this post to select each broadcast individually.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Favorite saying of Dr. Pierce for men and women of European ancestry to live by:

Cattle die, and kinsmen die, and so must one die oneself. But there is one thing I know which never dies, and that is the fame of a dead man's deeds.
(Old Norse Proverb)

Last edited by SmokyMtn; March 20th, 2011 at 11:15 PM.
 
Old March 20th, 2011 #3
SmokyMtn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 8,506
Default

Who We Are: a Series of Articles on the History of the White Race

The PDF version of Who We Are can be found here:

List of articles by William L. Pierce (part one)


List of articles by William L. Pierce (part two)


COSMOTHEISM MP3s

Last edited by SmokyMtn; March 20th, 2011 at 11:50 PM.
 
Old March 21st, 2011 #4
P.E.
Geriatric Coalburner
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,825
P.E.
Default

You have to wonder how the mob (like the original 'no to socialism' writer) responds to such a great reply as that bold text.

Considering this youtube video has 32 million views, I think perhaps this may possibly (taking a stab in the dark) be the mobs sentiments, which are the real reason they say 'no to socialism'.

*Note*: I'm not a fan, just using it for the social commentary due to its prominence as a cornerstone of modern sentiments.


The only way all whites who want to live like the ideas espoused in this video (well, this is the mobs current perception of 'success' which is told to them by authority, but the higher principle in this short writing is 'higher quality of life' rather than the slavery struggle they feel in multikulti West), is if everyone but whites were kicked out of the U.S. and all resources of this country went to white workers who contribute to the nation and the race, kinda like N.S. did but with their far more limited space and resources.

That is to say, if N.S. Germany lived like it did (and we see in the videos how well they lived in that short time) with what they were working with, I couldn't imagine the quality of life in an all-white U.S. at this point with similar political infrastructure and leadership.

Too bad whites can't see that the only way their quality of living could ever go up is if they turn to their own people and race, rather than trying to weasel in to playing the Jews game perfectly.

For me and many here, the latter idea of foregoing racial precedence and participating in the multicultural rat race is as misanthropic as it is idiotic, since the entire rat race for so many of these hypocritical whites is in their attempt to distance themselves from multiculturalism (i.e.: their desire to get out of their multikulti lower and middle class areas).

As those 'winners' refuse to turn their head to look behind them to see that the chosen managers of the whole 'track' in the multicultural rat race are making the white contestants fewer and fewer, they deny their own foresight to see that when they get to the 'winners circle', they will only be sharing it with people not like them, and a lower quality 'winners circle' it will be.

For many potentially genius whites who have both future foresight and historical hindsight, they see today's 'winners circle', and don't even think it's worth it. The high life of the past was a lot more worth pushing for if you just wanted to be a non-political participant in society (the reason why is for another time and place, but in brief, it's because 'things' in the west today are more plastic today, more meaningless than they were). Hence, those whites, like many here, make their efforts political, they know they should be running their own race (which shouldn't be a judeo-capitalist rat race, as every area for every contributor should be suitable for white living rather than multikulti anarchy).

See this, you idiot white kids that were in that CPAC video with bumbling Jamie Kelso? Talking to you! You people with your motto 'we'll shill for the Jews so we don't have to live with the niggers!'.

Last edited by P.E.; March 21st, 2011 at 05:39 AM.
 
Old March 21st, 2011 #5
Hudson
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hassling shopkeeps along the information superhighway
Posts: 1,483
Default

Quote:
These beliefs determined the racial, economic, and educational policies of Hitler’s government. That government was “socialist,” in that it devoted much of its efforts to improving the economic welfare of working-class and middle-class Germans, as well as the racial quality and racial consciousness of the whole nation. But it did not attempt to enforce any sort of artificial “equality” on its citizens, either of status or income. And it did not discourage the entrepreneurial activities of individual Germans, so long as those activities were not harmful to national interests. Private property not only remained sacrosanct in National Socialist Germany, but the government instituted new policies to enable small farmers to avoid losing their land to moneylenders.


You want your capitalism without a proletariat. You want your cake and eat it too.



But tell me this....don't we have this fascistic form of government you want, already? Yes we do, but it loves niggers and mexicans and not blue eyed blonds.

America is already a Nazi state, just not the one you would prefer.

Last edited by Hudson; March 21st, 2011 at 06:36 AM.
 
Old March 21st, 2011 #6
Rounder
Senior Member
 
Rounder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 12,684
Rounder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokyMtn View Post
Who We Are: a Series of Articles on the History of the White Race

The PDF version of Who We Are can be found here:

List of articles by William L. Pierce (part one)


List of articles by William L. Pierce (part two)


COSMOTHEISM MP3s
Thanks for starting this thread, Smokey.

Nobody influenced my mind or my actions these past 40 years as much as Dr William Pierce. And his articles and speeches, even today, are spell-binding.

I'm highly pleased too, that VNN main page promotes Dr Pierce's work.

Frankly, I wish somebody would publish a WN newspaper featuring the best jew-exposing articles by Pierce, Linder, and Duke.
__________________
“To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize” —–Voltaire




 
Old March 21st, 2011 #7
Fred Streed
Holy Order of Cosmonauts
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,050
Fred Streed
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hudson View Post
You want your capitalism without a proletariat. You want your cake and eat it too.



But tell me this....don't we have this fascistic form of government you want, already? Yes we do, but it loves niggers and mexicans and not blue eyed blonds.

America is already a Nazi state, just not the one you would prefer.
Same tired commie line as always. Same old lies. Your idiocy really doesn't even deserve a response.

BTW, you lying commie POS, I see you cannot back up your previous lies about Dr. Pierce. Thus I conclude you are nothing more than a lying communist cur.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by For Understanding
I even agree with some of your points, Fred. God did regret making mankind (Genesis 6). You just kicked both God's and my ass. Congratulations.
 
Old March 21st, 2011 #8
zoomcopter
Senior Member
 
zoomcopter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The goyim reservation
Posts: 4,684
Blog Entries: 3
zoomcopter
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokyMtn View Post
"Editor’s Reply:
[B]The Second World War was the great watershed in the collapse of the West. Had any major Western nation — in particular, Britain, France, or America — had the integrity to resist the Jews and avoid being drawn into their worldwide conspiracy against Germany, there would have been no world war, but only a war between National Socialist Germany and the Marxist Soviet Union. Germany would have won, Marxism would have been eradicated, and it would have been the beginning of the end for the Jews everywhere.
What a vastly differnent world we would be living in.
__________________
One of the many blessings of being self-chosen by god, is permission to kill anyone questioning your divinity.
 
Old March 21st, 2011 #9
zoomcopter
Senior Member
 
zoomcopter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The goyim reservation
Posts: 4,684
Blog Entries: 3
zoomcopter
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokyMtn View Post
We will not break the Zionist hold on America until White Americans have made a conscious decision to put their common racial interests ahead of their private interests.[/B]—
If we cannot, or will not, make that conscious decision, we will lose by default.
__________________
One of the many blessings of being self-chosen by god, is permission to kill anyone questioning your divinity.
 
Old March 21st, 2011 #10
SmokyMtn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 8,506
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zoomcopter View Post
What a vastly differnent world we would be living in.
All is not lost, and we can have that world, with more effort on our part in spreading the good word of Dr. William Pierce, who's broadcasts still resonate with our people today.

I keep a memory stick with me with all 308 of Pierce's ADV radio shows, ready to upload them on someone's computer. In addition to that, I will burn three of his radio shows on CDs and hand them out. One person who does not even own a computer recently asked me if I could burn some more for him. I reached into my CD case and gave him 45 more shows and asked him to pass them along to his friends.

The next frontier for us will be "face to face", reaching out to potential biological racialists who are not on the Internet.

Rounder's idea of newsprint with the best of Pierce, Linder and Duke, is a good idea. But do not forget Ben Klassen, he wrote some great articles also.
 
Old March 21st, 2011 #11
Hudson
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hassling shopkeeps along the information superhighway
Posts: 1,483
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred Streed View Post
Same tired commie line as always. Same old lies. Your idiocy really doesn't even deserve a response.

BTW, you lying commie POS, I see you cannot back up your previous lies about Dr. Pierce. Thus I conclude you are nothing more than a lying communist cur.

I suppose you would love to live in Nazi Germany and be forced to work a job removing asbestos assigned to you by the state? ...for the good of the "race".
 
Old March 21st, 2011 #12
SmokyMtn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 8,506
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hudson View Post
I suppose you would love to live in Nazi Germany and be forced to work a job removing asbestos assigned to you by the state? ...for the good of the "race".
I will shovel horse manure for the opportunity to live in a country grounded on the supremacy of the White race, where everyone followed the Golden Rule, "What is good for the White Race is the highest virtue; what is the bad for the White Race is the ultimate sin."
 
Old March 21st, 2011 #13
Hudson
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hassling shopkeeps along the information superhighway
Posts: 1,483
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokyMtn View Post
I will shovel horse manure for the opportunity to live in a country grounded on the supremacy of the White race, where everyone followed the Golden Rule, "What is good for the White Race is the highest virtue; what is the bad for the White Race is the ultimate sin."
But having read these boards for 15 years, I know without a doubt none of you can define and agree on exactly who is in "the white race".

So you are full of it.
 
Old March 21st, 2011 #14
SmokyMtn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 8,506
Default

Dr. William Pierce

Who We Are, #26

Last Chance at Stalingrad

These things could be accomplished, even at this late date. And once accomplished in one major country, they could be extended worldwide, though perhaps not without another major war and its attendant risks. But, of course, they will not be accomplished, because the will to survive does not exist, and has not existed in the White population of any major power since the end of the Second World War. The race's last chance to overcome its problems in this relatively painless manner died in January 1943, at Stalingrad.

So, much will inevitably be lost during the next few decades. The population balance everywhere will shift even more rapidly toward the non-Whites, the mongrels, and the unfit.

The world will become a poorer, uglier, noisier, more crowded, and dirtier place.
Superstition, degeneracy, and corruption will be pervasive, even among those Whites of sound racial stock, and much of the best stock will disappear forever through racial mixing.

And repression will certainly increase everywhere: those who stand for quality over quantity and for racial progress will be denied the right of dissent and the right of selfdefense, in the name of "freedom" and "justice."

Ultimately, however, none of these losses need be decisive or even significant,
frightening though they may be to contemplate now, and terrible though they may be to experience in the dark years immediately ahead. All that is really important is that a portion of the race survive, keep itself pure physically and spiritually, continue propagating itself, and eventually prevail over those who threaten its existence, even if this take a thousand years; and to ensure this outcome is the urgent task of the racially conscious minority of our people in these perilous times.


A Few Guidelines

A detailed elaboration of this task here would take us beyond the intended scope of this series, which, as stated in the prologue to the first installment, has been merely to provide for its readers a better understanding of their own racial identity. It may be appropriate, however, to conclude the "Who We Are" series by drawing on its lessons in order to set out a few very concise guidelines for addressing ourselves to the task ahead:

1) The duration of the task will be decades, at the least, and perhaps centuries. History has a very great inertia; a historical process of long duration may culminate suddenly in a single, cataclysmic event, but every major development in the history of the race has had deep roots and has grown in soil thoroughly prepared for it by preceding developments. The course of history now, so far as our race is concerned, is steeply downward, and to change its direction will be no overnight matter, nor will this be accomplished by any gimcrack scheme
which promises success without first building a foundation for that success, block by carefully laid block.

2) The workers at the task will be only a tiny minority of the race. Any program
which envisages an "awakening of the masses" or which relies on the native wisdom of the great bulk of our people -- which is to say, any populist program -- is based on a false vision and a false understanding of the nature of the masses. No great, upward step in all of our long history has ever been accomplished by the bulk of any population, but always by an exceptional individual or a few exceptional individuals. The masses always take the path of least resistance: which is to say, they always follow the strongest faction. It is important to work with the masses, to inform them, to influence them, to recruit from among them; but they must not be counted on for determinative, spontaneous support until after a small minority has already, by its own efforts, built a stronger force than that of any opposing faction.

3) The task is inherently fundamental, and it will be accomplished only through a fundamental approach. That is to say, those who devote themselves to it must be pure in spirit and mind; they must understand that their goal is a society based on quite different values from those underlying the present society, and they must be committed wholeheartedly and without reservation to that goal; they must be prepared to outgrow all the baggage of superstition and convention inherent in the present society. Thus, the task is not one for conservatives or right wingers, for, "moderates" or liberals, or for any of those whose thinking is mired in the errors and in the corruption which have led us to the downward course, but it is a task for those capable of an altogether new consciousness of the world.

The task is a biological, cultural, and spiritual one as well as an educational and
political one. Its goal has meaning only with reference to a particular type of person, and if this type cannot be preserved while the educational and political aspects of the task are being performed, then the goal cannot be achieved. If the task cannot be completed in a single generation, then there must exist, somewhere, a social milieu which reflects and embodies the cultural and spiritual values associated with the goal, and serves to pass these values from one generation to the next. The preservation of a social milieu, just as the preservation of a gene pool, requires a degree of isolation from alien elements: the longer the duration of the task, the higher the degree. This requirement may be difficult of fulfillment, but it is essential.

What should be envisaged, then, is a task with both an internal, or community-oriented aspect, and an external, or political-educational-recruiting aspect. As the task progresses and both external and internal conditions vary, the relative weight given to the two aspects will undoubtedly vary as well.


No Outside Help

The task set out here is a very large one, and accomplishing it will require greater will, intelligence, and selflessness than demanded from the race in any previous crisis. The danger we face now, from the enemy within our gates as well as the one still outside, is greater than the one we faced from the deracinated Romans in the first century, the Huns in the fifth century, the Moors in the eighth century, or the Mongols in the 13th century. If we do not overcome it, we will have no second chance.

But the task of survival has always been a demanding one, just as it is an unrelenting one. We have always met its demands in the past, or we would not be here today. There is no fundamental reason why we cannot overcome the present threat to our survival, horrendous though it be, and live to face new threats in the future.

What we must do, however, is understand that all our resources in the coming struggle must come from within ourselves; there will be no outside help, no miracles. If this "Who We Are" series has helped even a few of us better understand ourselves and the resources therein, then it has accomplished its purpose.

Last edited by SmokyMtn; March 21st, 2011 at 11:16 AM.
 
Old March 21st, 2011 #15
Matthaus Hetzenauer
Wutta maroon!
 
Matthaus Hetzenauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In my comfy rabbit hole. Wut's it to ya, doitbag?
Posts: 5,687
Matthaus Hetzenauer
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hudson View Post
But having read these boards for 15 years
15 years? Horseshit. You didn't start reading 3 years before you were birthed/splatted on the kitchen floor by your mammy; that's impossible, totally preposterous. I've heard of prodigies but come on, just how gullible do you think we are...

Sheesh! Kids.
__________________
Wit' jews ya lose; wit' rope theah's hope.
- Bugs
 
Old March 21st, 2011 #16
Hudson
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hassling shopkeeps along the information superhighway
Posts: 1,483
Default

You dumb American Nazi wannabees think that that Hitler was fighting for the "white race", when in reality that was not the case at all.
 
Old March 21st, 2011 #17
SmokyMtn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 8,506
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthias Hetzenauer View Post
15 years? Horseshit. You didn't start reading 3 years before you were birthed/splatted on the kitchen floor by your mammy; that's impossible, totally preposterous. I've heard of prodigies but come on, just how gullible do you think we are...

Sheesh! Kids.
Please, just ignore this troll. He is only here to disrupt any serious discussion on this forum.
 
Old March 21st, 2011 #18
Hudson
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hassling shopkeeps along the information superhighway
Posts: 1,483
Default

Hey Smokey? You think Eric Gliebe is an Aryan?
 
Old March 21st, 2011 #19
Hudson
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hassling shopkeeps along the information superhighway
Posts: 1,483
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokyMtn View Post
Please, just ignore this troll. He is only here to disrupt any serious discussion on this forum.
Yes, this is a very serious discussion between trailer-trash-aryans and their leader (the one guy among them who went to college, but did not study history there, obviously) discussing their uneducated view of WWII history and facts.
 
Old March 21st, 2011 #20
SmokyMtn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 8,506
Default

Poisonous Doctrines

by Dr. William Pierce


Today let's begin by talking about individualism and individualists. I'm using those words in a special sense. In this broadcast, when I say "individualist" I mean a person who habitually fails to consider or to give proper weight to the group context in which he belongs when viewing the world, formulating ideas, and reaching decisions; and who in evaluating other people fails to put them into the group context to which they belong, instead focusing narrowly only on the individual at hand.

I also will use the word "individualist" to designate a person who makes an ideology out of his individualism. In this sense an individualist is a person who believes that it is good, moral, admirable, proper, and so on, to disregard group contexts; and immoral, unpatriotic, reprehensible, and wicked not to disregard them. Actually it's impossible to avoid group contexts, and the ideological individualist himself divides people into two groups: namely, individualists, who, like himself, are good people; and "collectivists," who, like me, are bad people, akin to communists.

I've spoken with you in earlier broadcasts about the ideology of individualism, and today I want to focus more on some of the practical implications of the attitude. I'll tell you first what prompted my choice of this subject today: Two weeks ago I said some unkind things about lawyers, judges, and our judicial system, and in response to that broadcast I received a couple of indignant letters from lawyers who told me that I was both unfair and inaccurate in my negative characterization of lawyers. Not all lawyers are soulless, money-grubbing crooks, they told me. Some lawyers are decent, honest, patriotic people, they told me. Some lawyers agree with me about most things, and it is foolish to alienate them by calling all lawyers crooks. I need their support, and I will lose it if I continue to insult them.

Well, I can't really disagree with that. I personally know a few lawyers who aren't crooks, and I certainly do want to retain their support. Looking at my broadcast of two weeks ago from an individualist viewpoint, it was both unfair and inaccurate. The individualist would say that I paint things with too broad a brush. I should say that some lawyers are crooks, and then the individualist will agree with me. Of course, the essence of my message two weeks ago was not that some lawyers are crooks; it was that the judicial system is corrupt. The system designed by lawyers and staffed by lawyers for the purpose of making and interpreting the laws is corrupt. The fact that every lawyer is in some sense a part of that system does not mean that every lawyer is corrupt. A few lawyers who are in the system are fighting against the system. I didn't say that two weeks ago, because I wanted to keep my message simple and direct. I didn't want to distract my listeners from the main thrust of the message with qualifications and quibbles. It's an important message, and I wanted it to make the strongest possible impression on my listeners. I deliberately paint with a broad stroke.

Here's another example of the way in which people looking at things from an individualist viewpoint misunderstand my message. I am often critical of the Christian churches, of their subservient collaboration with the Jews, of their encouragement of miscegenation and their other racially destructive policies. And some Christians who agree with my positions on the Jews and on race take offense at my comments regarding the overall role of Christianity in our society today, and they tell me, "Hey! I'm offended. All Christians aren't race-mixers and collaborators with the Jews." And of course, I understand that. I understand that there are many individual Christians who are good people, Christians who don't run with the Jews, but what I was talking about was the overall role of Christianity and the Christian churches in our society, and that role today is destructive.

Another example: I often talk about the feminization of our society and the feminization of our young men, and I make it quite clear that I don't approve of these things. This offends some women, who take what I say personally. An expression I used in one broadcast that offended several of my women listeners enough for them to send me indignant letters of protest was the phrase "college girls of both sexes." The implication was that college girls are not to be taken more seriously than feminized college boys. At another time I stated that permitting women to vote was a terrible mistake, and again I received letters from women who indignantly told me that they vote more responsibly than many men they know. Well, I'm sure they do, but I was talking about the overall effect of women's votes, and that has been very damaging to our society.

Of course, women as a rule take everything personally, and so I explain individually to those who protest that I do take women seriously, that I value and respect them, and that I love them -- but that I also understand that despite all of the fascinating individual differences among them, all of them are profoundly different from men.

When I receive protests from lawyers and from male Christians, however, I see the individualist fallacy at work. Men should not look at the world as individualists. They should understand that it is not only natural and proper but necessary to judge other men according to the group of which they are a part. Just as people have individual characteristics, they also have collective characteristics, and to ignore the latter from fear of being considered a racist or a sexist or an anti-Semite or a homophobe is the worst sort of folly. When one is in a war one doesn't judge the soldiers on the other side as individuals. One doesn't hold one's fire because the fellow in the enemy's uniform who is charging with a rifle in his hands may really have wanted to be a conscientious objector instead of a combat infantryman. If he's in the enemy's uniform, one shoots at him.

We understand, of course, that not all Blacks are muggers or gang-bangers or armed robbers or HIV-infected rapists, just as we understand that not every Jew is a predator who is actively scheming to destroy our people after he has sucked us dry. When I look at a Black I may see a criminal or a welfare bum, or I may see an honest, hard-working person, but in either case I see a Black, and I understand what his race is doing to my race collectively. Even if an individual Black with whom I am dealing is friendly, intelligent, and moral, I would be a fool to expect him to join me in a campaign to put an end to what his race is doing to my race and my civilization collectively.

I sometimes am obliged to deal with Jews: much more often than with Blacks, in fact, because Jews collectively have arrogated to themselves so many positions of control and influence in our society. And I am able to distinguish among individual Jews. I see that many Jews with whom I deal are tricky and deceitful, but there are some who are straightforward and sincere, I believe. Many are really hateful, but occasionally I meet one who is almost likable. Yet I never forget what Jews collectively, as a whole, are doing and have done to my people collectively.

We must understand that we are in a planet-wide race-war, and the survival of our race depends on our winning this war. We won't win by wasting our time trying to figure out who the friendly Blacks are and who the hostile ones are. We won't win by refusing to talk about what the Jewish media bosses and the powerful Jewish organizations are doing to our people from fear that we may be unjustly casting suspicion on Jews who are simply minding their own business. We must deal with them collectively, and when the crunch comes that's certainly the way they will deal with us.

In fact, that's pretty much the way they already deal with us. When those gangs of Blacks were running wild through the Mardi Gras crowd in Seattle a couple of weeks ago, savagely attacking White people, they didn't try to figure out which Whites were racists and which ones were diversity-loving, race-mixing liberals. Their cry was, "Let's get a Whitey! We gonna kick some White ass tonight," and they attacked any White target of opportunity they encountered.

The national media have successfully kept most of the country from hearing about the Fat Tuesday race riot in Seattle, and on that subject I have a few more thoughts to share with you. For one thing, I've been able to gather a little more information about what happened that night. Not only was there a series of vicious beatings and robberies of White men and women by gangs of rampaging Blacks, there also was a series of sexual assaults. The controlled media were even more eager to keep these covered up than the beatings and robberies, but the news is leaking out -- in Seattle, at least.

It was very similar to what happened in New York's Central Park last year, when a gang of Blacks and Puerto Ricans grabbed White women who were walking in the park, ripped their clothes off, squeezed their breasts, pushed fingers into their vaginas, and otherwise abused and humiliated them. Just as in New York, in Seattle it was very definitely racial, often with both Black males and Black females collaborating in the sexual abuse of White women, and it was very definitely hostile: the same Black gangs who were sexually abusing White women were viciously beating White women and White men. When it happened in Central Park the news got out; primarily, I think, because a couple of very loud Jewish feminists were among those abused. In Seattle it's been covered up. But now it is coming out, after a fashion. I'll read just one line from a March 12 article in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer about just one woman who was being held down and abused on Fat Tuesday while a news reporter filmed the scene: "At one point there are 19 hands -- black, Asian, Hispanic -- on her body."

Now I want to talk with you more about something I touched on at the beginning of last week's broadcast, and that's the behavior of the White people in Seattle's Mardi Gras crowd both before and during the riot. I should begin by saying that it wasn't the way the local media and the Seattle police claimed it was, with hooligans of both races fighting it out. Whites did not attack Blacks. It was entirely Blacks attacking Whites. I have had a chance now to study videotape footage of the riot, and the one-sided nature of the racial attacks is quite clear.

What also is quite clear, however, is that many Whites in the crowd were acting like Blacks, and virtually all of the Whites were acting like lemmings. First, the Whites acting like Blacks: "wiggers" they are generally called, for an obvious reason. There were many young White men in the crowd wearing the backward baseball caps and baggy shorts that are the trademark uniform of the wigger. Pathetic souls that they are, they have been robbed of any natural sense of racial identity and racial community by this utterly sick and depraved society in which we live. And I mean deliberately robbed, with malice aforethought.

The Jewish media -- and the public schools -- have played especially reprehensible roles in this destructive, genocidal work. Everything that in healthier times helped give our young people a sense of collective racial identity and racial pride has been repudiated in the schools. The teaching of history and literature has become a joke. The Jews and the feminists and the egalitarians have ripped the guts out of everything in the schools that used to have White racial content. The multiculturalist ideologues think this is wonderful because it prepares our children to be world citizens in the New World Order of multiculturalism and diversity. For the multiculturalists it's a religion. But the conservative Republicans who have made an ideology out of individualism think it's fine too: at least, it's not collectivism; it's not racism.

But having a sense of collective identity, a sense of who we are and what group we belong to is what's natural. We evolved with a need for this sense of collective identity. That's the way we survived in the past. And so when the schools and the media rob the more lemming-like kids of their sense of identity, they look for a replacement. And the schools -- and especially the Jewish media -- have a ready-made replacement for them. They find it on Sumner Redstone's MTV. They find it in Black History Month, where they are told that everyone of worth, from the ancient Egyptian pharaohs to the inventors of the helicopter and television, were Blacks. They find it in the glorification by the media of Black basketball players and other Black sports figures. They find it in the almost inescapable presence of Black music promoted by the media. And they are made to understand that if they wear a Confederate flag patch on their shirts they'll be expelled from school. But it's OK to wear a Malcolm X T-shirt to commemorate a Black hero who wrote about how much he wanted to kill Whites. And so we have wiggers imitating Blacks in clothing styles, in speech patterns, in musical taste, and in behavior. That's why when we look at the video footage of Seattle's Fat Tuesday riot we can see young White men acting like Blacks, smashing windows, vandalizing cars, sometimes fighting with normal Whites, pawing girls, and behaving in a generally animalistic way.

Then there are the rest of the Whites, the approximately normal Whites. Two things are notable about them. First, they weren't expecting the Blacks to misbehave; they were completely surprised when the Blacks began attacking them. And second, they didn't fight back. With the notable exception of 20-year-old Kris Kime, who was murdered by the Blacks for behaving the way a White man should behave, they didn't even try to protect their own women. They just stood around and gaped at what was happening. To me these two things are far more disturbing than what the Blacks did.

So why were the more-or-less normal Whites surprised when the Blacks began behaving like Blacks? Why weren't they expecting that? Haven't we had enough experience with Black behavior in America yet?

And, of course, the answer to that is that the normal Whites are just as much lemmings as the wiggers. The wiggers just show it in a more degenerate fashion. The wiggers are usually the lower-IQ lemmings -- the lower-class, more impressionable lemmings. But the normal lemmings, most of them less than 30 years old, have been conditioned all their lives, just like the wiggers, by the Jewish media, by the schools, by the government, and by the Christian churches to believe that Blacks are the same as Whites, except a little darker. Really, most young Americans believe that, and they're surprised every time reality conflicts with their belief. Every day I receive letters from distressed young lemmings who have heard one of my broadcasts or visited my Web site. They whine at me, "Why can't you see that we're all the same? Don't you understand that the only difference between us and Blacks is skin color? Don't you know that the only race is the human race? The scientists have proved it!"

And really, they all sound pretty much alike. They have had these lies drilled into their heads, and they parrot them back at me. And some of these lemmings are reasonably bright, educated people. They really believe that scientists have proved that there is no difference between Blacks and Whites. And, I am sorry to say, some scientists have contributed to this false belief, either because they are lemmings themselves and want to show that they are Politically Correct, or because they hope to improve their chances of getting another government research grant. Some of the scientists associated with the human genome project, for example, have been quoted by the media as saying that the mapping of the human genome supports the notion that racial differences are insignificant. There is only a fraction of a percent difference between the genomes for Whites and for Blacks they say. The genomes for the various races are far more similar than they are different.

What they don't say, of course, is that there is only a fraction of a per cent difference between the genome for White people and that for chimpanzees. In fact, there is only a very small percentage difference among the genomes for all the species of mammals. Most of the mammalian genome, whether it is for a White person or a rat or a Negro or a dog, contains instructions for how to synthesize hair and skin and nails and bone and milk and teeth and nerve tissue and so on. Nearly all of the mammalian genome is taken up with these instructions that are pretty much the same for all mammals. Only a tiny fraction of the mammalian genome is different for each species. But that tiny fraction of the mammalian genome that specifies whether the hair and skin and bone and other tissues will become a White person or a rat or a Negro or a dog is important. The differences, small though they may seem compared to the similarities, are significant. Except to lemmings, of course, who really don't get it.

White women baring their breasts in the presence of Black males is an indication of just how lemming- like the normal Whites are. Even back in Christian times, when the Mardi Gras festival was a much more significant thing than it is today, there was a sexual flavor to much of the revelry. But if a woman bared her breasts in a village Mardi Gras festival in those times, 200 or 300 years ago, say, there were only Whites present, only members of her own tribe, her own racial family, and she could reasonably expect that she would not be sexually assaulted. There's an enormous difference between that and exposing herself to non-Whites. But lemmings have been conditioned not to understand that. And so they really were surprised when the Blacks in the crowd began behaving like Blacks.

It is not only the lie that we are all the same, that there are no significant differences between us and Blacks, that made the Whites in Seattle such easy victims for the Blacks. It also is the abominable doctrine of the ideological individualists that it is immoral to judge people collectively, the racially destructive doctrine that it is immoral to deal with rioting Blacks collectively. The individualists have preached that we should look only at individuals committing crimes against other individuals, and we should shut our eyes to the fact of Blacks committing crimes collectively against Whites. The individualists have preached that for Whites even to notice what Blacks collectively are doing to Whites collectively, whether in a Mardi Gras festival or in our public schools or anywhere else is wicked; it is racist. It is wicked to notice what the collective Black presence in our society is doing to our society, to our civilization. We must judge each Black individually; we must not organize a White posse and begin cracking Black skulls when we see Backs collectively rampaging against our fellow Whites, the way they did in Seattle.

These liberal doctrines are poisonous, racially destructive doctrines, both the doctrine of equality and the doctrine of individualism. Of course, there's more to it: there is the general softness, the generally feminized condition, of young White males these days. And there was the presence of the wiggers in the crowd, blurring the distinction between Whites and Blacks. Altogether, as a race we are in pretty sorry shape. It's really dangerous, and we need to do something about it. Get in touch with me, and I'll tell you what you and I together can do.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25 PM.
Page generated in 0.19733 seconds.